I guess the logic component of ChatGPT
needs some improvement. a) lets first
assure ourselvs that p & q → p is tautology.
p q ((p ∧ q) → p)
F F T
F T T
T F T
T T T
Truth Table Generator https://web.stanford.edu/class/cs103/tools/truth-table-tool/
b) Now what is ChatGPTs opinion on that:
No, “p and q” does not imply “p.”
The statement “p and q” means that both p
and q are true. However, this does not
necessarily mean that p is true on its own.
For example, consider the following statements:
“It is raining and the sun is shining.”
“The earth is round and the moon is round.”
In both of these cases, “p and q” is true,
but neither “p” nor “q” is true on its own.
I made a screenshot.
Credits: Fritz Feldhase, he suggested this question:
Does p and q imply p?
On de.sci.mathematik
Mostowski Collapse schrieb am Montag, 9. Januar 2023 um 10:44:45 UTC+1:
I guess the logic component of ChatGPT
needs some improvement. a) lets first
assure ourselvs that p & q → p is tautology.
p q ((p ∧ q) → p)
F F T
F T T
T F T
T T T
Truth Table Generator https://web.stanford.edu/class/cs103/tools/truth-table-tool/
b) Now what is ChatGPTs opinion on that:
No, “p and q” does not imply “p.”
The statement “p and q” means that both p
and q are true. However, this does not
necessarily mean that p is true on its own.
For example, consider the following statements:
“It is raining and the sun is shining.”
“The earth is round and the moon is round.”
In both of these cases, “p and q” is true,
but neither “p” nor “q” is true on its own.
I made a screenshot.
The central focus of Schank’s theory has beenthe structure of knowledge, especially in the context
https://www.instructionaldesign.org/theories/script-theory
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 491 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 147:39:58 |
Calls: | 9,695 |
Calls today: | 5 |
Files: | 13,732 |
Messages: | 6,178,673 |