• A small welding job

    From Snag@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jan 8 15:17:17 2023
    A neighbor's friend brought a small welding repair over for me . It's
    an I beam that is the backbone of a PTO powered post hole auger . But
    that's not what this post is about , this post is about OHMYGAWD I love
    my new welder . The flange that carries the yoke that the auger hangs on
    had fatigued and split from the web , First order was to pull it back
    into position and tack it in place . Then vee one side and run a bead
    then flip and grind down to fresh weld and lay in a couple of passes -
    all on the lowest power setting . Welding 1/4" thick reinforcing strips
    on both sides had it all the way up to half power . I may never need to
    use my tombstone welder again ...
    --
    Snag
    "You can lead a dummy to facts
    but you can't make him think."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Wilkins@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jan 8 16:35:44 2023
    "Snag" wrote in message news:tpfbt0$3ufpe$1@dont-email.me...

    A neighbor's friend brought a small welding repair over for me . It's
    an I beam that is the backbone of a PTO powered post hole auger . But
    that's not what this post is about , this post is about OHMYGAWD I love
    my new welder . The flange that carries the yoke that the auger hangs on
    had fatigued and split from the web , First order was to pull it back
    into position and tack it in place . Then vee one side and run a bead
    then flip and grind down to fresh weld and lay in a couple of passes -
    all on the lowest power setting . Welding 1/4" thick reinforcing strips
    on both sides had it all the way up to half power . I may never need to
    use my tombstone welder again ...
    Snag

    ------------------

    Flux core?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bob La Londe@21:1/5 to Jim Wilkins on Sun Jan 8 15:46:47 2023
    On 1/8/2023 2:35 PM, Jim Wilkins wrote:
    "Snag"  wrote in message news:tpfbt0$3ufpe$1@dont-email.me...
     A neighbor's friend brought a small welding repair over for me . It's
    an I beam that is the backbone of a PTO powered post hole auger . But
    that's not what this post is about , this post is about OHMYGAWD I love
    my new welder . The flange that carries the yoke that the auger hangs on
    had fatigued and split from the web , First order was to pull it back
    into position and tack it in place . Then vee one side and run a bead
    then flip and grind down to fresh weld and lay in a couple of passes -
    all on the lowest power setting . Welding 1/4" thick reinforcing strips
    on both sides had it all the way up to half power . I may never need to
    use my tombstone welder again ...
    Snag

    ------------------

    Flux core?


    I've been debating selling mine. On the rare occasion when I really
    might need to burn some 7018 for some thicker plate I have the AHP ACDC
    Pulse TIG/Stick. I like running DC stick so much better than using the
    AC cracker box.

    --
    Bob La Londe
    CNC Molds N Stuff


    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Snag@21:1/5 to Jim Wilkins on Sun Jan 8 17:58:39 2023
    On 1/8/2023 3:35 PM, Jim Wilkins wrote:
    "Snag"  wrote in message news:tpfbt0$3ufpe$1@dont-email.me...
     A neighbor's friend brought a small welding repair over for me . It's
    an I beam that is the backbone of a PTO powered post hole auger . But
    that's not what this post is about , this post is about OHMYGAWD I love
    my new welder . The flange that carries the yoke that the auger hangs on
    had fatigued and split from the web , First order was to pull it back
    into position and tack it in place . Then vee one side and run a bead
    then flip and grind down to fresh weld and lay in a couple of passes -
    all on the lowest power setting . Welding 1/4" thick reinforcing strips
    on both sides had it all the way up to half power . I may never need to
    use my tombstone welder again ...
    Snag

    ------------------

    Flux core?


    Yup , the roll this welder came with when it was brand new . I never realized how handicapped that WeldPak 100 was ! I was going to set it up
    for .030 solid wire for this repair , but there was enough of a breeze
    today that flux core was a better choice .
    --
    Snag
    "You can lead a dummy to facts
    but you can't make him think."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Clare Snyder@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jan 8 18:36:38 2023
    On Sun, 8 Jan 2023 15:46:47 -0700, Bob La Londe <none@none.com99>
    wrote:

    On 1/8/2023 2:35 PM, Jim Wilkins wrote:
    "Snag"  wrote in message news:tpfbt0$3ufpe$1@dont-email.me...
     A neighbor's friend brought a small welding repair over for me . It's
    an I beam that is the backbone of a PTO powered post hole auger . But
    that's not what this post is about , this post is about OHMYGAWD I love
    my new welder . The flange that carries the yoke that the auger hangs on
    had fatigued and split from the web , First order was to pull it back
    into position and tack it in place . Then vee one side and run a bead
    then flip and grind down to fresh weld and lay in a couple of passes -
    all on the lowest power setting . Welding 1/4" thick reinforcing strips
    on both sides had it all the way up to half power . I may never need to
    use my tombstone welder again ...
    Snag

    ------------------

    Flux core?


    I've been debating selling mine. On the rare occasion when I really
    might need to burn some 7018 for some thicker plate I have the AHP ACDC
    Pulse TIG/Stick. I like running DC stick so much better than using the
    AC cracker box.

    --
    Bob La Londe
    CNC Molds N Stuff
    I've got a lincoln AC/DC "tombstone" and it's plenty heavy enough for
    anything I do - sure like the DC capability. Don't have occaision to
    use it much as it's a bit TOO big for some od the stuff I've been into
    lately where I have a buddy TIG for me

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Snag@21:1/5 to Bob La Londe on Sun Jan 8 18:04:39 2023
    On 1/8/2023 4:46 PM, Bob La Londe wrote:
    On 1/8/2023 2:35 PM, Jim Wilkins wrote:
    "Snag"  wrote in message news:tpfbt0$3ufpe$1@dont-email.me...
      A neighbor's friend brought a small welding repair over for me .
    It's an I beam that is the backbone of a PTO powered post hole auger .
    But that's not what this post is about , this post is about OHMYGAWD I
    love my new welder . The flange that carries the yoke that the auger
    hangs on had fatigued and split from the web , First order was to pull
    it back into position and tack it in place . Then vee one side and run
    a bead then flip and grind down to fresh weld and lay in a couple of
    passes - all on the lowest power setting . Welding 1/4" thick
    reinforcing strips on both sides had it all the way up to half power .
    I may never need to use my tombstone welder again ...
    Snag

    ------------------

    Flux core?


    I've been debating selling mine.  On the rare occasion when I really
    might need to burn some 7018 for some thicker plate I have the AHP ACDC
    Pulse TIG/Stick.  I like running DC stick so much better than using the
    AC cracker box.


    Mine's probably worth more as scrap ... I've read that these IGBT
    welding machines have a bit of a different current profile , had mine
    for several years now and I've never even plugged the stinget cable into
    the machine . My stick welding sucks and I avoid it when I can .
    --
    Snag
    "You can lead a dummy to facts
    but you can't make him think."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Wilkins@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jan 9 11:50:20 2023
    "Snag" wrote in message news:tpflmq$3vdrl$1@dont-email.me...

    Mine's probably worth more as scrap ... I've read that these IGBT
    welding machines have a bit of a different current profile , had mine
    for several years now and I've never even plugged the stinget cable into
    the machine . My stick welding sucks and I avoid it when I can .
    Snag

    ----------------------

    I was terrible at stick welding until I took a night school class in it and
    was shown the proper preparation and technique, and introduced to 7018 DC. I spent all 6 sessions practicing making and breaking welds until finally I
    could fold one double without a crack. Then I built the front end loader and sawmill.

    It was just as helpful and more economical of steel to run many parallel
    beads across one piece of randomly shaped steel scrap instead of joining two straight-edged pieces.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Snag@21:1/5 to Jim Wilkins on Mon Jan 9 16:08:12 2023
    On 1/9/2023 10:50 AM, Jim Wilkins wrote:
    "Snag"  wrote in message news:tpflmq$3vdrl$1@dont-email.me...

    Mine's probably worth more as scrap ... I've read that these IGBT
    welding machines have a bit of a different current profile , had mine
    for several years now and I've never even plugged the stinget cable into
    the machine . My stick welding sucks and I avoid it when I can .
    Snag

    ----------------------

    I was terrible at stick welding until I took a night school class in it
    and was shown the proper preparation and technique, and introduced to
    7018 DC. I spent all 6 sessions practicing making and breaking welds
    until finally I could fold one double without a crack. Then I built the
    front end loader and sawmill.

    It was just as helpful and more economical of steel to run many parallel beads across one piece of randomly shaped steel scrap instead of joining
    two straight-edged pieces.


    I did that with the TIG . I should do a sheet or two with the stick ,
    I may be able to do better now . I've been studying puddles ... and it
    helped my MIG welding , may be it could help with stick too .
    --
    Snag
    "You can lead a dummy to facts
    but you can't make him think."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bob La Londe@21:1/5 to Snag on Tue Jan 10 11:40:00 2023
    On 1/9/2023 3:08 PM, Snag wrote:
    On 1/9/2023 10:50 AM, Jim Wilkins wrote:
    "Snag"  wrote in message news:tpflmq$3vdrl$1@dont-email.me...

    Mine's probably worth more as scrap ... I've read that these IGBT
    welding machines have a bit of a different current profile , had mine
    for several years now and I've never even plugged the stinget cable into
    the machine . My stick welding sucks and I avoid it when I can .
    Snag

    ----------------------

    I was terrible at stick welding until I took a night school class in
    it and was shown the proper preparation and technique, and introduced
    to 7018 DC. I spent all 6 sessions practicing making and breaking
    welds until finally I could fold one double without a crack. Then I
    built the front end loader and sawmill.

    It was just as helpful and more economical of steel to run many
    parallel beads across one piece of randomly shaped steel scrap instead
    of joining two straight-edged pieces.


      I did that with the TIG . I should do a sheet or two with the stick ,
    I may be able to do better now . I've been studying puddles ... and it
    helped my MIG welding , may be it could help with stick too .

    The stick part is easy. Its the welding part that's hard after you
    establish the stick.


    --
    Bob La Londe
    CNC Molds N Stuff


    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Richard Smith@21:1/5 to Jim Wilkins on Wed Jan 11 07:34:05 2023
    "Jim Wilkins" <muratlanne@gmail.com> writes:

    "Snag" wrote in message news:tpflmq$3vdrl$1@dont-email.me...

    Mine's ...

    ----------------------

    I was terrible at stick welding until I took a night school class in
    it and was shown the proper preparation and technique, and introduced
    to 7018 DC. I spent all 6 sessions practicing making and breaking
    welds until finally I could fold one double without a crack. Then I
    built the front end loader and sawmill.

    It was just as helpful and more economical of steel to run many
    parallel beads across one piece of randomly shaped steel scrap instead
    of joining two straight-edged pieces.

    That's the almost universal story of learning welding - starting off
    as a basic but competent welder-the-person, isn't it?

    Doing "pad-welds" is a great start. When you can lay a neat pad
    (which you might do "in real life" - build-up a worn section of a
    machine), you probably control angles (tilt and slope), run-rate,
    where exactly you are pointing the rod - so "you know where you are
    going with it" you have the basics of depositing metal.
    Well to be commended.

    Then making-and-breaking welds - that learning cycle.
    Makes you "engineering-minded". You are visualising a weld which will
    do the job and doing it.
    I worked in a college in a terribly deprived part of London and also
    did welding training there, and I can tell you - the welding school is
    always an oasis. If you went in and saw any person and asked what
    they are working at, they'd show you "the next weld" they are trying
    to master, how they have improved, what they think will get them there
    and what their hope is "I'm hoping to have 'got it' by midday meal
    break / by afternoon tea-time / etc. All on their own mission.
    (unlike a classroom where you are trying to get a cohort along one
    shared learning path).
    The self-motivation is astonishing in a welding school, compared to
    the miasma of hopelessness which can be most of the rest of the place.

    "Don't make welds without breaking welding" is the root.

    Here in the UK in production environments if that had that principle
    in mind most of the problems would not be there. As I have seen.

    In education to fit "frameworks" (sic.) they have split up years into "appearance" and then "doing breaks and macros".
    Never do that - the advance is fine-scale evolution make-and-break
    (and macro).

    So - big yes, yes, yes, concurring that is exactly the way and so it
    is that it was so for me.

    Regards,
    Rich Smith





    Welding is complexly dependent on several physical Laws of the
    Universe, unless a situation is so familiar and you know how good and
    bad welds run, you really should be doing test-welds.



    Then what you mention next - the problems I have seen in the UK if
    they did this most basic thing they'd get out of those problems.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Wilkins@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jan 11 08:02:27 2023
    "Richard Smith" wrote in message news:ly7cxt7ceq.fsf@void.com...
    ...
    In education to fit "frameworks" (sic.) they have split up years into "appearance" and then "doing breaks and macros".
    Never do that - the advance is fine-scale evolution make-and-break
    (and macro).

    So - big yes, yes, yes, concurring that is exactly the way and so it
    is that it was so for me.

    Regards,
    Rich Smith

    -------------------

    I didn't realize how hide-bound the educational establishment was until I started taking night classes with teachers who worked for a living. Instead
    of worshipping the formal structure of, say, Calculus they taught it as a useful tool, and finally I could understand it. In the college textbook the Limit process that underlies differentiation and integration took up one paragraph. The night class spent two weeks on the Limit origins of the memorized formulas and then they made sense. A useful trick I learned was memorizing reciprocals, which enables mental division and simplifies setting
    up a lathe to cut screw threads. Afterwards I could solve questions of frequency, capacitance and inductance in my head before the engineer could
    find his calculator.

    https://ecologyisnotadirtyword.com/2017/08/27/applied-vs-pure-its-all-ecology-at-the-end-of-the-day/
    " ‘Pure’ scientists were often more disparaging of applied science than the other way around. This kind of scholarly rivalry has been around since the ancient in-fighting between classical philosophers. John Dewey (among
    others) saw it as simple class snobbery:"

    I see it as denying the value of what they aren't good at. An article I read about Los Alamos mentioned a camping trip which revealed that many of the world's top theoretical physicists couldn't light a fire. The author was the only physicist who could weld, and thus quickly fixed many problems the
    others would have sought a consultant for -- a considerable delay on a
    highly classified project.

    The local night schools have been lucky to find excellent nuclear and bridge certified welders who could also teach. They have more trouble finding qualified instructors for the other subjects they would like to offer such
    as small engine repair, so much that they asked if I was interested. There
    are too many gaps in my self-education for that. I took the auto repair
    course to learn what's new and maybe lose any bad habits I'd acquired.
    jsw

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Wilkins@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jan 11 08:20:08 2023
    "Richard Smith" wrote in message news:ly7cxt7ceq.fsf@void.com...

    Doing "pad-welds" is a great start. When you can lay a neat pad
    (which you might do "in real life" - build-up a worn section of a
    machine), you probably control angles (tilt and slope), run-rate,
    where exactly you are pointing the rod - so "you know where you are
    going with it" you have the basics of depositing metal.
    Well to be commended.

    --------------------

    On my own initiative I practiced filling in coin-sized holes with MIG and piling up aluminum stalagmites with TIG, to refine my puddle control. I
    think they were good practice though I haven't seen them recommended.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Richard Smith@21:1/5 to Jim Wilkins on Wed Jan 11 18:42:14 2023
    "Jim Wilkins" <muratlanne@gmail.com> writes:

    "Richard Smith" wrote in message news:ly7cxt7ceq.fsf@void.com...
    ...
    ...

    -------------------

    I didn't realize how hide-bound the educational establishment was
    until I started taking night classes with teachers who worked for a
    living. Instead of worshipping the formal structure of, say, Calculus
    they taught it as a useful tool, and finally I could understand it.

    Yes I met this teaching vocational students. Showing them the theory
    and maths is actually good and useful.

    I can barely understand a word of mathematics books for techniques I
    have "re-invented" and used given a need.

    ...

    https://ecologyisnotadirtyword.com/2017/08/27/applied-vs-pure-its-all-ecology-at-the-end-of-the-day/
    " ‘Pure’ scientists were often more disparaging of applied science
    than the other way around. ...

    When doing my welding engineering masters the two of us who were
    welders - the poor Head of Department would rather have endured an
    untreated case of an embarrassing socially transmitted condition than
    have to talk with one of us.

    Poor fellow!

    The thing is we - the two of us welders - often knew that things don't
    work the way he was trying to help us see the way to proceed.
    Also some welding conditions are so exact that you have to know they
    are there and recognise your way to a very exact condition a matrix of
    test conditions could never find (the combinations are unimaginably
    immense). There were all sorts of things where we knew "God's design"
    and were therefore respectful of it.
    eg. response
    "If you as much of think of iron and titanium in the same thought they
    form a brittle intermetallic phase"
    Obviously that is superlative, but the direction of the conversation
    can be inferred :-)

    But yes the poor fellow thought his esteemed theoretical science was
    superior to our "applied science".
    Oh gawd - the poor fellow threatened to walk out of a meeting after I
    explained a strategy he suggested would not work - until he looked
    around and realised we were in his own office - he'd threatened to
    walk out of his own office ...

    We did feel a bit sorry for him...

    Rich S

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Wilkins@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jan 11 13:42:57 2023
    "Richard Smith" wrote in message news:ly7cxt7ceq.fsf@void.com...

    "Don't make welds without breaking welding" is the root.

    Here in the UK in production environments if that had that principle
    in mind most of the problems would not be there. As I have seen.

    -----------------------

    I've been testing things to destruction since high school, on a Tinius Olsen tensile strength tester at an after-school factory job. I destroyed a
    prototype GM fuel injection computer by subjecting it to the overvoltage
    abuse it was supposed to withstand, on a machine I built to their specs.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Load_dump

    I don't know if the 40V spec applies to welding, I disconnect the battery
    just in case. The energy in a load dump is whatever was stored in the alternator rotor's inductance, not continuous like a welder, although it can repeat, so my machine had time delay relays to let them set the pulse repetition rate. They specified a maximum time that included their
    undisclosed intended setting.

    At the time, the mid 70's, electronics was new to the automotive industry
    which previously had nothing more complex than a radio they bought. They
    hired a lot of bright new electrical engineers who had to painfully learn
    the decidedly non-theoretical conditions of road vehicles and typical
    American lack of maintenance. I did have the slight advantage of coming from military electronics which have to take anything Nature throws at them,
    though at a commercially unacceptable cost and weight penalty.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Wilkins@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jan 11 14:50:44 2023
    "Richard Smith" wrote in message news:lyzgaosyk9.fsf@void.com...
    ...
    But yes the poor fellow thought his esteemed theoretical science was
    superior to our "applied science".
    Oh gawd - the poor fellow threatened to walk out of a meeting after I
    explained a strategy he suggested would not work - until he looked
    around and realised we were in his own office - he'd threatened to
    walk out of his own office ...

    We did feel a bit sorry for him...

    Rich S
    -----------------------------
    Chemistry was different, the theory had evolved to explain unexpected experimental results. Newton had been able to puzzle out the underlying principles of Physics, Optics and Calculus but he utterly failed with Chemistry. The last critical step came in 1932 with Chadwick's discovery of
    the Neutron, which finally explained why many elements didn't have the
    simple integer atomic weight relationships the prevailing theory predicted.

    I didn't encounter pure theoreticians outside the classroom until later and
    by then I knew enough to deal with them. One Ph.D didn't know that resistors come with tolerance bands, he expected 8 digit precision until shown the commercial reality, and he didn't know how to handle measurement uncertainty
    as chemists have learned to. His final product had a 40% tolerance.

    https://learn.parallax.com/support/reference/resistor-color-codes
    Tolerances down to 0.01% are available if you need and can afford them. When
    I was building industrial test equipment in the 1980's they were $5 each, standard ones were $0.10 or less. Any that we drew from stock for lab use became "tainted" and couldn't be returned, so I have a decent supply of
    lightly used ones to calibrate my meters since I was building and
    programming the test and calibration fixtures.

    At Mitre the pure theoreticians apparently knew better than to try to design actual hardware, so the Ph.Ds I worked for had practical experience. I still could think of simplifying shortcuts they hadn't, to the extent that they handed me data sheets for the critical components and left me to figure out
    how to use them.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Wilkins@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jan 11 18:05:01 2023
    "Richard Smith" wrote in message news:lyzgaosyk9.fsf@void.com...

    There were all sorts of things where we knew "God's design"
    and were therefore respectful of it.
    eg. response
    "If you as much of think of iron and titanium in the same thought they
    form a brittle intermetallic phase"
    Obviously that is superlative, but the direction of the conversation
    can be inferred :-)

    -----------------------

    Huh?

    https://science.jrank.org/pages/6852/Titanium-Uses.html

    "By far the most important use of titanium is in making alloys. It is the element most commonly added to steel because it increases the strength and resistance to corrosion of steel."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Billington@21:1/5 to Jim Wilkins on Wed Jan 11 23:26:58 2023
    On 11/01/2023 23:05, Jim Wilkins wrote:
    "Richard Smith"  wrote in message news:lyzgaosyk9.fsf@void.com...

    There were all sorts of things where we knew "God's design"
    and were therefore respectful of it.
    eg. response
    "If you as much of think of iron and titanium in the same thought they
    form a brittle intermetallic phase"
    Obviously that is superlative, but the direction of the conversation
    can be inferred :-)

    -----------------------

    Huh?

    https://science.jrank.org/pages/6852/Titanium-Uses.html

    "By far the most important use of titanium is in making alloys. It is
    the element most commonly added to steel because it increases the
    strength and resistance to corrosion of steel."

    It may be like the effect of manganese in steel and depends on the
    percentage, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mangalloy also known as
    Hadfield steel. It mentions as I remembered that around 5% - 6%
    manganese addition it becomes so brittle it can be pulverised with a
    hammer beyond that things change and it becomes extremely durable and
    abrasion resistant. I may have some as I have an ore crusher knuckle
    somewhere.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Wilkins@21:1/5 to Jim Wilkins on Wed Jan 11 21:54:30 2023
    "David Billington" wrote in message news:tpngk2$11tvm$1@dont-email.me...

    On 11/01/2023 23:05, Jim Wilkins wrote:
    "Richard Smith" wrote in message news:lyzgaosyk9.fsf@void.com...

    There were all sorts of things where we knew "God's design"
    and were therefore respectful of it.
    eg. response
    "If you as much of think of iron and titanium in the same thought they
    form a brittle intermetallic phase"
    Obviously that is superlative, but the direction of the conversation
    can be inferred :-)

    -----------------------

    Huh?

    https://science.jrank.org/pages/6852/Titanium-Uses.html

    "By far the most important use of titanium is in making alloys. It is
    the element most commonly added to steel because it increases the
    strength and resistance to corrosion of steel."

    It may be like the effect of manganese in steel and depends on the
    percentage, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mangalloy also known as
    Hadfield steel. It mentions as I remembered that around 5% - 6%
    manganese addition it becomes so brittle it can be pulverised with a
    hammer beyond that things change and it becomes extremely durable and
    abrasion resistant. I may have some as I have an ore crusher knuckle
    somewhere.

    -----------------------------

    Tin bronze is like that, at a 2:1 mix it's quite brittle. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speculum_metal

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Richard Smith@21:1/5 to Jim Wilkins on Tue Jan 17 15:26:04 2023
    "Jim Wilkins" <muratlanne@gmail.com> writes:

    "Richard Smith" wrote in message news:lyzgaosyk9.fsf@void.com...

    There were all sorts of things where we knew "God's design"
    and were therefore respectful of it.
    eg. response
    "If you as much of think of iron and titanium in the same thought they
    form a brittle intermetallic phase"
    Obviously that is superlative, but the direction of the conversation
    can be inferred :-)

    -----------------------

    Huh?

    https://science.jrank.org/pages/6852/Titanium-Uses.html

    "By far the most important use of titanium is in making alloys. It is
    the element most commonly added to steel because it increases the
    strength and resistance to corrosion of steel."

    My impression is you shouldn't place too much credence on the "jrank"
    link.

    The brittleness is any attempt to bring together a piece of titanium
    and a piece of iron/steel.

    Alloying - broadly (forgive me experienced steel metallurgists)
    Titanium as an alloying addition is one of the very reactive alloying
    elements usually used in small quantities, like Aluminium, Calcium,
    Niobium, etc.
    With an already "clean" melt, Titanium is a ferocious "getter" for non-metallics in the melt. Titanium reactant precipitates feature in grain-refining. It might feature in a super-refined melt going to a High-Strength Low-Alloy steel - eg. a Thermo-Mechanically
    Controlled-Processed steel (see Dillinger Huette and the few others in
    the world (?) who can do this).
    I guess that throw Titanium in a "rough" melt and it would be entirely
    consumed and lost "getting" oxygen which could be much more cheaply
    removed with Aluminium.

    Get someone who works with this stuff to comment if it's important to
    you.

    In Sheffield there was an alloy with a small Titanium addition and it
    was a few Rockwell hardnesses above what it should have been. If they
    could have understood where it came from and what its characteristics
    were it would have been a very cheap way to get a stronger harder
    steel, if all else were well.
    I had a go at it - it would grain-grow if left a long time at a high temperature, so that eliminated some hypotheses at what was going on.
    Etc.

    I am not completely without knowledge, but do get experienced advice
    if it matters.

    However, as I say, this link https://science.jrank.org/pages/6852/Titanium-Uses.html
    tries to simplify more than gives usable impressions.

    Regards,

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Norman Yarvin@21:1/5 to Richard Smith on Tue Jan 17 19:38:50 2023
    On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 at 1:42:18 PM UTC-5, Richard Smith wrote:

    I can barely understand a word of mathematics books for techniques I
    have "re-invented" and used given a need.

    Having been looking at your website and in particular at your thesis recently... yeah, I can tell. I mean, that "sixth-jumping" technique of numerical computation is brilliant. One could probably derive it from
    the partial differential equation for diffusion (in a derivation that would involve making approximations at various points), and that would be
    theorists' way of doing it. But you just pulled it out of your hat, as
    if it were obvious, which in a way it is. It's not the most efficient way
    to do the computation, but it will do, and is simple and direct. (If you
    ever have that task again, look for a heat equation solver and pretend
    hydrogen content is "heat", the heat equation is the same as that
    for diffusion.) In any case, a theorist would have made it sound more profound, but wouldn't have done it any better -- at least as regards the
    core algorithm.

    On the other hand, your treatment of boundaries between regions with
    different diffusion coefficients really could have used a theorist's input, because the first thing to decide from a theoretical perspective is what
    the boundary condition should be. And the usual boundary condition for diffusion is that the concentrations on each side of the boundary are
    equal -- whereas you looked at your algorithm, whose process resulted
    in (at the boundary) a sharp jump in concentrations, and took that as
    given. It's not; you have a clever hack for changing the diffusion
    coefficient that works fine on either side of the boundary, but that hack should not be taken as an inevitable statement of what happens at the
    boundary. There are other possible hacks, such as changing the cell
    size on the slower-diffusing side to be smaller, which would give no
    jump.

    Sometimes there can indeed be a sharp jump; for instance if one side
    has a greater chemical affinity to the thing that is diffusing, then
    there's an energy level difference across the boundary, and since it's
    harder to go uphill than downhill the result is a jump in concentrations.
    But in this case that seems unlikely since you still basically have steel
    on both sides of the boundary: a hydrogen atom that wanders across
    the boundary won't find much change in conditions. (On a basic physics
    level, the diffusion can't be purely a process of jumping from one site that traps hydrogen to another; there's got to be some wandering-around
    between such sites, and it's the wandering-around that determines what
    site it lands in.) A sharp jump in concentration can't absolutely be
    ruled out, but shouldn't be assumed, either.

    This doesn't affect the main results of your thesis, of course. I was reading it because although I'd heard of hydrogen embrittlement, the fact that
    hydrogen actually could be observed bubbling out of a freshly welded
    surface (under the right conditions) was new to me and intriguing.

    Anyway, learning the theory of partial differential equations well
    enough to use it takes a lot of time and effort, and no one can be
    blamed for not doing so (unless of course that's what they're
    being paid for).

    When doing my welding engineering masters the two of us who were
    welders - the poor Head of Department would rather have endured an
    untreated case of an embarrassing socially transmitted condition than
    have to talk with one of us.

    "Their minds bred in and in, and were accordingly cursed with barrenness
    and degeneracy. No extraneous beauty or vigor was engrafted on the
    decaying stock. By an exclusive attention to one class of phenomena,
    by an exclusive taste for one species of excellence, the human intellect
    was stunted."

    I think that quote sums it up.

    ---
    Norman Yarvin
    yarvin@yarchive.net

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Richard Smith@21:1/5 to Norman Yarvin on Fri Jan 20 04:11:58 2023
    Norman Yarvin <norman.yarvin@gmail.com> writes:

    On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 at 1:42:18 PM UTC-5, Richard Smith wrote:

    I can barely understand a word of mathematics books for techniques I
    have "re-invented" and used given a need.

    Having been looking at your website and in particular at your thesis recently... yeah, I can tell. I mean, that "sixth-jumping" technique of numerical computation is brilliant. One could probably derive it from
    the partial differential equation for diffusion (in a derivation that would involve making approximations at various points), and that would be theorists' way of doing it. But you just pulled it out of your hat, as
    if it were obvious, which in a way it is. It's not the most efficient way
    to do the computation, but it will do, and is simple and direct. (If you ever have that task again, look for a heat equation solver and pretend hydrogen content is "heat", the heat equation is the same as that
    for diffusion.) In any case, a theorist would have made it sound more profound, but wouldn't have done it any better -- at least as regards the core algorithm.

    On the other hand, your treatment of boundaries between regions with different diffusion coefficients really could have used a theorist's input, because the first thing to decide from a theoretical perspective is what
    the boundary condition should be. And the usual boundary condition for diffusion is that the concentrations on each side of the boundary are
    equal -- whereas you looked at your algorithm, whose process resulted
    in (at the boundary) a sharp jump in concentrations, and took that as
    given. It's not; you have a clever hack for changing the diffusion coefficient that works fine on either side of the boundary, but that hack should not be taken as an inevitable statement of what happens at the boundary. There are other possible hacks, such as changing the cell
    size on the slower-diffusing side to be smaller, which would give no
    jump.

    Sometimes there can indeed be a sharp jump; for instance if one side
    has a greater chemical affinity to the thing that is diffusing, then
    there's an energy level difference across the boundary, and since it's
    harder to go uphill than downhill the result is a jump in concentrations.
    But in this case that seems unlikely since you still basically have steel
    on both sides of the boundary: a hydrogen atom that wanders across
    the boundary won't find much change in conditions. (On a basic physics level, the diffusion can't be purely a process of jumping from one site that traps hydrogen to another; there's got to be some wandering-around
    between such sites, and it's the wandering-around that determines what
    site it lands in.) A sharp jump in concentration can't absolutely be
    ruled out, but shouldn't be assumed, either.

    This doesn't affect the main results of your thesis, of course. I was reading
    it because although I'd heard of hydrogen embrittlement, the fact that hydrogen actually could be observed bubbling out of a freshly welded
    surface (under the right conditions) was new to me and intriguing.

    Anyway, learning the theory of partial differential equations well
    enough to use it takes a lot of time and effort, and no one can be
    blamed for not doing so (unless of course that's what they're
    being paid for).

    When doing my welding engineering masters the two of us who were
    welders - the poor Head of Department would rather have endured an
    untreated case of an embarrassing socially transmitted condition than
    have to talk with one of us.

    "Their minds bred in and in, and were accordingly cursed with barrenness
    and degeneracy. No extraneous beauty or vigor was engrafted on the
    decaying stock. By an exclusive attention to one class of phenomena,
    by an exclusive taste for one species of excellence, the human intellect
    was stunted."

    I think that quote sums it up.

    ---
    Norman Yarvin
    yarvin@yarchive.net

    The "sixth-jumping" technique came to me having read Adolf Fick's
    original 1855 (?) scientific paper. It is wise. He knows most
    "assumptions" on the way to formulating his "Fick's Laws" are not
    going to be so in most realities,

    (I believe you can see "Fickian Diffusion" if you use a radioactive
    tracer isotope on one side of a boundary (same element; difference in
    the nucleus not affecting chemical properties), and see it mix in time
    and have a way to detect concentration of "origin-1" to "origin-2"
    atoms by radioactivity) - other than that - no chance...)

    I saw that if you have "an automatic computer" ("a computer") you
    don't need to formulate differential equations.

    A person of Middle-Eastern origin showed me the computational method
    for solving mathematical integration ("calculus") approximately but
    achievably. But having seen that, my "sixth-jumping model" came to
    me. My sixth-jumping model used as a general solution does have
    "convergence" with increasing discretisation, by the way, stating the
    obvious.

    The algorithm is / was very efficient. The Computer Science people
    were very glad of seeing the real performance of computers revealed,
    by reason of knowing exactly how many operations my algorithm had to
    do to go each step of the solution.

    By the way - when I did my Doctoral research back up to the late
    1990's, it really wasn't then possible to solve in 3 dimensions for mathematical expressions for conductive heat flow and diffusion.
    The computer memory requirement; the computing time.
    Now; yes - "even I" solve for stresses and strains in 3 dimensions
    with Finite Element Analysis programs.
    But then, being realistic...
    I had 80MB of memory, which was five times a good-spec computer then,
    and people used to sit there drooling watching the computer go through
    its boot-up routine and check the memory. But I had to fit a
    3-dimensional computational model into that. I did not need or use "swap-space" on a hard-disk - the entire solution fitted into the
    computer memory.

    That is a digression from hydrogen in metals.

    *** My solution did the right thing. ***
    That must be surely correct because it explains so much.
    You talk of "boundaries" and "boundary conditions". How could anyone
    have prior knowledge of what to set this at???
    I found scientific "papers" where solutions were presented which were mathematically correct but physically incorrect.
    My solution is a model which done sytematically gives a quantitative
    result. It "shows the way" because it is a model.

    You talk about "hacks" - but this solution, which is the
    implementation of a model, is "pure" - you know what it represents
    physically.

    I don't think I am contributing anything, because your comment is very insightful and I get the impression you are a genuine scientist.

    I would commend anyone interested to go back and re-read what you have
    written after reading these comments of mine, because of the quality
    of your understanding.

    PS - I used the "sixth-jumping" solution for two years before I ever
    explained to anyone how it worked. It took me something like 20
    minutes to find an explanation which worked, to a person who was an
    expert in diffusion and had made useful discoveries. He finally "got
    it" and asked "So if Adolf Fick had had an automatic computer, he
    would have solved for diffusion this way?", to which I replied
    something like "Almost certainly".

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Richard Smith@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jan 20 08:09:34 2023
    Norman - the reality at the time, in the early 1990's, was that these
    German and Japanese Thermo-Mechanically Controlled-Processed plate High-Strength Low-Alloy steels were so superior, leaving "us" having
    to buy these steels and put them through our pipe-mills while plate
    capacity here stood idle.
    One advantage was their weldability. That was what I sought to
    address. Previous weld cracking susceptibility tests we had - you
    could set every variable to the maximum and the TMCP steels would not
    crack ever.

    There were other advantages. Tough at arctic temperatures. High
    strength. Highly resistant to "sour" crude oils for pipelines. Etc.

    I "got" weldability and sour oil resistance.

    I set out to understand the weldability. That explanation also
    explained the resistance to "SOHIC" - sour oil resistance.

    Models lead the way, and what mine showed appears to explain
    everything.
    I would have needed more tests to prove whether the apparent
    explanation was the actual explanation - but I had had a bruising
    journey through my PhD, and the thought of more time in academia was
    so horrible I didn't even have it.


    Regarding this work and how you seem to find it remarkable - in "bang
    for buck"? - I found others.
    One is "fatigue-resistant welds" http://weldsmith.co.uk/tech/fatgres/210209_hiperfstrlstl_intro/210209_hiperfstrlstl_intro.html
    "Invitation to take interest in high-performance steel structures for cyclic-loading ("fatiguing") applications"
    Again I played an instinct - I had no plan but was curious about how
    "low specification" welds would perform in fatigue and did an "extra
    sample". It hadn't even got any cracks started at nearly six times
    the cycles it should have broken.

    Then there's been well-chosen welding techniques.

    I have helped people who know me with analyses which solved major
    "challenges" but they are confidential.

    This was the best work I got http://www.weldsmith.co.uk/career/writing/3bb_2015/1703_3BBp_RDS_memoir.html "Memoir - the 3rd Bosphorus Bridge project, Turkey, 2015"


    BTW I did a memoir of the Doctoral research I did http://www.weldsmith.co.uk/career/writing/phd/1701_hmov_weldzone_platesteels_story.html
    "Memoir of my Doctoral research endeavour"

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Richard Smith@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jan 20 11:08:55 2023
    Norman - no-one previously knew there was a more than 3-fold
    difference in the diffusivity ("movement rate") of hydrogen in "plate
    steels" - thicker C-Mn steels used for general construction,
    pipelines, ships, etc.
    I found that out experimentally early on.
    That was a surprise. It had my thoughts going on a path which lead to
    "the sixth-jumping solution".
    In all fairness - those initiating and putting together the project
    had that intuition that movement could surely be the only aspect
    concealing the explanation seeing as so much is / was known about
    other things. The steel samples they had assembled for me was an
    embodiment of that intuition of theirs.
    But in all fairness to me - I found the test(s) which revealed the hydrogen-movement behaviour, when everyone else thought it
    all-but-impossible.
    My experiments had about the same qualities as my computational model
    / solution, I suggest...

    My "Wedge Weld Hydrogen Penetration" test - that only works because
    there are things going on we do not understand. But the pattern of
    results is so exact - movement-distance is strictly proportional to
    square-root of time always as ever seen. So there was confidence to
    use this "unexpected bounty".
    But the thing is, I did a "scattergun" approach early on, with
    "dead-certs" not working at all and "almost no hope'ers" astonishing
    with being workhorses - the WWHP test being one.

    You are clearly a scientist - there were about four previous
    scientific papers on hydrogen mmovement in welds - none with any
    analysis of what physical phenomena are giving the results.
    You will be knowing - that is double-unusual.
    * tiny number of previous investigations reported (and that being more
    because cooperation in welding science never ceased during the Cold
    War)(you'd be expecting thousands minimum given the economic,
    commercial and military relevance).
    * a scientific paper published with no mechanistic model trying to
    explain the results is rare

    So that investigation could have been subtitled "To boldly go where
    no-one considered it a particularly good idea to go before".

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Norman Yarvin@21:1/5 to Richard Smith on Sat Jan 21 11:58:04 2023
    On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 3:09:54 AM UTC-5, Richard Smith wrote:
    Norman - the reality at the time, in the early 1990's, was that these
    German and Japanese Thermo-Mechanically Controlled-Processed plate High-Strength Low-Alloy steels were so superior, leaving "us" having
    to buy these steels and put them through our pipe-mills while plate
    capacity here stood idle.

    Has that improved? (Or has it gotten worse, with no longer even a
    British attempt to compete?)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Norman Yarvin@21:1/5 to Richard Smith on Sat Jan 21 11:53:07 2023
    On Thursday, January 19, 2023 at 11:12:03 PM UTC-5, Richard Smith wrote:

    The "sixth-jumping" technique came to me having read Adolf Fick's
    original 1855 (?) scientific paper. It is wise. He knows most
    "assumptions" on the way to formulating his "Fick's Laws" are not
    going to be so in most realities,

    (I believe you can see "Fickian Diffusion" if you use a radioactive
    tracer isotope on one side of a boundary (same element; difference in
    the nucleus not affecting chemical properties), and see it mix in time
    and have a way to detect concentration of "origin-1" to "origin-2"
    atoms by radioactivity) - other than that - no chance...)

    To me it's just "diffusion": with that sort of basic process -- particles wandering around randomly -- it's hard for there to be any other
    governing law.

    I saw that if you have "an automatic computer" ("a computer") you
    don't need to formulate differential equations.

    Well, the differential equation is simply the difference equation (what
    you used) taken to the limit of infinite resolution: not a big step in and
    of itself, but it opens the door to taking advantage of some
    powerful mathematical techniques (as well as of course the risk
    of getting lost in math and never finishing your project).


    By the way - when I did my Doctoral research back up to the late
    1990's, it really wasn't then possible to solve in 3 dimensions for mathematical expressions for conductive heat flow and diffusion.
    The computer memory requirement; the computing time.

    Ah, but that presumes you're storing a number for every point in
    a 3-dimensional grid and doing a calculation at each point for
    every timestep. There are more sophisticated ways: for instance
    one way to solve the heat equation is to take the FFT of your starting
    state (in all three dimensions, one at a time), after which you can get
    the solution at any subsequent time by just multiplying each FFT
    coefficient by an easily-calculated value (an exponential decay
    proportional to spatial frequency) and doing the inverse FFT
    transforms. (No time-stepping: just go directly to the desired time.)

    Now, that only applies to a 3D rectangular block, and your shape
    was a bit more complicated than that, so you couldn't have done
    exactly that; but it's an illustration of the sorts of techniques that are
    out there (and that these days you could access by just using a good
    heat equation solver and pretending hydrogen concentration was heat).

    You talk of "boundaries" and "boundary conditions". How could anyone
    have prior knowledge of what to set this at???
    I found scientific "papers" where solutions were presented which were mathematically correct but physically incorrect.

    You answered that one yourself: demand physical correctness. (And
    beware of math tricks; admit no bad assumptions.)

    You talk about "hacks" - but this solution, which is the
    implementation of a model, is "pure" - you know what it represents physically.

    Hack is not a dirty word here; it just means not taking as much care as
    would be taken in a really thorough solution. Like, it may seem a waste
    of time to take your difference equation, take the limit to make it a differential equation, only to convert it back to a difference
    equation to actually solve it. And for your purposes of your thesis it probably would have been a waste of time. But the differential equation
    is closer to the actual physics, and in the process of converting it back
    to a difference equation you learn what sort of errors you'll be making
    and have opportunities to improve them.

    Hacks that work are great; it's just that not all of them work. You mostly validated your solver, by checking against an analytical (textbook)
    solution, so that part worked, but I don't believe you validated the
    aspect of the solver that gave you sharp jumps across boundaries
    between different diffusion coefficients.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Wilkins@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jan 21 18:22:28 2023
    "Richard Smith" wrote in message news:ly7cxhfooo.fsf@void.com...

    Norman - no-one previously knew there was a more than 3-fold
    difference in the diffusivity ("movement rate") of hydrogen in "plate
    steels" - thicker C-Mn steels used for general construction,
    pipelines, ships, etc.
    I found that out experimentally early on.
    That was a surprise. It had my thoughts going on a path which lead to
    "the sixth-jumping solution".
    In all fairness - those initiating and putting together the project
    had that intuition that movement could surely be the only aspect
    concealing the explanation seeing as so much is / was known about
    other things. The steel samples they had assembled for me was an
    embodiment of that intuition of theirs.
    But in all fairness to me - I found the test(s) which revealed the hydrogen-movement behaviour, when everyone else thought it
    all-but-impossible.
    My experiments had about the same qualities as my computational model
    / solution, I suggest...

    My "Wedge Weld Hydrogen Penetration" test - that only works because
    there are things going on we do not understand. But the pattern of
    results is so exact - movement-distance is strictly proportional to
    square-root of time always as ever seen. So there was confidence to
    use this "unexpected bounty".
    But the thing is, I did a "scattergun" approach early on, with
    "dead-certs" not working at all and "almost no hope'ers" astonishing
    with being workhorses - the WWHP test being one.

    You are clearly a scientist - there were about four previous
    scientific papers on hydrogen mmovement in welds - none with any
    analysis of what physical phenomena are giving the results.
    You will be knowing - that is double-unusual.
    * tiny number of previous investigations reported (and that being more
    because cooperation in welding science never ceased during the Cold
    War)(you'd be expecting thousands minimum given the economic,
    commercial and military relevance).
    * a scientific paper published with no mechanistic model trying to
    explain the results is rare

    So that investigation could have been subtitled "To boldly go where
    no-one considered it a particularly good idea to go before".

    -----------------------

    Diffusion of atoms is extremely important, thoroughly studied and fairly
    easy to measure over distance and time in semiconductor fabrication. I was
    on a team that designed and built the necessary instruments for automated production testing. The electrical properties of Silicon are very sensitive
    to the concentration of trace amounts of other atoms. https://www.eeeguide.com/diffusion-process-in-ic-fabrication/

    BTW "Fick" is the basic 4-letter-word in German.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Richard Smith@21:1/5 to Norman Yarvin on Sun Jan 22 10:43:48 2023
    Norman Yarvin <norman.yarvin@gmail.com> writes:

    On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 3:09:54 AM UTC-5, Richard Smith wrote:
    Norman - the reality at the time, in the early 1990's, was that these
    German and Japanese Thermo-Mechanically Controlled-Processed plate
    High-Strength Low-Alloy steels were so superior, leaving "us" having
    to buy these steels and put them through our pipe-mills while plate
    capacity here stood idle.

    Has that improved? (Or has it gotten worse, with no longer even a
    British attempt to compete?)

    My PhD research should have been subtitled
    "To boldly go where no-one thought it a particularly good idea to go"
    (parody on "Star Trek" upbeat theme)
    and when I completed it, after the scientifically posed "Conclusions"
    the common-language ultra-brief summary would have been
    "You're screwed".

    The properties of the TMCP steels seems only attainable using the TMCP production route. The TMCP steels have a very "clean" microstructure
    of very fine ferrite grains. Nothing else. Tiny precipitates which
    with a scanning electron microscope (SEM) you can resolve are just
    that - some very fine solid precipitates. Presumably reaction
    products of the "fine" additions of the likes of Titanium to an
    already very clean pure highly deoxidised melt. (I had not the budget
    and it was of no importance to my work to use electron spectographic
    methods to analyse what they were - what SEM I got was a "gift"
    anyway).

    Other ways to get the same properties would cost a lot lot lot in
    alloying elements and would have none of the weldability and
    sour-crude-oil resistance. Total non-starter.

    I have never seen one of these, and no photos are released, but I do
    know a few who have seen the rolling mill stand(s) in a
    Thermo-Mechanically Controlled-Processed plate steel plant and they
    are apparently jaw-droppingly awesome. They "work" the steel with
    heavy reductions at blood-red heat (not light reductions at
    yellow-heat). There was not possibility to make that investment here.

    So the answer is "No".

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Richard Smith@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jan 22 11:00:06 2023
    ...
    Diffusion of atoms is extremely important, thoroughly studied and
    fairly easy to measure over distance and time in semiconductor
    fabrication. I was on a team that designed and built the necessary instruments for automated production testing. The electrical
    properties of Silicon are very sensitive to the concentration of trace amounts of other atoms. https://www.eeeguide.com/diffusion-process-in-ic-fabrication/
    ...

    Yes.
    But with hydrogen in steel the hydrogen is moving millimetres in minutes.
    What you'd do for every other element - take a slice and measure the concentration-at-position in the hours days and weeks following - very specifically cannot work for hydrogen in steel.
    Restating:
    if you try to slice a sample with intent to measure the hydrogen in
    it, the hydrogen would be long-gone by the time you had your slice.

    There is then an additional problem. Suppose you had your slice of
    steel with the hydrogen it had previously still all there in the
    conentration profile it had...
    How are you going to measure that hydrogen concentration in-situ???
    Element #1 - you can name a spectroscopic method which would tell you
    what concentration of hydrogen is there?
    (hypothetically - "neutron spectroscopy" - but there is no such
    instrument with fine beam to spot-probe and plot concentration
    *profile* - a hole in the wall of a running nuclear reactor gives a
    "uniform illumination" (?))

    That is why no-one had managed to touch this topic before - despite
    all the steel welded in the world, no-one had information where the
    weld hydrogen went and in what time-scale. Yes, cracks in the weld
    metal and heat affected zone said "'ydrogen woz 'ere" but that's about
    it...


    That's why I work as a welder - I frightened everyone doing what I did
    - and to be honest was very broken and damaged myself after getting
    through that.
    Then furthermore, what I discovered didn't fit with text-book writings
    - and no-one questions what is written even if "God" seems to be
    saying otherwise.

    Etc.

    Best wishes,

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Richard Smith@21:1/5 to Norman Yarvin on Sun Jan 22 11:24:21 2023
    Norman Yarvin <norman.yarvin@gmail.com> writes:


    ...

    To me it's just "diffusion": with that sort of basic process -- particles wandering around randomly -- it's hard for there to be any other
    governing law.

    ...

    No way!!!

    "Random" is the problem - it is hardly likely to be so.

    For two element types to co-exist in one space with no interaction is
    hardly probable. Fick recognises that. He gave us a baseline: "What
    would happen if there were no interaction". Everyone then has to be
    realistic - that is a "baseline" reference case but is almost never
    going to happen.

    My computing solution is a "caveperson with a wooden club" method and
    should be recognised as such.

    You are obviously very bright.

    Then there are other things going on we absolutely do not know about. "Asymmetric diffusion", where the rate the solute enters the solid
    solvent does not match the rate the solute leaves the solid solvent,
    was previously known and observed.
    Broadly the "in" rate is Fickian, but the "out" rate is slower and
    "something else" for hydrogen in steel.

    Even what we do know - that for treatments like cold-working steel the
    product (multiplication) of solubility and diffusivity stays the same
    with increasing cold-work (cold work increases - S increases; D
    decreases) (the "permeability" - seen abundantly elsewhere in-support)
    - which means that solubility and diffusivity must be dependent
    variables on the same one underlying independent physical state - got
    massive explosive vitriolic response when I counselled that at the
    time about 20 years ago to someone dealing with hydrogen. Academics
    who were absolutely livid at the suggestion which is to be seen right
    there "exact" in experimental data.

    Back to movement and "something else" happening...

    I found that this is happening in steel welds.
    That is why I needed my computational solution.

    "Fickian" assumptions are used as the best guess in explaining clauses
    in Standards for welding and hydrogen - but I showed for certain the
    reality is something else.

    I could visualise experiments to try to "break into that" / "get a
    window into what is going on" - but that would have needed a new
    project, and I'd gone through two Universities and three supervisors
    just getting this project done...

    Best wishes,

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Wilkins@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jan 22 19:05:46 2023
    "Jim Wilkins" wrote in message news:tqkid4$3aek4$1@dont-email.me...

    'The effective
    diffusion coefficient of hydrogen in the presence of defect sites is always smaller than that of ideally dissolved hydrogen in the defect-free perfect crystalline lattice."

    ----------------------

    Inversely, the rate of diffusion might be a measure of the quality of the steel.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Wilkins@21:1/5 to Richard Smith on Sun Jan 22 18:54:25 2023
    "Richard Smith" wrote in message news:lycz763kcp.fsf@void.com...

    ...
    Diffusion of atoms is extremely important, thoroughly studied and
    fairly easy to measure over distance and time in semiconductor
    fabrication. I was on a team that designed and built the necessary instruments for automated production testing. The electrical
    properties of Silicon are very sensitive to the concentration of trace amounts of other atoms. https://www.eeeguide.com/diffusion-process-in-ic-fabrication/
    ...

    Yes.
    But with hydrogen in steel the hydrogen is moving millimetres in minutes.
    What you'd do for every other element - take a slice and measure the concentration-at-position in the hours days and weeks following - very specifically cannot work for hydrogen in steel.
    Restating:
    if you try to slice a sample with intent to measure the hydrogen in
    it, the hydrogen would be long-gone by the time you had your slice.

    There is then an additional problem. Suppose you had your slice of
    steel with the hydrogen it had previously still all there in the
    conentration profile it had...
    How are you going to measure that hydrogen concentration in-situ???
    Element #1 - you can name a spectroscopic method which would tell you
    what concentration of hydrogen is there?
    -------------------
    Raman lidar.
    -------------------
    (hypothetically - "neutron spectroscopy" - but there is no such
    instrument with fine beam to spot-probe and plot concentration
    *profile* - a hole in the wall of a running nuclear reactor gives a
    "uniform illumination" (?))

    That is why no-one had managed to touch this topic before - despite
    all the steel welded in the world, no-one had information where the
    weld hydrogen went and in what time-scale. Yes, cracks in the weld
    metal and heat affected zone said "'ydrogen woz 'ere" but that's about
    it...


    That's why I work as a welder - I frightened everyone doing what I did
    - and to be honest was very broken and damaged myself after getting
    through that.
    Then furthermore, what I discovered didn't fit with text-book writings
    - and no-one questions what is written even if "God" seems to be
    saying otherwise.

    Etc.

    Best wishes,

    ------------------------------

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5090567/
    "Only at higher temperatures are the values from different works [diffusion rate measurements] close to each other; at room temperature differences in
    the order of three magnitudes are observed. This is a direct result of the interaction of hydrogen dissolved interstitially in the crystal lattice and lattice defects in the iron, such as vacancies, foreign atoms, dislocations, grain boundaries, voids and other defects. Most of these defect sites tend
    to react exothermally with interstitial hydrogen, as opposed to the
    endothermic dissolution of hydrogen in the lattice, and constitute traps for hydrogen uptake, respectively sources for hydrogen release. The effective diffusion coefficient of hydrogen in the presence of defect sites is always smaller than that of ideally dissolved hydrogen in the defect-free perfect crystalline lattice."

    Is the rate of diffusion through a thin sheet relatable to the rate of diffusion the same distance into a solid?

    For real-time measurement:
    https://unisense.com/products/h2-microsensor/

    For integrated measurement, hydrogen can reduce silver and copper compounds
    to the metal, and increase the sensitivity of photo film.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Richard Smith@21:1/5 to Jim Wilkins on Mon Jan 23 08:08:37 2023
    "Jim Wilkins" <muratlanne@gmail.com> writes:

    "Richard Smith" wrote in message news:lycz763kcp.fsf@void.com...

    ...

    ...

    -------------------
    Raman lidar.
    -------------------

    ...

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5090567/
    "Only at higher temperatures are the values from different works
    [diffusion rate measurements] close to each other; at room temperature differences in the order of three magnitudes are observed. This is a
    direct result of the interaction of hydrogen dissolved interstitially
    in the crystal lattice and lattice defects in the iron, such as
    vacancies, foreign atoms, dislocations, grain boundaries, voids and
    other defects. Most of these defect sites tend to react exothermally
    with interstitial hydrogen, as opposed to the endothermic dissolution
    of hydrogen in the lattice, and constitute traps for hydrogen uptake, respectively sources for hydrogen release. The effective diffusion coefficient of hydrogen in the presence of defect sites is always
    smaller than that of ideally dissolved hydrogen in the defect-free
    perfect crystalline lattice."

    Is the rate of diffusion through a thin sheet relatable to the rate of diffusion the same distance into a solid?

    For real-time measurement:
    https://unisense.com/products/h2-microsensor/

    For integrated measurement, hydrogen can reduce silver and copper
    compounds to the metal, and increase the sensitivity of photo film.

    Correct. Exactly so. "Trapping". By 300degC and upwards all steels
    are showing the same diffusivity to hydrogen accordign to all
    experimental data - they all interlock to say that.

    Thanks
    "Raman Lidar"

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Richard Smith@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jan 23 08:09:02 2023
    Too complex to say that, really, I believe

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Wilkins@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jan 23 08:09:17 2023
    "Richard Smith" wrote in message news:lyh6wh7jwa.fsf@void.com...

    Thanks
    "Raman Lidar"

    --------------------

    If the H2 concentration is high enough there are commercial sensors. https://www.amazon.com/HYDROGEN-FORENSICS-Professional-Explosion-Vibration/dp/B07CRLQZFW

    I assume you'd need a narrow probe to sense in a drilled hole, a data output
    to record the changing rate, local support and an affordable cost, so I
    didn't look further. It can be done. The Mass Air Flow sensor in a car was adapted from the gas chromatograph and might be cobbled into a DIY hydrogen detector, and possibly a Coleman lantern mantle would provide the heat-producing catalyst. Google didn't help there, and I'm too far away and busy with my own projects to provide hands-on interactive lab tech support. https://e2e.ti.com/support/sensors-group/sensors/f/sensors-forum/1061992/how-can-i-design-a-wheatstone-bridge-signal-processing-of-gas-sensor

    I worked at a company that had a semiconductor fab line and gas sensors to detect leaks. There was an oxygen monitor next to the liquid nitrogen cooled wafer probe (IC test) station because we breathe to reduce CO2 acidity in
    the blood and aren't aware of lack of oxygen.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Wilkins@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jan 23 08:47:49 2023
    "Jim Wilkins" wrote in message news:tqm0vg$3kkvv$1@dont-email.me...
    If the H2 concentration is high enough there are commercial sensors.

    ---------------------------
    Carbon monoxide detectors also sense hydrogen, this claims they display 10%
    of the actual concentration. https://chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/81308/can-lead-acid-batteries-release-co-or-can-a-co-sensor-detect-gasses-other-than

    Here's a small, cheap hydrogen sensor for a do-it-yourself project:

    https://www.l-com.com/h2-sensor-modulemq8-50-10000ppmanalog-ttl-output-sraq-g013?gclid=Cj0KCQiA_bieBhDSARIsADU4zLfPelOr3Iycu3HISzQIXUi7KUS-WRNvllq4aRWdtUS7JSNmHJ_agK8aAl8BEALw_wcB

    https://www.l-com.com/Images/Downloadables/Manuals/M_SRAQ-G013.pdf

    https://www.winsen-sensor.com/sensors/h2-sensor/mq8.html

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Norman Yarvin@21:1/5 to Richard Smith on Mon Jan 23 11:28:00 2023
    On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 5:43:55 AM UTC-5, Richard Smith wrote:
    Norman Yarvin writes:

    Has that improved? (Or has it gotten worse, with no longer even a
    British attempt to compete?)
    My PhD research should have been subtitled
    "To boldly go where no-one thought it a particularly good idea to go"
    (parody on "Star Trek" upbeat theme)
    and when I completed it, after the scientifically posed "Conclusions"
    the common-language ultra-brief summary would have been
    "You're screwed".

    That much I gathered. But there are a lot of things that can happen
    in the world: sometimes failing British companies have been bought
    by their German competitors and revamped.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Norman Yarvin@21:1/5 to Richard Smith on Mon Jan 23 11:15:49 2023
    On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 6:24:25 AM UTC-5, Richard Smith wrote:

    Norman Yarvin writes:

    To me it's just "diffusion": with that sort of basic process -- particles
    wandering around randomly -- it's hard for there to be any other
    governing law.

    ...

    No way!!!

    "Random" is the problem - it is hardly likely to be so.

    Oh, it's definitely a random process: thermal energy causing all the
    atoms to vibrate and the looser ones (like hydrogen) to wander around.
    But there are a lot of different random processes.

    Your objection would have been better addressed to the words
    "wandering around" -- because thinking it over again, I see you have a
    point. Suppose that on average the hydrogen atoms spent almost no
    time wandering around and almost all of their time stuck in some trap
    (some local energy well). Then, at equilibrium, a part of the
    material with twice as many traps would have almost twice as many
    hydrogen atoms, since at equilibrium the concentration of hydrogen
    atoms *that are wandering around* is equal everywhere. (That last is
    the part of my argument that survives.)

    Now, the hydrogen atoms have to spend some of their time wandering
    around, or there wouldn't be diffusion at all. But it might be close
    enough to zero that the difference can be neglected. In any case, if
    a fraction X of them are trapped and the rest are wandering, then the concentration ratio is 2:1 for the trapped ones and 1:1 for the
    wandering ones, so an overall ratio of (1+X):1.

    Of course that's just considering equilibrium; in general the thing to
    do is to apply the diffusion equation only to the fraction of the
    population that is actively diffusing, and couple that to some other
    equation that models the kinetics of getting trapped and released.

    But even that is just a thought experiment, since there most probably
    aren't just two states ("trapped" and "untrapped"), but rather a whole
    spectrum of different energy levels, with the lower ones being trapped
    states and the higher ones being wandering-around states. That's the
    realm of statistical mechanics, about which it has been said:

    "Ludwig Boltzmann, who spent much of his life studying
    statistical mechanics, died in 1906, by his own hand. Paul
    Ehrenfest, carrying on the work, died similarly in 1933. Now
    it is our turn to study statistical mechanics. Perhaps it will
    be wise to approach the subject cautiously."

    (Opening lines of "States of Matter", by D.L. Goodstein).


    Then there are other things going on we absolutely do not know about. >"Asymmetric diffusion", where the rate the solute enters the solid
    solvent does not match the rate the solute leaves the solid solvent,
    was previously known and observed.

    You seemed to know the reason when you were writing your thesis: it's
    the result of a difference in energy levels between the two sides,
    with one side having a greater chemical affinity to the substance that
    is diffusing and thus readily sucking it out from the other side.
    (And with hydrogen in particular, the hydrogen molecule having to
    dissociate into hydrogen atoms before it can penetrate the steel,
    with that dissociation requiring a lot of energy.)

    Even what we do know - that for treatments like cold-working steel the >product (multiplication) of solubility and diffusivity stays the same
    with increasing cold-work (cold work increases - S increases; D
    decreases) (the "permeability" - seen abundantly elsewhere in-support)
    - which means that solubility and diffusivity must be dependent
    variables on the same one underlying independent physical state - got
    massive explosive vitriolic response when I counselled that at the
    time about 20 years ago to someone dealing with hydrogen. Academics
    who were absolutely livid at the suggestion which is to be seen right
    there "exact" in experimental data.

    Not all academics are like that. Feynman wrote that when he was
    investigating the Space Shuttle disaster, he got along fine with the
    people who worked on the solid rocket boosters: he knew stuff from
    theory and they knew it from practice, but all were on the same page.

    That said, your style is a sort that raises the hackles of theorists:
    you're making theoretical statements (trespassing on their turf) but
    doing so using crude arguments: it makes them feel like they're under
    barbarian invasion. It's a theorist's job to explain experiments and
    to look past any crude justifications an experimenter offers, but not
    everybody is good at their job.

    --
    Norman Yarvin
    yarvin@yarchive.net

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Wilkins@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jan 23 18:23:38 2023
    "Norman Yarvin" wrote in message news:2c734b42-916b-4807-8a6c-109de60eab43n@googlegroups.com...

    ...
    But even that is just a thought experiment, since there most probably
    aren't just two states ("trapped" and "untrapped"), but rather a whole
    spectrum of different energy levels, with the lower ones being trapped
    states and the higher ones being wandering-around states. That's the
    realm of statistical mechanics, about which it has been said:

    "Ludwig Boltzmann, who spent much of his life studying
    statistical mechanics, died in 1906, by his own hand. Paul
    Ehrenfest, carrying on the work, died similarly in 1933. Now
    it is our turn to study statistical mechanics. Perhaps it will
    be wise to approach the subject cautiously."

    (Opening lines of "States of Matter", by D.L. Goodstein).
    ...
    Norman Yarvin
    yarvin@yarchive.net

    ---------------------

    Read at your own risk:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Activation_energy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxwell%E2%80%93Boltzmann_distribution


    Einstein accepted that Quantum theory explained observed results but he
    didn't believe it was the real answer. He died of heart failure. https://www.amnh.org/exhibitions/einstein/legacy/quantum-theory

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Richard Smith@21:1/5 to Norman Yarvin on Tue Jan 24 06:54:19 2023
    Norman Yarvin <norman.yarvin@gmail.com> writes:

    On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 5:43:55 AM UTC-5, Richard Smith wrote:
    Norman Yarvin writes:

    Has that improved? (Or has it gotten worse, with no longer even a
    British attempt to compete?)
    My PhD research should have been subtitled
    "To boldly go where no-one thought it a particularly good idea to go"
    (parody on "Star Trek" upbeat theme)
    and when I completed it, after the scientifically posed "Conclusions"
    the common-language ultra-brief summary would have been
    "You're screwed".

    That much I gathered. But there are a lot of things that can happen
    in the world: sometimes failing British companies have been bought
    by their German competitors and revamped.

    Too far gone; nothing worth having.
    Sad.
    The person who mentored me on my metal and fatigue investigation and
    knowledge told me the path to Thermo-Mechanically Controlled-Processed
    steels started when to get seriously far North in the North Sea the
    British engineers needed steels with exceptional properties and could
    see how that could be obtained. Apparently the British steel
    companies "took a sensible view about this fringe product" and the
    Japanese made these super-refined (compared to anything before) plate
    C-Mn steels. Then the development path and there they are, the
    Japanese and Germans, the established incumbents able to meet all
    market demand.
    Told me that - note that distinction.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Richard Smith@21:1/5 to Norman Yarvin on Tue Jan 24 06:47:13 2023
    Norman Yarvin wrote:

    ...
    you're making theoretical statements (trespassing on their turf) but
    doing so using crude arguments: it makes them feel like they're under barbarian invasion.
    ...

    Roaring with laughter!!!

    Yes, I had that self-perception.

    You are "running with the baton" now (analogy to a relay race), and I
    work as a welder mainly on marine (boats, etc) and marine civils.

    That said; in welding I went for an interview at an esteemed offshore engineering Company in the oil&gas sector and the panel of four
    interviewers behind the desk had to hold onto that desk to avoid
    falling off their chairs at one response. They had picked a
    fascination I did not share with the sequence of small
    rough-as-... steel fabrications companies I had worked for and a
    somewhat disengaged answer had then wiped-out. My response conjured
    up a world where more than half the people who tendered their
    resignation scripted it in the "four knuckles format".

    Happy to read your comments.
    Best wishes

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Richard Smith@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jan 24 06:31:30 2023
    Raman Lidar
    {other detectors}

    Ahhh...
    The problem is that these are detecting hydrogen after it has already
    left the sample.
    The fundamental scientific issue is that how hydrogen leaves the
    "solid solvent" iron/steel is complex in ways we don't know.

    Scientists have run round and round in circles with the Devanathan and Stachurski (?) electrochemical permeation cell because it introduces
    two surfaces not part of the what happens within a solid object - the
    surface though which the hydrogen is input and the surface through
    which hydrogen leaves (the electrochemical permeation cell has the
    sample as a disc / wafer). It has been realised that what happens at
    those surfaces tends to dominate the results and little of what you
    measure in this apparently "perfect" method is what's happening
    *within* the sample.

    That is why I enraged some "scientists" - at the outset I "threw-out"
    any theory or method which did not have a ready demonstration that it
    really works like that.

    Against much fury, I started with "hydrogen does move in steels".
    Then had only hydrogen bubble formation in glycerol as my detection
    method.
    Something wise scientists will tell you - it's something like "You
    cannot browbeat God".
    That is at the root of finding your way into a subject, seeing what is
    there and conveying what you have seen ("creating new knowledge").

    Your "Raman Lidar" would work for a thin sample extracted from eg. a
    weld, at liquid nitrogen temperature (hydrogen is "condensed" on
    "traps" and is immobile) and that sample suddenly brought back to room-temperature.
    You could have the laser beam scanning the sample - likely a
    raster-pattern, plotting {rate of hydrogen evolution (inferred by
    hydrogen concentration in the gas surrounding} vs {position (x-y
    coordinates)}.
    There is no guessing how well this would work (?).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Wilkins@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jan 24 07:28:02 2023
    "Richard Smith" wrote in message news:ly1qnkphod.fsf@void.com...
    ...
    There is no guessing how well this would work (?).

    ---------------------

    It would have to be calibrated against another method.

    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0001616063902141
    "An increase of the electrical resistance of the wires due to the cracks and
    an increase due to coldworking, could be measured as two distinctly
    different effects. No change in the resistance due to interstitial solution
    of hydrogen could be detected."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Wilkins@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jan 24 09:11:30 2023
    "Jim Wilkins" wrote in message news:tqoiu7$4qou$1@dont-email.me...

    "Richard Smith" wrote in message news:ly1qnkphod.fsf@void.com...
    ...
    There is no guessing how well this would work (?).

    ---------------------

    It would have to be calibrated against another method.

    No change in the resistance due to interstitial solution
    of hydrogen could be detected."

    -----------------------

    I'm still looking for cheap DIY methods. It appears that heavily anodized aluminum might be a good low permeability material for a chamber in which to pressurize steel samples with hydrogen and test sensors, and quickly
    evacuate the chamber, electrically heat the sample and measure the amount of outgassed hydrogen.

    A vacuum chamber can be a piece of tubing with thick plate ends clamped by
    tie rods. The seals can be O rings in grooves turned in the tube ends.

    https://www.amazon.com/Super-Lube-91003-Silicone-High-Dielectric/dp/B002KH0YDY/ref=sr_1_4?keywords=vacuum+grease&qid=1674568160&sr=8-4

    https://gigabecquerel.wordpress.com/2019/06/02/quick-n-dirty-vacuum-feedthrough/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Norman Yarvin@21:1/5 to Richard Smith on Tue Jan 24 08:05:30 2023
    On Tuesday, January 24, 2023 at 1:31:33 AM UTC-5, Richard Smith wrote:
    Your "Raman Lidar" would work for a thin sample extracted from eg. a
    weld, at liquid nitrogen temperature (hydrogen is "condensed" on
    "traps" and is immobile) and that sample suddenly brought back to >room-temperature.
    You could have the laser beam scanning the sample - likely a
    raster-pattern, plotting {rate of hydrogen evolution (inferred by
    hydrogen concentration in the gas surrounding} vs {position (x-y >coordinates)}.
    There is no guessing how well this would work (?).

    I bet it could be done by freezing the welded sample down to liquid
    nitrogen temperatures, then hitting it with a high-power pulsed laser
    that instantly vaporized a small part of the surface, feeding the
    gases that came out into a mass spectrometer to detect the hydrogen.
    (Yes, optical detection is another possibility, but it might struggle with
    the low concentration, whereas mass spectrometers are good at
    detecting exceedingly small concentrations.) The process could then
    be repeated until the sample was entirely consumed and you had
    hydrogen numbers for each little piece of it. Or if that would take
    too much time you could take a representative slice through it.

    Of course that'd be quite a formidable apparatus, requiring much money
    and years of work by several people.

    ---
    Norman Yarvin
    yarvin@yarchive.net

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Norman Yarvin@21:1/5 to Jim Wilkins on Tue Jan 24 07:21:37 2023
    On Monday, January 23, 2023 at 6:24:34 PM UTC-5, Jim Wilkins wrote:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxwell%E2%80%93Boltzmann_distribution

    For hydrogen diffusion in steel, you have to go a bit farther on, to
    the Fermi-Dirac distribution:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermi%E2%80%93Dirac_statistics

    (Neither Fermi nor Dirac met such sad ends.)

    Einstein accepted that Quantum theory explained observed results but he didn't believe it was the real answer.

    His line "God doesn't play dice with the universe" deserved the
    response it got (roughly "don't tell God what to do".) But he wasn't
    wrong that quantum theory needed work. The modern "decoherence"
    theory of quantum measurement might have satisfied him:

    https://infoproc.blogspot.com/2022/12/decoherence-and-quantum-measurement.html

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Wilkins@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jan 24 12:58:41 2023
    "Norman Yarvin" wrote in message news:78e4e745-cb33-4d18-b776-a60b1c956011n@googlegroups.com...

    I bet it could be done by freezing the welded sample down to liquid
    nitrogen temperatures, then hitting it with a high-power pulsed laser
    that instantly vaporized a small part of the surface, feeding the
    gases that came out into a mass spectrometer to detect the hydrogen.

    Norman Yarvin
    yarvin@yarchive.net

    -----------------------

    It appears that the reason hydrogen in steel hasn't been studied is lack of instruments, not lack of interest.
    XRF is another analytical technique that doesn't work for it, or other light elements.

    https://nmi3.eu/neutron-research/techniques-for-/imaging.html

    The Fusor is a tabletop fusion reactor that emits neutrons. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fusor
    "Most recently, the fusor has gained popularity among amateurs, who choose
    them as home projects due to their relatively low space, money, and power requirements."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From James Waldby@21:1/5 to Richard Smith on Sat Feb 11 07:19:03 2023
    Richard Smith wrote:
    ...
    The "sixth-jumping" technique came to me having read Adolf Fick's
    original 1855 (?) scientific paper.
    ...

    See [*] for a related technique (known in the 1930s and possibly earlier).
    [*] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relaxation_(iterative_method)>

    In the 2D case, "To approximate the solution of the Poisson equation
    ... numerically on a two-dimensional grid with grid spacing h, the
    relaxation method assigns the given values of function phi to the grid
    points near the boundary and arbitrary values to the interior grid
    points, and then repeatedly performs the assignment phi := phi* on the
    interior points, where phi* is..." 1/4 of sum of neighbor cells, less
    an f(x,y) term. Your case with two different D regions would mean
    using two different phi* equations, but I don't see that as a problem.
    Where the relaxation method (at least as stated in [*]) doesn't quite
    fit is that it starts with given boundary conditions and computes
    until interior point values reach equilibrium, while your process is
    given some initial interior values and evolves the state from there,
    not necessarily reaching a nonzero equilibrium.

    I saw that if you have "an automatic computer" ("a computer") you
    don't need to formulate differential equations.

    Need to formulate DE's to have a model to be solved, but don't need
    analytical solutions if the computer can quickly approach a solution
    that's accurate enough and provides enough insight. (An example of
    slowness and limited insight: The writer of following ca 1950 thesis
    says it only took 7 hours to compute a relaxation solution for a heat
    transfer problem on 50 points. It probably would take a couple of
    milliseconds nowadays and there would be an informative graphic as well.) <https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5895&context=masters_theses>

    A person of Middle-Eastern origin showed me the computational method
    for solving mathematical integration ("calculus") approximately but achievably. But having seen that, my "sixth-jumping model" came to
    me. My sixth-jumping model used as a general solution does have "convergence" with increasing discretisation, by the way, stating the obvious.
    ...

    The mid-point method of numerical integration is not bad -- its error
    is O(h^3), for intervals of width h -- but Simpson's rule, for about
    the same cost per step, has far smaller error, O(h^5). Eg, where the
    midpoint rule might need hundreds or perhaps thousands of divisions to
    compute a 9-decimals value of erf(x), Simpson's needs fewer than 40. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riemann_sum#Midpoint_rule> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simpson's_rule>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)