So, yeah. NFTs are back. Sorry.
Or rather, Ubisoft really wants them to come back. After losing their
shirts (and reputations) on their previous attempt to lever NFTs into
their games, they are trying again.*
Sure, the customers hate the idea. Sure, the employees hate the idea.
Sure, the NFT market has collapsed. But that doesn't matter, right?
And they're not NFTs anyway; they are 'smart collectibles'. So this
time it's gonna work. Why, you'll even be able to level them up and
forge new ones with recipes. How can it not work?
<sigh>
I suspect somebody high up at Ubisoft really bought into the whole cryptocoin/NFT thing and is desperate to find new suckers to prop up
his investment. But, c'mon; give it up man. That train has sailed.
Anyway, the new hotness is AI, not NFTs. You don't wanna be seen as old-fanished? Don't get left behind. See if you can somehow
unnecessarily wedge ChatGPT into your games.
I mean, even mobile games haven't tried to embrace NFTs as desperately
as Ubisoft. When you come out the worst in a comparison with the most rapacious part of the video game industry, you really need to do a
rethink.
Well, it will be fun to watch this crash-n-burn too.
Anyway, the new hotness is AI, not NFTs. You don't wanna be seen as >old-fanished? Don't get left behind. See if you can somehow
unnecessarily wedge ChatGPT into your games.
On Wed, 17 May 2023 10:52:15 -0400, in comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,
Spalls Hurgenson wrote:
Anyway, the new hotness is AI, not NFTs. You don't wanna be seen as >>old-fanished? Don't get left behind. See if you can somehow
unnecessarily wedge ChatGPT into your games.
Oh, that's going to happen. I think Bethesda will probably release
something where the entire open world, including the dialog, will be >procedurely generated on the spot and call it "The Elder Scrolls VI: >Roguelike." It will require a Core i9 13900K and 64 GB of RAM.
On Wed, 17 May 2023 11:45:25 -0500, Zaghadka <zaghadka@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Wed, 17 May 2023 10:52:15 -0400, in comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,
Spalls Hurgenson wrote:
Anyway, the new hotness is AI, not NFTs. You don't wanna be seen as >>>old-fanished? Don't get left behind. See if you can somehow
unnecessarily wedge ChatGPT into your games.
Oh, that's going to happen. I think Bethesda will probably release >>something where the entire open world, including the dialog, will be >>procedurely generated on the spot and call it "The Elder Scrolls VI: >>Roguelike." It will require a Core i9 13900K and 64 GB of RAM.
Damn, I knew I should have splurged on that extra 32GB...
And I'm absolutely sure that ChatGPT will be used in future games.
It's too powerful a tool for publishers to ignore.
I'm just not convinced that - other than reducing development costs -
it will make for better games.
On Wed, 17 May 2023 13:30:26 -0400, in comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,
Spalls Hurgenson wrote:
And I'm absolutely sure that ChatGPT will be used in future games.
It's too powerful a tool for publishers to ignore.
I'm just not convinced that - other than reducing development costs -
it will make for better games.
Currently? No.
I engaged Bing and asked it to "write a story about a llama going to the >dentist"*. It sucked. I mean, it was really bad and it took me at my word >that it was going to the dentist, complete with a mama llama**, instead
of a human caregiver taking it to a dentist (which should have been the >veterinarian). It is not context aware. It anthropomorphized the llama.
So facts wrong and narrative dry as a bone. Like I remember my daughters >writing stories in the 5th grade. That level of "not good."
On Wed, 17 May 2023 13:30:26 -0400, in comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,
Spalls Hurgenson wrote:
On Wed, 17 May 2023 11:45:25 -0500, Zaghadka <zaghadka@hotmail.com>Currently? No.
wrote:
On Wed, 17 May 2023 10:52:15 -0400, in comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action, >>>Spalls Hurgenson wrote:
Anyway, the new hotness is AI, not NFTs. You don't wanna be seen as >>>>old-fanished? Don't get left behind. See if you can somehow >>>>unnecessarily wedge ChatGPT into your games.
Oh, that's going to happen. I think Bethesda will probably release >>>something where the entire open world, including the dialog, will be >>>procedurely generated on the spot and call it "The Elder Scrolls VI: >>>Roguelike." It will require a Core i9 13900K and 64 GB of RAM.
Damn, I knew I should have splurged on that extra 32GB...
And I'm absolutely sure that ChatGPT will be used in future games.
It's too powerful a tool for publishers to ignore.
I'm just not convinced that - other than reducing development costs -
it will make for better games.
I engaged Bing and asked it to "write a story about a llama going to the >dentist"*. It sucked. I mean, it was really bad and it took me at my word >that it was going to the dentist, complete with a mama llama**, instead
of a human caregiver taking it to a dentist (which should have been the >veterinarian). It is not context aware. It anthropomorphized the llama.
So facts wrong and narrative dry as a bone. Like I remember my daughters >writing stories in the 5th grade. That level of "not good."
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 483 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 174:27:06 |
Calls: | 9,596 |
Calls today: | 2 |
Files: | 13,679 |
Messages: | 6,150,344 |