On Sun, 11 Aug 2024 at 15:25, Bastian Blank <
waldi@debian.org> wrote:
Hi Luca
I find it interesting that you explicitly exclude me in your reply, but
not the other people I sent the e-mail in the first place.
Just as interesting as the fact that _you_ explicitly excluded _me_ in
your first email, and that I noticed only because of the reply from
someone else that cc'ed me, I guess?
But I might also note that your behaviour within https://lwn.net/Articles/984635/ mimicks the one you employed within the
CTTE bug report. So you now dragged this conflict into an external
forum. Really?
Nice personal attack you are trying to mount there, but I'm afraid
it's both off topic and off track: I do not decide what LWN writes
articles about.
On Sun, Aug 11, 2024 at 12:13:38AM +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
On Sat, 10 Aug 2024 at 20:38, Steve McIntyre <93sam@debian.org> wrote:
On Sat, Aug 10, 2024 at 07:49:09PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
bluca just announced that he is going on a rampage after the CTTE >decided not to hear him. As this is the second time within a few weeks >just within the confines of #debian-boot, please remove him from the >"installer-team" on salsa, until he manages to stop this.
I am not sure what you are talking about - the last changes I've done
in D-I are adding optional support for systemd-boot:
This information was skipped from the reply as irrelevant, but I
referred to the ordeal about discoverable partitions in partman. You wouldn't have forgotten about this already?
You mean the MR that was closed by you, where for no reason at all you
were incredibly rude and unhelpful, and rejected it without any hint
of constructiveness? And that ended there and then, with no further
activity, there or elsewhere, and that never, ever reached either any
of the Salsa group repos or the archive, at any point in time, and
therefore only ever existed as an experimental branch in a personal
fork in a personal git repo? Because I find it very hard to find any justification for asserting about a "rampage in debian-boot" in any of
this, at least from myself. The way you routinely behave when you
review other people's work, and when you communicate on mailing lists
such as this example, though, might very well fit the bill.
Evidence from #debian-systemd:
| 18:52 < bluca> I've already changed live-build to write a local etc/os-release, will do debootstrap next
| 18:53 < bluca> that should be enough for you to close those lsb-release bugs
That exchange is referring to implementing this suggestion from Timo
and Marc, which I happen to like a lot: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1077764#303
Okay. Please fill bug reports. After reading the os-release
documentation, I don't actually see any way to do that, but I would be interested if it actually exists.
It's quite simple to do, and I'll file an MR for review when I have it
ready, and I will ask other people to look at it at that point.
However, given how unpleasantly and aggressively you typically behave
when you review other people's work, and given these personal attacks
you are mounting, I will not ask for your review, and I will ask that
you please refrain from doing so.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)