• Bug#1104164: debmake-doc: 11.5 mentions 'gdb' based workflow, should be

    From Andreas Ronnquist@21:1/5 to All on Sat Apr 26 13:00:01 2025
    Package: debmake-doc
    Version: 1.22-1
    Severity: normal
    Tags: patch

    Dear Maintainer,

    Reading debmake-doc on the web [1], I discovered in 11.5 "Patch unapplied
    Git repository" that it mentions

    This repository style is useful for all variants of traditional
    workflows and gdb based workflow:

    This should probably be "gbp based workflow", right?

    Patch:

    diff --git a/asciidoc/38-git.txt b/asciidoc/38-git.txt
    index a85804e..806ecca 100644
    --- a/asciidoc/38-git.txt
    +++ b/asciidoc/38-git.txt
    @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ The patch unapplied Git repository can be summarized as:
    ** The upstream source is recorded in the Git repository without changes.
    ** The maintainer modified contents are confined within the *debian/** directory.
    ** Maintainer changes to the upstream source are recorded in **debian/patches/*** files for the Debian source format "`**3.0 (quilt)**`".
    -* This repository style is useful for all variants of traditional workflows and *gdb* based workflow:
    +* This repository style is useful for all variants of traditional workflows and *gbp* based workflow:
    ** "`<<step-maintainer>>`" (no patch)
    ** "`<<diff-u-ap>>`"
    *** **debian/patches/*** files can also be generated using "`**git format-patch**`", "`**git diff**`", or "`**gitk**`" from *git* commits in the through-away maintainer modification branch or from the upstream unreleased commits.


    1: https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debmake-doc/ch11.en.html#git-patch-unapplied