A bit offtopic, apart from jq, are there any other JSON utilities that
are good and that you personally find useful? Something that's useful
from the commandline and can be piped to/out?
In article <851r4aij8p.fsf@gmail.com>,
Sivaram Neelakantan <nsivaram.net@gmail.com> wrote:
A bit offtopic, apart from jq, are there any other JSON utilities that
are good and that you personally find useful? Something that's useful
from the commandline and can be piped to/out?
I think you need to explain why you don't like or can't use jq.
On Sunday, October 24, 2021 at 5:35:06 PM UTC+3, Sivaram Neelakantan wrote:
A bit offtopic, apart from jq, are there any other JSON utilities thatThere is jtc:
are good and that you personally find useful? Something that's useful
from the commandline and can be piped to/out?
sivaram
--
https://github.com/ldn-softdev/jtc
But I never tried it.
No, I haven't, that's why I'm asking questions. If you won't help me,
why don't you just go find your lost manhood elsewhere.
A bit offtopic, apart from jq, are there any other JSON utilities thatThere is jtc:
are good and that you personally find useful? Something that's useful
from the commandline and can be piped to/out?
sivaram
--
On Sun, Oct 24 2021,Kenny McCormack wrote:
In article <851r4aij8p.fsf@gmail.com>,
Sivaram Neelakantan <nsivaram.net@gmail.com> wrote:
A bit offtopic, apart from jq, are there any other JSON utilities that >>>are good and that you personally find useful? Something that's useful >>>from the commandline and can be piped to/out?
I think you need to explain why you don't like or can't use jq.
I didn't say anything of that sort.
I asked if there are others. In this context, I was aware
of jq and was asking for any other that people use.
In article <07df88bd-b46f-4239...@googlegroups.com>,
O uz <oguzism...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sunday, October 24, 2021 at 5:35:06 PM UTC+3, Sivaram Neelakantan wrote: >> A bit offtopic, apart from jq, are there any other JSON utilities that
are good and that you personally find useful? Something that's usefulThere is jtc:
from the commandline and can be piped to/out?
sivaram
--
https://github.com/ldn-softdev/jtc
But I never tried it.One of OP's requirements was "... and that you personally find useful ...".
So this doesn't qualify.
--
No, I haven't, that's why I'm asking questions. If you won't help me,
why don't you just go find your lost manhood elsewhere.
CLC in a nutshell.
On Sunday, October 24, 2021 at 5:35:06 PM UTC+3, Sivaram Neelakantan wrote:
A bit offtopic, apart from jq, are there any other JSON utilities thatThere is jtc:
are good and that you personally find useful? Something that's useful
from the commandline and can be piped to/out?
sivaram
--
https://github.com/ldn-softdev/jtc
But I never tried it.
And I'm not disagreeing with you at all. Still, both of the following are true:
1) This sort of post (almost) always contains an implication of "There's
something wrong with X; what should I use instead?" Because, if
there weren't something wrong with X, the obvious answer would be
"Use X".
I'm not saying that this is 100%, of course, but it is the usual
implication, and people are right to draw it unless/until you
explain otherwise.
2) Knowing why you don't want to use jq, would help us greatly in
figuring out what you are actually looking for and what your actual
requirements are.
Or, this could all just be an academic exercise (maybe for a university class) where what you want is just a list of jq-like programs. If so, then Google could probably provide it quite easily.
Mind you, I am a long-time (though not very deep) user of jq, and I've
found that it does the job.
I have no other connection with, nor any deep love of, the program,
other than as a reasonably satisfied user.
A bit offtopic, apart from jq, are there any other JSON utilities that
are good and that you personally find useful? Something that's useful
from the commandline and can be piped to/out?
Thank you but none of the above hypothesis of yours about *why* I
asked is true.
A bit offtopic, apart from jq, are there any other JSON utilities that
are good and that you personally find useful? Something that's useful
from the commandline and can be piped to/out?
sivaram
On 2021-10-25, Sivaram Neelakantan <nsivaram.net@gmail.com> wrote:
Thank you but none of the above hypothesis of yours about *why* I
asked is true.
Kennys (2) isn't a hypothesis and quite true; your explanation is helpful.
There is a difference between:
- I'm dissatisfied with jq and looking for alternatives.
versus:
- I'm evaluating as many tools as I can get my hands on for manipulating
JSON in a shell scriting environment. I already know about jq; can you
inform me about any others?"
Sivaram Neelakantan <nsivaram.net@gmail.com> writes:
A bit offtopic, apart from jq, are there any other JSON utilities that
are good and that you personally find useful? Something that's useful
from the commandline and can be piped to/out?
Also a bit off topic, but when I want to process json, python with it's excellent json processing stuff is my weapon of choice.
"Sivaram" == Sivaram Neelakantan <nsivaram.net@gmail.com> writes:
"Sivaram" == Sivaram Neelakantan <nsivaram.net@gmail.com> writes:
Sivaram> A bit offtopic, apart from jq, are there any other JSON utilities that
Sivaram> are good and that you personally find useful? Something that's useful
Sivaram> from the commandline and can be piped to/out?
Not JSON related, but I find https://github.com/kislyuk/yq as a wrapper
for YAML, XML, and TOML being fed to JQ to be quite powerful. It's
great for converting any of those four forms into each other, and for
doing deep manipulation.
Sivaram Neelakantan wrote:
Thank you but none of the above hypothesis of yours about *why* I
asked is true. Since you insist on remote mind reading, I'll humour
you [...]
The "humor" bit is important! There are only two possible answers to your >original question:
1) Yes
2) I don't know.
That's not only boring, it also doesn't help you or anybody else. Therefore a >bit of background is required so we can have an interesting discussion, which >is the only reason anybody is in this group at all.
Thank you but none of the above hypothesis of yours about *why* I
asked is true. Since you insist on remote mind reading, I'll humour
you [...]
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 443 |
Nodes: | 16 (3 / 13) |
Uptime: | 62:21:55 |
Calls: | 9,190 |
Calls today: | 6 |
Files: | 13,475 |
Messages: | 6,051,873 |