Oooh, what else you ask?!? Well, you'll find lots of changes that will literally change the way you work.
"Stop whining about the stuff they took away, Howard. Go back to the
great new stuff!". I've played with 17 pretty extensively and I promise
you that there is nothing -- NADA -- worth upgrading for.
FM17 was released today and for the first time includes developer and power-user tools such as script debugger and data viewer. These tools
were previously only included in FM Pro Advanced, which sold for
almost twice the price of the standard FM Pro. In fact, FM Pro is no longer, as the desktop client is now being sold strictly as FM Pro
Advanced.
FM17 was released today and for the first time includes developer and power-user tools such as script debugger and data viewer. These tools[snip]
were previously only included in FM Pro Advanced, which sold for almost
twice the price of the standard FM Pro. In fact, FM Pro is no longer,
as the desktop client is now being sold strictly as FM Pro Advanced.
On 2018-05-15 16:05:48 +0000, Howard Schlossberg said:
FM17 was released today and for the first time includes developer and power-user tools such as script debugger and data viewer. These tools[snip]
were previously only included in FM Pro Advanced, which sold for almost twice the price of the standard FM Pro. In fact, FM Pro is no longer,
as the desktop client is now being sold strictly as FM Pro Advanced.
Here are a couple of news articles.
FileMaker 17 Launches With Improvements to App Development Speed and Interface
<https://www.macrumors.com/2018/05/15/filemaker-17-launch/>
Hands On: FileMaker Pro 17 beefs up its app development features
<https://appleinsider.com/articles/18/05/15/hands-on-filemaker-pro-17-beefs-up-its-app-development-features>
The new pricing, with no explanation, could well scare off a lot of
people. Because they've now dropped the standard version of "FileMaker
Pro" and are only selling the "FileMaker Pro Advanced" version, the
price has risen dramatically for buyers (the articles don't mention
upgrade pricing):
"To buy FileMaker Pro Advanced 17 outright for just yourself,
not a team, costs US$540 where last year's FileMaker Pro 16
was US$329."
Or you can subscribe for US$15 per month (per user), which could easily
work out cheaper, especially since for that price you apparently get
"Mac and Windows versions plus FileMaker Go for iOS, as well as
FileMaker Cloud and FileMaker WebDirect for hosting custom apps
remotely".
FM17 was released today and for the first time includes developer and power-user tools such as script debugger and data viewer. These tools
were previously only included in FM Pro Advanced, which sold for almost
twice the price of the standard FM Pro. In fact, FM Pro is no longer,
as the desktop client is now being sold strictly as FM Pro Advanced.
The other notable aspect of FM17 is that it is now being sold as a "platform". Rather than having to purchase each app separately (FM
Pro, Pro Advanced, Server, Data API, WebDirect concurrencies, etc), all
VLA purchases of 5 seats or more will automatically include all of this.
What about new features? FM17 adds new functionality to portals, where
you can now set it to be based on the current found set. If you find yourself wanting to add a filtered list of, for example, contact names
from which you want to select one to see the detail on that one...well,
you can now very easily set that up...without adding buttons or
highlight bars or anything else special.
Another interesting feature that will be particularly useful for non-developers is the ability to add on modules. When creating a new database, you have always been able to start with a pre-built template
that could then be customized as needed. Now you can add on to that in "modules" that automatically add the table structures, relationships,
layouts and more. It's kind of cool how it does that and it might just
help some people.
Oooh, what else you ask?!? Well, you'll find lots of changes that will literally change the way you work.
In layout mode, the Inspector, Field Picker, and Layout Objects
palettes are now side panels that are attached to each window and take
up too much space and reduce our overall layout work area.
The Launch Center has now been re-re-reconfigured so as to no longer be efficient (I'll let you play with it to discover your own set of
reasons).
New tables will now automatically include a small set of default
fields; though these fields are all based on good practice, they are
not named with good-practice names and nor are they changeable through
FM itself (can be done outside of FM, however, if you know how).
The server admin console has removed pesky troubleshooting features
like log-viewer, server and client level statistics, changing of the
default backup schedule, etc. All this stuff is now included in the
new Server Admin API, for which you'll need to build your own tools or
pay for one from among the many third-party tools that will likely
become available (or go away) at any moment.
"Stop whining about the stuff they took away, Howard. Go back to the
great new stuff!". I've played with 17 pretty extensively and I
promise you that there is nothing -- NADA -- worth upgrading for. BUT
this is probably meant more as a half-step to something great that
might or might not be implemented a year from now when FM18 is released.
Howard
Would you happen to know a good book to learn how to use FM?
DipStick <dipstick@dingleberry.org> schrub:
Would you happen to know a good book to learn how to use FM?
I used
- Filemaker Training Series (the ones you need to get a certification
as developer)
- The Missing manual
- Filemaker in Depth
As for the latter 2, check out how old they are resp. which FM
versions they cover.
On 2018-05-17 07:03:31 +0000, Christoph L. Kaufmann said:[snip]
DipStick <dipstick@dingleberry.org> schrub:
Would you happen to know a good book to learn how to use FM?
I used
- Filemaker Training Series (the ones you need to get a certification
as developer)
- The Missing manual
- Filemaker in Depth
As for the latter 2, check out how old they are resp. which FM
versions they cover.
All this time I didn't realize Filemaker Inc was owned by Apple. That explains the good Mac support!
PS-how long have you been using FileMaker? I'm wondering because I
know somebody who used it since 1984.
All this time I didn't realize Filemaker Inc was owned by Apple. That >explains the good Mac support!
PS-how long have you been using FileMaker?
DipStick <dipstick@dingleberry.org> schrub:
All this time I didn't realize Filemaker Inc was owned by Apple. That
explains the good Mac support!
Beware of any new Mac OS - your Filemaker won't work any more.
With a new free MacOS every year and customers prompted to update by apple, Filemaker has trouble updating.
Windows OS are better in supporting a variety of Filemaker version.
Filemaker looks horribly on Windows, however :-(
Filemaker Inc. is managed by the Apple's finance dept, i.e. the only
contact they ever have is every two months when Filemaker has to
report and justify why they haven't doubled their earnings yet.
DipStick <dipstick@dingleberry.org> schrub:
All this time I didn't realize Filemaker Inc was owned by Apple. That
explains the good Mac support!
Beware of any new Mac OS - your Filemaker won't work any more. With a
new free MacOS every year and customers prompted to update by apple, Filemaker has trouble updating.
Windows OS are better in supporting a variety of Filemaker version.
Filemaker looks horribly on Windows, however :-(
Filemaker Inc. is managed by the Apple's finance dept, i.e. the only
contact they ever have is every two months when Filemaker has to
report and justify why they haven't doubled their earnings yet.
PS-how long have you been using FileMaker?
1997, the oldest version I've see is Filemaker 3.
On 2018-05-17 20:07:07 +0000, DipStick said:
On 2018-05-17 07:03:31 +0000, Christoph L. Kaufmann said:[snip]
DipStick <dipstick@dingleberry.org> schrub:
Would you happen to know a good book to learn how to use FM?
I used
- Filemaker Training Series (the ones you need to get a certification
as developer)
- The Missing manual
- Filemaker in Depth
As for the latter 2, check out how old they are resp. which FM
versions they cover.
All this time I didn't realize Filemaker Inc was owned by Apple. That
explains the good Mac support!
FileMaker Inc. is the Apple-ownerd spin-off company previously known as Claris. They used to also make the ClarisWorks office suite among a few
other things.
Of course, the "FileMaker" database software itself pre-dates that (and
the Mac). The original database software was called Nutshell and had
been made for MS-DOS computers by a company caleld Nashoba. The
software's name was changed to FileMaker when the graphical user
interface was added and the original distributor, Leading Edge, wanted
to stick with DOS applications. Nashoba distributed that through a
company called Forethought Inc., which was later bought up by
Microsoft, but thankfully Nashoba kept hold of the ownership of the
FileMaker software (just imagine the horrible mess if Microsoft had got
hold of it - just look at Access!). Apple obtained the FileMaker
software when they bought up Nashoba.
The software has been through various names over the years and owners / distributors: Nutshell, FileMaker, FileMaker Plus, FileMaker II,
FileMaker Pro.
PS-how long have you been using FileMaker? I'm wondering because I
know somebody who used it since 1984.
That is possible if they mean the original "Nutshell" DOS application,
but the name "FileMaker" wasn't used until 1985. Realistically Nutshell
and FileMaker are very different application to use though, thanks to
the GUI interface.
Helpful Harry :o)
On 2018-05-19 08:34:01 +0000, Christoph L. Kaufmann said:
DipStick <dipstick@dingleberry.org> schrub:
All this time I didn't realize Filemaker Inc was owned by Apple. That
explains the good Mac support!
Beware of any new Mac OS - your Filemaker won't work any more. With a
new free MacOS every year and customers prompted to update by apple,
Filemaker has trouble updating.
Windows OS are better in supporting a variety of Filemaker version.
Filemaker looks horribly on Windows, however :-(
Filemaker Inc. is managed by the Apple's finance dept, i.e. the only
contact they ever have is every two months when Filemaker has to
report and justify why they haven't doubled their earnings yet.
PS-how long have you been using FileMaker?
1997, the oldest version I've see is Filemaker 3.
I think you're exaggerating!
On 2018-05-29 22:20:50 +0000, DipStick said:
On 2018-05-19 08:34:01 +0000, Christoph L. Kaufmann said:
DipStick <dipstick@dingleberry.org> schrub:
All this time I didn't realize Filemaker Inc was owned by Apple. That >>>> explains the good Mac support!
Beware of any new Mac OS - your Filemaker won't work any more. With a
new free MacOS every year and customers prompted to update by apple,
Filemaker has trouble updating.
Windows OS are better in supporting a variety of Filemaker version.
Filemaker looks horribly on Windows, however :-(
Filemaker Inc. is managed by the Apple's finance dept, i.e. the only
contact they ever have is every two months when Filemaker has to
report and justify why they haven't doubled their earnings yet.
PS-how long have you been using FileMaker?
1997, the oldest version I've see is Filemaker 3.
I think you're exaggerating!
I would have started using FileMaker with version 3, possibly slightly earlier.
Helpful Harry :o)
On 2018-05-30 01:22:21 +0000, Helpful Harry said:
On 2018-05-29 22:20:50 +0000, DipStick said:
On 2018-05-19 08:34:01 +0000, Christoph L. Kaufmann said:
DipStick <dipstick@dingleberry.org> schrub:
All this time I didn't realize Filemaker Inc was owned by Apple. That >>>>> explains the good Mac support!
Beware of any new Mac OS - your Filemaker won't work any more. With a
new free MacOS every year and customers prompted to update by apple,
Filemaker has trouble updating.
Windows OS are better in supporting a variety of Filemaker version.
Filemaker looks horribly on Windows, however :-(
Filemaker Inc. is managed by the Apple's finance dept, i.e. the only
contact they ever have is every two months when Filemaker has to
report and justify why they haven't doubled their earnings yet.
PS-how long have you been using FileMaker?
1997, the oldest version I've see is Filemaker 3.
I think you're exaggerating!
I would have started using FileMaker with version 3, possibly slightly earlier.
Helpful Harry :o)
I should have added that I also got "stuck" on my own ancient computer
at versions 4 and 5 for *many* years. Then when the computer died I
briefly moved to version 7 when using a newer version of OS X on a temporarily borrowed computer. Then I had to jump directly to version
15 on my new Mac. I did use some of the intervening versions elsewhere though.
Helpful Harry :o)
On 2018-05-30 01:29:00 +0000, Helpful Harry said:
On 2018-05-30 01:22:21 +0000, Helpful Harry said:
On 2018-05-29 22:20:50 +0000, DipStick said:
On 2018-05-19 08:34:01 +0000, Christoph L. Kaufmann said:
DipStick <dipstick@dingleberry.org> schrub:
All this time I didn't realize Filemaker Inc was owned by Apple. That >>>>>> explains the good Mac support!
Beware of any new Mac OS - your Filemaker won't work any more. With a >>>>> new free MacOS every year and customers prompted to update by apple, >>>>> Filemaker has trouble updating.
Windows OS are better in supporting a variety of Filemaker version.
Filemaker looks horribly on Windows, however :-(
Filemaker Inc. is managed by the Apple's finance dept, i.e. the only >>>>> contact they ever have is every two months when Filemaker has to
report and justify why they haven't doubled their earnings yet.
PS-how long have you been using FileMaker?
1997, the oldest version I've see is Filemaker 3.
I think you're exaggerating!
I would have started using FileMaker with version 3, possibly slightly earlier.
I should have added that I also got "stuck" on my own ancient computer
at versions 4 and 5 for *many* years. Then when the computer died I
briefly moved to version 7 when using a newer version of OS X on a
temporarily borrowed computer. Then I had to jump directly to version
15 on my new Mac. I did use some of the intervening versions elsewhere
though.
Yeah, once I get used to software I don't want to learn another
version. I had that issue with Office 2008 - even though it was a
complete piece of shit. At the time I finally threw in the towel and
learned iWork.
Yeah, once I get used to software I don't want to learn another
version. I had that issue with Office 2008 - even though it was a
complete piece of shit. At the time I finally threw in the towel and
learned iWork.
Mine was more a case of the old G3 simply not being able to run
anything newer (it was also "stuck" on MacOS X 10.2) ... BUT the newer versions of FileMaker Pro definitely have been becoming more overly-complicated and less user-friendly. The horrible Relationship
'tree' being the most obvious example.
Helpful Harry :o)
On 2018-05-31 01:49:25 +0000, Helpful Harry said:
Yeah, once I get used to software I don't want to learn another
version. I had that issue with Office 2008 - even though it was a
complete piece of shit. At the time I finally threw in the towel and
learned iWork.
Mine was more a case of the old G3 simply not being able to run
anything newer (it was also "stuck" on MacOS X 10.2) ... BUT the newer
versions of FileMaker Pro definitely have been becoming more
overly-complicated and less user-friendly. The horrible Relationship
'tree' being the most obvious example.
Yeah, when they finally ditched PowerPC and went x64/86 it caused some
pain. Almost as bad as when they stopped including 3.5" floppy drives!
People are saying the same thing about AutoCAD 2018. But there's
AutoCAD 2018 LT. AutoCAD Lite? AutoCAD and FM are two programs I'd
like to learn how to use, but working full time and studying for the
CPA doesn't leave me much time. I have two books on AutoCAD one for
2017 one for 2018.
Unrelated: what was the biggest file you ever encountered? Excluding
video & audio files. A few years ago my friend from college dealt with
a 900MB DXF (AutoCAD) which grew to 1GB by the end of the day.
Surprisingly the users were able to open and manipulate the file
perfectly fine.
On 2018-05-29 22:20:50 +0000, DipStick said:
On 2018-05-19 08:34:01 +0000, Christoph L. Kaufmann said:
DipStick <dipstick@dingleberry.org> schrub:
All this time I didn't realize Filemaker Inc was owned by Apple. That >>>> explains the good Mac support!
Beware of any new Mac OS - your Filemaker won't work any more. With a
new free MacOS every year and customers prompted to update by apple,
Filemaker has trouble updating.
Windows OS are better in supporting a variety of Filemaker version.
Filemaker looks horribly on Windows, however :-(
Filemaker Inc. is managed by the Apple's finance dept, i.e. the only
contact they ever have is every two months when Filemaker has to
report and justify why they haven't doubled their earnings yet.
PS-how long have you been using FileMaker?
1997, the oldest version I've see is Filemaker 3.
I think you're exaggerating!
I would have started using FileMaker with version 3, possibly slightly earlier.
Yeah, once I get used to software I don't want to learn another
version. I had that issue with Office 2008 - even though it was a
complete piece of shit. At the time I finally threw in the towel and
learned iWork.
Mine was more a case of the old G3 simply not being able to run
anything newer (it was also "stuck" on MacOS X 10.2) ... BUT the newer versions of FileMaker Pro definitely have been becoming more overly-complicated and less user-friendly. The horrible Relationship
'tree' being the most obvious example.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 470 |
Nodes: | 16 (3 / 13) |
Uptime: | 84:16:44 |
Calls: | 9,457 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 13,599 |
Messages: | 6,115,217 |