It seems that the latest post I see on here before this
one is from September 30. I wonder if that is a
problem with Eternal September? Or has CTAN
abandoned this group, or is on holiday?
It seems that the latest post I see on here before this
one is from September 30. I wonder if that is a
problem with Eternal September? Or has CTAN
abandoned this group, or is on holiday?
Am 07.10.2024 um 00:17 schrieb David Dalton:
It seems that the latest post I see on here before this
one is from September 30. I wonder if that is a
problem with Eternal September? Or has CTAN
abandoned this group, or is on holiday?
Yesterday I wrote to CTAN and mentioned the issue. Today I got the
answer that this is due to CTAN’s move to a new server with new
software. They hope that the service can be restored in a medium term. Unfortunately first they have to research how to do it, and besides that
they have other important features to work on.
In the meantime the announcements are available online: https://ctan.org/ctan-ann
Holger
Am 07.10.2024 um 00:17 schrieb David Dalton:
It seems that the latest post I see on here before this
one is from September 30. I wonder if that is a
problem with Eternal September? Or has CTAN
abandoned this group, or is on holiday?
Yesterday I wrote to CTAN and mentioned the issue. Today I got the
answer that this is due to CTAN’s move to a new server with new
software. They hope that the service can be restored in a medium
term.
Unfortunately first they have to research how to do it, and besides
that
they have other important features to work on.
In the meantime the announcements are available online:
https://ctan.org/
To be honest, I think CTAN Announcements are spam. It is high volume
and drowns out the discussions here. For people who really need to be up-to-date with CTAN packages (like people maintaining mirrors), there
is both Atom[2] and RSS[1] feed to help them keep track.
I think this channel should be for more interesting discussions.
[1]: https://ctan.org/ctan-ann/rss
[2]: https://ctan.org/ctan-ann/atom
To be honest, I think CTAN Announcements are spam. It is high volume
and drowns out the discussions here. For people who really need to
be up-to-date with CTAN packages (like people maintaining mirrors),
there is both Atom[2] and RSS[1] feed to help them keep track.
I think this channel should be for more interesting discussions.
Annada
To be honest, I think CTAN Announcements are spam. It is high volume
and drowns out the discussions here.
For people who really need to be
up-to-date with CTAN packages (like people maintaining mirrors), there
is both Atom[2] and RSS[1] feed to help them keep track.
I think this channel should be for more interesting discussions.
---
[1]: https://ctan.org/ctan-ann/rss
[2]: https://ctan.org/ctan-ann/atom
I do not agree.So what? I think it is preferable to have low high quality (or good)
They are low volume, easily identified by subject and there is next to
no discussion in thes news group anyway.
It's a bit of a shame, but it is understandable that this is not aAgree. It is more work for CTAN team/admin. Better not bother.
priority for the CTAN Team any longer, only a few dinosaurs know what
the Usenet is or even access it.
To be honest, I think CTAN Announcements are spam. It is high volume
and drowns out the discussions here. For people who really need to
be up-to-date with CTAN packages (like people maintaining mirrors),
there is both Atom[2] and RSS[1] feed to help them keep track.
I think this channel should be for more interesting discussions.
Annada
To be honest, I think CTAN Announcements are spam. It is high volume
and drowns out the discussions here. For people who really need to be up-to-date with CTAN packages (like people maintaining mirrors), there
is both Atom[2] and RSS[1] feed to help them keep track.
I think this channel should be for more interesting discussions.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 480 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 247:59:49 |
Calls: | 9,532 |
Files: | 13,650 |
Messages: | 6,137,792 |