1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. LINUX.DEBIAN.BUGS.DIST

  • Bug#1100427: kylin-burner: rebuild against tinysparql

    From =?UTF-8?Q?Jeremy_B=C3=ADcha?=@21:1/5 to All on Thu Mar 13 20:10:01 2025
    Source: kylin-burner
    Version: 3.0.11-1
    Tags: trixie sid
    X-Debbugs-CC: jianfengli@ubuntukylin.com

    Please rebuild kylin-burner. This will result in kylin-burner
    having a Depends: libtinysparql-3.0-0 instead of against the
    transitional libtracker-sparql-3.0-0 .

    I encourage you to also replace Suggests: tracker with Suggests: localsearch

    You can also update the package description to mention LocalSearch
    instead of tracker.

    For more explanation about the package renames, see https://discourse.gnome.org/t/renaming-tracker-git-and-tracker-sparql-git-and-changing-default-branch/21461

    Thank you,
    Jeremy Bícha

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Aron Xu@21:1/5 to jeremy.bicha@canonical.com on Fri Mar 14 09:30:01 2025
    On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 3:00 AM Jeremy Bícha <jeremy.bicha@canonical.com> wrote:

    Source: kylin-burner
    Version: 3.0.11-1
    Tags: trixie sid
    X-Debbugs-CC: jianfengli@ubuntukylin.com

    Please rebuild kylin-burner. This will result in kylin-burner
    having a Depends: libtinysparql-3.0-0 instead of against the
    transitional libtracker-sparql-3.0-0 .


    I wonder if it is better to ask release team to schedule binNMUs for
    such case, rather than sending individual bugs to package maintainers
    for doing no-change rebuild. I understand the latter is common in the development of Ubuntu but I'm not sure what's the recommended approach
    in Debian.

    Thanks,
    Aron

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?Q?Jeremy_B=C3=ADcha?=@21:1/5 to aron@debian.org on Sat Mar 15 13:30:01 2025
    Control: retitle -1 kylin-burner: Please update references to tracker
    Control: severity -1 minor

    On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 4:16 AM Aron Xu <aron@debian.org> wrote:
    I wonder if it is better to ask release team to schedule binNMUs for
    such case, rather than sending individual bugs to package maintainers
    for doing no-change rebuild.

    The binNMU has been scheduled now.

    However, I am requesting more than just a binNMU so I'm retitling this
    bug and keeping it open.

    I encourage you to also replace Suggests: tracker with Suggests: localsearch

    You can also update the package description to mention LocalSearch
    instead of tracker.

    Thank you,
    Jeremy Bícha

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)