• Re: Translation: YA bored troll thread (was OT: Vancouver BC - who can

    From -hh@21:1/5 to Tom Elam on Tue Dec 24 16:17:38 2024
    On 12/23/24 7:20 PM, Tom Elam wrote the first of four posts (merged herein):
    On 12/23/2024 4:23 PM, -hh wrote:
    On 12/23/24 9:12 AM, Tom Elam wrote:
    On 12/21/2024 4:10 PM, Alan wrote:
    ...
    Are you still whining, Liarboy?

    And I'm not 67.

    I'll check my numbers. Left Malvern Collegiate Institute (grade 9-12
    high school) in 1980, likely at age 18 unless you failed a grade or
    two. Highly unlikely you ever skipped a grade. 1980-18=1962.
    2024-1962=62, or so. Could be 63, depending on details. Closer?

    https://schoolweb.tdsb.on.ca/malvernci/About-Us

    I'll amend my remark.

    "Bottom line? No wonder 62-ish year old not-retired ...

    Interesting dig attempt from one who worked for more than a decade
    longer:  just how old were you when you finally hung it up?  75?  76?

     Very unlikely he can afford much of an upgrade."

    Interesting dig attempt from one who definitely knows that one of his
    hobbies is running a dedicated race car (or two).

    Odd how with four replies, Tommy missed the first point.

    ...
    In the borrowed CAP again, most likely.
    ...
    Seems like someone forgot about skiing as another pastime. /s


    I don't borrow CAP aircraft. I am privileged to fly missions authorized
    and funded by USAF. Today it was demo flights for 2 high school students
    with aviation career interests. That is most of my flying these days.

    Minor details to the point which was that your out of pocket expense was essentially zero, making the hobby be quite cheap.


    I don't think Alan has mentioned skiing in a long time...

    So? When did Absence of Evidence flip to become Evidence of Absence?

    -----

    Forgot, I was already pretty well off in 2002. But the opportunity
    to make $200-300 an hour and be my own boss was very tempting.

    Quite an interesting spin on that history, because from the 2016 archives:

    [quote]
    By 55, 2001, 22 years later, I was at $2.5 million....

    And by 56, it dropped to $1M as your life choices caught up with you.
    [/quote]


    ... I was very much part-time, and were were able to travel
    on our schedule and I was able to pursue my flying avocation.
    The 401k that came out of that has enabled a VERY comfortable
    retirement.

    Of course consulting can be more schedule-flexible by its nature,
    although fewer hours needs to be queried if that's by hours booked, or
    actually worked, since Tommy has said that he typically worked more
    hours than he booked. Finally, 'comfortable' is made easier when one
    defers for a decade later than average retirement age.

    My last major project started in late 2018, but took to 2020 once it
    started.

    But the question was when you retired: that statement only makes it
    clear that as of 2020 (age 72+2=74), you were still taking on new work.


    I have not accepted another since, and several were offered.
    In 2018 I turned 72 and the RMD money started to flow in. It
    was always my intention to scale way back once the 401K kicked in.
    As I stated were a now VERY comfortable, even to the point of
    re-investing considerable RMD and investment earnings. It's
    been a great ride.

    Yet envision having as good of a ride while retiring ten years younger. Something along those lines is still a possibility for Alan, et al.

    -----

    Oh, and by the way, if you want to fly a CAP airplane on a mission
    not USAF-assigned you can rent one for a few hours...CAP 182 is
    currently about $150/hour compared to $178 for the club 182 I rented
    last week.

    So instead of free, a mere 15% discount for local joyriding.

    -----

    And one more point. By working into my 70's I was not in
    the denominator of the dependency ratio for ...

    So what? Individual decisions like this invariably are self-serving, so
    its not like you were being highly altruistic and didn't claim SS to
    avoid being a burden on society, particularly in light of your 'VERY comfortable' 401k, as you you were quite aggressive in maxing that out,
    which served to lower your reportable income & lowered SS taxes paid.


    ... and extra 15 years or so after I retired from my full time job.

    An 'extra' interesting euphemism for being caught in an office purge in
    your 50s, and losing more than half of your net worth in a divorce.


    One solution to dependency ratio declines is to increase retirement
    age for more of us.

    Pretty much the worst solution, as non-whitecollar workers pay with
    their bodies and have difficulties getting even to age 62 without
    deliberating injuries & loss of income. Consider instead liberalizing immigration policy and providing affordable childcare, as both are less injurious & expand in the younger prime working age (25-55) workforce.


    -hh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Tom Elam on Tue Dec 24 23:39:22 2024
    On 2024-12-24 07:55, Tom Elam wrote:
    On 12/23/2024 4:23 PM, -hh wrote:
    On 12/23/24 9:12 AM, Tom Elam wrote:
    On 12/21/2024 4:10 PM, Alan wrote:
    ...
    Are you still whining, Liarboy?

    And I'm not 67.

    I'll check my numbers. Left Malvern Collegiate Institute (grade 9-12
    high school) in 1980, likely at age 18 unless you failed a grade or
    two. Highly unlikely you ever skipped a grade. 1980-18=1962.
    2024-1962=62, or so. Could be 63, depending on details. Closer?

    https://schoolweb.tdsb.on.ca/malvernci/About-Us

    I'll amend my remark.

    "Bottom line? No wonder 62-ish year old not-retired ...

    Interesting dig attempt from one who worked for more than a decade
    longer:  just how old were you when you finally hung it up?  75?  76?

     Very unlikely he can afford much of an upgrade."

    Interesting dig attempt from one who definitely knows that one of his
    hobbies is running a dedicated race car (or two).
      > Actually, that is now even worse. Still working and stuck in a 500
    sq ft
    condo that is smaller than my kitchen, family room and one bathroom.
    Heck, your "home" is not much larger than my garage. One thing for
    sure, you don't suffer from claustrophobia.

    How big is one's bedroom once our eyes are closed?  /s

    Got to go now, I need to prep for some flying today.

    In the borrowed CAP again, most likely.

    I passed an IFR checkout yesterday too! Then in a few days we leave
    for 2 weeks at sea and a few interesting port stops. When are you
    driving a race car again, or going to a warm spot on a winter break?

    Seems like someone forgot about skiing as another pastime. /s


    -hh

    And one more point. By working into my 70's I was not in the denominator
    of the dependency ratio for and extra 15 years or so after I retired
    from my full time job. One solution to dependency ratio declines is to increase retirement age for more of us.

    "The lady doth protest too much, methinks".

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From -hh@21:1/5 to Tom Elam on Fri Dec 27 21:20:38 2024
    On 12/27/24 5:59 PM, Tom Elam wrote:
    On 12/24/2024 4:17 PM, -hh wrote:
    On 12/23/24 7:20 PM, Tom Elam wrote the first of four posts (merged
    herein):
    On 12/23/2024 4:23 PM, -hh wrote:
    On 12/23/24 9:12 AM, Tom Elam wrote:
    On 12/21/2024 4:10 PM, Alan wrote:
    ...
    Are you still whining, Liarboy?

    And I'm not 67.

    I'll check my numbers. Left Malvern Collegiate Institute (grade
    9-12 high school) in 1980, likely at age 18 unless you failed a
    grade or two. Highly unlikely you ever skipped a grade.
    1980-18=1962. 2024-1962=62, or so. Could be 63, depending on
    details. Closer?

    https://schoolweb.tdsb.on.ca/malvernci/About-Us

    I'll amend my remark.

    "Bottom line? No wonder 62-ish year old not-retired ...

    Interesting dig attempt from one who worked for more than a decade
    longer:  just how old were you when you finally hung it up?  75?  76? >>>>
     Very unlikely he can afford much of an upgrade."

    Interesting dig attempt from one who definitely knows that one of
    his hobbies is running a dedicated race car (or two).

    Odd how with four replies, Tommy missed the first point.

    ...
    In the borrowed CAP again, most likely.
    ...
    Seems like someone forgot about skiing as another pastime. /s


    I don't borrow CAP aircraft. I am privileged to fly missions
    authorized and funded by USAF. Today it was demo flights for 2 high
    school students with aviation career interests. That is most of my
    flying these days.

    Minor details to the point which was that your out of pocket expense
    was essentially zero, making the hobby be quite cheap.


    I don't think Alan has mentioned skiing in a long time...

    So?  When did Absence of Evidence flip to become Evidence of Absence?

    -----

    Forgot, I was already pretty well off in 2002. But the opportunity
    to make $200-300 an hour and be my own boss was very tempting.

    Quite an interesting spin on that history, because from the 2016
    archives:

    [quote]
    By 55, 2001, 22 years later, I was at $2.5 million....

    And by 56, it dropped to $1M as your life choices caught up with you.
    [/quote]


    ... I was very much part-time, and were were able to travel
    on our schedule and I was able to pursue my flying avocation.
    The 401k that came out of that has enabled a VERY comfortable
    retirement.

    Of course consulting can be more schedule-flexible by its nature,
    although fewer hours needs to be queried if that's by hours booked, or
    actually worked, since Tommy has said that he typically worked more
    hours than he booked.  Finally, 'comfortable' is made easier when one
    defers for a decade later than average retirement age.

    My last major project started in late 2018, but took to 2020 once
    it started.

    But the question was when you retired: that statement only makes it
    clear that as of 2020 (age 72+2=74), you were still taking on new work.


    I have not accepted another since, and several were offered.
    In 2018 I turned 72 and the RMD money started to flow in. It
    was always my intention to scale way back once the 401K kicked in.
    As I stated were a now VERY comfortable, even to the point of
    re-investing considerable RMD and investment earnings. It's
    been a great ride.

    Yet envision having as good of a ride while retiring ten years
    younger. Something along those lines is still a possibility for Alan,
    et al.

    -----

    Oh, and by the way, if you want to fly a CAP airplane on a mission
    not USAF-assigned you can rent one for a few hours...CAP 182 is
    currently about $150/hour compared to $178 for the club 182 I rented
    last week.

    So instead of free, a mere 15% discount for local joyriding.

    -----

    And one more point. By working into my 70's I was not in
    the denominator of the dependency ratio for ...

    So what?  Individual decisions like this invariably are self-serving,
    so its not like you were being highly altruistic and didn't claim SS
    to avoid being a burden on society, particularly in light of your
    'VERY comfortable' 401k, as you you were quite aggressive in maxing
    that out, which served to lower your reportable income & lowered SS
    taxes paid.


    ... and extra 15 years or so after I retired from my full time job.

    An 'extra' interesting euphemism for being caught in an office purge
    in your 50s, and losing more than half of your net worth in a divorce.


    One solution to dependency ratio declines is to increase retirement
    age for more of us.

    Pretty much the worst solution, as non-whitecollar workers pay with
    their bodies and have difficulties getting even to age 62 without
    deliberating injuries & loss of income.  Consider instead liberalizing
    immigration policy and providing affordable childcare, as both are
    less injurious & expand in the younger prime working age (25-55)
    workforce.


    -hh

    Incredible how you can find a cloud in any silver lining!

    Incredible how every cloud you ever talk about is lined with gold.


    How much did I work in 2019-2024? I have the billing records!

    2019 330 hours - the year the opinion was done
    2020 44 hours - followup and depositions
    2021 0 hours
    2022 20 hours - reply to plaintiff challenges
    2023 4 hours - testimony prep for a trial that never happened


    Which are hours billed, not worked. As you've already admitted, you
    work more hours than you actually bill.


    A 15% discount is a long way from "borrowing". CAP flying is far from
    free for me. I have also held numerous staff positions that take up time
    and effort. My current position is coordinating pilot and squadron
    resources for our Cadet O-Flight mission. Measured by aviation activity
    it's the most important aviation activity in the wing. I just took that
    on as of 1 October. So far this fiscal year activity is up by 45% versus FY23. FY24 flying hours are 200.4. My hours? 32. My admin hours? A lot
    more than that. Is it fun? Yes. Why is that a problem for you?

    Nothing against volunteering, but simply noting that you're still out
    hustling for the benefit of flying with minimal personal cash outlay.


    Since maxing out my 401k along with 2 IRA accounts established when I
    retired I have paid state and federal income tax on over $500,000 in
    RMDs.

    $500K ... but across how many years? Well, age 70.5 in 2016 would mean
    9 years. So call it an average of ~$50K/year, and without looking up
    the historical & current IRS Uniform Lifetime Table, using a factor of
    ~25x would mean you're drawing from ~$1.25M in tax-advantaged accounts.


    Yes I saved taxes to accumulate the wealth, but not in paying it
    back. That's just how in works.

    Depends on the marginal tax bracket of then vs now, and we know that the
    2017 TCJA lowered the brackets.


    "deliberating" injuries? Was that a typo?

    Yup; meant debilitating.


    You euphemism is a debasement of someone who had a plan, a major
    derailment, then more than recovered all on his own and through hard
    work that was rewarding in every sense of the word.

    No, not debasing it at all: merely noted that theis recovery took them
    past the US average retirement age and well into their 70s.


    You could learn a few things about a rewarding retirement.

    Just what kind of 'rewarding retirement' has you taking digs at Alan?

    In any event, I'm confident that my retirement will start well before
    age 74, which will afford ample rewards. Of course, as illustrated with travels to Africa 3x, etc, you already know that we've not waited for retirement; currently even thinking about Antarctica next year, even if
    the YoY gains don't crack seven digits.

    -hh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From -hh@21:1/5 to Tom Elam on Sun Dec 29 17:09:54 2024
    On 12/29/24 9:55 AM, Tom Elam wrote:
    On 12/27/2024 9:20 PM, -hh wrote:
    On 12/27/24 5:59 PM, Tom Elam wrote:
    On 12/24/2024 4:17 PM, -hh wrote:
    On 12/23/24 7:20 PM, Tom Elam wrote the first of four posts (merged
    herein):
    On 12/23/2024 4:23 PM, -hh wrote:
    On 12/23/24 9:12 AM, Tom Elam wrote:
    On 12/21/2024 4:10 PM, Alan wrote:
    ...
    Are you still whining, Liarboy?

    And I'm not 67.

    I'll check my numbers. Left Malvern Collegiate Institute (grade
    9-12 high school) in 1980, likely at age 18 unless you failed a
    grade or two. Highly unlikely you ever skipped a grade.
    1980-18=1962. 2024-1962=62, or so. Could be 63, depending on
    details. Closer?

    https://schoolweb.tdsb.on.ca/malvernci/About-Us

    I'll amend my remark.

    "Bottom line? No wonder 62-ish year old not-retired ...

    Interesting dig attempt from one who worked for more than a decade >>>>>> longer:  just how old were you when you finally hung it up?  75?  76? >>>>>>
     Very unlikely he can afford much of an upgrade."

    Interesting dig attempt from one who definitely knows that one of
    his hobbies is running a dedicated race car (or two).

    Odd how with four replies, Tommy missed the first point.

    ...
    In the borrowed CAP again, most likely.
    ...
    Seems like someone forgot about skiing as another pastime. /s


    I don't borrow CAP aircraft. I am privileged to fly missions
    authorized and funded by USAF. Today it was demo flights for 2 high
    school students with aviation career interests. That is most of my
    flying these days.

    Minor details to the point which was that your out of pocket expense
    was essentially zero, making the hobby be quite cheap.


    I don't think Alan has mentioned skiing in a long time...

    So?  When did Absence of Evidence flip to become Evidence of Absence? >>>>
    -----

    Forgot, I was already pretty well off in 2002. But the opportunity >>>>  > to make $200-300 an hour and be my own boss was very tempting.

    Quite an interesting spin on that history, because from the 2016
    archives:

    [quote]
    By 55, 2001, 22 years later, I was at $2.5 million....

    And by 56, it dropped to $1M as your life choices caught up with
    you.
    [/quote]


    ... I was very much part-time, and were were able to travel
    on our schedule and I was able to pursue my flying avocation.
    The 401k that came out of that has enabled a VERY comfortable
    retirement.

    Of course consulting can be more schedule-flexible by its nature,
    although fewer hours needs to be queried if that's by hours booked,
    or actually worked, since Tommy has said that he typically worked
    more hours than he booked.  Finally, 'comfortable' is made easier
    when one defers for a decade later than average retirement age.

    My last major project started in late 2018, but took to 2020 once
    it started.

    But the question was when you retired: that statement only makes it
    clear that as of 2020 (age 72+2=74), you were still taking on new work. >>>>

    I have not accepted another since, and several were offered.
    In 2018 I turned 72 and the RMD money started to flow in. It
    was always my intention to scale way back once the 401K kicked in. >>>>  > As I stated were a now VERY comfortable, even to the point of
    re-investing considerable RMD and investment earnings. It's
    been a great ride.

    Yet envision having as good of a ride while retiring ten years
    younger. Something along those lines is still a possibility for
    Alan, et al.

    -----

    Oh, and by the way, if you want to fly a CAP airplane on a mission >>>>  > not USAF-assigned you can rent one for a few hours...CAP 182 is
    currently about $150/hour compared to $178 for the club 182 I rented >>>>  > last week.

    So instead of free, a mere 15% discount for local joyriding.

    -----

    And one more point. By working into my 70's I was not in
    the denominator of the dependency ratio for ...

    So what?  Individual decisions like this invariably are self-
    serving, so its not like you were being highly altruistic and didn't
    claim SS to avoid being a burden on society, particularly in light
    of your 'VERY comfortable' 401k, as you you were quite aggressive in
    maxing that out, which served to lower your reportable income &
    lowered SS taxes paid.


    ... and extra 15 years or so after I retired from my full time job. >>>>
    An 'extra' interesting euphemism for being caught in an office purge
    in your 50s, and losing more than half of your net worth in a divorce. >>>>

    One solution to dependency ratio declines is to increase retirement >>>>  > age for more of us.

    Pretty much the worst solution, as non-whitecollar workers pay with
    their bodies and have difficulties getting even to age 62 without
    deliberating injuries & loss of income.  Consider instead
    liberalizing immigration policy and providing affordable childcare,
    as both are less injurious & expand in the younger prime working age
    (25-55) workforce.


    -hh

    Incredible how you can find a cloud in any silver lining!

    Incredible how every cloud you ever talk about is lined with gold.


    Not true, but not many clouds either.

    Ah, so "no clouds" is how you're trying to spin it. Good luck.


    How much did I work in 2019-2024? I have the billing records!

    2019 330 hours - the year the opinion was done
    2020 44 hours - followup and depositions
    2021 0 hours
    2022 20 hours - reply to plaintiff challenges
    2023 4 hours - testimony prep for a trial that never happened


    Which are hours billed, not worked.  As you've already admitted, you
    work more hours than you actually bill.

    The point being that after 2019, age 73, the hours are minimal. Even
    before that I never worked anywhere close to full time, and we took some incredible trips.

    But its still age 73, roughly a decade longer than the average US worker.

    So remind us again how many actual hours (not merely billed) were worked
    prior to age 73? Such as each year after age 65? Or better yet, go
    back to the minimum age to collect Social Security of age 62.

    And for that "gold lining" bit, can you clarify just which trips are you claiming as having been "incredible"? Was it the couple of days you
    tacked onto your Oct 2009 Elanco Poultry meeting in Austria? Or maybe
    the Rhine river cruise which I helped ID mile markers on your photos?


    A 15% discount is a long way from "borrowing". CAP flying is far from
    free for me. I have also held numerous staff positions that take up
    time and effort. My current position is coordinating pilot and
    squadron resources for our Cadet O-Flight mission. Measured by
    aviation activity it's the most important aviation activity in the
    wing. I just took that on as of 1 October. So far this fiscal year
    activity is up by 45% versus FY23. FY24 flying hours are 200.4. My
    hours? 32. My admin hours? A lot more than that. Is it fun? Yes. Why
    is that a problem for you?

    Nothing against volunteering, but simply noting that you're still out
    hustling for the benefit of flying with minimal personal cash outlay.

    I enjoy the admin piece too. Hustling implies that I don't.

    Volunteering is always a mixed bag, with a combination of good & bad.

    Since maxing out my 401k along with 2 IRA accounts established when I
    retired I have paid state and federal income tax on over $500,000 in
    RMDs.

    $500K ... but across how many years?  Well, age 70.5 in 2016 would
    mean 9 years.  So call it an average of ~$50K/year, and without
    looking up the historical & current IRS Uniform Lifetime Table, using
    a factor of ~25x would mean you're drawing from ~$1.25M in tax-
    advantaged accounts.

    I said over $500k. Your estimates are low.

    Yet had it been over $600K, you would have used that in your brag.

    Its not like I was making much of an effort anyway, as small changes
    don't really move the needle much: using 9 years instead of 10 makes it $55K/yr, and using $599K yields a hard upper limit of just $66,555: not
    really all that profound when one really is "golden lining" well off.


    Yes I saved taxes to accumulate the wealth, but not in paying it
    back. That's just how in works.

    Depends on the marginal tax bracket of then vs now, and we know that
    the 2017 TCJA lowered the brackets.

    My marginal rate has gone up. 2024 income is 50% higher than 2016.

    The change was 2017 to 2018, so why choose 2016 instead of 2017?
    By any chance, was 2016 a lean year for the claim which followed?

    Or is it finally an admission of how extreme you were manipulating your
    taxable income through your business's 401(k) funding? How's that
    worked out for you now for Social Security from that underpaying?

    Because 2016's/17's MFJ's brackets were 10% to $18.5K/$18.7K, then 15%
    to $75K/$76K: to satisfy a claim of "double marginal" in 2024 would
    need to be 2024's 22% bracket ($47K-$100K) from 10%, or 32% bracket ($192K-$244K) from 15% (there is no 50% bracket to be double of 25%).

    The taxable income ratios are roughly ($47K/$18.5K) or ($192K/$75K),
    either of which requires a taxable income increase of roughly 2.5x, so
    to be paying a higher marginal rate is very much expected.


    "deliberating" injuries? Was that a typo?

    Yup; meant debilitating.


    You euphemism is a debasement of someone who had a plan, a major
    derailment, then more than recovered all on his own and through hard
    work that was rewarding in every sense of the word.

    No, not debasing it at all:  merely noted that [this] recovery took
    them past the US average retirement age and well into their 70s.

    I planned to work at Lilly until age 65, 2011. In a sense I did, they
    were my biggest client until about 2009. In the meantime I built a core
    of other clients that took me to 2018, and enjoyed the assignments. I consider myself lucky.

    Oh, there's no doubt that there was luck involved. Point is that
    without that luck, straight up retiring at the Lilly downsizing would
    have been quite a different outcome.


    You could learn a few things about a rewarding retirement.

    Just what kind of 'rewarding retirement' has you taking digs at Alan?

    In any event, I'm confident that my retirement will start well before
    age 74, which will afford ample rewards.  Of course, as illustrated
    with travels to Africa 3x, etc, you already know that we've not waited
    for retirement; currently even thinking about Antarctica next year,
    even if the YoY gains don't crack seven digits.

    -hh

    What I meant about rewarding is not just the travel, but finding a side
    gig or two that you enjoy so much you can't give it up, and you can help others in the process. Like part time consulting and being involved with
    an aviation organization has been for me. Travel is self-centered, there
    is more to life than that. You have your photography too. How does that
    and personal travel help others? Maybe you don't give a damn about
    serving others?

    Maybe you're forgetting about the volunteering that we've been doing out
    of vacation time...or maybe its because you don't know about it, because
    I've not arrogantly bragged about it: check the archives. Then also
    check to see if you're making another logical fallacy again of
    incorrectly equating Absence of Evidence as Evidence of Absence.

    As for Alan his racing gig has seemingly petered out. A revealed in
    SCCBC public records he is absent from leadership positions. His racing entries for the last three years have been few and far between. Maybe he
    is still going golfing and skiing?

    YA attempt to equate Absence of Evidence as Evidence of Absence...right?

    FWIW, I've not mentioned PCA events for a long time (2011?), but that
    isn't proof that I'm not still attending meetings or events.


    -hh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to -hh on Sun Dec 29 18:23:08 2024
    On 2024-12-29 14:09, -hh wrote:
    As for Alan his racing gig has seemingly petered out. A revealed in
    SCCBC public records he is absent from leadership positions. His
    racing entries for the last three years have been few and far between.
    Maybe he is still going golfing and skiing?

    YA attempt to equate Absence of Evidence as Evidence of Absence...right?

    FWIW, I've not mentioned PCA events for a long time (2011?), but that
    isn't proof that I'm not still attending meetings or events.

    And it turns out that Tommie isn't much of a researcher...

    ...as I was chairman of the Race Drivers Committee in 2023.

    <https://web.archive.org/web/20230422005048/https://www.sccbc.net/about-sccbc/race-drivers/>

    'Membership on the Race Drivers Committee is by invitation only. The
    committee is comprised of some of the best racers in British Columbia.
    Most committee members have won championships in their class while
    others have done consistently well over the years and have proven
    themselves capable of excelling in all race conditions.'

    Not bad for a supposedly "terrible" driver.

    😎

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From -hh@21:1/5 to Tom Elam on Thu Jan 16 08:07:54 2025
    On 1/15/25 5:33 PM, Tom Elam wrote:
    On 12/29/2024 9:23 PM, Alan wrote:
    On 2024-12-29 14:09, -hh wrote:
    As for Alan his racing gig has seemingly petered out. A revealed in
    SCCBC public records he is absent from leadership positions. His
    racing entries for the last three years have been few and far
    between. Maybe he is still going golfing and skiing?

    YA attempt to equate Absence of Evidence as Evidence of Absence...right? >>>
    FWIW, I've not mentioned PCA events for a long time (2011?), but that
    isn't proof that I'm not still attending meetings or events.

    And it turns out that Tommie isn't much of a researcher...

    ...as I was chairman of the Race Drivers Committee in 2023.

    <https://web.archive.org/web/20230422005048/https://www.sccbc.net/
    about- sccbc/race-drivers/>

    'Membership on the Race Drivers Committee is by invitation only. The
    committee is comprised of some of the best racers in British Columbia.
    Most committee members have won championships in their class while
    others have done consistently well over the years and have proven
    themselves capable of excelling in all race conditions.'

    Not bad for a supposedly "terrible" driver.

    😎
    Alan, how many season championships have you won?

    As many Nobel Prizes as you've won, Tommy:
    Goalpost move much?


    -hh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Tom Elam on Thu Jan 16 12:04:20 2025
    On 2025-01-15 14:33, Tom Elam wrote:
    On 12/29/2024 9:23 PM, Alan wrote:
    On 2024-12-29 14:09, -hh wrote:
    As for Alan his racing gig has seemingly petered out. A revealed in
    SCCBC public records he is absent from leadership positions. His
    racing entries for the last three years have been few and far
    between. Maybe he is still going golfing and skiing?

    YA attempt to equate Absence of Evidence as Evidence of Absence...right? >>>
    FWIW, I've not mentioned PCA events for a long time (2011?), but that
    isn't proof that I'm not still attending meetings or events.

    And it turns out that Tommie isn't much of a researcher...

    ...as I was chairman of the Race Drivers Committee in 2023.

    <https://web.archive.org/web/20230422005048/https://www.sccbc.net/
    about- sccbc/race-drivers/>

    'Membership on the Race Drivers Committee is by invitation only. The
    committee is comprised of some of the best racers in British Columbia.
    Most committee members have won championships in their class while
    others have done consistently well over the years and have proven
    themselves capable of excelling in all race conditions.'

    Not bad for a supposedly "terrible" driver.

    😎
    Alan, how many season championships have you won?

    Asshole: your claim is that I'm "terrible".

    Do you have to be a champion to be better than "terrible"?

    :-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Tom Elam on Fri Jan 24 09:07:30 2025
    On 2025-01-24 06:05, Tom Elam wrote:
    On 12/29/2024 9:23 PM, Alan wrote:
    On 2024-12-29 14:09, -hh wrote:
    As for Alan his racing gig has seemingly petered out. A revealed in
    SCCBC public records he is absent from leadership positions. His
    racing entries for the last three years have been few and far
    between. Maybe he is still going golfing and skiing?

    YA attempt to equate Absence of Evidence as Evidence of Absence...right? >>>
    FWIW, I've not mentioned PCA events for a long time (2011?), but that
    isn't proof that I'm not still attending meetings or events.

    And it turns out that Tommie isn't much of a researcher...

    ...as I was chairman of the Race Drivers Committee in 2023.

    <https://web.archive.org/web/20230422005048/https://www.sccbc.net/
    about- sccbc/race-drivers/>

    'Membership on the Race Drivers Committee is by invitation only. The
    committee is comprised of some of the best racers in British Columbia.
    Most committee members have won championships in their class while
    others have done consistently well over the years and have proven
    themselves capable of excelling in all race conditions.'

    Not bad for a supposedly "terrible" driver.

    😎

    One year service as a committee chairman! WOW! Where is the long list of
    your leadership positions? Why were you chair only one year? Quit?
    Fired? Lack of interest in serving the organization?
    FYI I have been involved in various CAP committees and administrative
    positions every year since I joined in 2004. And you brag about
    attending meetings and events and 1 year as an appointed committee
    chairman? LOL! That is not much of a commitment level.

    Your ability to deliberately avoid the point is impressive, asshole.

    You claimed I as "absent from leadership positions". Clearly you didn't
    check very hard, asshole.

    Membership in the RDC is definite evidence that highly experienced
    racing drivers disagree with your assessment of my driving abilities.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Tom Elam on Fri Jan 24 09:35:04 2025
    On 2025-01-24 05:55, Tom Elam wrote:
    On 1/16/2025 8:07 AM, -hh wrote:
    On 1/15/25 5:33 PM, Tom Elam wrote:
    On 12/29/2024 9:23 PM, Alan wrote:
    On 2024-12-29 14:09, -hh wrote:
    As for Alan his racing gig has seemingly petered out. A
    revealed in SCCBC public records he is absent from
    leadership positions. His racing entries for the last
    three years have been few and far between. Maybe he is
    still going golfing and skiing?

    YA attempt to equate Absence of Evidence as Evidence of
    Absence...right?

    FWIW, I've not mentioned PCA events for a long time (2011?),
    but that isn't proof that I'm not still attending meetings
    or events.

    And it turns out that Tommie isn't much of a researcher...

    ...as I was chairman of the Race Drivers Committee in 2023.

    <https://web.archive.org/web/20230422005048/https://
    www.sccbc.net/ about- sccbc/race-drivers/>

    'Membership on the Race Drivers Committee is by invitation
    only. The committee is comprised of some of the best racers in
    British Columbia. Most committee members have won
    championships in their class while others have done
    consistently well over the years and have proven themselves
    capable of excelling in all race conditions.'

    Not bad for a supposedly "terrible" driver.

    😎
    Alan, how many season championships have you won?

    As many Nobel Prizes as you've won, Tommy: Goalpost move much?


    -hh

    So a SCCBC season championship = Nobel Prize?

    FYI my office wall is covered with activity-based CAP awards. More
    are in the desk, ran out of wall room. Those awards are at the Wing,
    Region and National levels. One award is the Wing Senior Member of
    the Year. I was selected to run the program that was responsible for
    half the Wing's flying and did that for 4 years. It was a full time
    job. I was promoted from that to running of the Wing's flying
    programs.

    "Activity-based" = participation trophies.

    Oh, and this is interesting:

    Googling "inwg.cap.gov "Wing Senior Member of the Year"...

    ...returns 'No results found for..."

    Interestingly, searching for 'site:inwg.cap.gov "elam"'...

    ...returns the same thing.

    Searching for '"senior member of the year"  "elam"'...

    ...returns a few irrelevant results; nothing to do with the Civil Air
    Patrol.

    But I DID find a reference to you winning an "award"...

    ...for completing some TRAINING.

    And searching for "thomas e. elam, indiana" finds ONLY that award.


    I don't think you can equate that activity level to running a
    single committee. But not a Nobel Prize either.

    Your claim that my CAP flying is free attaches a $0 opportunity cost
    to all the administrative time I donate.

    I don't think you can equate pretending you're a "colonel" and
    getting your flying paid by doing some light administrative work after
    you've retired can be equated with performing at an objectively high
    level in competition.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From -hh@21:1/5 to Tom Elam on Fri Jan 24 16:52:32 2025
    On 1/24/25 8:55 AM, Tom Elam wrote:
    On 1/16/2025 8:07 AM, -hh wrote:
    On 1/15/25 5:33 PM, Tom Elam wrote:
    On 12/29/2024 9:23 PM, Alan wrote:
    On 2024-12-29 14:09, -hh wrote:
    As for Alan his racing gig has seemingly petered out. A revealed
    in SCCBC public records he is absent from leadership positions.
    His racing entries for the last three years have been few and far
    between. Maybe he is still going golfing and skiing?

    YA attempt to equate Absence of Evidence as Evidence of
    Absence...right?

    FWIW, I've not mentioned PCA events for a long time (2011?), but
    that isn't proof that I'm not still attending meetings or events.

    And it turns out that Tommie isn't much of a researcher...

    ...as I was chairman of the Race Drivers Committee in 2023.

    <https://web.archive.org/web/20230422005048/https://www.sccbc.net/
    about- sccbc/race-drivers/>

    'Membership on the Race Drivers Committee is by invitation only. The
    committee is comprised of some of the best racers in British
    Columbia. Most committee members have won championships in their
    class while others have done consistently well over the years and
    have proven themselves capable of excelling in all race conditions.'

    Not bad for a supposedly "terrible" driver.

    😎
    Alan, how many season championships have you won?

    As many Nobel Prizes as you've won, Tommy:
    Goalpost move much?

    So a SCCBC season championship = Nobel Prize?

    With how you disingenuously try to move goalposts, it sure is!


    FYI my office wall is covered with activity-based CAP awards.

    So? I have a bunch of activity based participation "thank-you"s too.
    Not from CAP of course, but other organizations.

    Plus (as Alan pointed out) scores of "training completed" awards.


    More are
    in the desk, ran out of wall room. Those awards are at the Wing, Region
    and National levels. One award is the Wing Senior Member of the Year. I
    was selected to run the program that was responsible for half the Wing's flying and did that for 4 years. It was a full time job. I was promoted
    from that to running of the Wing's flying programs.

    I don't think you can equate that activity level to running a single committee. But not a Nobel Prize either.

    I don't, but you clearly try to do for yourself. That's why you've just
    posted yet another "brag" paragraph about your alleged exploits.


    Your claim that my CAP flying is free attaches a $0 opportunity cost to
    all the administrative time I donate.

    No, I was simply referring to it as ~zero dollars out of your pocket.

    Regarding Opportunity Costs, your problem is that the 'alternative
    forgone' is lopsided and thinking only of money. Sure, one can think of
    it as X hours in lieu of Y cash for paying for Z hours of flying time,
    but its the question of the actual value of the hours, not merely the
    fiscal: not only are your hours aren't worth as much *to you* because
    you're retired, but motivations of volunteers are less likely to be so
    fiscally centric: a common motivation is simply that they're lonely,
    and volunteering has a payoff of social interaction.


    -hh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)