"The security team will support the isc-dhcp package during the bookworm lifetime, but the package will likely be unsupported in the next stable release, see bug #1035972 (isc-dhcp EOL'ed) for more details."
That doesn't mean that it will be remove in trixie.
Control: severity -1 important
El 19/05/25 a las 22:26, Bastian Blank escribió:
Source: isc-dhcp
Version: 4.4.3-P1-7
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-Cc: waldi@debian.org
isc-dhcp is EOL and marked as not security supported. It should not be released with trixie.
See
https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/dhcp-users/2022-October/022786.html https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1035972
Bastian
While I consider that users of isc-dhcp-{client,server} should migrate
to alternative implementation, I think it is too late now to ask for the removal of isc-dhcp, being so close to release trixie.
It is to note that, TTBOMK, there is currently no substitute for isc-dhcp-relay.
https://www.debian.org/releases/bookworm/amd64/release-notes/ch-information.en.html#deprecated-components
reads:
"The security team will support the isc-dhcp package during the bookworm lifetime, but the package will likely be unsupported in the next stable release, see bug #1035972 (isc-dhcp EOL'ed) for more details."
That doesn't mean that it will be remove in trixie.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 481 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 14:20:14 |
Calls: | 9,540 |
Calls today: | 8 |
Files: | 13,653 |
Messages: | 6,139,533 |
Posted today: | 1 |