I'd like to put the question out there: has anyone seen the Henry IV plays >condensed into one play in the past, and if so, how was it? Did it work?
Their version essentially pulled out anything which wasn't Falstaff-related. I found it to be somewhat unsatisfying, although the performances were good.
As per a previous thread here on Faustus, I find some of the press about this adaptation to be a little annoying. The director is quoted as saying,
"They are, first and foremost, among the greatest works of the stage."
If so, then why not direct them instead of something vaguely related to them?
A local theatre company is running Henry IV, Parts I and II as one play. I've been of two minds on this. First, yes, the condensed play can provide a more concise journey on the road to Henry V. Then again, both Parts in full combine to a run time of about 5 hours. That's a lot of mountain to squeeze into a cup.
It has happened before, I am sure. I remember the film "Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy", which condensed a massive novel into a two-hour film. Things had to be deleted, with other things moved around, but it still adhered to the spirit of the source material.
I'd like to put the question out there: has anyone seen the Henry IV plays condensed into one play in the past, and if so, how was it? Did it work?
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 475 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 46:56:28 |
Calls: | 9,493 |
Calls today: | 4 |
Files: | 13,621 |
Messages: | 6,123,244 |
Posted today: | 1 |