Win7 USB [Dell 7010] -- USB to evilnet adapter -- Evilnet Win98 [8590]
networks.Win7 USB [Dell 7010] -- USB to evilnet adapter -- Evilnet Win98 [8590]
The USB drivers go back as far as XP typically, but not much further (and it has to be USB 2.0 for 10/100, and USB 3.0/USB-C for gigabit). We have a second network we add via USB - although it is convoluted and we are moving away to simplify the
RTL8153 does auto correct, nice to eliminate need for crossover cables.
RTL8153 does auto correct, nice to eliminate need for crossover cables.
The RTL8153 is directly supported under Win7 x64.
My ASSumption is the W98 box shovels out 10Mbit, the RTL8153 changes
that into USB. What could go wrong?
motherboard USB of a Windows 98 system will be version 1.1 at most. Doesn't the Windows 98 system have an Ethernet NIC you can put in?RTL8153 does auto correct, nice to eliminate need for crossover cables.
Get an Ethernet switch ($20 - many people are throwing old ones out; I have a box with about 15 - 20 of the things) - get rid of any need to have a crossover cable.
As said earlier, USB-to-Ethernet is going to be based on the USB version on the W9x system - find a PCI USB 2.0 board that has Windows 98 drivers and your issue is closer to a solution (the USB-to-Ethernet will also need Windows 9x support) - the
motherboard USB of a Windows 98 system will be version 1.1 at most. Doesn't the Windows 98 system have an Ethernet NIC you can put in?RTL8153 does auto correct, nice to eliminate need for crossover cables.
Get an Ethernet switch ($20 - many people are throwing old ones out; I have a box with about 15 - 20 of the things) - get rid of any need to have a crossover cable.
As said earlier, USB-to-Ethernet is going to be based on the USB version on the W9x system - find a PCI USB 2.0 board that has Windows 98 drivers and your issue is closer to a solution (the USB-to-Ethernet will also need Windows 9x support) - the
On 02.02.2023 17:53, Louis Ohland wrote:
RTL8153 does auto correct, nice to eliminate need for crossover cables.
The RTL8153 is directly supported under Win7 x64.
My ASSumption is the W98 box shovels out 10Mbit, the RTL8153 changes
that into USB. What could go wrong?
Nothing... what you describe is a pretty standard setup. USB ethernet
dongles are generally trouble-free. I use them to create a simple and controlled environment for firmware development.
Crossover cables are history. Nearly all modern ethernet devices support auto-crossover.
10 Mbit won't cause any trouble either...
Tom, though 10Mbit is so 1990s,
it sure beats the stuffing out of ZEERO
Mbit/s. Potentially orders of magnitude cheaper than a 5 port AnywhereUSB.
On 02-02-2023 20:45, Ryan Alswede wrote:
This topic made me remember this disc. Anybody ever try it. Support
anything good or just buzz words.
https://archive.org/details/Microsoft_Windows_95_With_USB_Support_Microsoft_000-59944_1997
IIRC that was W95 OSR2 ("B"-version) or OSR2.1
It worked. Somewhat. Mind you, USB was still pretty new and not very
common.
Plug-and-play was pretty ambitious, but still worked sometimes.
Disconnecting USB-hardware without notifying Windows first ==> unplug-and-pray
This topic made me remember this disc. Anybody ever try it. Support anything good or just buzz words.
https://archive.org/details/Microsoft_Windows_95_With_USB_Support_Microsoft_000-59944_1997
Win7 USB [Dell 7010] -- USB to evilnet adapter -- Evilnet Win98 [8590]
On 2/2/23 6:25 AM, Louis Ohland wrote:
Win7 USB [Dell 7010] -- USB to evilnet adapter -- Evilnet Win98 [8590]
The biggest issue I see is that the SMB networking in the Windows 7
system probably will not want to talk to the SMB networking in the
Windows 98 system.
You /might/ be able to beat Win7 into submission by tweaking settings / disabling encryption / etc.
You might want to plan on something other than SMB transfers.
The biggest issue I see is that the SMB networking in the Windows 7
system probably will not want to talk to the SMB networking in the
Windows 98 system.
On 2/2/23 6:25 AM, Louis Ohland wrote:
Win7 USB [Dell 7010] -- USB to evilnet adapter -- Evilnet Win98 [8590]
The biggest issue I see is that the SMB networking in the Windows 7
system probably will not want to talk to the SMB networking in the
Windows 98 system.
You /might/ be able to beat Win7 into submission by tweaking settings / disabling encryption / etc.
You might want to plan on something other than SMB transfers.
On 2/2/23 6:25 AM, Louis Ohland wrote:
Win7 USB [Dell 7010] -- USB to evilnet adapter -- Evilnet Win98 [8590]
The biggest issue I see is that the SMB networking in the Windows 7
system probably will not want to talk to the SMB networking in the
Windows 98 system.
You /might/ be able to beat Win7 into submission by tweaking settings / disabling encryption / etc.
You might want to plan on something other than SMB transfers.
On 2/2/23 6:25 AM, Louis Ohland wrote:
Win7 USB [Dell 7010] -- USB to evilnet adapter -- Evilnet Win98 [8590]
The biggest issue I see is that the SMB networking in the Windows 7
system probably will not want to talk to the SMB networking in the
Windows 98 system.
You /might/ be able to beat Win7 into submission by tweaking settings / disabling encryption / etc.
You might want to plan on something other than SMB transfers.
https://www.techrepublic.com/article/dsclientexe-connects-windows-9x-nt-pcs-to-active-directory/
Grant Taylor wrote:
On 2/2/23 6:25 AM, Louis Ohland wrote:
Win7 USB [Dell 7010] -- USB to evilnet adapter -- Evilnet Win98 [8590]
The biggest issue I see is that the SMB networking in the Windows 7
system probably will not want to talk to the SMB networking in the
Windows 98 system.
You /might/ be able to beat Win7 into submission by tweaking settings
/ disabling encryption / etc.
You might want to plan on something other than SMB transfers.
On 2/2/23 6:25 AM, Louis Ohland wrote:
Win7 USB [Dell 7010] -- USB to evilnet adapter -- Evilnet Win98 [8590]
The biggest issue I see is that the SMB networking in the Windows 7
system probably will not want to talk to the SMB networking in the
Windows 98 system.
You /might/ be able to beat Win7 into submission by tweaking settings / disabling encryption / etc.
You might want to plan on something other than SMB transfers.
On 2/2/23 6:25 AM, Louis Ohland wrote:
Win7 USB [Dell 7010] -- USB to evilnet adapter -- Evilnet Win98 [8590]
The biggest issue I see is that the SMB networking in the Windows 7
system probably will not want to talk to the SMB networking in the
Windows 98 system.
You /might/ be able to beat Win7 into submission by tweaking settings / disabling encryption / etc.
You might want to plan on something other than SMB transfers.
https://msfn.org/board/topic/154025-connecting-a-windows-98-and-windows-7-through-a-network/?do=findComment&comment=1169256
https://www.techrepublic.com/article/dsclientexe-connects-windows-9x-nt-pcs-to-active-directory/
From my readings, you can uninstall it, but the components needed will remain...
Grant Taylor wrote:
My understanding of the (Active) Directory Services client for 9x / NT
is that it adds some features like searching AD (LDAP) and DFS client
support.
My understanding of the (Active) Directory Services client for 9x / NT
is that it adds some features like searching AD (LDAP) and DFS client support.
From my readings, you can uninstall it, but the components needed will remain...
Grant Taylor wrote:
My understanding of the (Active) Directory Services client for 9x / NT
is that it adds some features like searching AD (LDAP) and DFS client
support.
A factor for Louis using the USB-to-Ethernet adapter as a second NIC on his Windows 7 machine will be that SMB1 would be enabled globally on the system - including for the primary NIC uplink. It would be nice if it were per connection instead. Having agood firewall that is locked down can lower the risk of SMB1 being opened, however.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 468 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 35:40:28 |
| Calls: | 9,444 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 13,594 |
| Messages: | 6,111,304 |