My better half has a Kindle which is about ten years old and something
we found out recently when we were on holiday. They wanted to download a
book and the WiFi would not connect which I presume (could be wrong) is
due to updates made to remove the vulnerabilities in the key exchange >mechanism that is commonly used to establish a secure connection between >devices. Now it could be worse as at least I've resisted my ISP's
attempts to upgrade my old router so at least it works with that.
It's one of the problems I have with our over reliance on ever changing >technology with limited life time support. So our new dishwasher has
in-built WiFi (no I'm not sure why I'd use it either) and I seriously
doubt that in five or so years time the required app will work on the
devices I have. Now in this case it's no biggy as I can't say I'm that >interested in being able to start it, and monitor progress, on my phone
but it does highlight the issue. Build a device that you might expect to
have for many years falls down if it relies in technology that won't
last that long.
/mini-rant end
So our new dishwasher has
in-built WiFi (no I'm not sure why I'd use it either) and I seriously
doubt that in five or so years time the required app will work on the
devices I have.
It's not so much the technology itself as the devices being tied to a
central vendor that doesn't open up its APIs. Arguably, a dishwasher
(or fridge, or whatever) is a useful thing.* But if it's tied to an
app that only the vendor controls, its utility will last only as long
as that vendor is interested in keeping that app up to date.
And
vendors - which are very much interested in you buying the latest and >greatest - are disincentivized from supporting older products for very
long.
If the device had an open API, third-parties (including yourself,
assuming you had the skill) could write their own interface that could
ensure the device would remain functional for as long as the hardware
keeps working. But too few devices offer this as an option.
On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 11:59:08 +0000, in comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action, JAB wrote:
So our new dishwasher has
in-built WiFi (no I'm not sure why I'd use it either) and I seriously
doubt that in five or so years time the required app will work on the
devices I have.
Jesus H Christ on a pogo stick, why the hell did you do that? I just
bought an air purifier, and I actually bought the more expensive model because it didn't want to connect to my phone. Like a $100 more
expensive. This is also because it wasn't crap from China, though.
My dishwasher is a Bosch. They know what relevant tech is and that not everyone wants to live cyborg life.* It doesn't have a touch screen; it
has buttons. You _can_ get a goofy Internet dishwasher from them, that
will break all your dishes and fire the glass shards at you when Bing
becomes Skynet, but they have plenty of models that don't. This one was praised for reliability by Consumer Reports. That's probably because it
has _buttons_.**
I also just bought a 2020 Mitsubishi Outlander that has truly useful
safety features, but not the unnecessary crap like autopark, park assist, adaptive cruise control, following distance management, automatic
steering correction, engine idle shut down, etc. It has a sane set of features like blind spot alert, FCM, and lane change warnings. It only
warns, excepting FCM, and you can turn the beeping down to a whisper so
it doesn't jump scare you.*** You can also turn everything OFF with
actual physical buttons.
There's a video screen console that lets me do Android Auto. I consider
this necessary tech at this point. But it's the entertainment system, not
the car's control center. The heater? Not part of the entertainment
system. Not controlled by the touchscreen. IT HAS DIALS. That's the best safety feature on the car, AFAIC. I see people messing with menus all the time just trying to turn the vents up. It's not safe.
On 17/11/2023 00:14, Zaghadka wrote:
On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 11:59:08 +0000, in comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action, JAB
wrote:
So our new dishwasher has
in-built WiFi (no I'm not sure why I'd use it either) and I seriously
doubt that in five or so years time the required app will work on the
devices I have.
Jesus H Christ on a pogo stick, why the hell did you do that? I just
bought an air purifier, and I actually bought the more expensive model
because it didn't want to connect to my phone. Like a $100 more
expensive. This is also because it wasn't crap from China, though.
My dishwasher is a Bosch. They know what relevant tech is and that not
everyone wants to live cyborg life.* It doesn't have a touch screen; it
has buttons. You _can_ get a goofy Internet dishwasher from them, that
will break all your dishes and fire the glass shards at you when Bing
becomes Skynet, but they have plenty of models that don't. This one was
praised for reliability by Consumer Reports. That's probably because it
has _buttons_.**
Sorry should have made that clearer. The dishwasher (a Bosch and brought >because yes they are more expensive but they do tend to last) has an app
but it's purely optional and everything is done with buttons but it does
have a small LCD display to tell you things like you need to add more
salt*. To be honest it feels like the WiFi capability is just there as a >gimmick as that's what some people expect out of an expensive item.
*It even has a setting for how hard you water is and when I looked at
the manual it reminded of just hard the water is like in our area. The >hardness is way above the top setting.
On Fri, 17 Nov 2023 09:19:52 +0000, in comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action, JAB wrote:
On 17/11/2023 00:14, Zaghadka wrote:
On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 11:59:08 +0000, in comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action, JAB >>> wrote:
So our new dishwasher has
in-built WiFi (no I'm not sure why I'd use it either) and I seriously
doubt that in five or so years time the required app will work on the
devices I have.
Jesus H Christ on a pogo stick, why the hell did you do that? I just
bought an air purifier, and I actually bought the more expensive model
because it didn't want to connect to my phone. Like a $100 more
expensive. This is also because it wasn't crap from China, though.
My dishwasher is a Bosch. They know what relevant tech is and that not
everyone wants to live cyborg life.* It doesn't have a touch screen; it
has buttons. You _can_ get a goofy Internet dishwasher from them, that
will break all your dishes and fire the glass shards at you when Bing
becomes Skynet, but they have plenty of models that don't. This one was
praised for reliability by Consumer Reports. That's probably because it
has _buttons_.**
Sorry should have made that clearer. The dishwasher (a Bosch and brought
because yes they are more expensive but they do tend to last) has an app
but it's purely optional and everything is done with buttons but it does
have a small LCD display to tell you things like you need to add more
salt*. To be honest it feels like the WiFi capability is just there as a
gimmick as that's what some people expect out of an expensive item.
*It even has a setting for how hard you water is and when I looked at
the manual it reminded of just hard the water is like in our area. The
hardness is way above the top setting.
Ah. Awesome. I am no longer shocked and dismayed. You are once again a sensible gentleman in my eyes. It's a small comfort I'm sure.
My water is so hard here I have a whole house softener in the basement.
And yeah, it's still not enough. I think the aquifer is under a lime
quarry or something. The dishwasher shows no signs of calcification after several years though. German engineering ftw. We run through a lot of CLR
and vinegar in my house.
Not necessarily.. The washing machine we have has wi-fi, an app whereI have started to have my own home assist automation server, so that
you can do things like start/monitor it remotely, create custom
program functionality, download a bunch of predefined programs that
aren't available by default from the front panel, etc.
Am 17.11.23 um 02:19 schrieb Rin Stowleigh:
Not necessarily.. The washing machine we have has wi-fi, an app whereI have started to have my own home assist automation server, so that
you can do things like start/monitor it remotely, create custom
program functionality, download a bunch of predefined programs that
aren't available by default from the front panel, etc.
whatever I need data from automation and automation tasks stays within
the home, this also gives me leverage because I am not connected to the >cloud, and no manufacturer can shut this down!
Thats the advantage if you have electronics sort of as a hobby and if
you start to dabble with microcontrollers, you get more leveral to avoid
the biggest stupidities from manufacturers.
ATM I am cloud dependend with my Panasonic ACs, but theoretically I can >decloud them and keep the ip remoting within my network, a friend of
mine already did that!
Alexa... Google home, no way jose...
I suppose it would be nice to be able to load the
washer and start it remotely before leaving the office so the wash
cycle was finishing right about as I walk in the door
On Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:29:24 +0100, "Werner P." <werpu@gmx.at> wrote:
Am 17.11.23 um 02:19 schrieb Rin Stowleigh:
Not necessarily.. The washing machine we have has wi-fi, an app whereI have started to have my own home assist automation server, so that
you can do things like start/monitor it remotely, create custom
program functionality, download a bunch of predefined programs that
aren't available by default from the front panel, etc.
whatever I need data from automation and automation tasks stays within
the home, this also gives me leverage because I am not connected to the
cloud, and no manufacturer can shut this down!
Thats the advantage if you have electronics sort of as a hobby and if
you start to dabble with microcontrollers, you get more leveral to avoid
the biggest stupidities from manufacturers.
ATM I am cloud dependend with my Panasonic ACs, but theoretically I can
decloud them and keep the ip remoting within my network, a friend of
mine already did that!
Alexa... Google home, no way jose...
Hopefully I didn't give the impression that I am anti-automation in
any way. I just feel that the default presets on the washing machine
are all I will ever need, so I couldn't see a strong use case for connectivity. I suppose it would be nice to be able to load the
washer and start it remotely before leaving the office so the wash
cycle was finishing right about as I walk in the door, but I'm not
always the one washing clothes and when I do it doesn't take very long
for the wash cycle (compared to drying at least), so it didn't seem
worth the hassle. I used to care somewhat about the timing of the
wash cycle, because letting the clothes wash when I would not be
available to immediately move them to the dryer sometimes meant extra wrinkles... but getting a dryer with a steam cycle (highly underrated featre) solved that problem nicely.
Where I do use the mobile app integration and a lot of bells and
whistles is on my car. It's nice to be able to pull out the phone app
and remote start it... my primary gym is large, and on crowded days
when I have to park far from the building, the walk from my parking
spot to the locker room can be significant....in those cases it's nice
to pull out the phone and remote start the car. Same goes for remote starting it from the office a couple of minutes before I leave the
building. On excessively cold or hot days, it's nice to get into a
vehicle that's perfectly pre-heated or air conditioned the moment you
get in.
On 11/18/2023 5:13 AM, Rin Stowleigh wrote:
On Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:29:24 +0100, "Werner P." <werpu@gmx.at> wrote:And now I'm picturing someone waiting in the parking lot, listening for
Am 17.11.23 um 02:19 schrieb Rin Stowleigh:
Not necessarily.. The washing machine we have has wi-fi, an app whereI have started to have my own home assist automation server, so that
you can do things like start/monitor it remotely, create custom
program functionality, download a bunch of predefined programs that
aren't available by default from the front panel, etc.
whatever I need data from automation and automation tasks stays within
the home, this also gives me leverage because I am not connected to the
cloud, and no manufacturer can shut this down!
Thats the advantage if you have electronics sort of as a hobby and if
you start to dabble with microcontrollers, you get more leveral to avoid >>> the biggest stupidities from manufacturers.
ATM I am cloud dependend with my Panasonic ACs, but theoretically I can
decloud them and keep the ip remoting within my network, a friend of
mine already did that!
Alexa... Google home, no way jose...
Hopefully I didn't give the impression that I am anti-automation in
any way. I just feel that the default presets on the washing machine
are all I will ever need, so I couldn't see a strong use case for
connectivity. I suppose it would be nice to be able to load the
washer and start it remotely before leaving the office so the wash
cycle was finishing right about as I walk in the door, but I'm not
always the one washing clothes and when I do it doesn't take very long
for the wash cycle (compared to drying at least), so it didn't seem
worth the hassle. I used to care somewhat about the timing of the
wash cycle, because letting the clothes wash when I would not be
available to immediately move them to the dryer sometimes meant extra
wrinkles... but getting a dryer with a steam cycle (highly underrated
featre) solved that problem nicely.
Where I do use the mobile app integration and a lot of bells and
whistles is on my car. It's nice to be able to pull out the phone app
and remote start it... my primary gym is large, and on crowded days
when I have to park far from the building, the walk from my parking
spot to the locker room can be significant....in those cases it's nice
to pull out the phone and remote start the car. Same goes for remote
starting it from the office a couple of minutes before I leave the
building. On excessively cold or hot days, it's nice to get into a
vehicle that's perfectly pre-heated or air conditioned the moment you
get in.
a car to be remotely started and hoping in it.... ;)
On Sat, 18 Nov 2023 08:24:24 -0800, Dimensional Traveler
<dtravel@sonic.net> wrote:
On 11/18/2023 5:13 AM, Rin Stowleigh wrote:
On Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:29:24 +0100, "Werner P." <werpu@gmx.at> wrote:And now I'm picturing someone waiting in the parking lot, listening for
Am 17.11.23 um 02:19 schrieb Rin Stowleigh:
Not necessarily.. The washing machine we have has wi-fi, an app where >>>>> you can do things like start/monitor it remotely, create customI have started to have my own home assist automation server, so that
program functionality, download a bunch of predefined programs that
aren't available by default from the front panel, etc.
whatever I need data from automation and automation tasks stays within >>>> the home, this also gives me leverage because I am not connected to the >>>> cloud, and no manufacturer can shut this down!
Thats the advantage if you have electronics sort of as a hobby and if
you start to dabble with microcontrollers, you get more leveral to avoid >>>> the biggest stupidities from manufacturers.
ATM I am cloud dependend with my Panasonic ACs, but theoretically I can >>>> decloud them and keep the ip remoting within my network, a friend of
mine already did that!
Alexa... Google home, no way jose...
Hopefully I didn't give the impression that I am anti-automation in
any way. I just feel that the default presets on the washing machine
are all I will ever need, so I couldn't see a strong use case for
connectivity. I suppose it would be nice to be able to load the
washer and start it remotely before leaving the office so the wash
cycle was finishing right about as I walk in the door, but I'm not
always the one washing clothes and when I do it doesn't take very long
for the wash cycle (compared to drying at least), so it didn't seem
worth the hassle. I used to care somewhat about the timing of the
wash cycle, because letting the clothes wash when I would not be
available to immediately move them to the dryer sometimes meant extra
wrinkles... but getting a dryer with a steam cycle (highly underrated
featre) solved that problem nicely.
Where I do use the mobile app integration and a lot of bells and
whistles is on my car. It's nice to be able to pull out the phone app
and remote start it... my primary gym is large, and on crowded days
when I have to park far from the building, the walk from my parking
spot to the locker room can be significant....in those cases it's nice
to pull out the phone and remote start the car. Same goes for remote
starting it from the office a couple of minutes before I leave the
building. On excessively cold or hot days, it's nice to get into a
vehicle that's perfectly pre-heated or air conditioned the moment you
get in.
a car to be remotely started and hoping in it.... ;)
Not even *remotely* (serendipitous pun) possible.
It actually detects if the keyfob is inside the car, and it's not
going anywhere unless that's detected. Not to mention, the camera
system has already gotten clear panoramic video of anyone who even accidentally bumps into the thing and stored it in the cloud (not only
from a panoramic view, but also a top-down view that is a "calculated
image" -- looks like it is taken from a drone above the car). That's
not even taking into consideration that since the door won't unlock
without the keyfob, the phone app, or a keycard, or remote assistance,
they would need to break the window (which would disable the car
anyway).
The last time I looked, this particular model of luxury european brand
(no point getting too specific) was consistently in the top 1-3 least
stolen vehicles out there, and insurance premiums discounted as a
result... Not to mention the car could be disabled remotely (and its position determined) way faster than any criminal could figure out
creative ways of bypassing all of the anti-theft mechanisms.
As far as I can tell, most car thieves go for less expensive vehicles
with less advanced anti-theft technologies... the high-end stuff is
too much of a pain in the ass. Easier to just steal a catalytic
converter off an old car and sell that for the most part.
On 11/18/2023 9:01 AM, Rin Stowleigh wrote:
On Sat, 18 Nov 2023 08:24:24 -0800, Dimensional Traveler
<dtravel@sonic.net> wrote:
On 11/18/2023 5:13 AM, Rin Stowleigh wrote:
On Sat, 18 Nov 2023 12:29:24 +0100, "Werner P." <werpu@gmx.at> wrote:And now I'm picturing someone waiting in the parking lot, listening for
Am 17.11.23 um 02:19 schrieb Rin Stowleigh:
Not necessarily.. The washing machine we have has wi-fi, an app where >>>>>> you can do things like start/monitor it remotely, create customI have started to have my own home assist automation server, so that >>>>> whatever I need data from automation and automation tasks stays within >>>>> the home, this also gives me leverage because I am not connected to the >>>>> cloud, and no manufacturer can shut this down!
program functionality, download a bunch of predefined programs that >>>>>> aren't available by default from the front panel, etc.
Thats the advantage if you have electronics sort of as a hobby and if >>>>> you start to dabble with microcontrollers, you get more leveral to avoid >>>>> the biggest stupidities from manufacturers.
ATM I am cloud dependend with my Panasonic ACs, but theoretically I can >>>>> decloud them and keep the ip remoting within my network, a friend of >>>>> mine already did that!
Alexa... Google home, no way jose...
Hopefully I didn't give the impression that I am anti-automation in
any way. I just feel that the default presets on the washing machine
are all I will ever need, so I couldn't see a strong use case for
connectivity. I suppose it would be nice to be able to load the
washer and start it remotely before leaving the office so the wash
cycle was finishing right about as I walk in the door, but I'm not
always the one washing clothes and when I do it doesn't take very long >>>> for the wash cycle (compared to drying at least), so it didn't seem
worth the hassle. I used to care somewhat about the timing of the
wash cycle, because letting the clothes wash when I would not be
available to immediately move them to the dryer sometimes meant extra
wrinkles... but getting a dryer with a steam cycle (highly underrated >>>> featre) solved that problem nicely.
Where I do use the mobile app integration and a lot of bells and
whistles is on my car. It's nice to be able to pull out the phone app >>>> and remote start it... my primary gym is large, and on crowded days
when I have to park far from the building, the walk from my parking
spot to the locker room can be significant....in those cases it's nice >>>> to pull out the phone and remote start the car. Same goes for remote
starting it from the office a couple of minutes before I leave the
building. On excessively cold or hot days, it's nice to get into a
vehicle that's perfectly pre-heated or air conditioned the moment you
get in.
a car to be remotely started and hoping in it.... ;)
Not even *remotely* (serendipitous pun) possible.
It actually detects if the keyfob is inside the car, and it's not
going anywhere unless that's detected. Not to mention, the camera
system has already gotten clear panoramic video of anyone who even
accidentally bumps into the thing and stored it in the cloud (not only
from a panoramic view, but also a top-down view that is a "calculated
image" -- looks like it is taken from a drone above the car). That's
not even taking into consideration that since the door won't unlock
without the keyfob, the phone app, or a keycard, or remote assistance,
they would need to break the window (which would disable the car
anyway).
The last time I looked, this particular model of luxury european brand
(no point getting too specific) was consistently in the top 1-3 least
stolen vehicles out there, and insurance premiums discounted as a
result... Not to mention the car could be disabled remotely (and its
position determined) way faster than any criminal could figure out
creative ways of bypassing all of the anti-theft mechanisms.
As far as I can tell, most car thieves go for less expensive vehicles
with less advanced anti-theft technologies... the high-end stuff is
too much of a pain in the ass. Easier to just steal a catalytic
converter off an old car and sell that for the most part.
That's _your_ car. I suspect that many models with remote start are not
so security conscious.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 483 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 174:19:01 |
Calls: | 9,596 |
Calls today: | 2 |
Files: | 13,679 |
Messages: | 6,150,344 |