I know I'm not the first one to comment on this - not even in thisTell that to Sony, AAA publishers over here charge for a new PS5 game 80
newsgroup! - but it really struck me: seeing Bethesda's "Starfield" on
Steam going for $70 right next to "Baldur's Gate 3" at $60 shows how
out of touch triple-A publishers are.
I don't get anything like the same vibe from "Starfield". I generally
like Bethesda open-world RPGs, but they've become quite formulaic, and
the sheer scale of "Starfield" - 1000 planets - puts me off more than
it draws me in. From what little I've seen about the game, it looks
like that - with so vast a playing area - the universe can't help but
feel empty and generic.
I know I'm not the first one to comment on this - not even in this newsgroup! - but it really struck me: seeing Bethesda's "Starfield" on
Steam going for $70 right next to "Baldur's Gate 3" at $60 shows how
out of touch triple-A publishers are.
I'm not sure I'd like "Baldur's Gate 3"; it's a top-down open-world
fantasy RPG that utilizes the 5E ruleset and has waaay too much magic
for my taste. But I'll happily trust all the rave reviews that
indicate that it is a quality game. It may not be the Second Coming of
RPGs that some make it out to be, but it definitely seems worth its
asking price.
I don't get anything like the same vibe from "Starfield". I generally
like Bethesda open-world RPGs, but they've become quite formulaic, and
the sheer scale of "Starfield" - 1000 planets - puts me off more than
it draws me in. From what little I've seen about the game, it looks
like that - with so vast a playing area - the universe can't help but
feel empty and generic. Bethesda's games were always poor in gameplay,
story and characters, but their worlds always were fun to explore. "Starfield" doesn't look like it will have even that. And they want
$70 USD for that? And worse, that's just the base price; Bethesda has confirmed there will be in-game purchases and microtransactions on top
of that (in addition, surely, to the usual 'seasonal passes' and
expansions to further drain the wallet)?
It's really hard to look at these two games and feel any attraction
for "Starfield"; "Baldur's Gate 3" feels like an old-school title
designed to trade a solid, entertaining experience for your cash,
while "Starfield" looks like a leech-like "live services" experience
whose primary goal isn't fun, but to drain your wallet. And it's
$10USD more right out the door.
"Starfield" could be great; it's not out yet, I haven't played it; I
don't know. But it's got a hard road ahead of it to convince me of its worth.
I also loved Outer Worlds which was pretty much a smaller Falout inI could not get warm with outer worlds, it felt too generic for me,
a space world setting by the makers of New Vegas, and I fear I'm going
to be severely disappointed in comparison by Bethesda's late comer to something similar.
On Tuesday, August 22, 2023 at 1:25:00 PM UTC-7, Spalls Hurgenson wrote:
I'm not sure I'd like "Baldur's Gate 3"; it's a top-down open-world fantasy RPG that utilizes the 5E ruleset and has waaay too much magic
for my taste. But I'll happily trust all the rave reviews that
indicate that it is a quality game. It may not be the Second Coming of RPGs that some make it out to be, but it definitely seems worth its
asking price.
The separate camera controls not staying
focused on your character (maybe something to do that) and click
movement are very antiquated.
Hovering cursor over everything to
see if you can interact with it or not (again maybe something to fix
that.)
On Wednesday, August 23, 2023 at 3:53:37?PM UTC-7, Justisaur wrote:
On Tuesday, August 22, 2023 at 1:25:00?PM UTC-7, Spalls Hurgenson wrote:
I'm not sure I'd like "Baldur's Gate 3"; it's a top-down open-world
fantasy RPG that utilizes the 5E ruleset and has waaay too much magic
for my taste. But I'll happily trust all the rave reviews that
indicate that it is a quality game. It may not be the Second Coming of
RPGs that some make it out to be, but it definitely seems worth its
asking price.
The separate camera controls not staying
focused on your character (maybe something to do that) and click
movement are very antiquated.
So double click on the character portrait and it follows them, until you
move the camera. I actually found this more annoying though as stuff
is frequently obscured.
Hovering cursor over everything to
see if you can interact with it or not (again maybe something to fix
that.)
Hold alt. Seems like it doesn't show about half the containers that
have things like piles of books so still have to go hovering.
I'll add one, about the third rock I noticed that was highlighted I
still couldn't figure out what to to with, so I looked it up. You have
to drag them with the mouse. As far as I remember there was no
indication that this was the way to interact with anything in the
prolog or tutorial tips, so I'm not sure I would've ever figured that
out since it is a different way of interacting than they're showing
(double click or right click menu.)
I probably should've moved this to the BG3 thread...
There's something about this game that feels very familiar,
but I can't quite place it. Wasteland 2 maybe? I could swear
I've played fantasy games like this though.
Anyone wanting a new cpu & starfield, deal here:
on sale, free starfield copy https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BTZB7F88/
You can actually get a free copy of Starfield with a purchase of most
current AMD CPUs or video cards from any participating retailer:
https://www.amd.com/en/promotions/starfield-bundle
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 483 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 158:33:48 |
Calls: | 9,594 |
Calls today: | 8 |
Files: | 13,676 |
Messages: | 6,149,140 |
Posted today: | 4 |