• Dear FAA, why isn't safety your main concern?

    From youngblood8116@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Tue Sep 26 13:32:02 2023
    Having been heavily involved with the NMAC's between towplane and jet traffic, it seems to me that doing nothing to secure the safety of aviation is being overlooked.
    Most of us at some time or another have seen traffic up close, too close for comfort. Our area consist of heavy traffic ranging from flight training schools to scheduled heavy jet traffic. Our club was successful in developing a program through a LOA to
    communicate with WPA, and KVRB when operating gliders. This program has helped in regard to instrument traffic being advised of gliders operating, and local traffic being advised through ATIS.
    The problem still exist as most training and private jet traffic operators are too busy looking at those fancy glass screens instead of making note of traffic upon visual approach.
    Why hasn't the FAA endorsed the portable ADSB units that are accepted in the UK, Australia, and New Zealand? The success of the portable ADSB unit in those countries has led to increased safety. A portable unit like the SkyEcho, from uAvioni could be a
    gamechanger for general aviation. Sailplanes would benefit along with many other forms of aviation. The ability to carry a portable unit with a 50 mile range could have and will save lives.
    Glider clubs all over the country would benefit, the cost reduction vs an installed unit would be substantial. OBTP

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Eric Greenwell@21:1/5 to youngbl...@gmail.com on Tue Sep 26 14:53:29 2023
    On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 1:32:05 PM UTC-7, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    Having been heavily involved with the NMAC's between towplane and jet traffic, it seems to me that doing nothing to secure the safety of aviation is being overlooked.
    Most of us at some time or another have seen traffic up close, too close for comfort. Our area consist of heavy traffic ranging from flight training schools to scheduled heavy jet traffic. Our club was successful in developing a program through a LOA
    to communicate with WPA, and KVRB when operating gliders. This program has helped in regard to instrument traffic being advised of gliders operating, and local traffic being advised through ATIS.
    The problem still exist as most training and private jet traffic operators are too busy looking at those fancy glass screens instead of making note of traffic upon visual approach.
    Why hasn't the FAA endorsed the portable ADSB units that are accepted in the UK, Australia, and New Zealand? The success of the portable ADSB unit in those countries has led to increased safety. A portable unit like the SkyEcho, from uAvioni could be a
    gamechanger for general aviation. Sailplanes would benefit along with many other forms of aviation. The ability to carry a portable unit with a 50 mile range could have and will save lives.
    Glider clubs all over the country would benefit, the cost reduction vs an installed unit would be substantial. OBTP
    Could you install Mode C transponders in club aircraft? There are many used ones for sale cheap. Not as good overall as ADSB, but a lot cheaper, and it'd keep the passenger aircraft away. My Mode C job works well for me - no airliners nearby since I
    installed one about 15 years ago.
    Eric

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From youngblood8116@gmail.com@21:1/5 to Eric Greenwell on Tue Sep 26 16:25:19 2023
    On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 5:53:32 PM UTC-4, Eric Greenwell wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 1:32:05 PM UTC-7, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    Having been heavily involved with the NMAC's between towplane and jet traffic, it seems to me that doing nothing to secure the safety of aviation is being overlooked.
    Most of us at some time or another have seen traffic up close, too close for comfort. Our area consist of heavy traffic ranging from flight training schools to scheduled heavy jet traffic. Our club was successful in developing a program through a LOA
    to communicate with WPA, and KVRB when operating gliders. This program has helped in regard to instrument traffic being advised of gliders operating, and local traffic being advised through ATIS.
    The problem still exist as most training and private jet traffic operators are too busy looking at those fancy glass screens instead of making note of traffic upon visual approach.
    Why hasn't the FAA endorsed the portable ADSB units that are accepted in the UK, Australia, and New Zealand? The success of the portable ADSB unit in those countries has led to increased safety. A portable unit like the SkyEcho, from uAvioni could be
    a gamechanger for general aviation. Sailplanes would benefit along with many other forms of aviation. The ability to carry a portable unit with a 50 mile range could have and will save lives.
    Glider clubs all over the country would benefit, the cost reduction vs an installed unit would be substantial. OBTP
    Could you install Mode C transponders in club aircraft? There are many used ones for sale cheap. Not as good overall as ADSB, but a lot cheaper, and it'd keep the passenger aircraft away. My Mode C job works well for me - no airliners nearby since I
    installed one about 15 years ago.
    Eric
    Eric, we could, but that would not solve the problem. The technology is out there, it is proven, it is affordable, and would provide a much better safety net than a mode c. The problem is that the FAA has required the ADSB to be a permanent installation.
    Why is a portable unit not acceptable, probably because the ADSB is used as an enforcement tool. Would it not provide a more safe environment if a driver received a warning through his fancy glass screen rather than by ATC advising. Take a look at the
    portable unit, it could fill the need of general aviation such as gliders, paragliders, hang gliders, gyro craft, and a lot more. Remember the Cessna Caravan that clobbered the paraglider in Texas, that could have been avoided with a simple portable ADSB.
    OBTP

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From 2G@21:1/5 to youngbl...@gmail.com on Wed Sep 27 17:55:29 2023
    On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 1:32:05 PM UTC-7, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    Having been heavily involved with the NMAC's between towplane and jet traffic, it seems to me that doing nothing to secure the safety of aviation is being overlooked.
    Most of us at some time or another have seen traffic up close, too close for comfort. Our area consist of heavy traffic ranging from flight training schools to scheduled heavy jet traffic. Our club was successful in developing a program through a LOA
    to communicate with WPA, and KVRB when operating gliders. This program has helped in regard to instrument traffic being advised of gliders operating, and local traffic being advised through ATIS.
    The problem still exist as most training and private jet traffic operators are too busy looking at those fancy glass screens instead of making note of traffic upon visual approach.
    Why hasn't the FAA endorsed the portable ADSB units that are accepted in the UK, Australia, and New Zealand? The success of the portable ADSB unit in those countries has led to increased safety. A portable unit like the SkyEcho, from uAvioni could be a
    gamechanger for general aviation. Sailplanes would benefit along with many other forms of aviation. The ability to carry a portable unit with a 50 mile range could have and will save lives.
    Glider clubs all over the country would benefit, the cost reduction vs an installed unit would be substantial. OBTP

    I have commented in the past that you DO NOT have an operating transponder, and certainly not ADS-B, in your own tow plane. You replied that you have this LOA; note to the uninformed, that an LOA is a PIECE OF PAPER, not an anti-collision instrument.
    Maybe you have installed this equipment since then; if so, then disregard this post; if you haven't then INSTALL THEM AS SOON AS POSSIBLE!

    Tom 2G

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From youngblood8116@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Thu Sep 28 04:50:34 2023
    On Wednesday, September 27, 2023 at 8:55:32 PM UTC-4, 2G wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 1:32:05 PM UTC-7, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    Having been heavily involved with the NMAC's between towplane and jet traffic, it seems to me that doing nothing to secure the safety of aviation is being overlooked.
    Most of us at some time or another have seen traffic up close, too close for comfort. Our area consist of heavy traffic ranging from flight training schools to scheduled heavy jet traffic. Our club was successful in developing a program through a LOA
    to communicate with WPA, and KVRB when operating gliders. This program has helped in regard to instrument traffic being advised of gliders operating, and local traffic being advised through ATIS.
    The problem still exist as most training and private jet traffic operators are too busy looking at those fancy glass screens instead of making note of traffic upon visual approach.
    Why hasn't the FAA endorsed the portable ADSB units that are accepted in the UK, Australia, and New Zealand? The success of the portable ADSB unit in those countries has led to increased safety. A portable unit like the SkyEcho, from uAvioni could be
    a gamechanger for general aviation. Sailplanes would benefit along with many other forms of aviation. The ability to carry a portable unit with a 50 mile range could have and will save lives.
    Glider clubs all over the country would benefit, the cost reduction vs an installed unit would be substantial. OBTP
    I have commented in the past that you DO NOT have an operating transponder, and certainly not ADS-B, in your own tow plane. You replied that you have this LOA; note to the uninformed, that an LOA is a PIECE OF PAPER, not an anti-collision instrument.
    Maybe you have installed this equipment since then; if so, then disregard this post; if you haven't then INSTALL THEM AS SOON AS POSSIBLE!

    Tom 2G
    Terrible Tommy, the transponder has been installed in the Pawnee, you went bananas when you could not track the Pawnee out of California, remember??? Our code is a special transponder code that was initiated by the FAA for the purpose of tracking our
    operations . You seem to be ignorant of the difference between transponder and ADSB as you should certainly know the operating and informative differences. My point is that there is technology available today that would insure greater aviation safety at
    a greatly reduced cost that could be made available but is not being allowed because of big brother, I guess that is our only point of agreement.
    Making a small unit like Skyecho would and could be a game changer for many areas of aviation as I have previously pointed out, my point is the FAA should get into the ball game and allow the codes from the portable units to be received and transmitted
    through the ADSB system. My question would be is this something that cannot be done or is it something that they just don't want to do because of the portability. OLD BOB, THE PURIST

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Eric Greenwell@21:1/5 to youngbl...@gmail.com on Thu Sep 28 06:29:24 2023
    On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 4:50:37 AM UTC-7, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Wednesday, September 27, 2023 at 8:55:32 PM UTC-4, 2G wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 1:32:05 PM UTC-7, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    Having been heavily involved with the NMAC's between towplane and jet traffic, it seems to me that doing nothing to secure the safety of aviation is being overlooked.
    Most of us at some time or another have seen traffic up close, too close for comfort. Our area consist of heavy traffic ranging from flight training schools to scheduled heavy jet traffic. Our club was successful in developing a program through a
    LOA to communicate with WPA, and KVRB when operating gliders. This program has helped in regard to instrument traffic being advised of gliders operating, and local traffic being advised through ATIS.
    The problem still exist as most training and private jet traffic operators are too busy looking at those fancy glass screens instead of making note of traffic upon visual approach.
    Why hasn't the FAA endorsed the portable ADSB units that are accepted in the UK, Australia, and New Zealand? The success of the portable ADSB unit in those countries has led to increased safety. A portable unit like the SkyEcho, from uAvioni could
    be a gamechanger for general aviation. Sailplanes would benefit along with many other forms of aviation. The ability to carry a portable unit with a 50 mile range could have and will save lives.
    Glider clubs all over the country would benefit, the cost reduction vs an installed unit would be substantial. OBTP
    I have commented in the past that you DO NOT have an operating transponder, and certainly not ADS-B, in your own tow plane. You replied that you have this LOA; note to the uninformed, that an LOA is a PIECE OF PAPER, not an anti-collision instrument.
    Maybe you have installed this equipment since then; if so, then disregard this post; if you haven't then INSTALL THEM AS SOON AS POSSIBLE!

    Tom 2G
    Terrible Tommy, the transponder has been installed in the Pawnee, you went bananas when you could not track the Pawnee out of California, remember??? Our code is a special transponder code that was initiated by the FAA for the purpose of tracking our
    operations . You seem to be ignorant of the difference between transponder and ADSB as you should certainly know the operating and informative differences. My point is that there is technology available today that would insure greater aviation safety at
    a greatly reduced cost that could be made available but is not being allowed because of big brother, I guess that is our only point of agreement.
    Making a small unit like Skyecho would and could be a game changer for many areas of aviation as I have previously pointed out, my point is the FAA should get into the ball game and allow the codes from the portable units to be received and transmitted
    through the ADSB system. My question would be is this something that cannot be done or is it something that they just don't want to do because of the portability. OLD BOB, THE PURIST
    How many gliders are flying out of Hibiscus without a transponder or ADSB? Why don't those pilots install at least a Mode C transponder? Why aren't you encouraging them to do so?

    For the price of a SkyEcho, a pilot flying from Hibiscus can likely have a good used Mode C transponder installed. Collision protection now, no waiting for the FAA to agree with you.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dan Kvinge@21:1/5 to Eric Greenwell on Thu Sep 28 12:03:39 2023
    On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 8:29:27 AM UTC-5, Eric Greenwell wrote:
    On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 4:50:37 AM UTC-7, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Wednesday, September 27, 2023 at 8:55:32 PM UTC-4, 2G wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 1:32:05 PM UTC-7, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    Having been heavily involved with the NMAC's between towplane and jet traffic, it seems to me that doing nothing to secure the safety of aviation is being overlooked.
    Most of us at some time or another have seen traffic up close, too close for comfort. Our area consist of heavy traffic ranging from flight training schools to scheduled heavy jet traffic. Our club was successful in developing a program through a
    LOA to communicate with WPA, and KVRB when operating gliders. This program has helped in regard to instrument traffic being advised of gliders operating, and local traffic being advised through ATIS.
    The problem still exist as most training and private jet traffic operators are too busy looking at those fancy glass screens instead of making note of traffic upon visual approach.
    Why hasn't the FAA endorsed the portable ADSB units that are accepted in the UK, Australia, and New Zealand? The success of the portable ADSB unit in those countries has led to increased safety. A portable unit like the SkyEcho, from uAvioni
    could be a gamechanger for general aviation. Sailplanes would benefit along with many other forms of aviation. The ability to carry a portable unit with a 50 mile range could have and will save lives.
    Glider clubs all over the country would benefit, the cost reduction vs an installed unit would be substantial. OBTP
    I have commented in the past that you DO NOT have an operating transponder, and certainly not ADS-B, in your own tow plane. You replied that you have this LOA; note to the uninformed, that an LOA is a PIECE OF PAPER, not an anti-collision
    instrument. Maybe you have installed this equipment since then; if so, then disregard this post; if you haven't then INSTALL THEM AS SOON AS POSSIBLE!

    Tom 2G
    Terrible Tommy, the transponder has been installed in the Pawnee, you went bananas when you could not track the Pawnee out of California, remember??? Our code is a special transponder code that was initiated by the FAA for the purpose of tracking our
    operations . You seem to be ignorant of the difference between transponder and ADSB as you should certainly know the operating and informative differences. My point is that there is technology available today that would insure greater aviation safety at
    a greatly reduced cost that could be made available but is not being allowed because of big brother, I guess that is our only point of agreement.
    Making a small unit like Skyecho would and could be a game changer for many areas of aviation as I have previously pointed out, my point is the FAA should get into the ball game and allow the codes from the portable units to be received and
    transmitted through the ADSB system. My question would be is this something that cannot be done or is it something that they just don't want to do because of the portability. OLD BOB, THE PURIST
    How many gliders are flying out of Hibiscus without a transponder or ADSB? Why don't those pilots install at least a Mode C transponder? Why aren't you encouraging them to do so?

    For the price of a SkyEcho, a pilot flying from Hibiscus can likely have a good used Mode C transponder installed. Collision protection now, no waiting for the FAA to agree with you.

    I definitely agree with Bob on this. The low-power portable ADSB-out devices are perfect for gliders, 95% of whom never go into controlled airspace. uAvionix makes many ADSB-out devices that work perfectly without a transponder for broadcasting ADSB
    position continuously. Some also have transponders built into them and those typically have ADSB-in via GDL-90 format that Foreflight and other software can decode and display. Some are meant for drones but would also work perfectly for gliders with
    their light weight and very low power needs. They report both GPS position and barometric altitude. Mode C transponder also doesn't seem very realistic for cramming into a limited space and limited power glider.

    I am amazed and so disappointed that the FAA doesn't approve these devices as UK, NZ and AU have done. Those countries have a program called Electronic Conspicuity, and their full focus is on how to make planes more easily visible, using the readily
    available technology of today, not from 20 years ago.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From youngblood8116@gmail.com@21:1/5 to Dan Kvinge on Thu Sep 28 13:59:42 2023
    On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 3:03:42 PM UTC-4, Dan Kvinge wrote:
    On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 8:29:27 AM UTC-5, Eric Greenwell wrote:
    On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 4:50:37 AM UTC-7, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Wednesday, September 27, 2023 at 8:55:32 PM UTC-4, 2G wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 1:32:05 PM UTC-7, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    Having been heavily involved with the NMAC's between towplane and jet traffic, it seems to me that doing nothing to secure the safety of aviation is being overlooked.
    Most of us at some time or another have seen traffic up close, too close for comfort. Our area consist of heavy traffic ranging from flight training schools to scheduled heavy jet traffic. Our club was successful in developing a program through
    a LOA to communicate with WPA, and KVRB when operating gliders. This program has helped in regard to instrument traffic being advised of gliders operating, and local traffic being advised through ATIS.
    The problem still exist as most training and private jet traffic operators are too busy looking at those fancy glass screens instead of making note of traffic upon visual approach.
    Why hasn't the FAA endorsed the portable ADSB units that are accepted in the UK, Australia, and New Zealand? The success of the portable ADSB unit in those countries has led to increased safety. A portable unit like the SkyEcho, from uAvioni
    could be a gamechanger for general aviation. Sailplanes would benefit along with many other forms of aviation. The ability to carry a portable unit with a 50 mile range could have and will save lives.
    Glider clubs all over the country would benefit, the cost reduction vs an installed unit would be substantial. OBTP
    I have commented in the past that you DO NOT have an operating transponder, and certainly not ADS-B, in your own tow plane. You replied that you have this LOA; note to the uninformed, that an LOA is a PIECE OF PAPER, not an anti-collision
    instrument. Maybe you have installed this equipment since then; if so, then disregard this post; if you haven't then INSTALL THEM AS SOON AS POSSIBLE!

    Tom 2G
    Terrible Tommy, the transponder has been installed in the Pawnee, you went bananas when you could not track the Pawnee out of California, remember??? Our code is a special transponder code that was initiated by the FAA for the purpose of tracking
    our operations . You seem to be ignorant of the difference between transponder and ADSB as you should certainly know the operating and informative differences. My point is that there is technology available today that would insure greater aviation safety
    at a greatly reduced cost that could be made available but is not being allowed because of big brother, I guess that is our only point of agreement.
    Making a small unit like Skyecho would and could be a game changer for many areas of aviation as I have previously pointed out, my point is the FAA should get into the ball game and allow the codes from the portable units to be received and
    transmitted through the ADSB system. My question would be is this something that cannot be done or is it something that they just don't want to do because of the portability. OLD BOB, THE PURIST
    How many gliders are flying out of Hibiscus without a transponder or ADSB? Why don't those pilots install at least a Mode C transponder? Why aren't you encouraging them to do so?

    For the price of a SkyEcho, a pilot flying from Hibiscus can likely have a good used Mode C transponder installed. Collision protection now, no waiting for the FAA to agree with you.
    I definitely agree with Bob on this. The low-power portable ADSB-out devices are perfect for gliders, 95% of whom never go into controlled airspace. uAvionix makes many ADSB-out devices that work perfectly without a transponder for broadcasting ADSB
    position continuously. Some also have transponders built into them and those typically have ADSB-in via GDL-90 format that Foreflight and other software can decode and display. Some are meant for drones but would also work perfectly for gliders with
    their light weight and very low power needs. They report both GPS position and barometric altitude. Mode C transponder also doesn't seem very realistic for cramming into a limited space and limited power glider.

    I am amazed and so disappointed that the FAA doesn't approve these devices as UK, NZ and AU have done. Those countries have a program called Electronic Conspicuity, and their full focus is on how to make planes more easily visible, using the readily
    available technology of today, not from 20 years ago.
    Dan, you are 100% correct, one guy wrote me and stated that TCAS protects all of us, I almost soiled my pants laughing so hard. The technology is there, proven and available, why not make it acceptable. ADSB is registered by aircraft, owner, type, and
    much more, not thinking out of the box and adopting a portable unit is not doing many forms of general aviation and service. Installing mode c transponders in a 2-33 or a 1-26, or other training type aircraft is not feasible for many operations,
    including ours.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Eric Greenwell@21:1/5 to Dan Kvinge on Thu Sep 28 20:50:36 2023
    On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 12:03:42 PM UTC-7, Dan Kvinge wrote:
    On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 8:29:27 AM UTC-5, Eric Greenwell wrote:
    On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 4:50:37 AM UTC-7, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Wednesday, September 27, 2023 at 8:55:32 PM UTC-4, 2G wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 1:32:05 PM UTC-7, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    Having been heavily involved with the NMAC's between towplane and jet traffic, it seems to me that doing nothing to secure the safety of aviation is being overlooked.
    Most of us at some time or another have seen traffic up close, too close for comfort. Our area consist of heavy traffic ranging from flight training schools to scheduled heavy jet traffic. Our club was successful in developing a program through
    a LOA to communicate with WPA, and KVRB when operating gliders. This program has helped in regard to instrument traffic being advised of gliders operating, and local traffic being advised through ATIS.
    The problem still exist as most training and private jet traffic operators are too busy looking at those fancy glass screens instead of making note of traffic upon visual approach.
    Why hasn't the FAA endorsed the portable ADSB units that are accepted in the UK, Australia, and New Zealand? The success of the portable ADSB unit in those countries has led to increased safety. A portable unit like the SkyEcho, from uAvioni
    could be a gamechanger for general aviation. Sailplanes would benefit along with many other forms of aviation. The ability to carry a portable unit with a 50 mile range could have and will save lives.
    Glider clubs all over the country would benefit, the cost reduction vs an installed unit would be substantial. OBTP
    I have commented in the past that you DO NOT have an operating transponder, and certainly not ADS-B, in your own tow plane. You replied that you have this LOA; note to the uninformed, that an LOA is a PIECE OF PAPER, not an anti-collision
    instrument. Maybe you have installed this equipment since then; if so, then disregard this post; if you haven't then INSTALL THEM AS SOON AS POSSIBLE!

    Tom 2G
    Terrible Tommy, the transponder has been installed in the Pawnee, you went bananas when you could not track the Pawnee out of California, remember??? Our code is a special transponder code that was initiated by the FAA for the purpose of tracking
    our operations . You seem to be ignorant of the difference between transponder and ADSB as you should certainly know the operating and informative differences. My point is that there is technology available today that would insure greater aviation safety
    at a greatly reduced cost that could be made available but is not being allowed because of big brother, I guess that is our only point of agreement.
    Making a small unit like Skyecho would and could be a game changer for many areas of aviation as I have previously pointed out, my point is the FAA should get into the ball game and allow the codes from the portable units to be received and
    transmitted through the ADSB system. My question would be is this something that cannot be done or is it something that they just don't want to do because of the portability. OLD BOB, THE PURIST
    How many gliders are flying out of Hibiscus without a transponder or ADSB? Why don't those pilots install at least a Mode C transponder? Why aren't you encouraging them to do so?

    For the price of a SkyEcho, a pilot flying from Hibiscus can likely have a good used Mode C transponder installed. Collision protection now, no waiting for the FAA to agree with you.
    I definitely agree with Bob on this. The low-power portable ADSB-out devices are perfect for gliders, 95% of whom never go into controlled airspace. uAvionix makes many ADSB-out devices that work perfectly without a transponder for broadcasting ADSB
    position continuously. Some also have transponders built into them and those typically have ADSB-in via GDL-90 format that Foreflight and other software can decode and display. Some are meant for drones but would also work perfectly for gliders with
    their light weight and very low power needs. They report both GPS position and barometric altitude. Mode C transponder also doesn't seem very realistic for cramming into a limited space and limited power glider.

    I am amazed and so disappointed that the FAA doesn't approve these devices as UK, NZ and AU have done. Those countries have a program called Electronic Conspicuity, and their full focus is on how to make planes more easily visible, using the readily
    available technology of today, not from 20 years ago.
    " Mode C transponder also doesn't seem very realistic for cramming into a limited space and limited power glider." Mode C has been easily and successfully "crammed" into a lot of gliders over the last 20. It's not much harder than putting in a radio of
    the same vintage, which almost every glider has. The main issue is the additional power consumption, but with today's LFP batteries, that can be supplied easily, too.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From youngblood8116@gmail.com@21:1/5 to Eric Greenwell on Fri Sep 29 04:27:58 2023
    On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 11:50:39 PM UTC-4, Eric Greenwell wrote:
    On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 12:03:42 PM UTC-7, Dan Kvinge wrote:
    On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 8:29:27 AM UTC-5, Eric Greenwell wrote:
    On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 4:50:37 AM UTC-7, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Wednesday, September 27, 2023 at 8:55:32 PM UTC-4, 2G wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 1:32:05 PM UTC-7, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    Having been heavily involved with the NMAC's between towplane and jet traffic, it seems to me that doing nothing to secure the safety of aviation is being overlooked.
    Most of us at some time or another have seen traffic up close, too close for comfort. Our area consist of heavy traffic ranging from flight training schools to scheduled heavy jet traffic. Our club was successful in developing a program
    through a LOA to communicate with WPA, and KVRB when operating gliders. This program has helped in regard to instrument traffic being advised of gliders operating, and local traffic being advised through ATIS.
    The problem still exist as most training and private jet traffic operators are too busy looking at those fancy glass screens instead of making note of traffic upon visual approach.
    Why hasn't the FAA endorsed the portable ADSB units that are accepted in the UK, Australia, and New Zealand? The success of the portable ADSB unit in those countries has led to increased safety. A portable unit like the SkyEcho, from uAvioni
    could be a gamechanger for general aviation. Sailplanes would benefit along with many other forms of aviation. The ability to carry a portable unit with a 50 mile range could have and will save lives.
    Glider clubs all over the country would benefit, the cost reduction vs an installed unit would be substantial. OBTP
    I have commented in the past that you DO NOT have an operating transponder, and certainly not ADS-B, in your own tow plane. You replied that you have this LOA; note to the uninformed, that an LOA is a PIECE OF PAPER, not an anti-collision
    instrument. Maybe you have installed this equipment since then; if so, then disregard this post; if you haven't then INSTALL THEM AS SOON AS POSSIBLE!

    Tom 2G
    Terrible Tommy, the transponder has been installed in the Pawnee, you went bananas when you could not track the Pawnee out of California, remember??? Our code is a special transponder code that was initiated by the FAA for the purpose of tracking
    our operations . You seem to be ignorant of the difference between transponder and ADSB as you should certainly know the operating and informative differences. My point is that there is technology available today that would insure greater aviation safety
    at a greatly reduced cost that could be made available but is not being allowed because of big brother, I guess that is our only point of agreement.
    Making a small unit like Skyecho would and could be a game changer for many areas of aviation as I have previously pointed out, my point is the FAA should get into the ball game and allow the codes from the portable units to be received and
    transmitted through the ADSB system. My question would be is this something that cannot be done or is it something that they just don't want to do because of the portability. OLD BOB, THE PURIST
    How many gliders are flying out of Hibiscus without a transponder or ADSB? Why don't those pilots install at least a Mode C transponder? Why aren't you encouraging them to do so?

    For the price of a SkyEcho, a pilot flying from Hibiscus can likely have a good used Mode C transponder installed. Collision protection now, no waiting for the FAA to agree with you.
    I definitely agree with Bob on this. The low-power portable ADSB-out devices are perfect for gliders, 95% of whom never go into controlled airspace. uAvionix makes many ADSB-out devices that work perfectly without a transponder for broadcasting ADSB
    position continuously. Some also have transponders built into them and those typically have ADSB-in via GDL-90 format that Foreflight and other software can decode and display. Some are meant for drones but would also work perfectly for gliders with
    their light weight and very low power needs. They report both GPS position and barometric altitude. Mode C transponder also doesn't seem very realistic for cramming into a limited space and limited power glider.

    I am amazed and so disappointed that the FAA doesn't approve these devices as UK, NZ and AU have done. Those countries have a program called Electronic Conspicuity, and their full focus is on how to make planes more easily visible, using the readily
    available technology of today, not from 20 years ago.
    " Mode C transponder also doesn't seem very realistic for cramming into a limited space and limited power glider." Mode C has been easily and successfully "crammed" into a lot of gliders over the last 20. It's not much harder than putting in a radio of
    the same vintage, which almost every glider has. The main issue is the additional power consumption, but with today's LFP batteries, that can be supplied easily, too.
    Eric, you are smarter than that, wake up and smell the coffee. The Transponder is not likely to save you from the most obvious collision target. When pilots are glued to their glass screens, and not watching yet just waiting for that ADSB signal the TCAS
    does not exist in their equipment, where was the TCAS when the jet came within 25 feet of my wing??? I was squalking on the TXP, yet his reply stated that he had no warning. OBTP

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gary Emerson@21:1/5 to All on Fri Sep 29 05:48:20 2023
    Hey Boober,
    Thanks for coming to RAS to whine about your situation vs doing something useful like trying to work with the FAA and negotiate real change. You must be a socialist democrat. Help me oh great government, I won't spend my money to install the proper
    equipment that is recommended, I'm just here to whine about why you won't give me what I want and take care of me.
    Old Bob, Tiny Penis

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Eric Greenwell@21:1/5 to youngbl...@gmail.com on Fri Sep 29 05:47:26 2023
    On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 4:28:01 AM UTC-7, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 11:50:39 PM UTC-4, Eric Greenwell wrote:
    On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 12:03:42 PM UTC-7, Dan Kvinge wrote:
    On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 8:29:27 AM UTC-5, Eric Greenwell wrote:
    On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 4:50:37 AM UTC-7, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Wednesday, September 27, 2023 at 8:55:32 PM UTC-4, 2G wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 1:32:05 PM UTC-7, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    Having been heavily involved with the NMAC's between towplane and jet traffic, it seems to me that doing nothing to secure the safety of aviation is being overlooked.
    Most of us at some time or another have seen traffic up close, too close for comfort. Our area consist of heavy traffic ranging from flight training schools to scheduled heavy jet traffic. Our club was successful in developing a program
    through a LOA to communicate with WPA, and KVRB when operating gliders. This program has helped in regard to instrument traffic being advised of gliders operating, and local traffic being advised through ATIS.
    The problem still exist as most training and private jet traffic operators are too busy looking at those fancy glass screens instead of making note of traffic upon visual approach.
    Why hasn't the FAA endorsed the portable ADSB units that are accepted in the UK, Australia, and New Zealand? The success of the portable ADSB unit in those countries has led to increased safety. A portable unit like the SkyEcho, from
    uAvioni could be a gamechanger for general aviation. Sailplanes would benefit along with many other forms of aviation. The ability to carry a portable unit with a 50 mile range could have and will save lives.
    Glider clubs all over the country would benefit, the cost reduction vs an installed unit would be substantial. OBTP
    I have commented in the past that you DO NOT have an operating transponder, and certainly not ADS-B, in your own tow plane. You replied that you have this LOA; note to the uninformed, that an LOA is a PIECE OF PAPER, not an anti-collision
    instrument. Maybe you have installed this equipment since then; if so, then disregard this post; if you haven't then INSTALL THEM AS SOON AS POSSIBLE!

    Tom 2G
    Terrible Tommy, the transponder has been installed in the Pawnee, you went bananas when you could not track the Pawnee out of California, remember??? Our code is a special transponder code that was initiated by the FAA for the purpose of
    tracking our operations . You seem to be ignorant of the difference between transponder and ADSB as you should certainly know the operating and informative differences. My point is that there is technology available today that would insure greater
    aviation safety at a greatly reduced cost that could be made available but is not being allowed because of big brother, I guess that is our only point of agreement.
    Making a small unit like Skyecho would and could be a game changer for many areas of aviation as I have previously pointed out, my point is the FAA should get into the ball game and allow the codes from the portable units to be received and
    transmitted through the ADSB system. My question would be is this something that cannot be done or is it something that they just don't want to do because of the portability. OLD BOB, THE PURIST
    How many gliders are flying out of Hibiscus without a transponder or ADSB? Why don't those pilots install at least a Mode C transponder? Why aren't you encouraging them to do so?

    For the price of a SkyEcho, a pilot flying from Hibiscus can likely have a good used Mode C transponder installed. Collision protection now, no waiting for the FAA to agree with you.
    I definitely agree with Bob on this. The low-power portable ADSB-out devices are perfect for gliders, 95% of whom never go into controlled airspace. uAvionix makes many ADSB-out devices that work perfectly without a transponder for broadcasting
    ADSB position continuously. Some also have transponders built into them and those typically have ADSB-in via GDL-90 format that Foreflight and other software can decode and display. Some are meant for drones but would also work perfectly for gliders with
    their light weight and very low power needs. They report both GPS position and barometric altitude. Mode C transponder also doesn't seem very realistic for cramming into a limited space and limited power glider.

    I am amazed and so disappointed that the FAA doesn't approve these devices as UK, NZ and AU have done. Those countries have a program called Electronic Conspicuity, and their full focus is on how to make planes more easily visible, using the
    readily available technology of today, not from 20 years ago.
    " Mode C transponder also doesn't seem very realistic for cramming into a limited space and limited power glider." Mode C has been easily and successfully "crammed" into a lot of gliders over the last 20. It's not much harder than putting in a radio
    of the same vintage, which almost every glider has. The main issue is the additional power consumption, but with today's LFP batteries, that can be supplied easily, too.
    Eric, you are smarter than that, wake up and smell the coffee. The Transponder is not likely to save you from the most obvious collision target. When pilots are glued to their glass screens, and not watching yet just waiting for that ADSB signal the
    TCAS does not exist in their equipment, where was the TCAS when the jet came within 25 feet of my wing??? I was squalking on the TXP, yet his reply stated that he had no warning. OBTP
    I don't claim a Mode C transponder is a perfect shield against collisions with airplanes, but I do claim it's a lot better than no transponder. Glider pilots have used Mode C (and Mode S) transponders for at least 20 years in high traffic areas like
    Minden, and they work. My personal experience was I no longer saw airliners, bizjets, and military aircraft close to me after I installed my Mode C transponder.

    I don't know what happened with you and the jet, but you don't how many close encounters were avoided because your towplane DID have a transponder. Don't let the dream of low-cost perfection (SkyEcho) keep you and your clubmates from preventing potential
    accidents now.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark628CA@21:1/5 to Gary Emerson on Fri Sep 29 05:57:00 2023
    On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 6:48:22 AM UTC-6, Gary Emerson wrote:
    Hey Boober,
    Thanks for coming to RAS to whine about your situation vs doing something useful like trying to work with the FAA and negotiate real change. You must be a socialist democrat. Help me oh great government, I won't spend my money to install the proper
    equipment that is recommended, I'm just here to whine about why you won't give me what I want and take care of me.
    Old Bob, Tiny Penis

    Let the battle begin.......
    This one has the hallmarks of a classic!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Guy Acheson@21:1/5 to All on Fri Sep 29 12:25:18 2023
    I also must support the value of a Mode S transponder.
    I had many uncomfortably close calls with Reno traffic when flying around Minden.
    Even had an Air Force refueling tanker drop out of the cloud deck on top of me once.
    Then I installed a Mode S transponder and that all ended.
    All the power planes stayed away and Reno traffic control could route traffic away from me and provide warnings to aircraft.
    In ten years of flying I only ran out of primary battery after five hours and I have a back-up battery.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From youngblood8116@gmail.com@21:1/5 to Gary Emerson on Fri Sep 29 12:38:47 2023
    On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 8:48:22 AM UTC-4, Gary Emerson wrote:
    Hey Boober,
    Thanks for coming to RAS to whine about your situation vs doing something useful like trying to work with the FAA and negotiate real change. You must be a socialist democrat. Help me oh great government, I won't spend my money to install the proper
    equipment that is recommended, I'm just here to whine about why you won't give me what I want and take care of me.
    Old Bob, Tiny Penis
    Look Richard Noggig, or I should I just call you Dickhead? I have negotiated wit the FAA, been on more than one zoom meeting, what have you done? You probably sit on your liberal ass in some liberal out west hovel looking for some crack to smoke. Old Bob,
    The Purist

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From 2G@21:1/5 to youngbl...@gmail.com on Fri Sep 29 13:44:58 2023
    On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 12:38:50 PM UTC-7, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 8:48:22 AM UTC-4, Gary Emerson wrote:
    Hey Boober,
    Thanks for coming to RAS to whine about your situation vs doing something useful like trying to work with the FAA and negotiate real change. You must be a socialist democrat. Help me oh great government, I won't spend my money to install the proper
    equipment that is recommended, I'm just here to whine about why you won't give me what I want and take care of me.
    Old Bob, Tiny Penis
    Look Richard Noggig, or I should I just call you Dickhead? I have negotiated wit the FAA, been on more than one zoom meeting, what have you done? You probably sit on your liberal ass in some liberal out west hovel looking for some crack to smoke. Old
    Bob, The Purist

    Richard, don't pay any attention to Boobie - he calls everyone who disagrees with him a "dickhead" and/or a "liberal." These rants are typical of a DSM-5 candidate.

    Tom 2G

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From 2G@21:1/5 to youngbl...@gmail.com on Fri Sep 29 13:50:53 2023
    On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 4:50:37 AM UTC-7, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Wednesday, September 27, 2023 at 8:55:32 PM UTC-4, 2G wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 1:32:05 PM UTC-7, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    Having been heavily involved with the NMAC's between towplane and jet traffic, it seems to me that doing nothing to secure the safety of aviation is being overlooked.
    Most of us at some time or another have seen traffic up close, too close for comfort. Our area consist of heavy traffic ranging from flight training schools to scheduled heavy jet traffic. Our club was successful in developing a program through a
    LOA to communicate with WPA, and KVRB when operating gliders. This program has helped in regard to instrument traffic being advised of gliders operating, and local traffic being advised through ATIS.
    The problem still exist as most training and private jet traffic operators are too busy looking at those fancy glass screens instead of making note of traffic upon visual approach.
    Why hasn't the FAA endorsed the portable ADSB units that are accepted in the UK, Australia, and New Zealand? The success of the portable ADSB unit in those countries has led to increased safety. A portable unit like the SkyEcho, from uAvioni could
    be a gamechanger for general aviation. Sailplanes would benefit along with many other forms of aviation. The ability to carry a portable unit with a 50 mile range could have and will save lives.
    Glider clubs all over the country would benefit, the cost reduction vs an installed unit would be substantial. OBTP
    I have commented in the past that you DO NOT have an operating transponder, and certainly not ADS-B, in your own tow plane. You replied that you have this LOA; note to the uninformed, that an LOA is a PIECE OF PAPER, not an anti-collision instrument.
    Maybe you have installed this equipment since then; if so, then disregard this post; if you haven't then INSTALL THEM AS SOON AS POSSIBLE!

    Tom 2G
    Terrible Tommy, the transponder has been installed in the Pawnee, you went bananas when you could not track the Pawnee out of California, remember??? Our code is a special transponder code that was initiated by the FAA for the purpose of tracking our
    operations . You seem to be ignorant of the difference between transponder and ADSB as you should certainly know the operating and informative differences. My point is that there is technology available today that would insure greater aviation safety at
    a greatly reduced cost that could be made available but is not being allowed because of big brother, I guess that is our only point of agreement.
    Making a small unit like Skyecho would and could be a game changer for many areas of aviation as I have previously pointed out, my point is the FAA should get into the ball game and allow the codes from the portable units to be received and transmitted
    through the ADSB system. My question would be is this something that cannot be done or is it something that they just don't want to do because of the portability. OLD BOB, THE PURIST

    Boobbie, I am WELL AWARE of the difference between a transponder and ADS-B: I have BOTH in my glider. And you DO NOT get a "special transponder code" that is invisible to tracking - if you have it on it WILL be tracked AND visible to websites such as
    FlightAware and FlightRadar24.

    BTW, you meant "ensure", NOT "insure"

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From youngblood8116@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Fri Sep 29 14:42:31 2023
    On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 4:50:55 PM UTC-4, 2G wrote:
    On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 4:50:37 AM UTC-7, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Wednesday, September 27, 2023 at 8:55:32 PM UTC-4, 2G wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 1:32:05 PM UTC-7, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    Having been heavily involved with the NMAC's between towplane and jet traffic, it seems to me that doing nothing to secure the safety of aviation is being overlooked.
    Most of us at some time or another have seen traffic up close, too close for comfort. Our area consist of heavy traffic ranging from flight training schools to scheduled heavy jet traffic. Our club was successful in developing a program through a
    LOA to communicate with WPA, and KVRB when operating gliders. This program has helped in regard to instrument traffic being advised of gliders operating, and local traffic being advised through ATIS.
    The problem still exist as most training and private jet traffic operators are too busy looking at those fancy glass screens instead of making note of traffic upon visual approach.
    Why hasn't the FAA endorsed the portable ADSB units that are accepted in the UK, Australia, and New Zealand? The success of the portable ADSB unit in those countries has led to increased safety. A portable unit like the SkyEcho, from uAvioni
    could be a gamechanger for general aviation. Sailplanes would benefit along with many other forms of aviation. The ability to carry a portable unit with a 50 mile range could have and will save lives.
    Glider clubs all over the country would benefit, the cost reduction vs an installed unit would be substantial. OBTP
    I have commented in the past that you DO NOT have an operating transponder, and certainly not ADS-B, in your own tow plane. You replied that you have this LOA; note to the uninformed, that an LOA is a PIECE OF PAPER, not an anti-collision
    instrument. Maybe you have installed this equipment since then; if so, then disregard this post; if you haven't then INSTALL THEM AS SOON AS POSSIBLE!

    Tom 2G
    Terrible Tommy, the transponder has been installed in the Pawnee, you went bananas when you could not track the Pawnee out of California, remember??? Our code is a special transponder code that was initiated by the FAA for the purpose of tracking our
    operations . You seem to be ignorant of the difference between transponder and ADSB as you should certainly know the operating and informative differences. My point is that there is technology available today that would insure greater aviation safety at
    a greatly reduced cost that could be made available but is not being allowed because of big brother, I guess that is our only point of agreement.
    Making a small unit like Skyecho would and could be a game changer for many areas of aviation as I have previously pointed out, my point is the FAA should get into the ball game and allow the codes from the portable units to be received and
    transmitted through the ADSB system. My question would be is this something that cannot be done or is it something that they just don't want to do because of the portability. OLD BOB, THE PURIST
    Boobbie, I am WELL AWARE of the difference between a transponder and ADS-B: I have BOTH in my glider. And you DO NOT get a "special transponder code" that is invisible to tracking - if you have it on it WILL be tracked AND visible to websites such as
    FlightAware and FlightRadar24.

    BTW, you meant "ensure", NOT "insure"
    Terrible Tommy, it is so good to be back at home feeling better and getting into your head. Yes, I do have a special transponder code. Let me help you out here, go to either of those tracking formats that you mentioned and tell me about the flights of
    N7463Z. I'll give you a hint, the transponder is on for every flight. OBTP

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From youngblood8116@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Fri Sep 29 14:36:01 2023
    On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 4:45:00 PM UTC-4, 2G wrote:
    On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 12:38:50 PM UTC-7, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 8:48:22 AM UTC-4, Gary Emerson wrote:
    Hey Boober,
    Thanks for coming to RAS to whine about your situation vs doing something useful like trying to work with the FAA and negotiate real change. You must be a socialist democrat. Help me oh great government, I won't spend my money to install the proper
    equipment that is recommended, I'm just here to whine about why you won't give me what I want and take care of me.
    Old Bob, Tiny Penis
    Look Richard Noggig, or I should I just call you Dickhead? I have negotiated wit the FAA, been on more than one zoom meeting, what have you done? You probably sit on your liberal ass in some liberal out west hovel looking for some crack to smoke. Old
    Bob, The Purist
    Richard, don't pay any attention to Boobie - he calls everyone who disagrees with him a "dickhead" and/or a "liberal." These rants are typical of a DSM-5 candidate.

    Tom 2G
    Terrible Tommy, you need to quit stealing my material, I was the one who identified you as the DSM-5 personality, come up with your own material. OBTP

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Moshe Braner@21:1/5 to All on Fri Sep 29 20:14:53 2023
    On 9/29/2023 4:50 PM, 2G wrote:
    ...
    BTW, you meant "ensure", NOT "insure"

    Ensure: take steps to prevent bad thing from happening.

    Insure: they'll pay you some money if bad thing happens.

    Assure: talk down the possibility of bad thing happening.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Moshe Braner@21:1/5 to Dan Kvinge on Fri Sep 29 20:10:24 2023
    On 9/28/2023 3:03 PM, Dan Kvinge wrote:

    I definitely agree with Bob on this. The low-power portable ADSB-out devices are perfect for gliders, 95% of whom never go into controlled airspace. uAvionix makes many ADSB-out devices that work perfectly without a transponder for broadcasting
    ADSB position continuously. Some also have transponders built into them and those typically have ADSB-in via GDL-90 format that Foreflight and other software can decode and display. Some are meant for drones but would also work perfectly for gliders
    with their light weight and very low power needs. They report both GPS position and barometric altitude. Mode C transponder also doesn't seem very realistic for cramming into a limited space and limited power glider.

    I am amazed and so disappointed that the FAA doesn't approve these devices as UK, NZ and AU have done. Those countries have a program called Electronic Conspicuity, and their full focus is on how to make planes more easily visible, using the readily
    available technology of today, not from 20 years ago.


    Yeah, in this realm, as they say, "the perfect is the enemy of the
    good". The low-power ADS-B-out devices, approved by other countries,
    would add an affordable and practical safety option here in the US. I
    think the SSA should use its clout (such as it is) to ask the FAA to
    allow the use of such devices. The 200-watt transponders are a relic of ancient tech and way overkill these days.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From 2G@21:1/5 to youngbl...@gmail.com on Fri Sep 29 18:16:54 2023
    On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 2:36:04 PM UTC-7, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 4:45:00 PM UTC-4, 2G wrote:
    On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 12:38:50 PM UTC-7, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 8:48:22 AM UTC-4, Gary Emerson wrote:
    Hey Boober,
    Thanks for coming to RAS to whine about your situation vs doing something useful like trying to work with the FAA and negotiate real change. You must be a socialist democrat. Help me oh great government, I won't spend my money to install the
    proper equipment that is recommended, I'm just here to whine about why you won't give me what I want and take care of me.
    Old Bob, Tiny Penis
    Look Richard Noggig, or I should I just call you Dickhead? I have negotiated wit the FAA, been on more than one zoom meeting, what have you done? You probably sit on your liberal ass in some liberal out west hovel looking for some crack to smoke.
    Old Bob, The Purist
    Richard, don't pay any attention to Boobie - he calls everyone who disagrees with him a "dickhead" and/or a "liberal." These rants are typical of a DSM-5 candidate.

    Tom 2G
    Terrible Tommy, you need to quit stealing my material, I was the one who identified you as the DSM-5 personality, come up with your own material. OBTP

    WOW! I didn't know that you wrote the DSM-5 - I'm IMPRESSED! Thanks for bringing up what you so closely identify with.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From 2G@21:1/5 to Dan Kvinge on Fri Sep 29 19:58:31 2023
    On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 12:03:42 PM UTC-7, Dan Kvinge wrote:
    On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 8:29:27 AM UTC-5, Eric Greenwell wrote:
    On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 4:50:37 AM UTC-7, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Wednesday, September 27, 2023 at 8:55:32 PM UTC-4, 2G wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 1:32:05 PM UTC-7, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    Having been heavily involved with the NMAC's between towplane and jet traffic, it seems to me that doing nothing to secure the safety of aviation is being overlooked.
    Most of us at some time or another have seen traffic up close, too close for comfort. Our area consist of heavy traffic ranging from flight training schools to scheduled heavy jet traffic. Our club was successful in developing a program through
    a LOA to communicate with WPA, and KVRB when operating gliders. This program has helped in regard to instrument traffic being advised of gliders operating, and local traffic being advised through ATIS.
    The problem still exist as most training and private jet traffic operators are too busy looking at those fancy glass screens instead of making note of traffic upon visual approach.
    Why hasn't the FAA endorsed the portable ADSB units that are accepted in the UK, Australia, and New Zealand? The success of the portable ADSB unit in those countries has led to increased safety. A portable unit like the SkyEcho, from uAvioni
    could be a gamechanger for general aviation. Sailplanes would benefit along with many other forms of aviation. The ability to carry a portable unit with a 50 mile range could have and will save lives.
    Glider clubs all over the country would benefit, the cost reduction vs an installed unit would be substantial. OBTP
    I have commented in the past that you DO NOT have an operating transponder, and certainly not ADS-B, in your own tow plane. You replied that you have this LOA; note to the uninformed, that an LOA is a PIECE OF PAPER, not an anti-collision
    instrument. Maybe you have installed this equipment since then; if so, then disregard this post; if you haven't then INSTALL THEM AS SOON AS POSSIBLE!

    Tom 2G
    Terrible Tommy, the transponder has been installed in the Pawnee, you went bananas when you could not track the Pawnee out of California, remember??? Our code is a special transponder code that was initiated by the FAA for the purpose of tracking
    our operations . You seem to be ignorant of the difference between transponder and ADSB as you should certainly know the operating and informative differences. My point is that there is technology available today that would insure greater aviation safety
    at a greatly reduced cost that could be made available but is not being allowed because of big brother, I guess that is our only point of agreement.
    Making a small unit like Skyecho would and could be a game changer for many areas of aviation as I have previously pointed out, my point is the FAA should get into the ball game and allow the codes from the portable units to be received and
    transmitted through the ADSB system. My question would be is this something that cannot be done or is it something that they just don't want to do because of the portability. OLD BOB, THE PURIST
    How many gliders are flying out of Hibiscus without a transponder or ADSB? Why don't those pilots install at least a Mode C transponder? Why aren't you encouraging them to do so?

    For the price of a SkyEcho, a pilot flying from Hibiscus can likely have a good used Mode C transponder installed. Collision protection now, no waiting for the FAA to agree with you.
    I definitely agree with Bob on this. The low-power portable ADSB-out devices are perfect for gliders, 95% of whom never go into controlled airspace. uAvionix makes many ADSB-out devices that work perfectly without a transponder for broadcasting ADSB
    position continuously. Some also have transponders built into them and those typically have ADSB-in via GDL-90 format that Foreflight and other software can decode and display. Some are meant for drones but would also work perfectly for gliders with
    their light weight and very low power needs. They report both GPS position and barometric altitude. Mode C transponder also doesn't seem very realistic for cramming into a limited space and limited power glider.

    I am amazed and so disappointed that the FAA doesn't approve these devices as UK, NZ and AU have done. Those countries have a program called Electronic Conspicuity, and their full focus is on how to make planes more easily visible, using the readily
    available technology of today, not from 20 years ago.

    This is just another red herring by Boobie. This is from uAvionix' website:

    SkyEcho is NOT approved for use in the United States.
    For U.S. applications, see Sentry by ForeFlight

    And there is a link to:
    https://flywithsentry.com/

    Tom 2G

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From youngblood8116@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Sat Sep 30 04:27:44 2023
    On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 10:58:33 PM UTC-4, 2G wrote:
    On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 12:03:42 PM UTC-7, Dan Kvinge wrote:
    On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 8:29:27 AM UTC-5, Eric Greenwell wrote:
    On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 4:50:37 AM UTC-7, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Wednesday, September 27, 2023 at 8:55:32 PM UTC-4, 2G wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 1:32:05 PM UTC-7, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    Having been heavily involved with the NMAC's between towplane and jet traffic, it seems to me that doing nothing to secure the safety of aviation is being overlooked.
    Most of us at some time or another have seen traffic up close, too close for comfort. Our area consist of heavy traffic ranging from flight training schools to scheduled heavy jet traffic. Our club was successful in developing a program
    through a LOA to communicate with WPA, and KVRB when operating gliders. This program has helped in regard to instrument traffic being advised of gliders operating, and local traffic being advised through ATIS.
    The problem still exist as most training and private jet traffic operators are too busy looking at those fancy glass screens instead of making note of traffic upon visual approach.
    Why hasn't the FAA endorsed the portable ADSB units that are accepted in the UK, Australia, and New Zealand? The success of the portable ADSB unit in those countries has led to increased safety. A portable unit like the SkyEcho, from uAvioni
    could be a gamechanger for general aviation. Sailplanes would benefit along with many other forms of aviation. The ability to carry a portable unit with a 50 mile range could have and will save lives.
    Glider clubs all over the country would benefit, the cost reduction vs an installed unit would be substantial. OBTP
    I have commented in the past that you DO NOT have an operating transponder, and certainly not ADS-B, in your own tow plane. You replied that you have this LOA; note to the uninformed, that an LOA is a PIECE OF PAPER, not an anti-collision
    instrument. Maybe you have installed this equipment since then; if so, then disregard this post; if you haven't then INSTALL THEM AS SOON AS POSSIBLE!

    Tom 2G
    Terrible Tommy, the transponder has been installed in the Pawnee, you went bananas when you could not track the Pawnee out of California, remember??? Our code is a special transponder code that was initiated by the FAA for the purpose of tracking
    our operations . You seem to be ignorant of the difference between transponder and ADSB as you should certainly know the operating and informative differences. My point is that there is technology available today that would insure greater aviation safety
    at a greatly reduced cost that could be made available but is not being allowed because of big brother, I guess that is our only point of agreement.
    Making a small unit like Skyecho would and could be a game changer for many areas of aviation as I have previously pointed out, my point is the FAA should get into the ball game and allow the codes from the portable units to be received and
    transmitted through the ADSB system. My question would be is this something that cannot be done or is it something that they just don't want to do because of the portability. OLD BOB, THE PURIST
    How many gliders are flying out of Hibiscus without a transponder or ADSB? Why don't those pilots install at least a Mode C transponder? Why aren't you encouraging them to do so?

    For the price of a SkyEcho, a pilot flying from Hibiscus can likely have a good used Mode C transponder installed. Collision protection now, no waiting for the FAA to agree with you.
    I definitely agree with Bob on this. The low-power portable ADSB-out devices are perfect for gliders, 95% of whom never go into controlled airspace. uAvionix makes many ADSB-out devices that work perfectly without a transponder for broadcasting ADSB
    position continuously. Some also have transponders built into them and those typically have ADSB-in via GDL-90 format that Foreflight and other software can decode and display. Some are meant for drones but would also work perfectly for gliders with
    their light weight and very low power needs. They report both GPS position and barometric altitude. Mode C transponder also doesn't seem very realistic for cramming into a limited space and limited power glider.

    I am amazed and so disappointed that the FAA doesn't approve these devices as UK, NZ and AU have done. Those countries have a program called Electronic Conspicuity, and their full focus is on how to make planes more easily visible, using the readily
    available technology of today, not from 20 years ago.
    This is just another red herring by Boobie. This is from uAvionix' website:

    SkyEcho is NOT approved for use in the United States.
    For U.S. applications, see Sentry by ForeFlight

    And there is a link to:
    https://flywithsentry.com/

    Tom 2G
    Terrible Tommie, does Sentry give you ADSB out? I will let you answer that question then follow up. OBTP

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From youngblood8116@gmail.com@21:1/5 to Moshe Braner on Sat Sep 30 04:22:07 2023
    On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 8:14:45 PM UTC-4, Moshe Braner wrote:
    On 9/29/2023 4:50 PM, 2G wrote:
    ...
    BTW, you meant "ensure", NOT "insure"
    Ensure: take steps to prevent bad thing from happening.

    Insure: they'll pay you some money if bad thing happens.

    Assure: talk down the possibility of bad thing happening.
    Thanks Moshe, just a slip of the finger. OBTP

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Hank Nixon@21:1/5 to youngbl...@gmail.com on Sat Sep 30 07:35:35 2023
    On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 4:32:05 PM UTC-4, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    Having been heavily involved with the NMAC's between towplane and jet traffic, it seems to me that doing nothing to secure the safety of aviation is being overlooked.
    Most of us at some time or another have seen traffic up close, too close for comfort. Our area consist of heavy traffic ranging from flight training schools to scheduled heavy jet traffic. Our club was successful in developing a program through a LOA
    to communicate with WPA, and KVRB when operating gliders. This program has helped in regard to instrument traffic being advised of gliders operating, and local traffic being advised through ATIS.
    The problem still exist as most training and private jet traffic operators are too busy looking at those fancy glass screens instead of making note of traffic upon visual approach.
    Why hasn't the FAA endorsed the portable ADSB units that are accepted in the UK, Australia, and New Zealand? The success of the portable ADSB unit in those countries has led to increased safety. A portable unit like the SkyEcho, from uAvioni could be a
    gamechanger for general aviation. Sailplanes would benefit along with many other forms of aviation. The ability to carry a portable unit with a 50 mile range could have and will save lives.
    Glider clubs all over the country would benefit, the cost reduction vs an installed unit would be substantial. OBTP

    I think Bobbie makes a good point. If we could add a much higher level of protection for 3 or $400 a glider I would expect a lot of pilots and clubs would go for it.
    Whether it would satisfy the objectives of Homeland Security( in my opinion the driving force behind the S(surveilance) is another question.
    It would seem to me that some of the technology that is being developed for UAV's(airspace trash to me) might also provide similar potential benefits.
    Flame suit on
    UH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark628CA@21:1/5 to All on Sat Sep 30 08:06:47 2023
    Anybody remember the FAA's attempt to require transponders in ALL aircraft back in the 1980s? This would have closed off virtually all airspace in the US to non-transponder equipped aircraft. It would mandate the installation of Mode C transponders in
    everything from hang gliders and balloons to commercial airliners, regardless of whether the aircraft had an electrical system or not. The proposal was ultimately shot down by lobbying efforts by AOPA and a massive letter writing campaign by General
    Aviation users to elected representatives in the US Congress. The number of letters received was apparently the largest response ever to a proposed Federal mandate.

    At the time, attempts were made to introduce portable transponders that would operate on battery power for use in non-electrically equipped aircraft, but the equipment was never made available due to FCC requirements and cost. Eventually, the proposed
    mandate was abandoned, only to rise again with the advent of ADS-B.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Eric Greenwell@21:1/5 to Hank Nixon on Sat Sep 30 08:25:25 2023
    On Saturday, September 30, 2023 at 7:35:38 AM UTC-7, Hank Nixon wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 4:32:05 PM UTC-4, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    Having been heavily involved with the NMAC's between towplane and jet traffic, it seems to me that doing nothing to secure the safety of aviation is being overlooked.
    Most of us at some time or another have seen traffic up close, too close for comfort. Our area consist of heavy traffic ranging from flight training schools to scheduled heavy jet traffic. Our club was successful in developing a program through a LOA
    to communicate with WPA, and KVRB when operating gliders. This program has helped in regard to instrument traffic being advised of gliders operating, and local traffic being advised through ATIS.
    The problem still exist as most training and private jet traffic operators are too busy looking at those fancy glass screens instead of making note of traffic upon visual approach.
    Why hasn't the FAA endorsed the portable ADSB units that are accepted in the UK, Australia, and New Zealand? The success of the portable ADSB unit in those countries has led to increased safety. A portable unit like the SkyEcho, from uAvioni could be
    a gamechanger for general aviation. Sailplanes would benefit along with many other forms of aviation. The ability to carry a portable unit with a 50 mile range could have and will save lives.
    Glider clubs all over the country would benefit, the cost reduction vs an installed unit would be substantial. OBTP
    I think Bobbie makes a good point. If we could add a much higher level of protection for 3 or $400 a glider I would expect a lot of pilots and clubs would go for it.
    Whether it would satisfy the objectives of Homeland Security( in my opinion the driving force behind the S(surveilance) is another question.
    It would seem to me that some of the technology that is being developed for UAV's(airspace trash to me) might also provide similar potential benefits.
    Flame suit on
    UH
    SkyEcho is about $650 (US dollars), so well within the "affordable" range. As far as I can determine, it's allowed only in the UK, Australia, and New Zealand. Why it's not available more widely, I don't know, but the UK does have a history of "lighter"
    regulation, such as allowing cloud flying in gliders.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From youngblood8116@gmail.com@21:1/5 to Hank Nixon on Sat Sep 30 12:21:12 2023
    On Saturday, September 30, 2023 at 10:35:38 AM UTC-4, Hank Nixon wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 4:32:05 PM UTC-4, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    Having been heavily involved with the NMAC's between towplane and jet traffic, it seems to me that doing nothing to secure the safety of aviation is being overlooked.
    Most of us at some time or another have seen traffic up close, too close for comfort. Our area consist of heavy traffic ranging from flight training schools to scheduled heavy jet traffic. Our club was successful in developing a program through a LOA
    to communicate with WPA, and KVRB when operating gliders. This program has helped in regard to instrument traffic being advised of gliders operating, and local traffic being advised through ATIS.
    The problem still exist as most training and private jet traffic operators are too busy looking at those fancy glass screens instead of making note of traffic upon visual approach.
    Why hasn't the FAA endorsed the portable ADSB units that are accepted in the UK, Australia, and New Zealand? The success of the portable ADSB unit in those countries has led to increased safety. A portable unit like the SkyEcho, from uAvioni could be
    a gamechanger for general aviation. Sailplanes would benefit along with many other forms of aviation. The ability to carry a portable unit with a 50 mile range could have and will save lives.
    Glider clubs all over the country would benefit, the cost reduction vs an installed unit would be substantial. OBTP
    I think Bobbie makes a good point. If we could add a much higher level of protection for 3 or $400 a glider I would expect a lot of pilots and clubs would go for it.
    Whether it would satisfy the objectives of Homeland Security( in my opinion the driving force behind the S(surveilance) is another question.
    It would seem to me that some of the technology that is being developed for UAV's(airspace trash to me) might also provide similar potential benefits.
    Flame suit on
    UH
    UH. you are 100% correct, if drones that you buy at Best Buy are transmitting ADSB signals why can't the glider and other sectors of aviation be equipped with a portable ADSB device, which is available and can add another layer of safety. Also, the
    ultimate goal is to see and be seen, not just see, which is a 50% factor and a 100% factor is available. Skyecho can provide a 40-50 mile protection buffer for both target aircraft, what is wrong with that? I would like for every glider in our club to
    have the ability to have a portable ADSB out available!!! This is not an argument about transponders, or TCAS, just a logical approach to increasing safety. I am relative sure that the hex codes of the portable unit could easily be received and
    identified within the system. OBTP

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Eric Greenwell@21:1/5 to youngbl...@gmail.com on Sat Sep 30 13:05:49 2023
    On Saturday, September 30, 2023 at 12:21:14 PM UTC-7, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Saturday, September 30, 2023 at 10:35:38 AM UTC-4, Hank Nixon wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 4:32:05 PM UTC-4, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    Having been heavily involved with the NMAC's between towplane and jet traffic, it seems to me that doing nothing to secure the safety of aviation is being overlooked.
    Most of us at some time or another have seen traffic up close, too close for comfort. Our area consist of heavy traffic ranging from flight training schools to scheduled heavy jet traffic. Our club was successful in developing a program through a
    LOA to communicate with WPA, and KVRB when operating gliders. This program has helped in regard to instrument traffic being advised of gliders operating, and local traffic being advised through ATIS.
    The problem still exist as most training and private jet traffic operators are too busy looking at those fancy glass screens instead of making note of traffic upon visual approach.
    Why hasn't the FAA endorsed the portable ADSB units that are accepted in the UK, Australia, and New Zealand? The success of the portable ADSB unit in those countries has led to increased safety. A portable unit like the SkyEcho, from uAvioni could
    be a gamechanger for general aviation. Sailplanes would benefit along with many other forms of aviation. The ability to carry a portable unit with a 50 mile range could have and will save lives.
    Glider clubs all over the country would benefit, the cost reduction vs an installed unit would be substantial. OBTP
    I think Bobbie makes a good point. If we could add a much higher level of protection for 3 or $400 a glider I would expect a lot of pilots and clubs would go for it.
    Whether it would satisfy the objectives of Homeland Security( in my opinion the driving force behind the S(surveilance) is another question.
    It would seem to me that some of the technology that is being developed for UAV's(airspace trash to me) might also provide similar potential benefits.
    Flame suit on
    UH
    UH. you are 100% correct, if drones that you buy at Best Buy are transmitting ADSB signals why can't the glider and other sectors of aviation be equipped with a portable ADSB device, which is available and can add another layer of safety. Also, the
    ultimate goal is to see and be seen, not just see, which is a 50% factor and a 100% factor is available. Skyecho can provide a 40-50 mile protection buffer for both target aircraft, what is wrong with that? I would like for every glider in our club to
    have the ability to have a portable ADSB out available!!! This is not an argument about transponders, or TCAS, just a logical approach to increasing safety. I am relative sure that the hex codes of the portable unit could easily be received and
    identified within the system. OBTP
    The drones from Best Buy (or any consumer drone) do not transmit ADS-B signals, but some drones made by DJI do have ADS-B in. A concern about drones emitting ADS-B signals is overwhelming the system. but DJI and others are supposed to be working on
    methods to prevent system overload. Equipping with ADS-B in would aid pilots in avoiding ADS-B equipped aircraft. Does everyone flying from Hibiscus have ADS-B in?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From youngblood8116@gmail.com@21:1/5 to Eric Greenwell on Sat Sep 30 14:24:54 2023
    On Saturday, September 30, 2023 at 4:05:52 PM UTC-4, Eric Greenwell wrote:
    On Saturday, September 30, 2023 at 12:21:14 PM UTC-7, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Saturday, September 30, 2023 at 10:35:38 AM UTC-4, Hank Nixon wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 4:32:05 PM UTC-4, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    Having been heavily involved with the NMAC's between towplane and jet traffic, it seems to me that doing nothing to secure the safety of aviation is being overlooked.
    Most of us at some time or another have seen traffic up close, too close for comfort. Our area consist of heavy traffic ranging from flight training schools to scheduled heavy jet traffic. Our club was successful in developing a program through a
    LOA to communicate with WPA, and KVRB when operating gliders. This program has helped in regard to instrument traffic being advised of gliders operating, and local traffic being advised through ATIS.
    The problem still exist as most training and private jet traffic operators are too busy looking at those fancy glass screens instead of making note of traffic upon visual approach.
    Why hasn't the FAA endorsed the portable ADSB units that are accepted in the UK, Australia, and New Zealand? The success of the portable ADSB unit in those countries has led to increased safety. A portable unit like the SkyEcho, from uAvioni
    could be a gamechanger for general aviation. Sailplanes would benefit along with many other forms of aviation. The ability to carry a portable unit with a 50 mile range could have and will save lives.
    Glider clubs all over the country would benefit, the cost reduction vs an installed unit would be substantial. OBTP
    I think Bobbie makes a good point. If we could add a much higher level of protection for 3 or $400 a glider I would expect a lot of pilots and clubs would go for it.
    Whether it would satisfy the objectives of Homeland Security( in my opinion the driving force behind the S(surveilance) is another question.
    It would seem to me that some of the technology that is being developed for UAV's(airspace trash to me) might also provide similar potential benefits.
    Flame suit on
    UH
    UH. you are 100% correct, if drones that you buy at Best Buy are transmitting ADSB signals why can't the glider and other sectors of aviation be equipped with a portable ADSB device, which is available and can add another layer of safety. Also, the
    ultimate goal is to see and be seen, not just see, which is a 50% factor and a 100% factor is available. Skyecho can provide a 40-50 mile protection buffer for both target aircraft, what is wrong with that? I would like for every glider in our club to
    have the ability to have a portable ADSB out available!!! This is not an argument about transponders, or TCAS, just a logical approach to increasing safety. I am relative sure that the hex codes of the portable unit could easily be received and
    identified within the system. OBTP
    The drones from Best Buy (or any consumer drone) do not transmit ADS-B signals, but some drones made by DJI do have ADS-B in. A concern about drones emitting ADS-B signals is overwhelming the system. but DJI and others are supposed to be working on
    methods to prevent system overload. Equipping with ADS-B in would aid pilots in avoiding ADS-B equipped aircraft. Does everyone flying from Hibiscus have ADS-B in?
    I do know a bit about drones, I have about ten of them, authorization is required for ADSB out , the FAA has required that UAS operators receiving ATC services must have ADSB out, it does get a bit crazy at times. No, not all operators at Hibiscus have
    ADSB in, probably most gliders in this country do not either . OBTP

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Eric Greenwell@21:1/5 to youngbl...@gmail.com on Sat Sep 30 19:53:56 2023
    On Saturday, September 30, 2023 at 2:24:57 PM UTC-7, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Saturday, September 30, 2023 at 4:05:52 PM UTC-4, Eric Greenwell wrote:
    On Saturday, September 30, 2023 at 12:21:14 PM UTC-7, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Saturday, September 30, 2023 at 10:35:38 AM UTC-4, Hank Nixon wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 4:32:05 PM UTC-4, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    Having been heavily involved with the NMAC's between towplane and jet traffic, it seems to me that doing nothing to secure the safety of aviation is being overlooked.
    Most of us at some time or another have seen traffic up close, too close for comfort. Our area consist of heavy traffic ranging from flight training schools to scheduled heavy jet traffic. Our club was successful in developing a program through
    a LOA to communicate with WPA, and KVRB when operating gliders. This program has helped in regard to instrument traffic being advised of gliders operating, and local traffic being advised through ATIS.
    The problem still exist as most training and private jet traffic operators are too busy looking at those fancy glass screens instead of making note of traffic upon visual approach.
    Why hasn't the FAA endorsed the portable ADSB units that are accepted in the UK, Australia, and New Zealand? The success of the portable ADSB unit in those countries has led to increased safety. A portable unit like the SkyEcho, from uAvioni
    could be a gamechanger for general aviation. Sailplanes would benefit along with many other forms of aviation. The ability to carry a portable unit with a 50 mile range could have and will save lives.
    Glider clubs all over the country would benefit, the cost reduction vs an installed unit would be substantial. OBTP
    I think Bobbie makes a good point. If we could add a much higher level of protection for 3 or $400 a glider I would expect a lot of pilots and clubs would go for it.
    Whether it would satisfy the objectives of Homeland Security( in my opinion the driving force behind the S(surveilance) is another question.
    It would seem to me that some of the technology that is being developed for UAV's(airspace trash to me) might also provide similar potential benefits.
    Flame suit on
    UH
    UH. you are 100% correct, if drones that you buy at Best Buy are transmitting ADSB signals why can't the glider and other sectors of aviation be equipped with a portable ADSB device, which is available and can add another layer of safety. Also, the
    ultimate goal is to see and be seen, not just see, which is a 50% factor and a 100% factor is available. Skyecho can provide a 40-50 mile protection buffer for both target aircraft, what is wrong with that? I would like for every glider in our club to
    have the ability to have a portable ADSB out available!!! This is not an argument about transponders, or TCAS, just a logical approach to increasing safety. I am relative sure that the hex codes of the portable unit could easily be received and
    identified within the system. OBTP
    The drones from Best Buy (or any consumer drone) do not transmit ADS-B signals, but some drones made by DJI do have ADS-B in. A concern about drones emitting ADS-B signals is overwhelming the system. but DJI and others are supposed to be working on
    methods to prevent system overload. Equipping with ADS-B in would aid pilots in avoiding ADS-B equipped aircraft. Does everyone flying from Hibiscus have ADS-B in?
    I do know a bit about drones, I have about ten of them, authorization is required for ADSB out , the FAA has required that UAS operators receiving ATC services must have ADSB out, it does get a bit crazy at times. No, not all operators at Hibiscus have
    ADSB in, probably most gliders in this country do not either . OBTP
    You wrote: "if drones that you buy at Best Buy are transmitting ADSB signals why can't the glider and other sectors of aviation be equipped with a portable ADSB device"

    Did you get it from Best Buy? Did have it ADSB Out when you walked out the door with it? Nope, it's more complicated than that. My point is ADSB is not in consumer level drones that anyone can just walk into a store and buy, so the response to your
    remark "if drones that you buy at Best Buy ..." is "you can't buy drones from Best Buy that are transmitting ADS-B".

    The major practical reason is the very large numbers of consumer drones could/would overwhelm the system, but I'm sure there are several other reasons.

    Eric

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From youngblood8116@gmail.com@21:1/5 to Eric Greenwell on Sun Oct 1 03:26:10 2023
    On Saturday, September 30, 2023 at 10:53:59 PM UTC-4, Eric Greenwell wrote:
    On Saturday, September 30, 2023 at 2:24:57 PM UTC-7, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Saturday, September 30, 2023 at 4:05:52 PM UTC-4, Eric Greenwell wrote:
    On Saturday, September 30, 2023 at 12:21:14 PM UTC-7, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Saturday, September 30, 2023 at 10:35:38 AM UTC-4, Hank Nixon wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 4:32:05 PM UTC-4, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    Having been heavily involved with the NMAC's between towplane and jet traffic, it seems to me that doing nothing to secure the safety of aviation is being overlooked.
    Most of us at some time or another have seen traffic up close, too close for comfort. Our area consist of heavy traffic ranging from flight training schools to scheduled heavy jet traffic. Our club was successful in developing a program
    through a LOA to communicate with WPA, and KVRB when operating gliders. This program has helped in regard to instrument traffic being advised of gliders operating, and local traffic being advised through ATIS.
    The problem still exist as most training and private jet traffic operators are too busy looking at those fancy glass screens instead of making note of traffic upon visual approach.
    Why hasn't the FAA endorsed the portable ADSB units that are accepted in the UK, Australia, and New Zealand? The success of the portable ADSB unit in those countries has led to increased safety. A portable unit like the SkyEcho, from uAvioni
    could be a gamechanger for general aviation. Sailplanes would benefit along with many other forms of aviation. The ability to carry a portable unit with a 50 mile range could have and will save lives.
    Glider clubs all over the country would benefit, the cost reduction vs an installed unit would be substantial. OBTP
    I think Bobbie makes a good point. If we could add a much higher level of protection for 3 or $400 a glider I would expect a lot of pilots and clubs would go for it.
    Whether it would satisfy the objectives of Homeland Security( in my opinion the driving force behind the S(surveilance) is another question.
    It would seem to me that some of the technology that is being developed for UAV's(airspace trash to me) might also provide similar potential benefits.
    Flame suit on
    UH
    UH. you are 100% correct, if drones that you buy at Best Buy are transmitting ADSB signals why can't the glider and other sectors of aviation be equipped with a portable ADSB device, which is available and can add another layer of safety. Also,
    the ultimate goal is to see and be seen, not just see, which is a 50% factor and a 100% factor is available. Skyecho can provide a 40-50 mile protection buffer for both target aircraft, what is wrong with that? I would like for every glider in our club
    to have the ability to have a portable ADSB out available!!! This is not an argument about transponders, or TCAS, just a logical approach to increasing safety. I am relative sure that the hex codes of the portable unit could easily be received and
    identified within the system. OBTP
    The drones from Best Buy (or any consumer drone) do not transmit ADS-B signals, but some drones made by DJI do have ADS-B in. A concern about drones emitting ADS-B signals is overwhelming the system. but DJI and others are supposed to be working on
    methods to prevent system overload. Equipping with ADS-B in would aid pilots in avoiding ADS-B equipped aircraft. Does everyone flying from Hibiscus have ADS-B in?
    I do know a bit about drones, I have about ten of them, authorization is required for ADSB out , the FAA has required that UAS operators receiving ATC services must have ADSB out, it does get a bit crazy at times. No, not all operators at Hibiscus
    have ADSB in, probably most gliders in this country do not either . OBTP
    You wrote: "if drones that you buy at Best Buy are transmitting ADSB signals why can't the glider and other sectors of aviation be equipped with a portable ADSB device"

    Did you get it from Best Buy? Did have it ADSB Out when you walked out the door with it? Nope, it's more complicated than that. My point is ADSB is not in consumer level drones that anyone can just walk into a store and buy, so the response to your
    remark "if drones that you buy at Best Buy ..." is "you can't buy drones from Best Buy that are transmitting ADS-B".

    The major practical reason is the very large numbers of consumer drones could/would overwhelm the system, but I'm sure there are several other reasons.

    Eric
    No, it did not have ADSB out when I walked out the door, but it did the following few days, the point is that why does a drone have the capability to have ADSB out and a portable unit is not allowed ? To further explain to you a bit about ADSB in, it is
    basically useless on a drone, even with the smart controllers like I use. Now how about telling me how much more safety is applied when there is ADSB out vs in? The argument that the FAA has used is that there are not enough ground stations to provide
    coverage, and that the power output from Skyecho is not enough to meet the requirements for reception, that is what the FAA told me. I would think that most glider traffic that has a higher rate of NMAC is within the 50 mile range from a receiver
    station, we certainly are, Florida to my knowledge is well covered by ADSB receiving stations, just take a look at our number of airports and traffic. The FAA has stated that the signal of a standard ADSB installed unit is 200 miles or so, yet they don't
    tell you that the signal is dependent on altitude and other variables. OBTP

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Eric Greenwell@21:1/5 to youngbl...@gmail.com on Sun Oct 1 09:19:26 2023
    On Sunday, October 1, 2023 at 3:26:13 AM UTC-7, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Saturday, September 30, 2023 at 10:53:59 PM UTC-4, Eric Greenwell wrote:
    On Saturday, September 30, 2023 at 2:24:57 PM UTC-7, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Saturday, September 30, 2023 at 4:05:52 PM UTC-4, Eric Greenwell wrote:
    On Saturday, September 30, 2023 at 12:21:14 PM UTC-7, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Saturday, September 30, 2023 at 10:35:38 AM UTC-4, Hank Nixon wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 4:32:05 PM UTC-4, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    Having been heavily involved with the NMAC's between towplane and jet traffic, it seems to me that doing nothing to secure the safety of aviation is being overlooked.
    Most of us at some time or another have seen traffic up close, too close for comfort. Our area consist of heavy traffic ranging from flight training schools to scheduled heavy jet traffic. Our club was successful in developing a program
    through a LOA to communicate with WPA, and KVRB when operating gliders. This program has helped in regard to instrument traffic being advised of gliders operating, and local traffic being advised through ATIS.
    The problem still exist as most training and private jet traffic operators are too busy looking at those fancy glass screens instead of making note of traffic upon visual approach.
    Why hasn't the FAA endorsed the portable ADSB units that are accepted in the UK, Australia, and New Zealand? The success of the portable ADSB unit in those countries has led to increased safety. A portable unit like the SkyEcho, from
    uAvioni could be a gamechanger for general aviation. Sailplanes would benefit along with many other forms of aviation. The ability to carry a portable unit with a 50 mile range could have and will save lives.
    Glider clubs all over the country would benefit, the cost reduction vs an installed unit would be substantial. OBTP
    I think Bobbie makes a good point. If we could add a much higher level of protection for 3 or $400 a glider I would expect a lot of pilots and clubs would go for it.
    Whether it would satisfy the objectives of Homeland Security( in my opinion the driving force behind the S(surveilance) is another question.
    It would seem to me that some of the technology that is being developed for UAV's(airspace trash to me) might also provide similar potential benefits.
    Flame suit on
    UH
    UH. you are 100% correct, if drones that you buy at Best Buy are transmitting ADSB signals why can't the glider and other sectors of aviation be equipped with a portable ADSB device, which is available and can add another layer of safety. Also,
    the ultimate goal is to see and be seen, not just see, which is a 50% factor and a 100% factor is available. Skyecho can provide a 40-50 mile protection buffer for both target aircraft, what is wrong with that? I would like for every glider in our club
    to have the ability to have a portable ADSB out available!!! This is not an argument about transponders, or TCAS, just a logical approach to increasing safety. I am relative sure that the hex codes of the portable unit could easily be received and
    identified within the system. OBTP
    The drones from Best Buy (or any consumer drone) do not transmit ADS-B signals, but some drones made by DJI do have ADS-B in. A concern about drones emitting ADS-B signals is overwhelming the system. but DJI and others are supposed to be working
    on methods to prevent system overload. Equipping with ADS-B in would aid pilots in avoiding ADS-B equipped aircraft. Does everyone flying from Hibiscus have ADS-B in?
    I do know a bit about drones, I have about ten of them, authorization is required for ADSB out , the FAA has required that UAS operators receiving ATC services must have ADSB out, it does get a bit crazy at times. No, not all operators at Hibiscus
    have ADSB in, probably most gliders in this country do not either . OBTP
    You wrote: "if drones that you buy at Best Buy are transmitting ADSB signals why can't the glider and other sectors of aviation be equipped with a portable ADSB device"

    Did you get it from Best Buy? Did have it ADSB Out when you walked out the door with it? Nope, it's more complicated than that. My point is ADSB is not in consumer level drones that anyone can just walk into a store and buy, so the response to your
    remark "if drones that you buy at Best Buy ..." is "you can't buy drones from Best Buy that are transmitting ADS-B".

    The major practical reason is the very large numbers of consumer drones could/would overwhelm the system, but I'm sure there are several other reasons.

    Eric
    No, it did not have ADSB out when I walked out the door, but it did the following few days, the point is that why does a drone have the capability to have ADSB out and a portable unit is not allowed ? To further explain to you a bit about ADSB in, it
    is basically useless on a drone, even with the smart controllers like I use. Now how about telling me how much more safety is applied when there is ADSB out vs in? The argument that the FAA has used is that there are not enough ground stations to provide
    coverage, and that the power output from Skyecho is not enough to meet the requirements for reception, that is what the FAA told me. I would think that most glider traffic that has a higher rate of NMAC is within the 50 mile range from a receiver station,
    we certainly are, Florida to my knowledge is well covered by ADSB receiving stations, just take a look at our number of airports and traffic. The FAA has stated that the signal of a standard ADSB installed unit is 200 miles or so, yet they don't tell
    you that the signal is dependent on altitude and other variables. OBTP
    How did you add ADS-B to your drone? Where did you get the device and what did it cost?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From youngblood8116@gmail.com@21:1/5 to Eric Greenwell on Sun Oct 1 11:47:41 2023
    On Sunday, October 1, 2023 at 12:19:29 PM UTC-4, Eric Greenwell wrote:
    On Sunday, October 1, 2023 at 3:26:13 AM UTC-7, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Saturday, September 30, 2023 at 10:53:59 PM UTC-4, Eric Greenwell wrote:
    On Saturday, September 30, 2023 at 2:24:57 PM UTC-7, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Saturday, September 30, 2023 at 4:05:52 PM UTC-4, Eric Greenwell wrote:
    On Saturday, September 30, 2023 at 12:21:14 PM UTC-7, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Saturday, September 30, 2023 at 10:35:38 AM UTC-4, Hank Nixon wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 4:32:05 PM UTC-4, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    Having been heavily involved with the NMAC's between towplane and jet traffic, it seems to me that doing nothing to secure the safety of aviation is being overlooked.
    Most of us at some time or another have seen traffic up close, too close for comfort. Our area consist of heavy traffic ranging from flight training schools to scheduled heavy jet traffic. Our club was successful in developing a program
    through a LOA to communicate with WPA, and KVRB when operating gliders. This program has helped in regard to instrument traffic being advised of gliders operating, and local traffic being advised through ATIS.
    The problem still exist as most training and private jet traffic operators are too busy looking at those fancy glass screens instead of making note of traffic upon visual approach.
    Why hasn't the FAA endorsed the portable ADSB units that are accepted in the UK, Australia, and New Zealand? The success of the portable ADSB unit in those countries has led to increased safety. A portable unit like the SkyEcho, from
    uAvioni could be a gamechanger for general aviation. Sailplanes would benefit along with many other forms of aviation. The ability to carry a portable unit with a 50 mile range could have and will save lives.
    Glider clubs all over the country would benefit, the cost reduction vs an installed unit would be substantial. OBTP
    I think Bobbie makes a good point. If we could add a much higher level of protection for 3 or $400 a glider I would expect a lot of pilots and clubs would go for it.
    Whether it would satisfy the objectives of Homeland Security( in my opinion the driving force behind the S(surveilance) is another question.
    It would seem to me that some of the technology that is being developed for UAV's(airspace trash to me) might also provide similar potential benefits.
    Flame suit on
    UH
    UH. you are 100% correct, if drones that you buy at Best Buy are transmitting ADSB signals why can't the glider and other sectors of aviation be equipped with a portable ADSB device, which is available and can add another layer of safety.
    Also, the ultimate goal is to see and be seen, not just see, which is a 50% factor and a 100% factor is available. Skyecho can provide a 40-50 mile protection buffer for both target aircraft, what is wrong with that? I would like for every glider in our
    club to have the ability to have a portable ADSB out available!!! This is not an argument about transponders, or TCAS, just a logical approach to increasing safety. I am relative sure that the hex codes of the portable unit could easily be received and
    identified within the system. OBTP
    The drones from Best Buy (or any consumer drone) do not transmit ADS-B signals, but some drones made by DJI do have ADS-B in. A concern about drones emitting ADS-B signals is overwhelming the system. but DJI and others are supposed to be
    working on methods to prevent system overload. Equipping with ADS-B in would aid pilots in avoiding ADS-B equipped aircraft. Does everyone flying from Hibiscus have ADS-B in?
    I do know a bit about drones, I have about ten of them, authorization is required for ADSB out , the FAA has required that UAS operators receiving ATC services must have ADSB out, it does get a bit crazy at times. No, not all operators at
    Hibiscus have ADSB in, probably most gliders in this country do not either . OBTP
    You wrote: "if drones that you buy at Best Buy are transmitting ADSB signals why can't the glider and other sectors of aviation be equipped with a portable ADSB device"

    Did you get it from Best Buy? Did have it ADSB Out when you walked out the door with it? Nope, it's more complicated than that. My point is ADSB is not in consumer level drones that anyone can just walk into a store and buy, so the response to your
    remark "if drones that you buy at Best Buy ..." is "you can't buy drones from Best Buy that are transmitting ADS-B".

    The major practical reason is the very large numbers of consumer drones could/would overwhelm the system, but I'm sure there are several other reasons.

    Eric
    No, it did not have ADSB out when I walked out the door, but it did the following few days, the point is that why does a drone have the capability to have ADSB out and a portable unit is not allowed ? To further explain to you a bit about ADSB in, it
    is basically useless on a drone, even with the smart controllers like I use. Now how about telling me how much more safety is applied when there is ADSB out vs in? The argument that the FAA has used is that there are not enough ground stations to provide
    coverage, and that the power output from Skyecho is not enough to meet the requirements for reception, that is what the FAA told me. I would think that most glider traffic that has a higher rate of NMAC is within the 50 mile range from a receiver station,
    we certainly are, Florida to my knowledge is well covered by ADSB receiving stations, just take a look at our number of airports and traffic. The FAA has stated that the signal of a standard ADSB installed unit is 200 miles or so, yet they don't tell
    you that the signal is dependent on altitude and other variables. OBTP
    How did you add ADS-B to your drone? Where did you get the device and what did it cost?
    Expensive, very expensive! OBTP

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Moshe Braner@21:1/5 to All on Sun Oct 1 19:21:08 2023
    On 9/29/2023 10:58 PM, 2G wrote:
    SkyEcho is NOT approved for use in the United States.
    For U.S. applications, see Sentry by ForeFlight

    And there is a link to:
    https://flywithsentry.com/

    - The Sentry is ADS-B *in*. There are several inexpensive solutions for
    that. (PowerFLARM is one of them.) The issue at hand is low power, affordable, ADS-B *out*.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tom Watson@21:1/5 to Moshe Braner on Mon Oct 2 13:22:05 2023
    On Sunday, October 1, 2023 at 7:21:14 PM UTC-4, Moshe Braner wrote:
    On 9/29/2023 10:58 PM, 2G wrote:
    SkyEcho is NOT approved for use in the United States.
    For U.S. applications, see Sentry by ForeFlight

    And there is a link to:
    https://flywithsentry.com/
    - The Sentry is ADS-B *in*. There are several inexpensive solutions for that. (PowerFLARM is one of them.) The issue at hand is low power, affordable, ADS-B *out*.
    All,
    The public comment period for the NPRM MOSAIC ends in 21 days, calling for some of the most sweeping changes in general aviation in years. Many aircraft will be affected, probably gliders too. The current group topic of non certified, portable ADSB is
    relevant and needed in this area. The collective, knowledge, and persuasiveness of this group could send a powerful messsage to our safety interested friends in the FAA. Consider commenting and encourage your friends to do so also. It costs nothing,
    and could possibly help a great deal.

    Tidewater Soaring Society operates in a high traffic area in the approaches to Langley AFB, Norfolk City, Williamsburg/ Newport News and several surrounding GA airports. After a number of close calls, we entered into an agreement with Norfolk
    Approach to notify them when we operated and received a squak number for our gliders. We have equipped all our club gliders and tow planes with transponders and have seen the close calls decrease. We would welcome this next step in safety for us all.
    NPRM Public comment link below

    Tom Watson
    Tidewater Soaring Society


    https://www.regulations.gov/commenton/FAA-2023-1377-0001

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From youngblood8116@gmail.com@21:1/5 to Tom Watson on Tue Oct 3 04:03:12 2023
    On Monday, October 2, 2023 at 4:22:08 PM UTC-4, Tom Watson wrote:
    On Sunday, October 1, 2023 at 7:21:14 PM UTC-4, Moshe Braner wrote:
    On 9/29/2023 10:58 PM, 2G wrote:
    SkyEcho is NOT approved for use in the United States.
    For U.S. applications, see Sentry by ForeFlight

    And there is a link to:
    https://flywithsentry.com/
    - The Sentry is ADS-B *in*. There are several inexpensive solutions for that. (PowerFLARM is one of them.) The issue at hand is low power, affordable, ADS-B *out*.
    All,
    The public comment period for the NPRM MOSAIC ends in 21 days, calling for some of the most sweeping changes in general aviation in years. Many aircraft will be affected, probably gliders too. The current group topic of non certified, portable ADSB is
    relevant and needed in this area. The collective, knowledge, and persuasiveness of this group could send a powerful messsage to our safety interested friends in the FAA. Consider commenting and encourage your friends to do so also. It costs nothing, and
    could possibly help a great deal.

    Tidewater Soaring Society operates in a high traffic area in the approaches to Langley AFB, Norfolk City, Williamsburg/ Newport News and several surrounding GA airports. After a number of close calls, we entered into an agreement with Norfolk
    Approach to notify them when we operated and received a squak number for our gliders. We have equipped all our club gliders and tow planes with transponders and have seen the close calls decrease. We would welcome this next step in safety for us all.
    NPRM Public comment link below

    Tom Watson
    Tidewater Soaring Society


    https://www.regulations.gov/commenton/FAA-2023-1377-0001
    Tom, thank you very much for this very informative and descriptive addition to this thread. I appears that your club has mirrored the proactive agreement that TCSC has with WPB, Vero Beach through the FSDO and regional office of the FAA in Atlanta. It is
    time for a change, and it is well past due. The inclusion of a portable ADSB device is a game changer, a huge safety factor increase and an affordable solution to all soaring pilots alike.
    No longer do we need transponders in gliders that are not equipped with such, as you stated the next step is safety for all of us, and it is long past due.
    The SSA and the EAA should be much more proactive in this effort to make a change that protects GA plots like us glider pilots. I encourage all SSA and EAA members to participate in the NPRM opportunity. Old Bob, The Purist

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dan Kvinge@21:1/5 to youngbl...@gmail.com on Tue Oct 3 05:22:22 2023
    On Tuesday, October 3, 2023 at 6:03:15 AM UTC-5, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Monday, October 2, 2023 at 4:22:08 PM UTC-4, Tom Watson wrote:
    On Sunday, October 1, 2023 at 7:21:14 PM UTC-4, Moshe Braner wrote:
    On 9/29/2023 10:58 PM, 2G wrote:
    SkyEcho is NOT approved for use in the United States.
    For U.S. applications, see Sentry by ForeFlight

    And there is a link to:
    https://flywithsentry.com/
    - The Sentry is ADS-B *in*. There are several inexpensive solutions for that. (PowerFLARM is one of them.) The issue at hand is low power, affordable, ADS-B *out*.
    All,
    The public comment period for the NPRM MOSAIC ends in 21 days, calling for some of the most sweeping changes in general aviation in years. Many aircraft will be affected, probably gliders too. The current group topic of non certified, portable ADSB
    is relevant and needed in this area. The collective, knowledge, and persuasiveness of this group could send a powerful messsage to our safety interested friends in the FAA. Consider commenting and encourage your friends to do so also. It costs nothing,
    and could possibly help a great deal.

    Tidewater Soaring Society operates in a high traffic area in the approaches to Langley AFB, Norfolk City, Williamsburg/ Newport News and several surrounding GA airports. After a number of close calls, we entered into an agreement with Norfolk
    Approach to notify them when we operated and received a squak number for our gliders. We have equipped all our club gliders and tow planes with transponders and have seen the close calls decrease. We would welcome this next step in safety for us all.
    NPRM Public comment link below

    Tom Watson
    Tidewater Soaring Society


    https://www.regulations.gov/commenton/FAA-2023-1377-0001
    Tom, thank you very much for this very informative and descriptive addition to this thread. I appears that your club has mirrored the proactive agreement that TCSC has with WPB, Vero Beach through the FSDO and regional office of the FAA in Atlanta. It
    is time for a change, and it is well past due. The inclusion of a portable ADSB device is a game changer, a huge safety factor increase and an affordable solution to all soaring pilots alike.
    No longer do we need transponders in gliders that are not equipped with such, as you stated the next step is safety for all of us, and it is long past due.
    The SSA and the EAA should be much more proactive in this effort to make a change that protects GA plots like us glider pilots. I encourage all SSA and EAA members to participate in the NPRM opportunity. Old Bob, The Purist

    I agree, this is a great chance to add our comments.
    The only reference to ADS-B or transponders is in section D7:
    D. Certification of Light-Sport Category Aircraft.....7. Instruments and Equipment
    (you can do a control+F to quickly find the word transponder)
    I copied the relevant part below in quotes....

    "Additionally, light-sport category aircraft would also be more prone to fly in airspace requiring transponders and ADS–B equipment as aircraft designers may be more willing to install this equipment. This equipment enhances safety of the national
    airspace system by making an aircraft visible to air traffic control and to other appropriately equipped aircraft, promoting the separation of aircraft, and decreasing the risk of mid-air collision."

    I think it odd that this lengthy document covers so much of the aircraft structure and pilot certification, but only two sentences about reducing risk of mid-air collisions. There is useful and low-cost technology available to "see and be seen" that
    would be very helpful beyond air traffic control visibility.

    As Tom and Bob said, please add your comments to this document...maybe we can make a difference!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Eric Greenwell@21:1/5 to Dan Kvinge on Tue Oct 3 07:32:40 2023
    On Tuesday, October 3, 2023 at 5:22:25 AM UTC-7, Dan Kvinge wrote:
    On Tuesday, October 3, 2023 at 6:03:15 AM UTC-5, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Monday, October 2, 2023 at 4:22:08 PM UTC-4, Tom Watson wrote:
    On Sunday, October 1, 2023 at 7:21:14 PM UTC-4, Moshe Braner wrote:
    On 9/29/2023 10:58 PM, 2G wrote:
    SkyEcho is NOT approved for use in the United States.
    For U.S. applications, see Sentry by ForeFlight

    And there is a link to:
    https://flywithsentry.com/
    - The Sentry is ADS-B *in*. There are several inexpensive solutions for
    that. (PowerFLARM is one of them.) The issue at hand is low power, affordable, ADS-B *out*.
    All,
    The public comment period for the NPRM MOSAIC ends in 21 days, calling for some of the most sweeping changes in general aviation in years. Many aircraft will be affected, probably gliders too. The current group topic of non certified, portable ADSB
    is relevant and needed in this area. The collective, knowledge, and persuasiveness of this group could send a powerful messsage to our safety interested friends in the FAA. Consider commenting and encourage your friends to do so also. It costs nothing,
    and could possibly help a great deal.

    Tidewater Soaring Society operates in a high traffic area in the approaches to Langley AFB, Norfolk City, Williamsburg/ Newport News and several surrounding GA airports. After a number of close calls, we entered into an agreement with Norfolk
    Approach to notify them when we operated and received a squak number for our gliders. We have equipped all our club gliders and tow planes with transponders and have seen the close calls decrease. We would welcome this next step in safety for us
    all.
    NPRM Public comment link below

    Tom Watson
    Tidewater Soaring Society


    https://www.regulations.gov/commenton/FAA-2023-1377-0001
    Tom, thank you very much for this very informative and descriptive addition to this thread. I appears that your club has mirrored the proactive agreement that TCSC has with WPB, Vero Beach through the FSDO and regional office of the FAA in Atlanta.
    It is time for a change, and it is well past due. The inclusion of a portable ADSB device is a game changer, a huge safety factor increase and an affordable solution to all soaring pilots alike.
    No longer do we need transponders in gliders that are not equipped with such, as you stated the next step is safety for all of us, and it is long past due.
    The SSA and the EAA should be much more proactive in this effort to make a change that protects GA plots like us glider pilots. I encourage all SSA and EAA members to participate in the NPRM opportunity. Old Bob, The Purist
    I agree, this is a great chance to add our comments.
    The only reference to ADS-B or transponders is in section D7:
    D. Certification of Light-Sport Category Aircraft.....7. Instruments and Equipment
    (you can do a control+F to quickly find the word transponder)
    I copied the relevant part below in quotes....

    "Additionally, light-sport category aircraft would also be more prone to fly in airspace requiring transponders and ADS–B equipment as aircraft designers may be more willing to install this equipment. This equipment enhances safety of the national
    airspace system by making an aircraft visible to air traffic control and to other appropriately equipped aircraft, promoting the separation of aircraft, and decreasing the risk of mid-air collision."

    I think it odd that this lengthy document covers so much of the aircraft structure and pilot certification, but only two sentences about reducing risk of mid-air collisions. There is useful and low-cost technology available to "see and be seen" that
    would be very helpful beyond air traffic control visibility.

    As Tom and Bob said, please add your comments to this document...maybe we can make a difference!
    The reference seems to about regulation changes for LSA and experimentals that want to fly at night and in IMC that encourage equipping those aircraft with transponders and ADS-B, not about lower cost transponder and ADSB to do the encouraging. Or did I
    miss something?

    How about pilots in UK, New Zealand, and Australia? Are you buying and using SkyEcho? Is it making airspace safer or more available to you? Does anyone have any idea why it's just these three countries that can use it, and not so many other countries?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Martin Gregorie@21:1/5 to Eric Greenwell on Tue Oct 3 17:12:39 2023
    On Tue, 3 Oct 2023 07:32:40 -0700 (PDT), Eric Greenwell wrote:

    How about pilots in UK, New Zealand, and Australia? Are you buying and
    using SkyEcho? Is it making airspace safer or more available to you?
    Does anyone have any idea why it's just these three countries that can
    use it, and not so many other countries?

    UK pilot, using a RedBox FLARM system, fitted to me Libelle in 2005 and
    'just working' ever since. Early on I found precisely where to position
    its dipole in front of the panel so it can (a) 'look back over its
    shoulder' past all the instruments on the panel and (b) its internal GPS
    has a good sky view. I know this setup is good: because I've periodically checked flight logs with the range analysis tool on the FLARM website.

    I'd never heard of SkyEcho until now, but it turns out that you're better placed than I am to find out more about it and its maker, uAvionix,
    because its website says the latter is a US company with offices in MT and
    VA.


    --

    Martin | martin at
    Gregorie | gregorie dot org

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Eric Greenwell@21:1/5 to Martin Gregorie on Tue Oct 3 11:08:45 2023
    On Tuesday, October 3, 2023 at 10:12:43 AM UTC-7, Martin Gregorie wrote:
    On Tue, 3 Oct 2023 07:32:40 -0700 (PDT), Eric Greenwell wrote:

    How about pilots in UK, New Zealand, and Australia? Are you buying and using SkyEcho? Is it making airspace safer or more available to you?
    Does anyone have any idea why it's just these three countries that can
    use it, and not so many other countries?

    UK pilot, using a RedBox FLARM system, fitted to me Libelle in 2005 and 'just working' ever since. Early on I found precisely where to position
    its dipole in front of the panel so it can (a) 'look back over its
    shoulder' past all the instruments on the panel and (b) its internal GPS
    has a good sky view. I know this setup is good: because I've periodically checked flight logs with the range analysis tool on the FLARM website.

    I'd never heard of SkyEcho until now, but it turns out that you're better placed than I am to find out more about it and its maker, uAvionix,
    because its website says the latter is a US company with offices in MT and VA.


    --

    Martin | martin at
    Gregorie | gregorie dot org
    It's available in the UK from Transair, Fightstore, and others: https://transair.co.uk/avionics-radios-and-gps/ads-b-devices/skyecho-2-uavionix-portable-ads-b-transceiver
    https://www.flightstore.co.uk/product/uavionix-skyecho-2-portable-ads-b-transceiver-12386

    It's even eligible for a big rebate:

    "Order your SkyEcho2 today and claim a rebate back of up to £250!
    The Rebate scheme has been extended to 31st March 2024."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From youngblood8116@gmail.com@21:1/5 to Eric Greenwell on Tue Oct 3 12:24:25 2023
    On Tuesday, October 3, 2023 at 10:32:43 AM UTC-4, Eric Greenwell wrote:
    On Tuesday, October 3, 2023 at 5:22:25 AM UTC-7, Dan Kvinge wrote:
    On Tuesday, October 3, 2023 at 6:03:15 AM UTC-5, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Monday, October 2, 2023 at 4:22:08 PM UTC-4, Tom Watson wrote:
    On Sunday, October 1, 2023 at 7:21:14 PM UTC-4, Moshe Braner wrote:
    On 9/29/2023 10:58 PM, 2G wrote:
    SkyEcho is NOT approved for use in the United States.
    For U.S. applications, see Sentry by ForeFlight

    And there is a link to:
    https://flywithsentry.com/
    - The Sentry is ADS-B *in*. There are several inexpensive solutions for
    that. (PowerFLARM is one of them.) The issue at hand is low power, affordable, ADS-B *out*.
    All,
    The public comment period for the NPRM MOSAIC ends in 21 days, calling for some of the most sweeping changes in general aviation in years. Many aircraft will be affected, probably gliders too. The current group topic of non certified, portable
    ADSB is relevant and needed in this area. The collective, knowledge, and persuasiveness of this group could send a powerful messsage to our safety interested friends in the FAA. Consider commenting and encourage your friends to do so also. It costs
    nothing, and could possibly help a great deal.

    Tidewater Soaring Society operates in a high traffic area in the approaches to Langley AFB, Norfolk City, Williamsburg/ Newport News and several surrounding GA airports. After a number of close calls, we entered into an agreement with Norfolk
    Approach to notify them when we operated and received a squak number for our gliders. We have equipped all our club gliders and tow planes with transponders and have seen the close calls decrease. We would welcome this next step in safety for us
    all.
    NPRM Public comment link below

    Tom Watson
    Tidewater Soaring Society


    https://www.regulations.gov/commenton/FAA-2023-1377-0001
    Tom, thank you very much for this very informative and descriptive addition to this thread. I appears that your club has mirrored the proactive agreement that TCSC has with WPB, Vero Beach through the FSDO and regional office of the FAA in Atlanta.
    It is time for a change, and it is well past due. The inclusion of a portable ADSB device is a game changer, a huge safety factor increase and an affordable solution to all soaring pilots alike.
    No longer do we need transponders in gliders that are not equipped with such, as you stated the next step is safety for all of us, and it is long past due.
    The SSA and the EAA should be much more proactive in this effort to make a change that protects GA plots like us glider pilots. I encourage all SSA and EAA members to participate in the NPRM opportunity. Old Bob, The Purist
    I agree, this is a great chance to add our comments.
    The only reference to ADS-B or transponders is in section D7:
    D. Certification of Light-Sport Category Aircraft.....7. Instruments and Equipment
    (you can do a control+F to quickly find the word transponder)
    I copied the relevant part below in quotes....

    "Additionally, light-sport category aircraft would also be more prone to fly in airspace requiring transponders and ADS–B equipment as aircraft designers may be more willing to install this equipment. This equipment enhances safety of the national
    airspace system by making an aircraft visible to air traffic control and to other appropriately equipped aircraft, promoting the separation of aircraft, and decreasing the risk of mid-air collision."

    I think it odd that this lengthy document covers so much of the aircraft structure and pilot certification, but only two sentences about reducing risk of mid-air collisions. There is useful and low-cost technology available to "see and be seen" that
    would be very helpful beyond air traffic control visibility.

    As Tom and Bob said, please add your comments to this document...maybe we can make a difference!
    The reference seems to about regulation changes for LSA and experimentals that want to fly at night and in IMC that encourage equipping those aircraft with transponders and ADS-B, not about lower cost transponder and ADSB to do the encouraging. Or did
    I miss something?

    How about pilots in UK, New Zealand, and Australia? Are you buying and using SkyEcho? Is it making airspace safer or more available to you? Does anyone have any idea why it's just these three countries that can use it, and not so many other countries?
    Eric, it is because they allow the portability of the unit. I works extremely well, it is affordable, readily available and will make flying gliders more safe, it is truly amazing that the UK, New Zealand and Australia have safer airspace than the US.
    Maybe they don't have as much bureaucratic BS to go through. OBTP

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Charlie M. (UH, Pi & 002 owner/pilo@21:1/5 to youngbl...@gmail.com on Tue Oct 3 15:07:41 2023
    On Tuesday, October 3, 2023 at 3:24:28 PM UTC-4, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Tuesday, October 3, 2023 at 10:32:43 AM UTC-4, Eric Greenwell wrote:
    On Tuesday, October 3, 2023 at 5:22:25 AM UTC-7, Dan Kvinge wrote:
    On Tuesday, October 3, 2023 at 6:03:15 AM UTC-5, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Monday, October 2, 2023 at 4:22:08 PM UTC-4, Tom Watson wrote:
    On Sunday, October 1, 2023 at 7:21:14 PM UTC-4, Moshe Braner wrote:
    On 9/29/2023 10:58 PM, 2G wrote:
    SkyEcho is NOT approved for use in the United States.
    For U.S. applications, see Sentry by ForeFlight

    And there is a link to:
    https://flywithsentry.com/
    - The Sentry is ADS-B *in*. There are several inexpensive solutions for
    that. (PowerFLARM is one of them.) The issue at hand is low power, affordable, ADS-B *out*.
    All,
    The public comment period for the NPRM MOSAIC ends in 21 days, calling for some of the most sweeping changes in general aviation in years. Many aircraft will be affected, probably gliders too. The current group topic of non certified, portable
    ADSB is relevant and needed in this area. The collective, knowledge, and persuasiveness of this group could send a powerful messsage to our safety interested friends in the FAA. Consider commenting and encourage your friends to do so also. It costs
    nothing, and could possibly help a great deal.

    Tidewater Soaring Society operates in a high traffic area in the approaches to Langley AFB, Norfolk City, Williamsburg/ Newport News and several surrounding GA airports. After a number of close calls, we entered into an agreement with Norfolk
    Approach to notify them when we operated and received a squak number for our gliders. We have equipped all our club gliders and tow planes with transponders and have seen the close calls decrease. We would welcome this next step in safety for
    us all.
    NPRM Public comment link below

    Tom Watson
    Tidewater Soaring Society


    https://www.regulations.gov/commenton/FAA-2023-1377-0001
    Tom, thank you very much for this very informative and descriptive addition to this thread. I appears that your club has mirrored the proactive agreement that TCSC has with WPB, Vero Beach through the FSDO and regional office of the FAA in
    Atlanta. It is time for a change, and it is well past due. The inclusion of a portable ADSB device is a game changer, a huge safety factor increase and an affordable solution to all soaring pilots alike.
    No longer do we need transponders in gliders that are not equipped with such, as you stated the next step is safety for all of us, and it is long past due.
    The SSA and the EAA should be much more proactive in this effort to make a change that protects GA plots like us glider pilots. I encourage all SSA and EAA members to participate in the NPRM opportunity. Old Bob, The Purist
    I agree, this is a great chance to add our comments.
    The only reference to ADS-B or transponders is in section D7:
    D. Certification of Light-Sport Category Aircraft.....7. Instruments and Equipment
    (you can do a control+F to quickly find the word transponder)
    I copied the relevant part below in quotes....

    "Additionally, light-sport category aircraft would also be more prone to fly in airspace requiring transponders and ADS–B equipment as aircraft designers may be more willing to install this equipment. This equipment enhances safety of the
    national airspace system by making an aircraft visible to air traffic control and to other appropriately equipped aircraft, promoting the separation of aircraft, and decreasing the risk of mid-air collision."

    I think it odd that this lengthy document covers so much of the aircraft structure and pilot certification, but only two sentences about reducing risk of mid-air collisions. There is useful and low-cost technology available to "see and be seen"
    that would be very helpful beyond air traffic control visibility.

    As Tom and Bob said, please add your comments to this document...maybe we can make a difference!
    The reference seems to about regulation changes for LSA and experimentals that want to fly at night and in IMC that encourage equipping those aircraft with transponders and ADS-B, not about lower cost transponder and ADSB to do the encouraging. Or
    did I miss something?

    How about pilots in UK, New Zealand, and Australia? Are you buying and using SkyEcho? Is it making airspace safer or more available to you? Does anyone have any idea why it's just these three countries that can use it, and not so many other countries?
    Eric, it is because they allow the portability of the unit. I works extremely well, it is affordable, readily available and will make flying gliders more safe, it is truly amazing that the UK, New Zealand and Australia have safer airspace than the US.
    Maybe they don't have as much bureaucratic BS to go through. OBTP
    Maybe it's all British rule, thus commonality between the 3 countries?
    I like Flarm in the US, at least I can see some traffic coming even if they can't see me on a screen. I'm in the NY metro area, so, 3 large airports nearby, a VOR not far away, and "crank" intersection just above.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Kathryn Kvinge@21:1/5 to All on Mon Oct 30 06:58:50 2023
    On Tuesday, October 3, 2023 at 5:07:44 PM UTC-5, Charlie M. (UH, Pi & 002 owner/pilot) wrote:
    On Tuesday, October 3, 2023 at 3:24:28 PM UTC-4, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Tuesday, October 3, 2023 at 10:32:43 AM UTC-4, Eric Greenwell wrote:
    On Tuesday, October 3, 2023 at 5:22:25 AM UTC-7, Dan Kvinge wrote:
    On Tuesday, October 3, 2023 at 6:03:15 AM UTC-5, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Monday, October 2, 2023 at 4:22:08 PM UTC-4, Tom Watson wrote:
    On Sunday, October 1, 2023 at 7:21:14 PM UTC-4, Moshe Braner wrote:
    On 9/29/2023 10:58 PM, 2G wrote:
    SkyEcho is NOT approved for use in the United States.
    For U.S. applications, see Sentry by ForeFlight

    And there is a link to:
    https://flywithsentry.com/
    - The Sentry is ADS-B *in*. There are several inexpensive solutions for
    that. (PowerFLARM is one of them.) The issue at hand is low power,
    affordable, ADS-B *out*.
    All,
    The public comment period for the NPRM MOSAIC ends in 21 days, calling for some of the most sweeping changes in general aviation in years. Many aircraft will be affected, probably gliders too. The current group topic of non certified,
    portable ADSB is relevant and needed in this area. The collective, knowledge, and persuasiveness of this group could send a powerful messsage to our safety interested friends in the FAA. Consider commenting and encourage your friends to do so also. It
    costs nothing, and could possibly help a great deal.

    Tidewater Soaring Society operates in a high traffic area in the approaches to Langley AFB, Norfolk City, Williamsburg/ Newport News and several surrounding GA airports. After a number of close calls, we entered into an agreement with Norfolk
    Approach to notify them when we operated and received a squak number for our gliders. We have equipped all our club gliders and tow planes with transponders and have seen the close calls decrease. We would welcome this next step in safety for
    us all.
    NPRM Public comment link below

    Tom Watson
    Tidewater Soaring Society


    https://www.regulations.gov/commenton/FAA-2023-1377-0001
    Tom, thank you very much for this very informative and descriptive addition to this thread. I appears that your club has mirrored the proactive agreement that TCSC has with WPB, Vero Beach through the FSDO and regional office of the FAA in
    Atlanta. It is time for a change, and it is well past due. The inclusion of a portable ADSB device is a game changer, a huge safety factor increase and an affordable solution to all soaring pilots alike.
    No longer do we need transponders in gliders that are not equipped with such, as you stated the next step is safety for all of us, and it is long past due.
    The SSA and the EAA should be much more proactive in this effort to make a change that protects GA plots like us glider pilots. I encourage all SSA and EAA members to participate in the NPRM opportunity. Old Bob, The Purist
    I agree, this is a great chance to add our comments.
    The only reference to ADS-B or transponders is in section D7:
    D. Certification of Light-Sport Category Aircraft.....7. Instruments and Equipment
    (you can do a control+F to quickly find the word transponder)
    I copied the relevant part below in quotes....

    "Additionally, light-sport category aircraft would also be more prone to fly in airspace requiring transponders and ADS–B equipment as aircraft designers may be more willing to install this equipment. This equipment enhances safety of the
    national airspace system by making an aircraft visible to air traffic control and to other appropriately equipped aircraft, promoting the separation of aircraft, and decreasing the risk of mid-air collision."

    I think it odd that this lengthy document covers so much of the aircraft structure and pilot certification, but only two sentences about reducing risk of mid-air collisions. There is useful and low-cost technology available to "see and be seen"
    that would be very helpful beyond air traffic control visibility.

    As Tom and Bob said, please add your comments to this document...maybe we can make a difference!
    The reference seems to about regulation changes for LSA and experimentals that want to fly at night and in IMC that encourage equipping those aircraft with transponders and ADS-B, not about lower cost transponder and ADSB to do the encouraging. Or
    did I miss something?

    How about pilots in UK, New Zealand, and Australia? Are you buying and using SkyEcho? Is it making airspace safer or more available to you? Does anyone have any idea why it's just these three countries that can use it, and not so many other
    countries?
    Eric, it is because they allow the portability of the unit. I works extremely well, it is affordable, readily available and will make flying gliders more safe, it is truly amazing that the UK, New Zealand and Australia have safer airspace than the US.
    Maybe they don't have as much bureaucratic BS to go through. OBTP
    Maybe it's all British rule, thus commonality between the 3 countries?
    I like Flarm in the US, at least I can see some traffic coming even if they can't see me on a screen. I'm in the NY metro area, so, 3 large airports nearby, a VOR not far away, and "crank" intersection just above.
    The FAA extended the comment deadline on MOSAIC light sport aircraft until Jan 22, 2024, due to requests from various aircraft groups (SSA not one of them). There is still time to offer your comments about Electronic Conspicuity and encourage the FAA
    to improve safety by allowing a low-cost ADS-B OUT solution for use outside of tower-controlled airspace.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From youngblood8116@gmail.com@21:1/5 to Kathryn Kvinge on Mon Oct 30 09:01:48 2023
    On Monday, October 30, 2023 at 9:58:52 AM UTC-4, Kathryn Kvinge wrote:
    On Tuesday, October 3, 2023 at 5:07:44 PM UTC-5, Charlie M. (UH, Pi & 002 owner/pilot) wrote:
    On Tuesday, October 3, 2023 at 3:24:28 PM UTC-4, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Tuesday, October 3, 2023 at 10:32:43 AM UTC-4, Eric Greenwell wrote:
    On Tuesday, October 3, 2023 at 5:22:25 AM UTC-7, Dan Kvinge wrote:
    On Tuesday, October 3, 2023 at 6:03:15 AM UTC-5, youngbl...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Monday, October 2, 2023 at 4:22:08 PM UTC-4, Tom Watson wrote:
    On Sunday, October 1, 2023 at 7:21:14 PM UTC-4, Moshe Braner wrote:
    On 9/29/2023 10:58 PM, 2G wrote:
    SkyEcho is NOT approved for use in the United States.
    For U.S. applications, see Sentry by ForeFlight

    And there is a link to:
    https://flywithsentry.com/
    - The Sentry is ADS-B *in*. There are several inexpensive solutions for
    that. (PowerFLARM is one of them.) The issue at hand is low power,
    affordable, ADS-B *out*.
    All,
    The public comment period for the NPRM MOSAIC ends in 21 days, calling for some of the most sweeping changes in general aviation in years. Many aircraft will be affected, probably gliders too. The current group topic of non certified,
    portable ADSB is relevant and needed in this area. The collective, knowledge, and persuasiveness of this group could send a powerful messsage to our safety interested friends in the FAA. Consider commenting and encourage your friends to do so also. It
    costs nothing, and could possibly help a great deal.

    Tidewater Soaring Society operates in a high traffic area in the approaches to Langley AFB, Norfolk City, Williamsburg/ Newport News and several surrounding GA airports. After a number of close calls, we entered into an agreement with
    Norfolk
    Approach to notify them when we operated and received a squak number for our gliders. We have equipped all our club gliders and tow planes with transponders and have seen the close calls decrease. We would welcome this next step in safety
    for us all.
    NPRM Public comment link below

    Tom Watson
    Tidewater Soaring Society


    https://www.regulations.gov/commenton/FAA-2023-1377-0001
    Tom, thank you very much for this very informative and descriptive addition to this thread. I appears that your club has mirrored the proactive agreement that TCSC has with WPB, Vero Beach through the FSDO and regional office of the FAA in
    Atlanta. It is time for a change, and it is well past due. The inclusion of a portable ADSB device is a game changer, a huge safety factor increase and an affordable solution to all soaring pilots alike.
    No longer do we need transponders in gliders that are not equipped with such, as you stated the next step is safety for all of us, and it is long past due.
    The SSA and the EAA should be much more proactive in this effort to make a change that protects GA plots like us glider pilots. I encourage all SSA and EAA members to participate in the NPRM opportunity. Old Bob, The Purist
    I agree, this is a great chance to add our comments.
    The only reference to ADS-B or transponders is in section D7:
    D. Certification of Light-Sport Category Aircraft.....7. Instruments and Equipment
    (you can do a control+F to quickly find the word transponder)
    I copied the relevant part below in quotes....

    "Additionally, light-sport category aircraft would also be more prone to fly in airspace requiring transponders and ADS–B equipment as aircraft designers may be more willing to install this equipment. This equipment enhances safety of the
    national airspace system by making an aircraft visible to air traffic control and to other appropriately equipped aircraft, promoting the separation of aircraft, and decreasing the risk of mid-air collision."

    I think it odd that this lengthy document covers so much of the aircraft structure and pilot certification, but only two sentences about reducing risk of mid-air collisions. There is useful and low-cost technology available to "see and be seen"
    that would be very helpful beyond air traffic control visibility.

    As Tom and Bob said, please add your comments to this document...maybe we can make a difference!
    The reference seems to about regulation changes for LSA and experimentals that want to fly at night and in IMC that encourage equipping those aircraft with transponders and ADS-B, not about lower cost transponder and ADSB to do the encouraging.
    Or did I miss something?

    How about pilots in UK, New Zealand, and Australia? Are you buying and using SkyEcho? Is it making airspace safer or more available to you? Does anyone have any idea why it's just these three countries that can use it, and not so many other
    countries?
    Eric, it is because they allow the portability of the unit. I works extremely well, it is affordable, readily available and will make flying gliders more safe, it is truly amazing that the UK, New Zealand and Australia have safer airspace than the
    US. Maybe they don't have as much bureaucratic BS to go through. OBTP
    Maybe it's all British rule, thus commonality between the 3 countries?
    I like Flarm in the US, at least I can see some traffic coming even if they can't see me on a screen. I'm in the NY metro area, so, 3 large airports nearby, a VOR not far away, and "crank" intersection just above.
    The FAA extended the comment deadline on MOSAIC light sport aircraft until Jan 22, 2024, due to requests from various aircraft groups (SSA not one of them). There is still time to offer your comments about Electronic Conspicuity and encourage the FAA
    to improve safety by allowing a low-cost ADS-B OUT solution for use outside of tower-controlled airspace.

    Kathryn, thanks for reminding pilots to take advantage of this opportunity that will certainly assist in air traffic safety. There are things happening behind the scenes that are working toward getting this portable ADSB unit available for glider pilots
    and others alike. OBTP

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)