# Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org> (2023-01-27)
# GKrellM and a variety of plugins. It's unmaintained for some time.
# Upstream homepage is gone, and the whole suite is collecting dust
# and patches.
# Removal on 2023-02-26. Bug #892251.
[also eclass/gkrellm-plugin.eclass]
acct-group/gkrellmd
acct-user/gkrellmd
app-admin/gkrellm
app-laptop/ibam
media-plugins/gkrellmpc
x11-plugins/bfm
x11-plugins/gkrellaclock
x11-plugins/gkrellfire
x11-plugins/gkrellkam
x11-plugins/gkrellm-bgchanger
x11-plugins/gkrellm-bluez
x11-plugins/gkrellm-countdown
x11-plugins/gkrellm-cpupower
x11-plugins/gkrellm-imonc
x11-plugins/gkrellmlaunch
x11-plugins/gkrellm-leds
x11-plugins/gkrellm-mailwatch
x11-plugins/gkrellmoon
x11-plugins/gkrellm-plugins
x11-plugins/gkrellm-radio
x11-plugins/gkrellmss
x11-plugins/gkrellm-trayicons
x11-plugins/gkrellm-vaiobright
x11-plugins/gkrellm-volume
x11-plugins/gkrellmwireless
x11-plugins/gkrellm-xkb
x11-plugins/gkrellshoot
x11-plugins/gkrellstock
x11-plugins/gkrellsun
x11-plugins/gkrelltop
x11-plugins/gkrellweather
x11-plugins/gkwebmon
x11-plugins/i8krellm
x11-themes/gkrellm-themes
Second, if no one takes it over, what could be used in its place? I'll
be honest, I don't know of anything that could replace it but I've never thought about looking either. I'm looking into app-admin category but
don't see anything obvious to replace it.
On Sat, 28 Jan 2023 00:20:03 -0600, Dale wrote:
Second, if no one takes it over, what could be used in its place? I'll
be honest, I don't know of anything that could replace it but I've never thought about looking either. I'm looking into app-admin category but don't see anything obvious to replace it.
The only thing I've found that comes close is app-admin/conky - it's nice
but a bit awkward to set up. The last time I troed it was a few years ago
and there was the odd issue so I went back to GkrellM.
Since my coding ability is even worse than Dale's I join him in kindly
asking for a maintainer/dev to take it on and keep it running.
Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Saturday, 28 January 2023 09:17:35 GMT Michael wrote:
Since my coding ability is even worse than Dale's I join him in kindly
asking for a maintainer/dev to take it on and keep it running.
I too am finding it hard to imagine life without gkrellm. I think it needs more than just a maintainer though - it needs a replacement for upstreamI agree. It needs someone to take care of it not only for Gentoo but
as well.
for other distros as well. It will be more than just keeping the ebuild
up to date. I'm hoping that someone somewhere will take it up. I'd
think it is used by a lot of people. Surely someone can do coding
updates as well. Only needs one, maybe two, people.
I found a video on conky. Link below. It's kinda scattered so I found myself skipping ahead. There is a few times where it shows what it
looks like. Set up could be a nightmare for someone like me. It sounds pretty complicated.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bHtpLEoRKmg
Home page has a couple screenshots too.
https://github.com/brndnmtthws/conky#screenshots
Conky may work but I don't see me liking it as much as I do gkrellm.
I hope someone will take it over and keep gkrellm running. Maybe then a
dev can keep the ebuilds updated. Given the original guy died, someone
has to replace him for sure.
Let's keep our fingers crossed. ;-)
Dale
:-) :-)
Michał Górny wrote:
# Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org> (2023-01-27)
# GKrellM and a variety of plugins. It's unmaintained for some time.
# Upstream homepage is gone, and the whole suite is collecting dust
# and patches.
# Removal on 2023-02-26. Bug #892251.
On Saturday, 28 January 2023 09:17:35 GMT Michael wrote:
Since my coding ability is even worse than Dale's I join him in kindlyI too am finding it hard to imagine life without gkrellm. I think it needs more
asking for a maintainer/dev to take it on and keep it running.
than just a maintainer though - it needs a replacement for upstream as well.
haven't used conky for some years now, its development must have
improved since. [...] Anyway,
even after spending time configuring it to suit my requirements, I
found gkrellms to be better in every respect.
LWN tipped off. If they run an article, we might get a new upstream.
Cheers,
Wol
On 28/01/2023 06:20, Dale wrote:
Michał Górny wrote:
# Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org> (2023-01-27)
# GKrellM and a variety of plugins. It's unmaintained for some time.
# Upstream homepage is gone, and the whole suite is collecting dust
# and patches.
# Removal on 2023-02-26. Bug #892251.
.
On Saturday, 28 January 2023 09:17:35 GMT Michael wrote:
Since my coding ability is even worse than Dale's I join him in kindlyI too am finding it hard to imagine life without gkrellm. I think it needs more
asking for a maintainer/dev to take it on and keep it running.
than just a maintainer though - it needs a replacement for upstream as well.
On 1/28/23 05:35, Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Saturday, 28 January 2023 09:17:35 GMT Michael wrote:
Since my coding ability is even worse than Dale's I join him in kindlyI too am finding it hard to imagine life without gkrellm. I think it
asking for a maintainer/dev to take it on and keep it running.
needs more
than just a maintainer though - it needs a replacement for upstream
as well.
I"m actually the one who first heard that the original maintainer had
died. (I had written to him about some support issue, and got a
belated reply from his brother.) Upstream is not dead at all, the
activity level is just fairly low. I tried to post to -dev, but my
message never got through, not sure if it's because I'm not a dev or I
made some other error in sending. The homepage is at htttps://gkrellm.srcbox.net with source at https://git.srcbox.net/gkrellm/gkrellm.
The main problem is that is still uses gtk+2. They do have an open
issue about that, but most of the discussion has been on why it would
be so hard to upgrade. There is apparently a lot of fairly low-level graphics stuff going on, and Bill himself (the original maintainer)
said something like the conversion to gkt+3 would be difficult, but to
go to gtk+4 (I have no idea how far off this is) would essentially be
a re-write.
Jack
On 1/28/23 05:35, Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Saturday, 28 January 2023 09:17:35 GMT Michael wrote:
Since my coding ability is even worse than Dale's I join him in kindly
asking for a maintainer/dev to take it on and keep it running.
I too am finding it hard to imagine life without gkrellm. I think it needs more than just a maintainer though - it needs a replacement for upstreamI"m actually the one who first heard that the original maintainer had
as well.
died. (I had written to him about some support issue, and got a belated reply from his brother.) Upstream is not dead at all, the activity
level is just fairly low. I tried to post to -dev, but my message never
got through, not sure if it's because I'm not a dev or I made some other error in sending. The homepage is at htttps://gkrellm.srcbox.net with
source at https://git.srcbox.net/gkrellm/gkrellm.
The main problem is that is still uses gtk+2. They do have an open
issue about that, but most of the discussion has been on why it would be
so hard to upgrade. There is apparently a lot of fairly low-level
graphics stuff going on, and Bill himself (the original maintainer) said something like the conversion to gkt+3 would be difficult, but to go to
gtk+4 (I have no idea how far off this is) would essentially be a re-write.
Jack
On 1/28/23 05:35, Peter Humphrey wrote:needs more
On Saturday, 28 January 2023 09:17:35 GMT Michael wrote:
Since my coding ability is even worse than Dale's I join him in kindlyI too am finding it hard to imagine life without gkrellm. I think it
asking for a maintainer/dev to take it on and keep it running.
well.than just a maintainer though - it needs a replacement for upstream as
I"m actually the one who first heard that the original maintainer hadre-write.
died. (I had written to him about some support issue, and got a belated reply from his brother.) Upstream is not dead at all, the activity
level is just fairly low. I tried to post to -dev, but my message never
got through, not sure if it's because I'm not a dev or I made some other error in sending. The homepage is at htttps://gkrellm.srcbox.net with
source at https://git.srcbox.net/gkrellm/gkrellm.
The main problem is that is still uses gtk+2. They do have an open
issue about that, but most of the discussion has been on why it would be
so hard to upgrade. There is apparently a lot of fairly low-level
graphics stuff going on, and Bill himself (the original maintainer) said something like the conversion to gkt+3 would be difficult, but to go to
gtk+4 (I have no idea how far off this is) would essentially be a
Jack
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 443 |
Nodes: | 16 (3 / 13) |
Uptime: | 62:08:54 |
Calls: | 9,190 |
Calls today: | 6 |
Files: | 13,475 |
Messages: | 6,051,873 |