I asked a simple question, which you obviously avoided answering...
i answered it, and far more tactfully than you deserve.
With chromecasts, it just uses the ultrasonic "connection" to do the wifi >> > pairing ... I'd imagine the audio transfer rate is pretty low?
again, what part of wifi is not clear?
chromecasts *can* use ultrasonic for *pairing* to use wifi, although
that's not the only method.
ultrasonic is *not* for file transfer, which as i said before is a
stupid idea.
you also originally asked about samsung switch, not chromecasts, so the
above is irrelevant to your question.
you claim to be be 'highly educated', even claiming to have a degree in electrical engineering, yet you do not know basic signal theory, or
english for that matter. is your diploma also a photo?
What's the advantage of ultrasonic negotiation of the initial ad hoc
network over the more common methods of initial ad hoc negotiations?
none.
And it is obvious where he was hoping to go with this. He wants to show
that Android has an app for Ultrasonic File Transfer but - of course -
the crippledČ iOS does not.
bingo.
If file transfer is over Wi-Fi, and if both devices are on the same
network, why would you even need the initial ultrasonic negotiation?
And, if both devices are NOT on a Wi-Fi network, then why not just
negotiate the connection & affect the file transfer both with Bluetooth?
[Yes, I know Bluetooth transfer is slower than is Wi-Fi but this is about the negotiation part of the ad hoc network - not the transfer per se.]
What's the advantage of ultrasonic negotiation of the initial ad hoc network?
I admit I don't yet know why you are so desperate to deflect the query from
a simple question of which free iOS app on the current App Store has this basic app functionality of ultrasonically initiating an ad hoc network.
*Might the answer be iOS is crippled in such basic functionality nospam?*
discussion the initial negotiation of the ad hoc network via ultrasound.
is it a boy or a girl?
I admit I don't yet know why you are so desperate to deflect the query from
a simple question of which free iOS app on the current App Store has this basic app functionality of ultrasonically initiating an ad hoc network.
*Might the answer be iOS is crippled in such basic functionality nospam?*
you haven't any clue what 'related android functionality' you're even
asking about.
discussion the initial negotiation of the ad hoc network via ultrasound.
is it a boy or a girl?
nospam wrote:
And it is obvious where he was hoping to go with this. He wants to show >>> that Android has an app for Ultrasonic File Transfer but - of course -
the crippledČ iOS does not.
bingo.
The question you are desperate to deflect, remains a viable query:
The question you are desperate to deflect, remains a viable query:
Sealion says "AAARFF ARRRF?"
ZING! : D
Thanks for the giggle. : )
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 463 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 156:12:05 |
Calls: | 9,384 |
Calls today: | 4 |
Files: | 13,561 |
Messages: | 6,095,837 |