ah, another one I already have on Steam. and I felt no inclination of actually playing before.
whatever, on my Epic account it goes.
Another True Believer in the Way of the Number! Blessings be upon your
hard drive Brother.
Dimensional Traveler <dtravel@sonic.net> wrote:
...
ah, another one I already have on Steam. and I felt no inclination of
actually playing before.
whatever, on my Epic account it goes.
Another True Believer in the Way of the Number! Blessings be upon your
hard drive Brother.
Who still uses HDDs for modern PC gaming? :P
Dimensional Traveler <dtravel@sonic.net> wrote:
...
ah, another one I already have on Steam. and I felt no inclination of
actually playing before.
whatever, on my Epic account it goes.
Another True Believer in the Way of the Number! Blessings be upon your
hard drive Brother.
Who still uses HDDs for modern PC gaming? :P
Dimensional Traveler <dtravel@sonic.net> wrote:
...
ah, another one I already have on Steam. and I felt no inclination of
actually playing before.
whatever, on my Epic account it goes.
Another True Believer in the Way of the Number! Blessings be upon your
hard drive Brother.
Who still uses HDDs for modern PC gaming? :P
On Sun, 31 Dec 2023 22:25:39 +0000, in comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action, Ant wrote:
Dimensional Traveler <dtravel@sonic.net> wrote:
...
ah, another one I already have on Steam. and I felt no inclination of
actually playing before.
whatever, on my Epic account it goes.
Another True Believer in the Way of the Number! Blessings be upon your
hard drive Brother.
Who still uses HDDs for modern PC gaming? :P
I do. I only put the really big stuff with atrocious load times* on the
NVMe drive. Also, it patches faster. The patching is the real reason for
it if you looked at the footnote. So my entire Steam install is there.
For games as large BG3, I have to leave about 200GB of empty on the SSD,
in case it wants to do a full patch. I made the mistake of having less
free space and it did the entire patch on the HDD and then _copied_ that
to the SSD. Absolute pain.
Everything else runs just fine off a modern HDD. No complaints at all.
Even BG3 ran fine off my HDD, but the patches were unbearable. Otherwise,
I don't know what you're tongue-wagging at. ;^P
(Warning: that footer is *extensive*)
* (TL;DR - Small rant. SSDs don't really improve anything very much. Verified with a fast HDD. Lazy development has eaten every hardware
advance since the IBM PC was released in the 80's. (*nom nom nom*))
<rant>
However, an SSD doesn't help the load times much; usually it's just >
badly
written software. Civ V and VI are particularly bad at this. No matter
how fast the drive, they still take an eternity to load. Since I game
on
HDD a lot, I've done the comparisons. It's the software, not transfer
speed.
At least SSDs have made on-the-fly loading a consideration --
theoretically shortening loading screens -- but it worked fine on HDDs
too (Rage). Somehow, developers are messing this up too (I'm looking
atyou BG3) and there's _still_ asset popping even _with_ an SSD. Again
folks, for the best game experience load what assets need to be there
to
avoid popping. Use a loading screen or a clever elevator ride. THEN >
bring
the game screen up and sideload everything else in-game. A side-> > > loading
stutter here or there is tolerable. Popping on screen reveal is just
brutal. Is it so hard? It's the overall experience that matters, not
theload times. My 2 cents.
Talos Principle 2 does a nice job of this by loading its rather large
assets during the transit from one zone to another. There are places
where the tunnel goes completely black, and the HD spins up and you >
can't
see the graphics skipping. I haven't tested this on HDD, but I bet >
it'spretty tolerable that way, too.
Paying attention to the basic experience of the gamer provides much >
more
performance quality -- both perceived and actual -- than SSDs. SSDs apparently have just inspired laziness in development. Most > > > > > performance
improvements over the years have inevitably been eaten up by > > > >
abstractionlayers and lazy coding. So now every game going forward will require
themand the experience will still be lacking. Ugh.
Pay attention to the experience people! Improved performance is not a
gift to developers to slag off and write more inefficient code more
quickly. I'm sick of PCs getting better and better and software
performance feeling pretty much the same no matter how much power I >
have.
</rant>
On Sun, 31 Dec 2023 22:25:39 +0000, ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) wrote:
Dimensional Traveler <dtravel@sonic.net> wrote:
...
ah, another one I already have on Steam. and I felt no inclination of
actually playing before.
whatever, on my Epic account it goes.
Another True Believer in the Way of the Number! Blessings be upon your
hard drive Brother.
Who still uses HDDs for modern PC gaming? :P
I do... Although it depends on the game. Because a 6TB HDD is far less >expensive than the equivalently sized SSD, and many games - even the
modern ones - don't actually require the performance of an SSD.
That's not to say some games don't run better (or require) an SSD...
but a lot of them don't, and for those games, I'm glad to have
spinning rust. And for the games that do benefit... well, I have an
SSD for them too.
SSDs are just excuses for Devs to get lazy and not optimize
Not to mention there are all the other things that don't require
screaming speed. Music (mp3s you ripped before), music videos,
On 1/2/24 11:06, Xocyll wrote:
<snip>
Not to mention there are all the other things that don't require
screaming speed.  Music (mp3s you ripped before), music videos,
Didn't know "screaming speed" was a stat lol
On 1/2/2024 3:22 PM, candycanearter07 wrote:
On 1/2/24 11:06, Xocyll wrote:
<snip>
Not to mention there are all the other things that don't require
screaming speed.  Music (mp3s you ripped before), music videos,
Didn't know "screaming speed" was a stat lol
You've never watching a horror movie where people are running screaming?
On 1/2/24 19:27, Dimensional Traveler wrote:
On 1/2/2024 3:22 PM, candycanearter07 wrote:
On 1/2/24 11:06, Xocyll wrote:
<snip>
Not to mention there are all the other things that don't require
screaming speed.  Music (mp3s you ripped before), music videos,
Didn't know "screaming speed" was a stat lol
You've never watching a horror movie where people are running screaming?
I don't like horror movies much.
On 1/3/2024 3:08 PM, candycanearter07 wrote:
On 1/2/24 19:27, Dimensional Traveler wrote:
On 1/2/2024 3:22 PM, candycanearter07 wrote:
On 1/2/24 11:06, Xocyll wrote:
<snip>
Not to mention there are all the other things that don't require
screaming speed. Music (mp3s you ripped before), music videos,
Didn't know "screaming speed" was a stat lol
You've never watching a horror movie where people are running screaming?
I don't like horror movies much.
Neither do I but I still know that's a trope.
Dimensional Traveler <dtravel@sonic.net> wrote:
On 1/3/2024 3:08 PM, candycanearter07 wrote:
On 1/2/24 19:27, Dimensional Traveler wrote:
On 1/2/2024 3:22 PM, candycanearter07 wrote:I don't like horror movies much.
On 1/2/24 11:06, Xocyll wrote:
<snip>
Not to mention there are all the other things that don't require
screaming speed.  Music (mp3s you ripped before), music videos,
Didn't know "screaming speed" was a stat lol
You've never watching a horror movie where people are running screaming? >>>
Neither do I but I still know that's a trope.
Ahhhhhhh!!!!!!!! /me runs.
On 1/2/24 11:06, Xocyll wrote:
<snip>
Not to mention there are all the other things that don't require
screaming speed. Music (mp3s you ripped before), music videos,
Didn't know "screaming speed" was a stat lol
candycanearter07 <no@thanks.net> looked up from reading the entrails of
the porn spammer to utter "The Augury is good, the signs say:
On 1/2/24 11:06, Xocyll wrote:
<snip>
Not to mention there are all the other things that don't require
screaming speed. Music (mp3s you ripped before), music videos,
Didn't know "screaming speed" was a stat lol
Basically playing any Judas Priest.
On 1/12/2024 3:54 AM, Xocyll wrote:
candycanearter07 <no@thanks.net> looked up from reading the entrails ofOh, there are much "screamier" bands than Judas Priest.
the porn spammer to utter "The Augury is good, the signs say:
On 1/2/24 11:06, Xocyll wrote:
<snip>
Not to mention there are all the other things that don't require
screaming speed. Music (mp3s you ripped before), music videos,
Didn't know "screaming speed" was a stat lol
Basically playing any Judas Priest.
Dimensional Traveler <dtravel@sonic.net> looked up from reading the
entrails of the porn spammer to utter "The Augury is good, the signs
say:
On 1/12/2024 3:54 AM, Xocyll wrote:
candycanearter07 <no@thanks.net> looked up from reading the entrails ofOh, there are much "screamier" bands than Judas Priest.
the porn spammer to utter "The Augury is good, the signs say:
On 1/2/24 11:06, Xocyll wrote:
<snip>
Not to mention there are all the other things that don't require
screaming speed. Music (mp3s you ripped before), music videos,
Didn't know "screaming speed" was a stat lol
Basically playing any Judas Priest.
Oh I'm aware, the difference is Judas Priest actually sing, vs the
shrieking and bellowing of others.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 483 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 167:13:42 |
Calls: | 9,594 |
Files: | 13,676 |
Messages: | 6,149,714 |