On Wed, 9 Oct 2024 12:58:23 -0500, Branden Robinson <
g.branden.robinson@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Oct 9, 2024, 12:43 Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> wrote:
On Wed, 2024-10-09 at 10:26 +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
On Mon Oct 7, 2024 at 8:58 AM BST, Marc Haber wrote:
P.S.: Isnt it about time to rename exim4 to exim?
Or apache2 to apache?
The ASF is responsible for a lot more than httpd now, and is also
(gradually) moving away from using the Apache name, so if that package
is to be renamed then something like "asf-httpd" would be better.
There's another name the Apache Software Foundation is NOT moving away
from at any speed, and seems determined to hang on to like grim death.
...which makes sense since what they're clinging to is a corpse.
So how about openoffice-httpd?
I personally care more about what people call it instead of what their
makes want it to be called (especiall if _that_ changes twice a year).
So, apache it would be for me.
Greetings
Marc
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header Rhein-Neckar, DE | Beginning of Wisdom " |
Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 6224 1600402
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)