1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. COMP.SYS.IBM.PC.GAMES.ACT

  • Random Ramble: Why am I disappointed?

    From Spalls Hurgenson@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jul 14 09:06:27 2023
    With ChatGPT and other similar large-language processors becoming more
    common, so too are tools designed to /detect/ verbiage created by
    these algorithms. Tools like ZeroGPT (https://www.zerogpt.com/), or
    GPTZero (https://gptzero.me/).

    So, of course I had to try them.

    On what? You ask. On myself, of course. Am I an AI? Because - reading
    back some of the drivel I've posted over the years - I can only assume
    I must be at least partly driven by some imperfectly coded AI that
    thinks extraneous amounts of verbiage and sesquipedalianism is a
    convincing writing methodology.

    But, no. "Your Text is Human written", says ZeroGPT. 0% AI generated
    text, claims GPTZero.

    Why am I suddenly feeling disappointed... and perhaps a little
    insulted? What, is my writing is not good (bad?) enough to be
    something created by an AI? Is it not shallow enough? Is it that I I
    doesn't claim enough facts without backing them up? Is that what
    you're saying, AI-detectors? 'Cause that sounds like a challenge to
    me!

    I reassure myself that these AI detection tools are still very new,
    and imperfect themselves. They've been known to make egregious
    mistakes (even insisting that the entirity of the US Constitution is
    completely AI written*, which I'm sure is almost entirely incorrect!).
    So they could be wrong about me too.

    But until their coding errors are fixed, I shall gleefully pick up the
    gauntlet they tossed at my feet. Expect more long-winded, fact-free
    nonsense from me in the future; I'll claim the AI crown yet!






    * https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2023/07/why-ai-detectors-think-the-us-constitution-was-written-by-ai/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?S2jDoW5oIFRy4bqnbg==?=@21:1/5 to Spalls Hurgenson on Thu Aug 24 21:09:26 2023
    On Friday, July 14, 2023 at 8:06:40 PM UTC+7, Spalls Hurgenson wrote:
    With ChatGPT and other similar large-language processors becoming more common, so too are tools designed to /detect/ verbiage created by
    these algorithms. Tools like ZeroGPT (https://www.zerogpt.com/), or
    GPTZero (https://gptzero.me/).

    So, of course I had to try them.

    On what? You ask. On myself, of course. Am I an AI? Because - reading
    back some of the drivel I've posted over the years - I can only assume
    I must be at least partly driven by some imperfectly coded AI that
    thinks extraneous amounts of verbiage and sesquipedalianism is a
    convincing writing methodology.

    But, no. "Your Text is Human written", says ZeroGPT. 0% AI generated
    text, claims GPTZero.

    Why am I suddenly feeling disappointed... and perhaps a little
    insulted? What, is my writing is not good (bad?) enough to be
    something created by an AI? Is it not shallow enough? Is it that I I
    doesn't claim enough facts without backing them up? Is that what
    you're saying, AI-detectors? 'Cause that sounds like a challenge to
    me!

    I reassure myself that these AI detection tools are still very new,
    and imperfect themselves. They've been known to make egregious
    mistakes (even insisting that the entirity of the US Constitution is completely AI written*, which I'm sure is almost entirely incorrect!).
    So they could be wrong about me too.

    But until their coding errors are fixed, I shall gleefully pick up the gauntlet they tossed at my feet. Expect more long-winded, fact-free
    nonsense from me in the future; I'll claim the AI crown yet!






    * https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2023/07/why-ai-detectors-think-the-us-constitution-was-written-by-ai/

    Yes, many tools out there can check AI content. You can try https://zerogpt.cc, https://contentatscale.ai/ ...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)