No, you are not maintaining powerpcspe as a release architecture, and that's something different than building packages for some of the ports architectures.
If you can get powerpcspe accepted as a release architecture, then maybe you gain some credibility to maintain another release architecture ;)
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 11:01:55PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:[...]
[...]I have not heard from the ppc64el porters, but I suspect ppc64 will
not be a release arch. So you need to take into consideration that for powerpc to remain a release arch, one need minimal working ppc64 port. Could we solve the situation of ppc64 for Stretch, could it be moved
to official release arch ?
What would you need ppc64 for? Unlike i386, powerpc includes 64-bit kernels so users don't need multiarch:
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 475 |
Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
Uptime: | 166:08:36 |
Calls: | 9,480 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 13,613 |
Messages: | 6,119,929 |