• Re: BLOOD SIMPLE (1984) (a film retrospective by Mark R. Leeper)

    From HenHanna@21:1/5 to Mark Leeper on Sun Mar 3 00:00:23 2024
    Mark Leeper wrote:

    Martin Gardner once wrote a book about what he called the "Aha!-
    experience." That is the instant in problem solving when all the
    pieces of the puzzle fit together and everything makes sense.
    MISSION IMPOSSIBLE was an entire TV series designed to create
    "Aha!" experiences. In each episode the main characters knew
    exactly what they were doing, but until the end the viewer was
    confused. Then at the end everything fit together.

    Don't look for that sort of scripting in the current Tom Cruise
    "Mission Impossible" series or at least look for it in the current
    "Ocean's 11" series, which seems to leave the viewer guessing until
    the end of the story.

    The Coen Brothers' BLOOD SIMPLE is sort of the dual of TV's MISSION IMPOSSIBLE. It is a film about the "Huh?" experience. Through
    most of the convoluted plot, it is the viewer who knows what is
    going on and the characters keep finding out that they only
    *thought* they knew what was happening. With the exception of the
    moments when the plot twists, it is really easy to keep track of
    what is happening. Yet, like RASHOMON, each character has a
    different understanding of who is doing what to whom. The plot can
    just be described as slow chaos punctuated with moments of
    delicious confusion from the characters.

    This is a film of very high production values which looks as if it
    was printed on cheap film stock. Somehow the film stock gives it a
    gritty feel of authenticity that a slick production would lack.
    There are some incredible camera shots in this film and it is
    amazing that they do not feel contrived. It is like reading Victor
    Hugo: the first time you read a paragraph, you are amazed at how
    well-written it is, and only secondarily you realize that it really
    did advance the plot. Scenes in this film are amazing in the same
    way.

    One scene toward the end of the film is particularly haunting. We
    are in a dark room and someone is shooting holes in the wall from a
    well-lit room. The effect is one of columns of light sprouting out
    of a dark wall. The scene fits naturally into the plot, but still
    is an unforgettable image. The effect was used again in SILVERADO.

    In some way I still do not understand, the cameraman is
    unobtrusively able to make the viewer notice props that will be
    important later. A prop will become important in the plot and the
    viewer finds himself thinking, "Yes, I noticed that prop five
    minutes ago, but it was in a corner of the screen and I thought
    noticing it was my idea."

    I rate this a low +3 on the -4 to +4 scale.

    Film Credits:
    <https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0086979/reference>

    What others are saying:
    <https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/blood_simple>

    --
    Mark R. Leeper


    (a film retrospective by Mark R. Leeper)


    ----------- Wow... i remember the name [Mark R. Leeper]
    from the glory days of USENET's Rec.Arts.Movies........


    if it's [a film retrospective], i'd expected things like....

    [ When i first saw it, .......... but now coming back more than 3 decades later... ]

    (as in J. Rosenbaum's film retrospective)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From HenHanna@21:1/5 to Mark Leeper on Sun Mar 3 02:16:28 2024
    Mark Leeper wrote:

    Martin Gardner once wrote a book about what he called the "Aha!-
    experience." That is the instant in problem solving when all the
    pieces of the puzzle fit together and everything makes sense.
    MISSION IMPOSSIBLE was an entire TV series designed to create
    "Aha!" experiences. In each episode the main characters knew
    exactly what they were doing, but until the end the viewer was
    confused. Then at the end everything fit together.

    Don't look for that sort of scripting in the current Tom Cruise
    "Mission Impossible" series or at least look for it in the current
    "Ocean's 11" series, which seems to leave the viewer guessing until
    the end of the story.

    The Coen Brothers' BLOOD SIMPLE is sort of the dual of TV's MISSION IMPOSSIBLE. It is a film about the "Huh?" experience. Through
    most of the convoluted plot, it is the viewer who knows what is
    going on and the characters keep finding out that they only
    *thought* they knew what was happening. With the exception of the
    moments when the plot twists, it is really easy to keep track of
    what is happening. Yet, like RASHOMON, each character has a
    different understanding of who is doing what to whom. The plot can
    just be described as slow chaos punctuated with moments of
    delicious confusion from the characters.

    This is a film of very high production values which looks as if it
    was printed on cheap film stock. Somehow the film stock gives it a
    gritty feel of authenticity that a slick production would lack.
    There are some incredible camera shots in this film and it is
    amazing that they do not feel contrived. It is like reading Victor
    Hugo: the first time you read a paragraph, you are amazed at how
    well-written it is, and only secondarily you realize that it really
    did advance the plot. Scenes in this film are amazing in the same
    way.

    One scene toward the end of the film is particularly haunting. We
    are in a dark room and someone is shooting holes in the wall from a
    well-lit room. The effect is one of columns of light sprouting out
    of a dark wall. The scene fits naturally into the plot, but still
    is an unforgettable image. The effect was used again in SILVERADO.

    In some way I still do not understand, the cameraman is
    unobtrusively able to make the viewer notice props that will be
    important later. A prop will become important in the plot and the
    viewer finds himself thinking, "Yes, I noticed that prop five
    minutes ago, but it was in a corner of the screen and I thought
    noticing it was my idea."

    I rate this a low +3 on the -4 to +4 scale.

    Film Credits: <https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0086979/reference>

    What others are saying: <https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/blood_simple>

    --
    Mark R. Leeper




    (a film retrospective by Mark R. Leeper)


    ----------- Wow... i remember the name [Mark R. Leeper]
    from the glory days of USENET's Rec.Arts.Movies........


    if it's [a film retrospective], i'd expected things like....
    [ When i first saw it, .......... but now coming back more than 3 decades later... ]
    (as in J. Rosenbaum's film retrospective)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)