Negotiations seem plausible as Uriarte was deferential to the
committee's oversight authority throughout the letter while
continuously warning that its Hunter Biden investigation, led by
newly appointed special counsel David Weiss, was ongoing and that
information flow would be limited during that time.
Fucking cover up.What's wrong with Terminal Lance? Would you prefer the investigation
On 8/30/23 1:52 PM, ScottW wrote:
Negotiations seem plausible as Uriarte was deferential to the
committee's oversight authority throughout the letter while
continuously warning that its Hunter Biden investigation, led by
newly appointed special counsel David Weiss, was ongoing and that information flow would be limited during that time.
Fucking cover up.What's wrong with Terminal Lance? Would you prefer the investigation
be closed so you can read the eventual report?
Sorry: wrong Uriarte. Weiss dragged the investigation out way longer
than it warranted. Why would "slow-walking" be a concern now? A
pro-Biden investigator would have wrapped things up with a fine years
ago. It's more likely Weiss wanted to stretch until the investigation
would benefit Trump.
On Wednesday, August 30, 2023 at 12:12:19 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 8/30/23 1:52 PM, ScottW wrote:
Negotiations seem plausible as Uriarte was deferential to theWhat's wrong with Terminal Lance? Would you prefer the investigation
committee's oversight authority throughout the letter while
continuously warning that its Hunter Biden investigation, led by
newly appointed special counsel David Weiss, was ongoing and that
information flow would be limited during that time.
Fucking cover up.
be closed so you can read the eventual report?
Sorry: wrong Uriarte. Weiss dragged the investigation out way longer
than it warranted. Why would "slow-walking" be a concern now? A
pro-Biden investigator would have wrapped things up with a fine years
ago. It's more likely Weiss wanted to stretch until the investigation
would benefit Trump.
Your insanity is complete.
On 8/31/23 11:36 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Wednesday, August 30, 2023 at 12:12:19 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 8/30/23 1:52 PM, ScottW wrote:
Negotiations seem plausible as Uriarte was deferential to theWhat's wrong with Terminal Lance? Would you prefer the investigation
committee's oversight authority throughout the letter while
continuously warning that its Hunter Biden investigation, led by
newly appointed special counsel David Weiss, was ongoing and that
information flow would be limited during that time.
Fucking cover up.
be closed so you can read the eventual report?
Sorry: wrong Uriarte. Weiss dragged the investigation out way longer
than it warranted. Why would "slow-walking" be a concern now? A
pro-Biden investigator would have wrapped things up with a fine years
ago. It's more likely Weiss wanted to stretch until the investigation
would benefit Trump.
Your insanity is complete.It's much less a stretch than your implication Weiss is somehow trying
to work for Biden's benefit.
And you were quick to pat yourself on the back for "predicting" a
prosecutor wouldn't comment on an ongoing investigation when that's
the general standard.
On Thursday, August 31, 2023 at 4:11:21 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 8/31/23 11:36 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Wednesday, August 30, 2023 at 12:12:19 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:It's much less a stretch than your implication Weiss is somehow trying
On 8/30/23 1:52 PM, ScottW wrote:
Negotiations seem plausible as Uriarte was deferential to theWhat's wrong with Terminal Lance? Would you prefer the investigation
committee's oversight authority throughout the letter while
continuously warning that its Hunter Biden investigation, led by
newly appointed special counsel David Weiss, was ongoing and that
information flow would be limited during that time.
Fucking cover up.
be closed so you can read the eventual report?
Sorry: wrong Uriarte. Weiss dragged the investigation out way longer
than it warranted. Why would "slow-walking" be a concern now? A
pro-Biden investigator would have wrapped things up with a fine years
ago. It's more likely Weiss wanted to stretch until the investigation
would benefit Trump.
Your insanity is complete.
to work for Biden's benefit.
And you were quick to pat yourself on the back for "predicting" a
prosecutor wouldn't comment on an ongoing investigation when that's
the general standard.
Somehow?
Try sweetheart deal, and the earlier attempt to completely drop the charges.
On 8/31/23 5:11 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Thursday, August 31, 2023 at 4:11:21 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 8/31/23 11:36 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Wednesday, August 30, 2023 at 12:12:19 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote: >>>> On 8/30/23 1:52 PM, ScottW wrote:It's much less a stretch than your implication Weiss is somehow trying
Negotiations seem plausible as Uriarte was deferential to theWhat's wrong with Terminal Lance? Would you prefer the investigation >>>> be closed so you can read the eventual report?
committee's oversight authority throughout the letter while
continuously warning that its Hunter Biden investigation, led by
newly appointed special counsel David Weiss, was ongoing and that >>>>> information flow would be limited during that time.
Fucking cover up.
Sorry: wrong Uriarte. Weiss dragged the investigation out way longer >>>> than it warranted. Why would "slow-walking" be a concern now? A
pro-Biden investigator would have wrapped things up with a fine years >>>> ago. It's more likely Weiss wanted to stretch until the investigation >>>> would benefit Trump.
Your insanity is complete.
to work for Biden's benefit.
And you were quick to pat yourself on the back for "predicting" a
prosecutor wouldn't comment on an ongoing investigation when that's
the general standard.
Somehow?Weiss hasn't dropped the prosecution and the deal was a trap to catch
Try sweetheart deal, and the earlier attempt to completely drop the charges.
him on other charges.
Compare Hunter's deal to that given Roger Stone.
https://www.sfltimes.com/news/politics/hunter-bidens-so-called-sweetheart-tax-deal-looks-tougher-than-the-deal-roger-stone-got-for-dodging-taxes
On Thursday, August 31, 2023 at 5:32:49 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
Compare Hunter's deal to that given Roger Stone.
https://www.sfltimes.com/news/politics/hunter-bidens-so-called-sweetheart-tax-deal-looks-tougher-than-the-deal-roger-stone-got-for-dodging-taxes
Love to...but your lame link doesn't even mention Stone beyond the
headline.
But let's look at some details beyond your High School newspaper
link. First....Stone is only facing a civil suit as the IRS also
didn't move soon enough and let SoL lapse. I don't recall him getting
a deferment deal for lying to the Mueller team like Hunter got for
gun application fraud.
Hunter's recent deal has nothing in it on his lapsed tax
issues....unless the report that Hunter told an associate is in
reference to his SoL tax issues...but I never heard of a civil suit
filed against him....so that comparison quickly falls apart as well.
Meanwhile, the Biden WH has established a "war room" staffed by
dozens of lawyers and WH aides to combat the impending House
impeachment inquiry which right now centers largely on the release of thousands of VP Biden e-mails under 3 pseudonyms which is according
to Joe just trivial non-WH and definitely not Hunter business
related. Which leads to the question....why not just release them
rather than go to "war" over them?
On 9/1/23 6:59 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Thursday, August 31, 2023 at 5:32:49 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
Compare Hunter's deal to that given Roger Stone.
https://www.sfltimes.com/news/politics/hunter-bidens-so-called-sweetheart-tax-deal-looks-tougher-than-the-deal-roger-stone-got-for-dodging-taxes
Love to...but your lame link doesn't even mention Stone beyond the headline.True, but you show you're familiar.
But let's look at some details beyond your High School newspaperCivil suit vs criminal means Stone's treatment is more lenient.
link. First....Stone is only facing a civil suit as the IRS also
didn't move soon enough and let SoL lapse. I don't recall him getting
a deferment deal for lying to the Mueller team like Hunter got for
gun application fraud.
Also
more lenient is that Stone didn't get a rarely used charge added on.
Please remind us when you complained about Stone's statute of limitation expiring.
However, the suit isn't about the SoL lapsed tax situation but
his reneging on his repayment deal.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.591126/gov.uscourts.flsd.591126.1.0.pdf
"Although the Stones’ tax liabilities for the years 2007–2009 were assessed over 10 years ago, the limitations period to commence this suit
was tolled by their submission of an offer in compromise to the IRS and requests to the IRS to enter into an installment agreement to pay those taxes."
Hunter's recent deal has nothing in it on his lapsed taxHow does an agreement to plead to misdemeanor tax charges not have
issues....unless the report that Hunter told an associate is in
reference to his SoL tax issues...but I never heard of a civil suit
filed against him....so that comparison quickly falls apart as well.
anything to do with his "lapsed tax issues"?
Stone's civil treatment vs Hunter's criminal treatment is the point.
Just so there's no wriggling on what you think the "deal" is:
https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000189-9524-dee7-a7ab-fd7d1d600000
Meanwhile, the Biden WH has established a "war room" staffed byChanging the subject, yes?
dozens of lawyers and WH aides to combat the impending House
impeachment inquiry which right now centers largely on the release of thousands of VP Biden e-mails under 3 pseudonyms which is according
to Joe just trivial non-WH and definitely not Hunter business
related. Which leads to the question....why not just release them
rather than go to "war" over them?
Of course, you would prefer the President not
prepare to deal with a possible impeachment in the future.
Multiple email accounts is not an impeachable offense and the NARA isn't "going to war" but enforcing its rules for what can be released.
On Saturday, September 2, 2023 at 8:09:57 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 9/1/23 6:59 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Thursday, August 31, 2023 at 5:32:49 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:True, but you show you're familiar.
Compare Hunter's deal to that given Roger Stone.
https://www.sfltimes.com/news/politics/hunter-bidens-so-called-sweetheart-tax-deal-looks-tougher-than-the-deal-roger-stone-got-for-dodging-taxes
Love to...but your lame link doesn't even mention Stone beyond the
headline.
But let's look at some details beyond your High School newspaperCivil suit vs criminal means Stone's treatment is more lenient.
link. First....Stone is only facing a civil suit as the IRS also
didn't move soon enough and let SoL lapse. I don't recall him getting
a deferment deal for lying to the Mueller team like Hunter got for
gun application fraud.
LoL....Hunter got nothing punitive for his SoL lapsed years of tax payments.
Also more lenient is that Stone didn't get a rarely used charge added on.
Rarely used? That's a joke.
Stone wasn't charged because he didn't commit the crime.
Please remind us when you complained about Stone's statute of limitation
expiring.
I didn't know til now.
However, the suit isn't about the SoL lapsed tax situation but
his reneging on his repayment deal.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.591126/gov.uscourts.flsd.591126.1.0.pdf
"Although the Stones’ tax liabilities for the years 2007–2009 were
assessed over 10 years ago, the limitations period to commence this suit
was tolled by their submission of an offer in compromise to the IRS and
requests to the IRS to enter into an installment agreement to pay those
taxes."
Maybe Stone wouldn't be broke if the DoJ hadn't gone after him for process crimes.
Hunter's recent deal has nothing in it on his lapsed taxHow does an agreement to plead to misdemeanor tax charges not have
issues....unless the report that Hunter told an associate is in
reference to his SoL tax issues...but I never heard of a civil suit
filed against him....so that comparison quickly falls apart as well.
anything to do with his "lapsed tax issues"?
Duh...different tax years. Do you lump all your tax returns into one giant pile
of illegal bile?
Stone's civil treatment vs Hunter's criminal treatment is the point.
The only reason for the difference is Stone is broke.
Hunter can sell his art.
Just so there's no wriggling on what you think the "deal" is:
https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000189-9524-dee7-a7ab-fd7d1d600000
Meanwhile, the Biden WH has established a "war room" staffed byChanging the subject, yes?
dozens of lawyers and WH aides to combat the impending House
impeachment inquiry which right now centers largely on the release of
thousands of VP Biden e-mails under 3 pseudonyms which is according
to Joe just trivial non-WH and definitely not Hunter business
related. Which leads to the question....why not just release them
rather than go to "war" over them?
No, returning to subject.
Of course, you would prefer the President not
prepare to deal with a possible impeachment in the future.
Multiple email accounts is not an impeachable offense and the NARA isn't
"going to war" but enforcing its rules for what can be released.
To congress for oversight? NARA rules override congressional oversight authority?
GMAFB. This has all been adjudicated before and most recently by Dems going after Trumps
records and congress won. All they can do is delay and that's what they want to do.
What's next? We can't release so close to an election cuz that shit will surely impact an election
and we can't be meddling by giving voters the facts.
On 9/2/23 11:46 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Saturday, September 2, 2023 at 8:09:57 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 9/1/23 6:59 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Thursday, August 31, 2023 at 5:32:49 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:True, but you show you're familiar.
Compare Hunter's deal to that given Roger Stone.
https://www.sfltimes.com/news/politics/hunter-bidens-so-called-sweetheart-tax-deal-looks-tougher-than-the-deal-roger-stone-got-for-dodging-taxes
Love to...but your lame link doesn't even mention Stone beyond the
headline.
But let's look at some details beyond your High School newspaperCivil suit vs criminal means Stone's treatment is more lenient.
link. First....Stone is only facing a civil suit as the IRS also
didn't move soon enough and let SoL lapse. I don't recall him getting >>> a deferment deal for lying to the Mueller team like Hunter got for
gun application fraud.
LoL....Hunter got nothing punitive for his SoL lapsed years of tax payments.Except years of investigation.
You're mixing up his taxes with his work
which could have been charged as a foreign agent.
Also more lenient is that Stone didn't get a rarely used charge added on.
Rarely used? That's a joke.Yes, especially without connection to violent crime.
Stone wasn't charged because he didn't commit the crime.Neither did Hunter. Most people make a deal and pay.
https://www.ksat.com/money/2021/03/08/that-time-when-willie-nelson-made-an-album-just-to-pay-his-irs-debt/
Please remind us when you complained about Stone's statute of limitation >> expiring.
I didn't know til now.The Trump DoJ really dropped the ball there, right?
However, the suit isn't about the SoL lapsed tax situation but
his reneging on his repayment deal.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.591126/gov.uscourts.flsd.591126.1.0.pdf
"Although the Stones’ tax liabilities for the years 2007–2009 were
assessed over 10 years ago, the limitations period to commence this suit >> was tolled by their submission of an offer in compromise to the IRS and >> requests to the IRS to enter into an installment agreement to pay those >> taxes."
Maybe Stone wouldn't be broke if the DoJ hadn't gone after him for process crimes.That "process" being "paying your taxes."
Hunter's recent deal has nothing in it on his lapsed taxHow does an agreement to plead to misdemeanor tax charges not have
issues....unless the report that Hunter told an associate is in
reference to his SoL tax issues...but I never heard of a civil suit
filed against him....so that comparison quickly falls apart as well.
anything to do with his "lapsed tax issues"?
Duh...different tax years. Do you lump all your tax returns into one giant pilehttps://www.cnbc.com/2023/04/21/federal-prosecutors-considered-possible-charges-against-hunter-biden.html
of illegal bile?
The "two misdemeanor counts for failure to file taxes" *are* his "lapsed
tax issues."
Threats of criminal charges is not the same as "Hunter got nothing punitive."
Stone's civil treatment vs Hunter's criminal treatment is the point.
The only reason for the difference is Stone is broke.You don't get criminal charges if you're broke?
Hunter can sell his art.
Just so there's no wriggling on what you think the "deal" is:
https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000189-9524-dee7-a7ab-fd7d1d600000
Meanwhile, the Biden WH has established a "war room" staffed byChanging the subject, yes?
dozens of lawyers and WH aides to combat the impending House
impeachment inquiry which right now centers largely on the release of >>> thousands of VP Biden e-mails under 3 pseudonyms which is according
to Joe just trivial non-WH and definitely not Hunter business
related. Which leads to the question....why not just release them
rather than go to "war" over them?
No, returning to subject.No, the subject is the House committee trying to get blood from a stone
by asking for info on an ongoing investigation.
Of course, you would prefer the President not
prepare to deal with a possible impeachment in the future.
Multiple email accounts is not an impeachable offense and the NARA isn't >> "going to war" but enforcing its rules for what can be released.
To congress for oversight? NARA rules override congressional oversight authority?https://www.justice.gov/olc/file/1356251/download
"The PRA restricts access to presidential records after they are
accessioned to NARA at the end of a President’s tenure in office. The
PRA includes various exceptions to its restrictions on access, one of
which provides that subject to any rights, defenses, or privileges which
the United States or any agency or person may invoke, Presidential
records shall be made available . . . to either House of Congress, or,
to the extent of matter within its jurisdiction, to any committee or subcommittee thereof if such records contain information that is needed
for the conduct of its business and that is not otherwise available."
Yes, the "fishing expedition" exception.
GMAFB. This has all been adjudicated before and most recently by Dems going after TrumpsYou got one more October surprise than you should have.
records and congress won. All they can do is delay and that's what they want to do.
What's next? We can't release so close to an election cuz that shit will surely impact an election
and we can't be meddling by giving voters the facts.
I want the truth...even if you can't handle it.
ScottW
On Saturday, September 2, 2023 at 12:28:34 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 9/2/23 11:46 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Saturday, September 2, 2023 at 8:09:57 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:Except years of investigation.
On 9/1/23 6:59 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Thursday, August 31, 2023 at 5:32:49 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:True, but you show you're familiar.
Compare Hunter's deal to that given Roger Stone.
https://www.sfltimes.com/news/politics/hunter-bidens-so-called-sweetheart-tax-deal-looks-tougher-than-the-deal-roger-stone-got-for-dodging-taxes
Love to...but your lame link doesn't even mention Stone beyond the
headline.
But let's look at some details beyond your High School newspaperCivil suit vs criminal means Stone's treatment is more lenient.
link. First....Stone is only facing a civil suit as the IRS also
didn't move soon enough and let SoL lapse. I don't recall him getting >>>>> a deferment deal for lying to the Mueller team like Hunter got for
gun application fraud.
LoL....Hunter got nothing punitive for his SoL lapsed years of tax payments.
Oh the horror. The endless investigation that provides more cover than a Klingon cloaking device.
You're mixing up his taxes with his work
which could have been charged as a foreign agent.
But it wasn't and still hasn't been charged. That alone should tell you a lot you
blind partisan fool.
Yes, especially without connection to violent crime.Also more lenient is that Stone didn't get a rarely used charge added on. >>>Rarely used? That's a joke.
Prostitution....sex traffiking....drug use and transport were all options left uncharged.
Stone wasn't charged because he didn't commit the crime.Neither did Hunter. Most people make a deal and pay.
Now you're on crack. Show me Stone's fraudulent gun application.
https://www.ksat.com/money/2021/03/08/that-time-when-willie-nelson-made-an-album-just-to-pay-his-irs-debt/
It's SPP time. I'm not wasting mine on your random link BS.
The Trump DoJ really dropped the ball there, right?Please remind us when you complained about Stone's statute of limitation >>>> expiring.
I didn't know til now.
I think it's the IRS responsible. Funny how they suddenly get after it when Stone gets
linked to Trump.
A lot of people who were apparently going uninvestigated are suddenly investigated.
What's up with that?
That "process" being "paying your taxes."However, the suit isn't about the SoL lapsed tax situation but
his reneging on his repayment deal.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.591126/gov.uscourts.flsd.591126.1.0.pdf
"Although the Stones’ tax liabilities for the years 2007–2009 were >>>> assessed over 10 years ago, the limitations period to commence this suit >>>> was tolled by their submission of an offer in compromise to the IRS and >>>> requests to the IRS to enter into an installment agreement to pay those >>>> taxes."
Maybe Stone wouldn't be broke if the DoJ hadn't gone after him for process crimes.
His legal costs for defending his lied to FBI charges dumbass. It's the dem DoJ's favorite
new tactic. Why prosecute when you can bankrupt someone far more easily?
https://www.cnbc.com/2023/04/21/federal-prosecutors-considered-possible-charges-against-hunter-biden.htmlHunter's recent deal has nothing in it on his lapsed taxHow does an agreement to plead to misdemeanor tax charges not have
issues....unless the report that Hunter told an associate is in
reference to his SoL tax issues...but I never heard of a civil suit
filed against him....so that comparison quickly falls apart as well.
anything to do with his "lapsed tax issues"?
Duh...different tax years. Do you lump all your tax returns into one giant pile
of illegal bile?
The "two misdemeanor counts for failure to file taxes" *are* his "lapsed
tax issues."
BS None of your links nor links within your links specify the tax years in question.
But with the scrutiny of the BS plea deal it was widely reported that the DoJ and IRS
let lapse any possible criminal charges for failing to file back around 2014 as
SoL had expired.
Threats of criminal charges is not the same as "Hunter got nothing
punitive."
Talk about slaps on the wrist..... we threatened him with charges and found that punitive enough. LoL. Can't wait to hear that Weiss news conference.
You don't get criminal charges if you're broke?Stone's civil treatment vs Hunter's criminal treatment is the point.
The only reason for the difference is Stone is broke.
Hunter can sell his art.
Stone can't be criminally charged for his non-payment of taxes you moron
as the SoL has expired. But he can still held civilly liable.
Keeping your shit straight for you is tedious.
No, the subject is the House committee trying to get blood from a stoneJust so there's no wriggling on what you think the "deal" is:
https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000189-9524-dee7-a7ab-fd7d1d600000
Meanwhile, the Biden WH has established a "war room" staffed byChanging the subject, yes?
dozens of lawyers and WH aides to combat the impending House
impeachment inquiry which right now centers largely on the release of >>>>> thousands of VP Biden e-mails under 3 pseudonyms which is according
to Joe just trivial non-WH and definitely not Hunter business
related. Which leads to the question....why not just release them
rather than go to "war" over them?
No, returning to subject.
by asking for info on an ongoing investigation.
That stone is dripping blood and it will eventually be found to be Joe's blood.
https://www.justice.gov/olc/file/1356251/downloadOf course, you would prefer the President not
prepare to deal with a possible impeachment in the future.
Multiple email accounts is not an impeachable offense and the NARA isn't >>>> "going to war" but enforcing its rules for what can be released.
To congress for oversight? NARA rules override congressional oversight authority?
"The PRA restricts access to presidential records after they are
accessioned to NARA at the end of a President’s tenure in office. The
PRA includes various exceptions to its restrictions on access, one of
which provides that subject to any rights, defenses, or privileges which
the United States or any agency or person may invoke, Presidential
records shall be made available . . . to either House of Congress, or,
to the extent of matter within its jurisdiction, to any committee or
subcommittee thereof if such records contain information that is needed
for the conduct of its business and that is not otherwise available."
Yes, the "fishing expedition" exception.
GMAFB. This has all been adjudicated before and most recently by Dems going after TrumpsYou got one more October surprise than you should have.
records and congress won. All they can do is delay and that's what they want to do.
What's next? We can't release so close to an election cuz that shit will surely impact an election
and we can't be meddling by giving voters the facts.
I want the truth...
On 9/2/23 6:43 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Saturday, September 2, 2023 at 12:28:34 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 9/2/23 11:46 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Saturday, September 2, 2023 at 8:09:57 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote: >>>> On 9/1/23 6:59 PM, ScottW wrote:Except years of investigation.
On Thursday, August 31, 2023 at 5:32:49 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote: >>>>True, but you show you're familiar.
Compare Hunter's deal to that given Roger Stone.
https://www.sfltimes.com/news/politics/hunter-bidens-so-called-sweetheart-tax-deal-looks-tougher-than-the-deal-roger-stone-got-for-dodging-taxes
Love to...but your lame link doesn't even mention Stone beyond the >>>>> headline.
But let's look at some details beyond your High School newspaperCivil suit vs criminal means Stone's treatment is more lenient.
link. First....Stone is only facing a civil suit as the IRS also
didn't move soon enough and let SoL lapse. I don't recall him getting >>>>> a deferment deal for lying to the Mueller team like Hunter got for >>>>> gun application fraud.
LoL....Hunter got nothing punitive for his SoL lapsed years of tax payments.
Oh the horror. The endless investigation that provides more cover than a Klingon cloaking device.Yes, undergoing years of investigation is generally considered a bad
thing to be avoided.
Maybe Joe's 80,000 armed IRS agents will finally bust your cheating ass.
On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 10:49:39 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 9/2/23 6:43 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Saturday, September 2, 2023 at 12:28:34 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:Yes, undergoing years of investigation is generally considered a bad
On 9/2/23 11:46 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Saturday, September 2, 2023 at 8:09:57 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote: >>>>>> On 9/1/23 6:59 PM, ScottW wrote:Except years of investigation.
On Thursday, August 31, 2023 at 5:32:49 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote: >>>>>>True, but you show you're familiar.
Compare Hunter's deal to that given Roger Stone.
https://www.sfltimes.com/news/politics/hunter-bidens-so-called-sweetheart-tax-deal-looks-tougher-than-the-deal-roger-stone-got-for-dodging-taxes
Love to...but your lame link doesn't even mention Stone beyond the >>>>>>> headline.
But let's look at some details beyond your High School newspaper >>>>>>> link. First....Stone is only facing a civil suit as the IRS also >>>>>>> didn't move soon enough and let SoL lapse. I don't recall him getting >>>>>>> a deferment deal for lying to the Mueller team like Hunter got for >>>>>>> gun application fraud.Civil suit vs criminal means Stone's treatment is more lenient.
LoL....Hunter got nothing punitive for his SoL lapsed years of tax payments.
Oh the horror. The endless investigation that provides more cover than a Klingon cloaking device.
thing to be avoided.
Yeah...the only thing worse would be to actually be indicted, convicted, and forced to
serve a sentence.
Yeah...the only thing worse would be to actually be indicted, convicted, and forced to
serve a sentence.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 470 |
| Nodes: | 16 (3 / 13) |
| Uptime: | 84:10:29 |
| Calls: | 9,457 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 13,599 |
| Messages: | 6,115,216 |