1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. LINUX.DEBIAN.BUGS.DIST

  • Bug#1104273: rust-ureq: autopkgtests fail on all archs

    From Jonas Smedegaard@21:1/5 to All on Sun May 4 16:50:01 2025
    Quoting Chris Hofstaedtler (2025-05-04 14:06:37)
    thanks for your time at MiniDebConf.

    Likewise. Have you left by now, or do we have a chance of bumbing into
    each other later tonight or at breakfast tomorrow as well?

    On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 08:39:03AM +0200, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
    Source: rust-ureq
    Your package's autopkgtests fail on all archs:
    [..]

    I re-checked, and rust-ureq has a _lot_ of reverse-dependencies, as
    can be seen here: https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=librust-ureq&literal=1

    That search lists these: ruff rust-cookie rust-rustls-native-certs python-maturin rust-debian-control

    Of those, rust-cookie and rust-rustls-native-certs only declare breaks, python-maturin: only mentions in a comment comment and
    rust-debian-control only mentions in testdata (together with a specific
    version of a library python no longer matching version in testing or
    untable, so unlikely to be testdata requiring avainable packages).

    This leaves only ruff, which uses rust-ureq only in fringe test, as
    reported in bug#1098854.

    I am not convinced that fixing this bug is highly important for the
    release of Debian: Upstream has moved on to a newer major version, and
    the only thing blocking an upgrade is this fringe use (which I suspect
    is not even run due to rust-ureq being about internet activity which is
    blokced on autobuilders).

    - Jonas

    --
    * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
    * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
    * Sponsorship: https://ko-fi.com/drjones

    [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris Hofstaedtler@21:1/5 to Jonas Smedegaard on Sun May 4 17:30:01 2025
    On Sun, May 04, 2025 at 04:44:53PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
    Quoting Chris Hofstaedtler (2025-05-04 14:06:37)
    thanks for your time at MiniDebConf.

    Likewise. Have you left by now, or do we have a chance of bumbing into
    each other later tonight or at breakfast tomorrow as well?

    I'll be here until tomorrow evening :-)

    On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 08:39:03AM +0200, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
    Source: rust-ureq
    Your package's autopkgtests fail on all archs:
    [..]

    I re-checked, and rust-ureq has a _lot_ of reverse-dependencies, as
    can be seen here: https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=librust-ureq&literal=1

    That search lists these: ruff rust-cookie rust-rustls-native-certs python-maturin rust-debian-control

    Of those, rust-cookie and rust-rustls-native-certs only declare breaks, python-maturin: only mentions in a comment comment and
    rust-debian-control only mentions in testdata (together with a specific version of a library python no longer matching version in testing or
    untable, so unlikely to be testdata requiring avainable packages).

    This leaves only ruff, which uses rust-ureq only in fringe test, as
    reported in bug#1098854.

    Right. Thanks for double checking the list and filing #1098854.

    I am not convinced that fixing this bug is highly important for the
    release of Debian: Upstream has moved on to a newer major version, and
    the only thing blocking an upgrade is this fringe use (which I suspect
    is not even run due to rust-ureq being about internet activity which is blokced on autobuilders).

    Agreed.

    I think once ruff stops Build-Depending on it, we can let rust-ureq
    decay, at least in Debian.

    Best,
    Chris

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)