• =?UTF-8?B?UkU6IFJlOiBEZVJvc2E=?=

    From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Sat Oct 12 00:01:11 2024
    On Fri Oct 11 07:32:09 2024 John B. wrote:
    On Thu, 10 Oct 2024 21:02:45 -0000 (UTC), Tom Kunich
    <cyclintom@yahoo.com> wrote:

    On Wed, 09 Oct 2024 07:32:50 +0700, John B. wrote:

    On Tue, 8 Oct 2024 19:57:56 -0000 (UTC), Tom Kunich
    <cyclintom@yahoo.com> wrote:

    On Wed, 02 Oct 2024 15:11:42 -0500, AMuzi wrote:

    On 10/2/2024 2:51 PM, cyclintom wrote:
    Looking at a build up of the same Merak type as mine I noted that it >>>>> had a bottom pull front derailleur. I looked carefully through the >>>>> photos of that assembled bike and realized that rather than routing >>>>> the inner cable under the bottom beacket and then through a passage >>>>> to come out and pull somewhat inderectly on the FD lever that it runs >>>>> a outer cable from near the bottom hear the BB up to a fixture on the >>>>> side of the seattube. I imagine this gives both a straighter path to >>>>> the FD lever and the slacker turn probably reduces friction. I will >>>>> have to wait to see the path but even UPS is being slowed down from >>>>> Colorado and it is now predicted tomorrow instead of today. USPS
    items are getting here sometimes 2 weeks after they're mailed. And >>>>> Colorado is a bicycle busy state so there is a lot of components
    available from there.

    I ordered a set of Dura Ace levers and they arrived, But the left
    lever return spring was not properly installed and messing about with >>>>> it trying to get it to work the end of the spring that engages the >>>>> opposite side (not the hook end) broke off. This is the second time >>>>> this has happened. Apparently it CAN get in the way of the pin that >>>>> holds the two lever halves together. So you have to be very careful >>>>> to SLIP the pin in and not force it. Since there is a great deal of >>>>> friction there that is quite difficult.

    The Shimano SARA robots seem to get that right, over and over, 24x7, >>>> in rooms without lighting.

    Assembly robots are remarkable. Too bad that Frank didn't get into that. >>>I think he could have accomplished something real and gain a great deal >>>more job satisfaction rather thn fall into the socialism trap.

    "the socialism trap"?

    You man like Social Security, Medicare, Aid to Unwed mothers,
    Unemployment, and all the other goodies the U.S. now provides?

    Slocomb, I know you're not very bright, but why is it that you don't know >about soxial security and medicare which are TAXES for specific purposes?
    I won't even break even on social security until I turn 92.


    And how do you think any socialism or partially socialist system
    works? First they tax you to get the money and then they give some of
    it back to you.

    Aid to unwed mother's? What is that?

    I don't know the "modern" term. Maybe https://www.debt.org/advice/financial-assistance-for-single-parents/ https://hopenetworkinc.org/ https://thelifeofasinglemom.com/national-resource-guide-new/

    --
    Cheers,

    John B.





    Nice to know that you don't know what socialism is.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Tue Oct 29 21:44:42 2024
    On Wed Oct 23 11:16:51 2024 Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 10/23/2024 9:38 AM, AMuzi wrote:
    On 10/23/2024 4:32 AM, Catrike Ryder wrote:
    On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 22:03:33 -0400, Frank Krygowski
    <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

    On 10/22/2024 3:49 PM, Tom Kunich wrote:

    On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 15:13:54 +0200, Rolf Mantel <news@hartig-
    mantel.de>
    wrote:
    Some people are actually eager to teach other people. My son does >>>>>> not
    aim to become a teacher nd doesn't need the money but he's happy >>>>>> to give
    math support teaching for 1st year engineers while he's at college. >>>>
    Exactly, how high an IQ do you need to teach something out of a
    textbook
    that is a required textbook for the course?

    Tom, you're completely ignorant about what goes on at a university.

    Where do you think those textbooks come from? Who do you think writes
    them? Who do you think selects them? How do you suppose they evaluate
    them? What criteria to you think they use? How do you think the contents >>> of the courses are determined? How do you think the curricula are
    decided?

    Makes no difference where the textbook came from, the teacher's job is
    to teach what's in the textbook. It doesn't take high intelligence to
    do that. Some people do just fine without the teacher...

    IME most instructors were boring plodding textbook readers but the few inspiring teachers made up for the others. I felt I had good value from university at $130 per semester.
    I certainly had some professors who were boring textbook readers. FWIW,
    my original inspiration to teach came from my friends, when we were
    doing homework sessions or studying for tests. They told me "You should become a teacher. You explain this stuff so much better than they do."

    But I submit that one can't effectively teach computation-based
    engineering material by just reading from a textbook. You have to show
    how to analyze a problem, understand and specify the quantities that are relevant and known, determine the physical laws that are applicable,
    properly apply the physical laws using proper mathematics to reach a solution, then use proper judgement to evaluate the answer and, if
    necessary, correct any mistakes. Just reading out of a textbook
    demonstrates none of that.

    And BTW, that's how any competent student in an Engineering Dynamics
    class would know you can't stop a tricycle from 20 mph within nine feet.

    I'll also note that one of my many responsibilities was hiring part-time instructors for our program. There were some engineers I hired (no more
    than once) who were competent at engineering, but ineffective at
    teaching. Fortunately, I had several guys who could have made much more
    money consulting, but were dedicated to our program and to passing on
    the engineering knowledge that they had.

    In general, the people who are anti-teacher and anti-education are the
    ones who are uneducated.

    --
    - Frank Krygowski




    There you have it from Krygowski - you cannot learn to analyze munless someone as brilliant and he shows you how.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Fri Nov 8 16:34:49 2024
    On Sun Oct 13 16:25:15 2024 Catrike Ryder wrote:
    On Sun, 13 Oct 2024 16:04:20 -0400, Frank Krygowski
    <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

    On 10/13/2024 3:57 PM, Catrike Ryder wrote:
    On Sun, 13 Oct 2024 15:45:42 -0400, Frank Krygowski
    <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

    On 10/13/2024 3:52 AM, Catrike Ryder wrote:
    On Sat, 12 Oct 2024 22:19:23 -0400, Frank Krygowski
    <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

    On 10/12/2024 4:24 PM, Tom Kunich wrote:
    On Tue, 08 Oct 2024 21:21:01 -0400, Frank Krygowski wrote:

    On 10/8/2024 3:57 PM, Tom Kunich wrote:

    Assembly robots are remarkable. Too bad that Frank didn't get into >>>>>>>> that.

    I did get into that. I did quite a lot of work programming robots on >>>>>>> several production lines.

    If you could do that why didn't you continue since programming mechanical
    mechanisms would pay you a whole lot more than teaching would have? >>>>>
    I was never primarily motivated by money. Most people in education are >>>>> motivated instead by a desire to help others.

    I've had many students who thanked me for helping them qualify for >>>>> satisfying careers. None of the robots I worked with ever did that. >>>>
    I suspect that your motivation for teaching and not working as an
    engineer was that you were incompetent at working as an engineer.

    Yet somehow, somehow, I qualified to take the test for my Professional >>> Engineering licenses (in two states). And of course, I passed very
    easily. I'd give details, but you'd complain I was bragging.

    Taking a test is one thing. Working as an engineer is quite different.
    A person isn't allowed to take the test until they've accumulated >sufficient qualifying experience as an engineer.

    Look it up.

    Experience as an engineer for a while is not so difficult but working
    as a competent engineer and not being fired is something else.

    --
    C'est bon
    Soloman




    I think that you hit a sore spot with Frank. He was allowed to take the PE test not because he was an experienced engineer but because he was a teacher. In several places he has claimed that he took a leave of absence and did PE work. I doubt that so
    much that I don't hesitate to call him a liar. NO ONE hires someone for any commercial purposes when they have no real experience.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Wed Nov 13 18:31:55 2024
    On Mon Nov 11 16:26:38 2024 Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 11/11/2024 7:30 AM, Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 11/9/2024 4:03 PM, cyclintom wrote:
    On Fri Nov 8 13:50:45 2024 Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 11/8/2024 11:34 AM, cyclintom wrote:


    NO ONE hires someone for any commercial purposes when they have no
    real experience.

    :-) What an odd thing to say! How, then, does anyone ever get their >>> first job?


    --
    - Frank Krygowski




    How did you get YOUR first job - the answer was that they were willing
    to take a chance on you for a very low end job and you coulkdn't hack
    it at that. Are you saying that people were willing to take a chance
    on a PE at the sort of wages they could make for a low end job? >

    I'm not a PE, but I've known quite a few over the years. When one gets a
    PE license, they've proven themselves by virtue of the education and experience necessary to get a PE license, and aren't going to be taking,
    or applying for, or even entertaining an offer for a "low-end" job.

    My error is that I keep expecting you to grow up.And now there's no
    chance of that.

    No tom, your error is that you keep thinking your smarter than everyone else.

    My father used to talk about men who had "delusions of adequacy."

    --
    - Frank Krygowski




    Trying to teach you something? Seems he failed.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)