rubyforge
Some of them seem to be obsolete. Presumably freshmeat, gitorious,
and
google-code should be removed? Any other removal candidates?
Some of them seem to be obsolete. Presumably freshmeat, gitorious, and google-code should be removed? Any other removal candidates?
Looks like SourceForge-JP was renamed to OSDN, should the file reflect
that?
Also, the "gentoo" remote-id was added the the DTD [2] but is missing
from the XML schema. Presumably it should be added there, too?
Comments please.
On Sun, 22 May 2022, Michał Górny wrote:
I think we should start documenting these values somewhere. Perhaps
in the GLEP, or maybe on some wiki page — particularly linking
the provider in question
and documenting the value syntax.
On Sun, 22 May 2022, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
According to the XML schema [1], the following remote-id types are
currently allowed:
bitbucket
cpan
cpan-module
cpe
cran
ctan
freecode
freshmeat
github
gitlab
gitorious
google-code
heptapod
launchpad
pear
pecl
pypi
rubyforge
rubygems
sourceforge
sourceforge-jp
vim
Some of them seem to be obsolete. Presumably freshmeat, gitorious, and google-code should be removed? Any other removal candidates?
Looks like SourceForge-JP was renamed to OSDN, should the file reflect
that?
Some of them seem to be obsolete. Presumably freshmeat, gitorious, and google-code should be removed? Any other removal candidates?
According to the XML schema [1], the following remote-id types are
currently allowed:
bitbucket
cpan
cpan-module
cpe
cran
ctan
freecode
freshmeat
github
gitlab
gitorious
google-code
heptapod
launchpad
pear
pecl
pypi
rubyforge
rubygems
sourceforge
sourceforge-jp
vim
Some of them seem to be obsolete. Presumably freshmeat, gitorious, and google-code should be removed? Any other removal candidates?
Looks like SourceForge-JP was renamed to OSDN, should the file reflect
that?
Also, the "gentoo" remote-id was added the the DTD [2] but is missing
from the XML schema. Presumably it should be added there, too?
Comments please.
On Sun, 22 May 2022, Alessandro Barbieri wrote:
How to propose new values?
On Sun, 22 May 2022, Hanno Böck wrote:
Some of them seem to be obsolete. Presumably freshmeat, gitorious, and
google-code should be removed? Any other removal candidates?
I'm not sure about Google code.
While it's no longer an active site, it is still online in an archived
state. We maintain plenty of packages that have no active upstream,
and having a reference to an unmaintained previous upstream which
still allows downloading the code and the repo archive seems like a
good thing.
On Sun, 22 May 2022, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
Some of them seem to be obsolete. Presumably freshmeat, gitorious, and google-code should be removed? Any other removal candidates?
Looks like SourceForge-JP was renamed to OSDN, should the file reflect
that?
Also, the "gentoo" remote-id was added the the DTD [2] but is missing
from the XML schema. Presumably it should be added there, too?
On Sun, 22 May 2022, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
I'm not sure about Google code.On Sun, 22 May 2022, Hanno Böck wrote:
While it's no longer an active site, it is still online in an
archived state. We maintain plenty of packages that have no active
upstream, and having a reference to an unmaintained previous upstream
which still allows downloading the code and the repo archive seems
like a good thing.
The same is true for gitorious, but we have dropped those remote-ids
from the tree nevertheless: https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=f8fd6bd07efee4d36a1babf55d6e69c7cb4a93d4
However, I think that your point is valid. So the basic question is
whether we should keep dead upstreams in that list, for archival
purposes? If the answer is yes, then consequently we should also keep gitorious (and maybe revert above commit?).
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 475 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 17:19:47 |
Calls: | 9,487 |
Calls today: | 6 |
Files: | 13,617 |
Messages: | 6,121,089 |