Is the esptool package still being maintained? I notice no upload for
many years and a new upstream available,
and no response in this ticket to my questions.
Note, upstream did not want to maintain the list of supported hardware
and believe it is better fixed on the Debian side, see forwarded
github issue.
Generally speaking, it would seem to me that upstreams are more
suited to maintain such lists than downstreams...
On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 12:23:31PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
Is the esptool package still being maintained? I notice no upload for
many years and a new upstream available,
There was an upload by Faidon in 2024, adding to CC:.
I know very little about AppStream, but this proposal doesn't make sense
to me.
[Faidon Liambotis]
I know very little about AppStream, but this proposal doesn't make sense
to me.
Perhaps
<URL: http://www.hungry.com/~pere/blog/121_packages_in_Debian_mapped_to_hardware_for_automatic_recommendation.html >
explain a bit how the AppStream hardware information work.
The initial patch was based on udev rules, which in my experience
generally is a good indicator of hardware specific packages that should announce their supported hardware using AppStream. I do not know
esptool enough to say what make sense or not in this specific case.
these are USB IDs of Nokia phones. Clearly offering esptool for them
makes zero sense. Wherever the data came from, taking it as the
truth seems like a bad plan.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 480 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 02:55:06 |
Calls: | 9,535 |
Calls today: | 3 |
Files: | 13,651 |
Messages: | 6,138,421 |
Posted today: | 1 |