Hello,
the one thing that keeps putting me off using slrn more frequently is
the way it is dealing with read messages.
I should say I'm using a vintage 0.9.8.1, so maybe this has changed with respect to this. But the way I see it is that read messages can only be zapped from the article overview. This is harsh. Would it not be nice
to have a read article just *flagged* as read by having something like
a letter R in front of the subject in the article overview?
But the way I see it is that read messages can only be zapped from
the article overview. This is harsh. Would it not be nice to have a
read article just *flagged* as read by having something like a
letter R in front of the subject in the article overview?
Articles marked as read are flagged in just this way; those articles
can be marked unread if you change your mind. I don't understand how
what you propose is different from marking an article unread in
article mode.
- R [J.B. Nicho]: [-] Re: [slrn] Dealing with read articles4 - [Lewis ]: >
If you want to read articles without marking them as read, consider
adding
set auto_mark_article_as_read 0
to your slrnrc.
Hallo,
thanks for replying.
Am Sat, 12 Jun 2021 04:54:08 -0000 (UTC) schrieb J.B. Nicholson <jbn@forestfield.org>:
Articles marked as read are flagged in just this way; those articles
can be marked unread if you change your mind. I don't understand how
what you propose is different from marking an article unread in
article mode.
I didn't make myself clear: I had a flag in mind that would just show
up in the article overview, eg like this:
Yes, I have done this, but as the faq correctly points out this just
leaves me with *all* the articles in the overview,
what's new is impossible. That's the whole point of flagging something
"read" - I just think removing things read completely out of sight of
the user is too harsh. Actually, the automark (and thus "autohide")
feature, which is on by default, probably discourages novices from
using slrn quite thouroughly, along the lines of "where the hack is that article I read yesterday and where I want to comment on today?"
<http://xkcd.com/241/><http://xkcd.com/304/>
I didn't make myself clear: I had a flag in mind that would just show
up in the article overview, eg like this:
2 - R [Andreas Ma]: [slrn] Dealing with read articles
- R [J.B. Nicho]: [-] Re: [slrn] Dealing with read articles4 - [Lewis ]: >
The articles from myself and you are flagged "read", Lewis' is still
unread. The read articles can still be accessed easily. Similar to
pan, where read articles are still there but appear in a pale font in
the overview. I personally find this appealing.
Actually, the automark (and thus "autohide") feature, which is on by
default, probably discourages novices from using slrn quite
thouroughly, along the lines of "where the hack is that article I
read yesterday and where I want to comment on today?"
The proposed "R" flag would do just nicely, me thinks.
Instead of hitting Enter to enter a group, try entering a group with ESC 1 Enter. By default slrn will prompt you for how many articles to show you
and you'll see that many articles (minus any articles which have expired
from your news server). You can put in the default number and see as many
of the group's old articles as slrn can fetch from the news server.
https://slrn.info/docs/slrn-manual-7.html#gkey_select_group has more info
on this.
- [Andreas Ma]: [slrn] Dealing with read articles@@sig3 D [J.B. Nicho]: tq[-] Re: [slrn] Dealing with read articles
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 482 |
Nodes: | 16 (3 / 13) |
Uptime: | 37:32:50 |
Calls: | 9,565 |
Calls today: | 25 |
Files: | 13,656 |
Messages: | 6,141,547 |