• Epic Games app and their gd Store page

    From Zaghadka@21:1/5 to All on Thu Aug 1 11:40:25 2024
    Quick question:

    Is there any way to get the Epic Games app to open up to your library
    page instead of their store?*

    --
    Zag

    West of House
    There is a small mailbox here.

    read leaflet
    "WELCOME TO USENET!

    USENET is a game of adventure, danger,
    and low cunning. In it you will
    explore some of the most amazing
    territory ever seen by mortals. No
    computer should be without it!"

    ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````

    * As every other content app in existence.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Justisaur@21:1/5 to Zaghadka on Thu Aug 1 11:57:13 2024
    On 8/1/2024 9:40 AM, Zaghadka wrote:
    Quick question:

    Is there any way to get the Epic Games app to open up to your library
    page instead of their store?*


    Welcome to their shit UI.

    --
    -Justisaur

    ø-ø
    (\_/)\
    `-'\ `--.___,
    ¶¬'\( ,_.-'
    \\
    ^'

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From candycanearter07@21:1/5 to Justisaur on Fri Aug 2 04:10:03 2024
    Justisaur <justisaur@yahoo.com> wrote at 18:57 this Thursday (GMT):
    On 8/1/2024 9:40 AM, Zaghadka wrote:
    Quick question:

    Is there any way to get the Epic Games app to open up to your library
    page instead of their store?*


    Welcome to their shit UI.


    And they wonder why steam is still the main game launcher
    --
    user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Zaghadka@21:1/5 to Justisaur on Fri Aug 2 08:04:12 2024
    On Thu, 1 Aug 2024 11:57:13 -0700, in comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,
    Justisaur wrote:

    On 8/1/2024 9:40 AM, Zaghadka wrote:
    Quick question:

    Is there any way to get the Epic Games app to open up to your library
    page instead of their store?*


    Welcome to their shit UI.

    Yup. I've basically been using Galaxy to see my library and organize my
    games. The only time the POS launcher happens is when I have to refresh
    my credentials or launch a game from Galaxy.

    What's odd is they actually have an option to hide your *library*.

    --
    Zag

    No one ever said on their deathbed, 'Gee, I wish I had
    spent more time alone with my computer.' ~Dan(i) Bunten

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JAB@21:1/5 to Spalls Hurgenson on Sat Aug 3 09:26:35 2024
    On 02/08/2024 17:33, Spalls Hurgenson wrote:
    This is a problem that has been pointed out to Epic for YEARS, and yet
    they don't do anything about it. User reviews? Nope. Forums? Nada.
    Workshop? Missing. Streaming? Not here. Screenshots? Why bother? Being
    able to launch directly into your library, bypassing the store-front?
    Fuck no!

    So it is obvious that Epic isn't unaware of these issues. They
    certainly don't lack the skill or resources to build something better.
    The only conclusion is that they just don't care. None of that is
    important to them. Hell, why should they want you to PLAY the games?
    Just BUY them; that's all that is important.

    That's the part I really don't understand, if they want to rival Steam,
    or at least take a large share of the market, then you'd think they'd do
    at least some research into why Steam is so successful and come up with
    the answer that it's because it's more than just a store front as it
    also has lots of other useful features and Steam keep adding to them to
    try and create a better experience.

    It just comes across as if we throw enough money at it then everything
    will be fine.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From candycanearter07@21:1/5 to JAB on Sun Aug 4 05:20:03 2024
    JAB <noway@nochance.com> wrote at 08:26 this Saturday (GMT):
    On 02/08/2024 17:33, Spalls Hurgenson wrote:
    This is a problem that has been pointed out to Epic for YEARS, and yet
    they don't do anything about it. User reviews? Nope. Forums? Nada.
    Workshop? Missing. Streaming? Not here. Screenshots? Why bother? Being
    able to launch directly into your library, bypassing the store-front?
    Fuck no!

    So it is obvious that Epic isn't unaware of these issues. They
    certainly don't lack the skill or resources to build something better.
    The only conclusion is that they just don't care. None of that is
    important to them. Hell, why should they want you to PLAY the games?
    Just BUY them; that's all that is important.

    That's the part I really don't understand, if they want to rival Steam,
    or at least take a large share of the market, then you'd think they'd do
    at least some research into why Steam is so successful and come up with
    the answer that it's because it's more than just a store front as it
    also has lots of other useful features and Steam keep adding to them to
    try and create a better experience.

    It just comes across as if we throw enough money at it then everything
    will be fine.


    Gaben, despite his faults of not making sequels, knows damn well how to /provide something good that people like/, which feels rare nowadays.

    excluding the recent botched games
    --
    user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Justisaur@21:1/5 to Spalls Hurgenson on Mon Aug 5 07:52:18 2024
    On 8/3/2024 9:02 AM, Spalls Hurgenson wrote:
    On Sat, 3 Aug 2024 09:26:35 +0100, JAB <noway@nochance.com> wrote:

    On 02/08/2024 17:33, Spalls Hurgenson wrote:
    This is a problem that has been pointed out to Epic for YEARS, and yet
    they don't do anything about it. User reviews? Nope. Forums? Nada.
    Workshop? Missing. Streaming? Not here. Screenshots? Why bother? Being
    able to launch directly into your library, bypassing the store-front?
    Fuck no!

    So it is obvious that Epic isn't unaware of these issues. They
    certainly don't lack the skill or resources to build something better.
    The only conclusion is that they just don't care. None of that is
    important to them. Hell, why should they want you to PLAY the games?
    Just BUY them; that's all that is important.

    That's the part I really don't understand, if they want to rival Steam,
    or at least take a large share of the market, then you'd think they'd do
    at least some research into why Steam is so successful and come up with
    the answer that it's because it's more than just a store front as it
    also has lots of other useful features and Steam keep adding to them to
    try and create a better experience.

    Especially since so many others have tried the same and failed to
    dethrone Valve. At best they competitors have found their own tiny
    niche, but even then most of them also rely on Steam to actually drive customers to their games. They're just annoying middleware that no
    gamer really wants but we endure because we've no choice. But given
    the option, we turn to Steam for our purchases and not UPlay or Origin
    or BattleNet... or Epic.



    It just comes across as if we throw enough money at it then everything
    will be fine.

    Epic's original spiel was that they'd offer games at a lower price,
    and share more of that money with the developers. But while these are
    both admirable goals, the former never really happened (games on EGS
    aren't notably less expensive than anywhere else) and the second
    ultimately wasn't enough to counter-balance the lackluster experience
    of the client. That, followed up by Epic's tone-deaf missteps
    (especially regarding third-party exclusives) turned off a lot of
    people. And while people were happy to grab free games from Epic, it
    does come across a lot like they're trying to buy people's loyalty,
    which ironically worked against them.

    The impression is that everything about EGS is self-serving Epic's own interests over those of the customers. Their refusal to improve their
    client in any significant way --despite this being one of the main
    complaints people have about EGS since the start-- may not be entirely self-interested... but it sure comes across that way. I think if Epic
    were to start rapidly adding features to the client, they'd win back a
    lot of good will (and active users). And yet they don't.

    It also seems to be being used by indy devs as a sort of paid beta test.
    Get an exclusive 1 year to Epic, release your game that needs a whole
    lot of work there, after you've built a bit of an audience and fixed
    your game up, make a real release of the game on Steam.

    --
    -Justisaur

    ø-ø
    (\_/)\
    `-'\ `--.___,
    ¶¬'\( ,_.-'
    \\
    ^'

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)