On Saturday, November 3, 2012 9:57:32 PM UTC-5, R S H wrote:
A pox on the Republicans if they are going to always obstruct Congress
and say no to bypartisanship, which is exactly what they did since
Obama was elected, and which I blame them for totally.
Fox News the first 100 days after President Obama's inauguration...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=35eRxxZ-Ar0
Watch the video.
The truth was right here all the time.
Georgette (with the peach colored pussy) Eat me
On 11/5/2012 1:26 PM, Georgette Neff wrote:
Georgette (with the peach colored pussy) Eat me
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4p4-vPrcDBo
I think we all 'ate it' when Obama shoveled his 'stimulus' out the door...
On Mon, 05 Nov 2012 13:42:55 -0700, Cade Larson<cdl@live.nail.com>
wrote:
On 11/5/2012 1:26 PM, Georgette Neff wrote:Did it taste good?
Georgette (with the peach colored pussy) Eat me
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4p4-vPrcDBo
I think we all 'ate it' when Obama shoveled his 'stimulus' out the door... >>
I didn't get any.
Fact is things are undeniably better today than when you voted for Obama thefirst time.
On Mon, 05 Nov 2012 13:42:55 -0700, Cade Larson <cdl@live.nail.com>--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.1
wrote:
On 11/5/2012 1:26 PM, Georgette Neff wrote:Did it taste good? I didn't get any. Fact is things are undeniably
Georgette (with the peach colored pussy) Eat me
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4p4-vPrcDBo
I think we all 'ate it' when Obama shoveled his 'stimulus' out the door...
better today than when you voted for Obama the first time.
Obama just told his black followers to vote to get revenge on white America! >This is unprecadents and virtually a declaration of war by this goverment >against the white majority!!!!--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.1
"Kiss" <kiss@my.liberal.ass> wrote in message >news:os9g98pe2opq1dv6b643fsaon3mv132mct@4ax.com...
On Mon, 05 Nov 2012 13:42:55 -0700, Cade Larson <cdl@live.nail.com>
wrote:
On 11/5/2012 1:26 PM, Georgette Neff wrote:Did it taste good? I didn't get any. Fact is things are undeniably
Georgette (with the peach colored pussy) Eat me
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4p4-vPrcDBo
I think we all 'ate it' when Obama shoveled his 'stimulus' out the door... >>>
better today than when you voted for Obama the first time.
On 11/5/2012 1:26 PM, Georgette Neff wrote:
Watch the video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OvnAE8olUxU
The truth was right here all the time.
"If I don't have this done in three years, then there's going to be a one-term proposition"—President Obama, 2009.
1. There no longer is a white majority in the U.S.
2. My net worth is higher than it was when Obama took office, after it divedwhile Bush was in office.
3. My stock holdings are back where they were before Bush drove them waydown.
4. As I recall it, Bush started the Stimulus, not Obama, and
many of the tax increases and other rises in costs over the past 4 yearshave
as much to do with Republican stands taken in the Congress as anything thePresident might have done. Remember that the President cannot do
anything legislative.
Congress has to pass bills and send them to the President, who then has toapprove them before they become law. This
is called checks and balances. So you cannot blame Obama for anything thatis
As for Begazzi and other foreign embassies and consulates, remember the theRepublicans refused
On Nov 5, 3:37 pm, Cade Larson<c...@live.nail.com> wrote:
On 11/5/2012 1:26 PM, Georgette Neff wrote:
Watch the video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OvnAE8olUxU
The truth was right here all the time.
"If I don't have this done in three years, then there's going to be a
one-term proposition"—President Obama, 2009.
Since we do republicans care what someone says,
Every incumbent runs on their record, and Obama's is pathetic. Obama has >been whining about Romney..and you have been whining about Obama since he was elected. For all
1. There no longer is a white majority in the U.S.
2. My net worth is higher than it was when Obama took office, after it dived while Bush was in office.
3. My stock holdings are back where they were before Bush drove them way down.
4. As I recall it, Bush started the Stimulus, not Obama, and many of the tax increases and other rises in costs over the past 4 years have
as much to do with Republican stands taken in the Congress as anything the President might have done. Remember that the President cannot do
anything legislative. Congress has to pass bills and send them to the President, who then has to approve them before they become law. This
is called checks and balances. So you cannot blame Obama for anything that is due to the actions of Congress, as much as you might want to.
As for Begazzi and other foreign embassies and consulates, remember the the Republicans refused to approve a higher appropriation for adding
addtional defences to them via more security manpower, as they rejected the cost of doing that. So try blaming the Republicans in Congress
for that one, instead of Obama.
FWIW
rsh
In January 2009, the month President Obama entered the Oval Office and shortly before he signed his stimulus spending bill, median household
income was $54,983. By June 2012, it had tumbled to $50,964, adjusted
for inflation. (See the chart nearby.) That's $4,019 in lost real
income, a little less than a month's income every year.
On Nov 5, 3:00 pm, Cade Larson <c...@live.nail.com> wrote:
In January 2009, the month President Obama entered the Oval Office and
shortly before he signed his stimulus spending bill, median household
income was $54,983. By June 2012, it had tumbled to $50,964, adjusted
for inflation. (See the chart nearby.) That's $4,019 in lost real
income, a little less than a month's income every year.
The September 2008 collapse caused about $4 trillion in wealth to
disappear just in the United States. That's some
$13,000 for every man, woman and child. To think that would not
affect household incomes adversely for many years is foolish.
If anything, the stimulus was not big enough to keep the economy only
in mild recession.
On Mon, 5 Nov 2012 21:04:24 -0600,<fredw@appalachian.net> wrote:
Every incumbent runs on their record, and Obama's is pathetic. Obama hasand you have been whining about Obama since he was elected.
been whining about Romney..
For all
you efforts, you better pray to whatever god you think listens to you
because if Obama wins, that says miles about you, your lies and your candidate. Give it up. You lost even if Obama loses.
You people chose getting rid of Obama over the Republic.
Are things better than when Obama took office? Of course they are.
On Nov 5, 3:00 pm, Cade Larson<c...@live.nail.com> wrote:
In January 2009, the month President Obama entered the Oval Office and
shortly before he signed his stimulus spending bill, median household
income was $54,983. By June 2012, it had tumbled to $50,964, adjusted
for inflation. (See the chart nearby.) That's $4,019 in lost real
income, a little less than a month's income every year.
The September 2008 collapse caused about $4 trillion in wealth to
disappear just in the United States. That's some
$13,000 for every man, woman and child. To think that would not
affect household incomes adversely for many years is foolish.
If anything, the stimulus was not big enough to keep the economy only
in mild recession.
4. I don't believe anyone who prefers to cut and paste and change
their ID as often as you do as well as spam newsgroups with
On Tue, 6 Nov 2012 06:33:53 -0800 (PST), Frank Provasek <frank@frankcoins.com> wrote:
On Nov 5, 3:00 pm, Cade Larson <c...@live.nail.com> wrote:1. You found this on a right-wing site as a madeup story.
In January 2009, the month President Obama entered the Oval Office and
shortly before he signed his stimulus spending bill, median household
income was $54,983. By June 2012, it had tumbled to $50,964, adjusted
for inflation. (See the chart nearby.) That's $4,019 in lost real
income, a little less than a month's income every year.
The September 2008 collapse caused about $4 trillion in wealth to
disappear just in the United States. That's some
$13,000 for every man, woman and child. To think that would not
affect household incomes adversely for many years is foolish.
If anything, the stimulus was not big enough to keep the economy only
in mild recession.
2. You made this up yourself
3. You reverting back to Bush's term in office. All you know how to
do is blame presidents particular for things they have no control
over.
4. I don't believe anyone who prefers to cut and paste and change
their ID as often as you do as well as spam newsgroups with multiple
copies of the same miss-informatoin. Excuse me but you are full of
shit.
On Mon, 05 Nov 2012 22:30:56 -0500, R S H <rsh_rsh@rogers.com> wrote:while Bush was in office.
1. There no longer is a white majority in the U.S.
2. My net worth is higher than it was when Obama took office, after it dived
increases and other rises in costs over the past 4 years have3. My stock holdings are back where they were before Bush drove them way down.
4. As I recall it, Bush started the Stimulus, not Obama, and many of the tax
as much to do with Republican stands taken in the Congress as anything the President might have done. Remember that the President cannot doThank you. Clearly details my situation.
anything legislative. Congress has to pass bills and send them to the President, who then has to approve them before they become law. This
is called checks and balances. So you cannot blame Obama for anything that is due to the actions of Congress, as much as you might want to.
As for Begazzi and other foreign embassies and consulates, remember the the Republicans refused to approve a higher appropriation for adding
addtional defences to them via more security manpower, as they rejected the cost of doing that. So try blaming the Republicans in Congress
for that one, instead of Obama.
FWIW
rsh
Are things better than when Obama took office? Of course they are.
No world leader has ever accomplished every detail in their agenda.
That is impossible. Obama has done very well especially when the
republicans have been standing on his shirtails since he took office.
To the rogue republicans, making him a one-term president was more
important than the nation. They should all be ashamed of themselves.
On Mon, 5 Nov 2012 21:04:24 -0600, <fredw@appalachian.net> wrote:
Every incumbent runs on their record, and Obama's is pathetic. Obama hasand you have been whining about Obama since he was elected. For all
been whining about Romney..
you efforts, you better pray to whatever god you think listens to you
because if Obama wins, that says miles about you, your lies and your candidate. Give it up. You lost even if Obama loses.
You people chose getting rid of Obama over the Republic. You are a
disgrace to America.
On 11/5/2012 8:52 PM, sgt23 wrote:
On Nov 5, 3:37 pm, Cade Larson<c...@live.nail.com> wrote:
On 11/5/2012 1:26 PM, Georgette Neff wrote:
Watch the video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OvnAE8olUxU
The truth was right here all the time.
"If I don't have this done in three years, then there's going to be a
one-term proposition"—President Obama, 2009.
Since we do republicans care what someone says,
http://online.wsj.com/
New income data from the Census Bureau, tabulated by former Census
income specialists at the nonpartisan economic consulting firm Sentier Research, reveal that the three-and-a-half years of the Obama Presidency
have done enormous harm to middle-class households.
In January 2009, the month President Obama entered the Oval Office and shortly before he signed his stimulus spending bill, median household
income was $54,983. By June 2012, it had tumbled to $50,964, adjusted
for inflation. (See the chart nearby.) That's $4,019 in lost real
income, a little less than a month's income every year.
On 11/6/2012 7:33 AM, Frank Provasek wrote:
On Nov 5, 3:00 pm, Cade Larson<c...@live.nail.com> wrote:
In January 2009, the month President Obama entered the Oval Office and
shortly before he signed his stimulus spending bill, median household
income was $54,983. By June 2012, it had tumbled to $50,964, adjusted
for inflation. (See the chart nearby.) That's $4,019 in lost real
income, a little less than a month's income every year.
The September 2008 collapse caused about $4 trillion in wealth to
disappear just in the United States. That's some
$13,000 for every man, woman and child. To think that would not
affect household incomes adversely for many years is foolish.
If anything, the stimulus was not big enough to keep the economy only
in mild recession.
The "stimulus" FAILED, less than 4% went to shovel-ready projects, LESS
THAN FOUR PERCENT!!!!!
Now we have an open-ended 40 BILLION$$ a month from the Fed to infinity
and beyond!!!
IT FAILED!!!
You taxaholic Dems are spending us into a full on national BANKRUPTCY!
Well, Yes, for him and Michelle, and the people who got "free" taxpayer
paid cellphones.
On Nov 5, 11:03 pm, Cade Larson<c...@live.nail.com> wrote:
On 11/5/2012 8:52 PM, sgt23 wrote:
On Nov 5, 3:37 pm, Cade Larson<c...@live.nail.com> wrote:
On 11/5/2012 1:26 PM, Georgette Neff wrote:
Watch the video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OvnAE8olUxU
The truth was right here all the time.
"If I don't have this done in three years, then there's going to be a
one-term proposition"—President Obama, 2009.
Since we do republicans care what someone says,
http://online.wsj.com/
New income data from the Census Bureau, tabulated by former Census
income specialists at the nonpartisan economic consulting firm Sentier
Research, reveal that the three-and-a-half years of the Obama Presidency
have done enormous harm to middle-class households.
In January 2009, the month President Obama entered the Oval Office and
shortly before he signed his stimulus spending bill, median household
income was $54,983. By June 2012, it had tumbled to $50,964, adjusted
for inflation. (See the chart nearby.) That's $4,019 in lost real
income, a little less than a month's income every year.
You are citing on OPINION PIECE
On Nov 6, 10:19 am, Cade Larson<c...@live.nail.com> wrote:
On 11/6/2012 7:33 AM, Frank Provasek wrote:
On Nov 5, 3:00 pm, Cade Larson<c...@live.nail.com> wrote:
In January 2009, the month President Obama entered the Oval Office and >>>> shortly before he signed his stimulus spending bill, median household
income was $54,983. By June 2012, it had tumbled to $50,964, adjusted
for inflation. (See the chart nearby.) That's $4,019 in lost real
income, a little less than a month's income every year.
The September 2008 collapse caused about $4 trillion in wealth to
disappear just in the United States. That's some
$13,000 for every man, woman and child. To think that would not
affect household incomes adversely for many years is foolish.
If anything, the stimulus was not big enough to keep the economy only
in mild recession.
The "stimulus" FAILED, less than 4% went to shovel-ready projects, LESS
THAN FOUR PERCENT!!!!!
Now we have an open-ended 40 BILLION$$ a month from the Fed to infinity
and beyond!!!
IT FAILED!!!
You taxaholic Dems are spending us into a full on national BANKRUPTCY!
Taxaholic?
There are no free cell phones paid for by taxpayers.
On 11/6/2012 3:22 PM, Frank Provasek wrote:
On Nov 5, 11:03 pm, Cade Larson<c...@live.nail.com> wrote:
On 11/5/2012 8:52 PM, sgt23 wrote:
On Nov 5, 3:37 pm, Cade Larson<c...@live.nail.com> wrote:
On 11/5/2012 1:26 PM, Georgette Neff wrote:
Watch the video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OvnAE8olUxU
The truth was right here all the time.
"If I don't have this done in three years, then there's going to be a >>>>> one-term proposition"—President Obama, 2009.
Since we do republicans care what someone says,
http://online.wsj.com/
New income data from the Census Bureau, tabulated by former Census
income specialists at the nonpartisan economic consulting firm Sentier
Research, reveal that the three-and-a-half years of the Obama Presidency >>> have done enormous harm to middle-class households.
In January 2009, the month President Obama entered the Oval Office and
shortly before he signed his stimulus spending bill, median household
income was $54,983. By June 2012, it had tumbled to $50,964, adjusted
for inflation. (See the chart nearby.) That's $4,019 in lost real
income, a little less than a month's income every year.
You are citing on OPINION PIECE
I am citing hard economic data, and here is some more:
Two of the groups hit hardest have been ones that turned out in
abundance for Obama in 2008: black Americans and younger Americans
(those between the ages of 25 and 34).
During the first three years of the Obama “recovery,” the real median household income for black Americans dropped a whopping 11.1 percent.
For Americans between the ages of 25 and 34 — the group most apt, as
Paul Ryan put it, to be “staring up at fading Obama posters” and looking
to “get going with life” — real median household income dropped 8.9
percent.
Moreover, we’re still not headed in the right direction. Last month,
American households’ real median annual income fell by another $543 —
from $51,221 to $50,678.
On Nov 6, 10:19 am, Cade Larson <c...@live.nail.com> wrote:The Stimulus saved an auto industry and jobs. IF you wanted to see the
On 11/6/2012 7:33 AM, Frank Provasek wrote:
On Nov 5, 3:00 pm, Cade Larson<c...@live.nail.com> wrote:
In January 2009, the month President Obama entered the Oval Office and >>>> shortly before he signed his stimulus spending bill, median household
income was $54,983. By June 2012, it had tumbled to $50,964, adjusted
for inflation. (See the chart nearby.) That's $4,019 in lost real
income, a little less than a month's income every year.
The September 2008 collapse caused about $4 trillion in wealth to
disappear just in the United States. That's some
$13,000 for every man, woman and child. To think that would not
affect household incomes adversely for many years is foolish.
If anything, the stimulus was not big enough to keep the economy only
in mild recession.
The "stimulus" FAILED, less than 4% went to shovel-ready projects, LESS
THAN FOUR PERCENT!!!!!
Now we have an open-ended 40 BILLION$$ a month from the Fed to infinity
and beyond!!!
IT FAILED!!!
You taxaholic Dems are spending us into a full on national BANKRUPTCY!
On Nov 6, 10:19 am, Cade Larson <c...@live.nail.com> wrote:The Stimulus saved an auto industry and jobs.
On 11/6/2012 7:33 AM, Frank Provasek wrote:
On Nov 5, 3:00 pm, Cade Larson<c...@live.nail.com> wrote:
In January 2009, the month President Obama entered the Oval Office and >>>> shortly before he signed his stimulus spending bill, median household >>>> income was $54,983. By June 2012, it had tumbled to $50,964, adjusted >>>> for inflation. (See the chart nearby.) That's $4,019 in lost real
income, a little less than a month's income every year.
The September 2008 collapse caused about $4 trillion in wealth to
disappear just in the United States. That's some
$13,000 for every man, woman and child. To think that would not
affect household incomes adversely for many years is foolish.
If anything, the stimulus was not big enough to keep the economy only
in mild recession.
The "stimulus" FAILED, less than 4% went to shovel-ready projects, LESS
THAN FOUR PERCENT!!!!!
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 469 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 44:45:46 |
| Calls: | 9,449 |
| Calls today: | 6 |
| Files: | 13,596 |
| Messages: | 6,112,014 |
| Posted today: | 1 |