I've got four autodark welding hoods...
Anyway, none of them produce anything close to the viewing picture you
see on video on the big welding video channels. Is the camera really correcting that much or is there really an auto lens that will produce
that quality of viewing picture.
"Bob La Londe" wrote in message news:tf5q5b$5ts$1@gioia.aioe.org...
I've got four autodark welding hoods, and one with a fixed #10 lens
(might be #11 I forget). Two of them are fairly cheap and two are what
I call 1st stage good. Not a top of the line, but first step up in
price to a helmet some pros have said is adequate. Arguably the Harbor Freight Vulcan is the best or maybe its just my favorite. My son
prefers the Lincoln Viking. That's the better one Lincoln sent me for
free when I threw a temper tantrum about buying the most expensive
helmet in local box hardware store and finding out it didn't have a replaceable battery. The Viking is pretty good.
Anyway, none of them produce anything close to the viewing picture you
see on video on the big welding video channels. Is the camera really correcting that much or is there really an auto lens that will produce
that quality of viewing picture.
------------------------
I think the answer is to flood the surroundings with bright light such
as halogen work lights to reduce the contrast between the arc and surroundings. I can see the joint I'm trying to follow better in full sunlight. A neutral density (ND) filter on the lens protects it from
spatter.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 485 |
Nodes: | 16 (3 / 13) |
Uptime: | 75:10:14 |
Calls: | 9,634 |
Calls today: | 2 |
Files: | 13,698 |
Messages: | 6,161,648 |