• Reactivity of Steel At Elevated Temperatures

    From Bob La Londe@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jul 3 13:49:38 2023
    Most of us know If you dump a ton of oxygen, heat, and fuel on steel it
    can burn. Burn may be technically arguable but a very violent reaction resulting in loss of material in its original form results.

    Some of us may know that there is some steel loss from reactions at a
    lower temperature when using a steel crucible for things like casting
    aluminum and even some material loss with steel molds used for casting
    aluminum many times.

    Still molten pourable aluminum is pretty hot.

    I test a lot of fishing tackle molds with lead. Its no where near the
    reactive temperatures mentioned above. I've got an RCBS Pro-Melt 20lb
    bottom pour lead pot. I've had it for years and its worked great for
    many of them. I don't think I have ever emptied it. The last few years
    its begun to drip. That's only a minor inconvenience really. Ask
    around the tackle making groups and you will find plenty of people who
    will say they all leak eventually. I stick an ingot mold under the
    spout to catch the drips when I am not actively pouring.

    Not only was my pot starting to drip the flow was getting to be less and
    less. Even with full head pressure (full pot) and the plunger set to
    maximum opening the flow was getting anemic. I was think various bits
    of debris must have gotten into the gate over time. Except it all
    floats to the top. Yeah, tungsten is heavier than lead, but I can't
    think of any other substance in my shop (well there are a couple gold
    trinkets in the safe) that wouldn't float on molten lead. Nothing that
    would be on the mold testing benches.

    I use pretty pure led purchased from a reputable source, but I still get
    a bit of dross on top. I figure its mostly lead oxide. I think some of
    it is some form of iron reactive from the melting pot, valve plunger,
    and valve nozzle. After draining and partial disassembly I am convinced
    that the steel was reacting at the mere 800F(+/-) of the molten lead.
    There was some metal growth like scaley rust "looking" corrosion in the
    pot itself, put the plunger had layers all the way around reaching as
    far as the wall of the pot on the closest side.

    I don't think there was much oxygen at those depths when encapsulated in
    lead either molten or frozen, but it look a lot like iron oxides.

    I ran a small aircraft drill through the gate and he flow is as it used
    to be again. Well, it was when I was still draining the pot. I have it
    very nearly perfectly empty and cooling down right now. I plan to clean
    and polish the plunger and valve seat so maybe I'll get several years
    again before it starts to drip.



    --
    Bob La Londe
    Proffessional Hack, Hobbyist, Wannabe, Shade Tree, Button Pushing, Not a
    real machinist

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Wilkins@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jul 3 18:00:13 2023
    "Bob La Londe" wrote in message news:u7vc95$3pur9$1@dont-email.me...

    Most of us know If you dump a ton of oxygen, heat, and fuel on steel it
    can burn. Burn may be technically arguable but a very violent reaction resulting in loss of material in its original form results.

    Some of us may know that there is some steel loss from reactions at a
    lower temperature when using a steel crucible for things like casting
    aluminum and even some material loss with steel molds used for casting
    aluminum many times.
    ...
    ---------------------
    Steel wool burns.

    Steel's tempering colors result from oxidation. https://www.servicesteel.org/resources/steel-tempering-colors

    As you can see it starts to oxidize below the melting point of lead. Above
    700F the oxidation layer becomes too thick to show a sub-micron interference effect. A cast iron exhaust manifold shows the result of being heated for a long time. I had to replace my catalytic converter at 80k miles because
    there was barely enough of the rear flange left to retain the bolts. The
    joint had loosened and become noisy.

    The blacksmith told me to temper the quench hardened froe blade I made from
    a leaf spring at ~350F for an hour, twice, and the high areas I had ground
    down became faintly yellow from incipient oxidation.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bob La Londe@21:1/5 to Jim Wilkins on Wed Jul 5 07:48:39 2023
    On 7/3/2023 3:00 PM, Jim Wilkins wrote:
    "Bob La Londe"  wrote in message news:u7vc95$3pur9$1@dont-email.me...

    Most of us know If you dump a ton of oxygen, heat, and fuel on steel it
    can burn.  Burn may be technically arguable but a very violent reaction resulting in loss of material in its original form results.

    Some of us may know that there is some steel loss from reactions at a
    lower temperature when using a steel crucible for things like casting aluminum and even some material loss with steel molds used for casting aluminum many times.
    ...
    ---------------------
    Steel wool burns.

    Steel's tempering colors result from oxidation. https://www.servicesteel.org/resources/steel-tempering-colors

    As you can see it starts to oxidize below the melting point of lead.
    Above 700F the oxidation layer becomes too thick to show a sub-micron interference effect. A cast iron exhaust manifold shows the result of
    being heated for a long time. I had to replace my catalytic converter at
    80k miles because there was barely enough of the rear flange left to
    retain the bolts. The joint had loosened and become noisy.

    The blacksmith told me to temper the quench hardened froe blade I made
    from a leaf spring at ~350F for an hour, twice, and the high areas I had ground down became faintly yellow from incipient oxidation.


    I absolutely believe what I was taught, that steel burns. That
    reactiveness of steel premise was originally shared with a tackle making
    group which tends to be more "craftsy" than technical. Sometimes its
    easier to allow for some grudging disagreement than to parrot "facts."

    Of course its obvious that steel(iron alloys) becomes more reactive at temperatures as low as molten lead. If for no other reason than an old gunsmith's trick for tempering flat springs (simple carbon spring
    steels) is to dunk them in molten lead until they change color. That's
    more than twice the temperature than knife makers tend to temper knife
    steel, but a much faster temper. (seconds)

    I suspect molten lead tempering is over tempering which is more likely
    to result in a loss of spring tension over time as opposed to a broken
    spring from under tempering. Of course can I argue with any spring that
    has lasted a hundred years? One of my other hobbies is buying old junk
    guns and fixing them. Not selling them. LOL. Maybe someday. Just
    fixing them.


    --
    Bob La Londe
    Proffessional Hack, Hobbyist, Wannabe, Shade Tree, Button Pushing, Not a
    real machinist


    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Wilkins@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jul 5 11:57:24 2023
    "Bob La Londe" wrote in message news:u83vsa$hvpc$1@dont-email.me...

    I absolutely believe what I was taught, that steel burns.
    [[[ Pinch off a bit of steel wool and light it. When forging if the steel is yellow hot and gets into the air stream it can burn and spark. ]]]

    That
    reactiveness of steel premise was originally shared with a tackle making
    group which tends to be more "craftsy" than technical. Sometimes its
    easier to allow for some grudging disagreement than to parrot "facts."

    Of course its obvious that steel(iron alloys) becomes more reactive at temperatures as low as molten lead. If for no other reason than an old gunsmith's trick for tempering flat springs (simple carbon spring
    steels) is to dunk them in molten lead until they change color. That's
    more than twice the temperature than knife makers tend to temper knife
    steel, but a much faster temper. (seconds)

    I suspect molten lead tempering is over tempering which is more likely
    to result in a loss of spring tension over time as opposed to a broken
    spring from under tempering. Of course can I argue with any spring that
    has lasted a hundred years? One of my other hobbies is buying old junk
    guns and fixing them. Not selling them. LOL. Maybe someday. Just
    fixing them.

    ---------------------------

    This gives 600-650F for gun spring temper, which puts molten pure lead in
    the middle. Alloys have lower melting points. https://kurtthegunsmith.com/how-to-make-heat-treat-flat-gun-springs/
    I was told springs could be tempered as high as 700F or dark purple to grey/black.

    Knives aren't expected to bend much so they can be tempered harder.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bob La Londe@21:1/5 to Jim Wilkins on Wed Jul 5 16:41:13 2023
    On 7/5/2023 8:57 AM, Jim Wilkins wrote:
    "Bob La Londe"  wrote in message news:u83vsa$hvpc$1@dont-email.me...

    I absolutely believe what I was taught, that steel burns.
    [[[ Pinch off a bit of steel wool and light it. When forging if the
    steel is yellow hot and gets into the air stream it can burn and spark. ]]]

    That
    reactiveness of steel premise was originally shared with a tackle making group which tends to be more "craftsy" than technical.  Sometimes its
    easier to allow for some grudging disagreement than to parrot "facts."

    Of course its obvious that steel(iron alloys) becomes more reactive at temperatures as low as molten lead.  If for no other reason than an old gunsmith's trick for tempering flat springs (simple carbon spring
    steels) is to dunk them in molten lead until they change color.  That's
    more than twice the temperature than knife makers tend to temper knife
    steel, but a much faster temper.  (seconds)

    That of course leads me to wonder then why steel baking in the southern
    Arizona Sun will get hot enough to harm you if you pick it up and hold
    it for very long, but just develops a light surface rust and lasts for
    decades. LOL.

    We joke about it developing its light coating of protective rust. Okay
    maybe two of us make that joke.

    --
    Bob La Londe
    CNC Molds N Stuff


    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Billington@21:1/5 to Jim Wilkins on Thu Jul 6 01:17:03 2023
    On 03/07/2023 23:00, Jim Wilkins wrote:
    "Bob La Londe"  wrote in message news:u7vc95$3pur9$1@dont-email.me...

    Most of us know If you dump a ton of oxygen, heat, and fuel on steel it
    can burn.  Burn may be technically arguable but a very violent reaction resulting in loss of material in its original form results.

    Some of us may know that there is some steel loss from reactions at a
    lower temperature when using a steel crucible for things like casting aluminum and even some material loss with steel molds used for casting aluminum many times.
    ...
    ---------------------
    Steel wool burns.

    Steel's tempering colors result from oxidation. https://www.servicesteel.org/resources/steel-tempering-colors

    As you can see it starts to oxidize below the melting point of lead.
    Above 700F the oxidation layer becomes too thick to show a sub-micron interference effect. A cast iron exhaust manifold shows the result of
    being heated for a long time. I had to replace my catalytic converter
    at 80k miles because there was barely enough of the rear flange left
    to retain the bolts. The joint had loosened and become noisy.

    The blacksmith told me to temper the quench hardened froe blade I made
    from a leaf spring at ~350F for an hour, twice, and the high areas I
    had ground down became faintly yellow from incipient oxidation.

    At a boy scout jamboree many years ago groups of us were challenged to
    start fires and the winner did what the leaders frowned on but it got a
    fire going quickly, he had brought along a D cell and some wire wool and shorted the wire wool across the cell and had a fire going in no time.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Wilkins@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jul 5 23:14:53 2023
    "Bob La Londe" wrote in message news:u84v2q$lce4$1@dont-email.me...

    That of course leads me to wonder then why steel baking in the southern
    Arizona Sun will get hot enough to harm you if you pick it up and hold
    it for very long, but just develops a light surface rust and lasts for
    decades. LOL.

    Bob La Londe

    -------------------

    As a general rule, the rate of a chemical reaction doubles with a
    temperature rise of 10 degrees C (18F). I mentioned that 2 hours at 350F
    gave a barely visible yellow tinge to bare spring steel. The jump from 150F
    to 350F is more than 10 such doublings, or 1000 times faster. Steel can
    oxidize in several ways (oxidation states) under different conditions to
    give red, brown, yellow->purple or black oxide coatings. Around room temperature the overall energy level is low so rust forms preferentially at irregularities with slightly higher energy, hot steel has enough overall
    energy to overwhelm the slight differences and it oxidizes more evenly, for example mill scale and temper color.

    That's a vast oversimplification of the complex subject of chemical thermodynamics.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrhenius_equation
    "With this equation it can be roughly estimated that the rate of reaction increases by a factor of about 2 or 3 for every 10°C rise in temperature."

    Thermodynamics can be hard to understand. 200 years ago the best minds
    believed that heat was an invisible fluid called Caloric or Phlogiston that could be squeezed out of the steel by cutting or hammering it. The concept
    that heat and temperature were the kinetic energy of molecular motion took a while to be accepted, and longer to be well understood. Chemistry is an
    example of pure reason utterly failing to discover the truth although it had succeeded for math and physics.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phlogiston_theory

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Wilkins@21:1/5 to David Billington on Wed Jul 5 23:33:38 2023
    "David Billington" wrote in message news:u8515v$lhrg$1@dont-email.me...

    At a boy scout jamboree many years ago groups of us were challenged to
    start fires and the winner did what the leaders frowned on but it got a
    fire going quickly, he had brought along a D cell and some wire wool and shorted the wire wool across the cell and had a fire going in no time.

    -----------------------

    That was also a college contest. The winning technique was soaking charcoal with liquid oxygen.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sab2Ltm1WcM

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Wilkins@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jul 6 07:31:54 2023
    While on the subject, the oxidation of iron can be enhanced or retarded by other materials that react with it. Chloride in sea or road salt is the
    common example, water is another that makes oxidation easier while
    phosphorus helps protect from oxidation. Cast iron for wood stoves often contains significant phosphorus which makes it fill the mold better and
    reduces oxidation of the hot stove. Some peoples' fingerprint oil protects
    bare steel, mine for instance, while others' makes it rust more easily in
    the fingerprint ridge pattern.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron_pillar_of_Delhi

    This is the steel used for unpainted bridges etc. https://www.corten.com/what-is-corten-steel.html
    It doesn't resist salt so it's not recommended near the ocean or in snow country.

    The Parkerizing on military equipment is a phosphate conversion coating.
    Naval Jelly contains phosphoric acid to remove existing rust and reduce subsequent corrosion. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phosphate_conversion_coating

    When I learned this stuff in the 1960's some was guesswork because there weren't good techniques to analyze a single-molecule-thick coating. Stress corrosion and cyclic fatigue were particularly hard to study. In chemistry experimental results precede theory, or at least allow choosing among
    competing ones.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bob La Londe@21:1/5 to Jim Wilkins on Thu Jul 6 09:02:49 2023
    On 7/5/2023 8:14 PM, Jim Wilkins wrote:
    "Bob La Londe"  wrote in message news:u84v2q$lce4$1@dont-email.me...

    That of course leads me to wonder then why steel baking in the southern Arizona Sun will get hot enough to harm you if you pick it up and hold
    it for very long, but just develops a light surface rust and lasts for decades.  LOL.

    Bob La Londe

    -------------------

    As a general rule, the rate of a chemical reaction doubles with a
    temperature rise of 10 degrees C (18F). I mentioned that 2 hours at 350F
    gave a barely visible yellow tinge to bare spring steel. The jump from
    150F to 350F is more than 10 such doublings, or 1000 times faster. Steel
    can oxidize in several ways (oxidation states) under different
    conditions to give red, brown, yellow->purple or black oxide coatings.
    Around room temperature the overall energy level is low so rust forms preferentially at irregularities with slightly higher energy, hot steel
    has enough overall energy to overwhelm the slight differences and it
    oxidizes more evenly, for example mill scale and temper color.

    That's a vast oversimplification of the complex subject of chemical thermodynamics.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrhenius_equation
    "With this equation it can be roughly estimated that the rate of
    reaction increases by a factor of about 2 or 3 for every 10°C rise in temperature."

    Thermodynamics can be hard to understand. 200 years ago the best minds believed that heat was an invisible fluid

    And while its totally wrong its still a good analogy for getting the
    point across. Its not just angry punk rockers in a mosh pit. Its a
    volume of angry punk rockers in a mosh pit. Not to technical people who
    will stop listening and start trashing you to show how smart/educated
    they are the instant you use an analogy so they can tell you how wrong
    you are. Its good for practical people who need a feel of how the a
    large volume of a substance at a particular temperature has more heat to
    manage than a small volume of that substance at the exact same
    temperature. Its not just angry punkers or the level of their anger.
    Its about a whole bunch of angry punkers.

    People sometimes struggle with heat management in injection molding
    because they can't understand why their skinny rubber worm comes out
    fine, but their thick heavy swimbait dents or pulls air. The people I
    am dealing with are often not technical experts, but sometimes they are
    or are becoming practical experts.

    Think of heat as having volume. The more volume there is, and the less transmission media there is the longer its going to take to drain the
    heat away.

    Yes I know that's wrong, and if anybody will feel better about
    themselves by telling me I am wrong have at it.


    called Caloric or Phlogiston
    that could be squeezed out of the steel by cutting or hammering it. The concept that heat and temperature were the kinetic energy of molecular
    motion took a while to be accepted, and longer to be well understood. Chemistry is an example of pure reason utterly failing to discover the
    truth although it had succeeded for math and physics. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phlogiston_theory

    --
    Bob La Londe
    Proffessional Hack, Hobbyist, Wannabe, Shade Tree, Button Pushing, Not a
    real machinist


    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Wilkins@21:1/5 to Jim Wilkins on Thu Jul 6 13:30:07 2023
    "Bob La Londe" wrote in message news:u86ojc$vrtr$1@dont-email.me...

    On 7/5/2023 8:14 PM, Jim Wilkins wrote:
    Thermodynamics can be hard to understand. 200 years ago the best minds believed that heat was an invisible fluid

    And while its totally wrong its still a good analogy for getting the
    point across. Its not just angry punk rockers in a mosh pit. Its a
    volume of angry punk rockers in a mosh pit. Not to technical people who
    will stop listening and start trashing you to show how smart/educated
    they are the instant you use an analogy so they can tell you how wrong
    you are. Its good for practical people who need a feel of how the a
    large volume of a substance at a particular temperature has more heat to
    manage than a small volume of that substance at the exact same
    temperature. Its not just angry punkers or the level of their anger.
    Its about a whole bunch of angry punkers.

    People sometimes struggle with heat management in injection molding
    because they can't understand why their skinny rubber worm comes out
    fine, but their thick heavy swimbait dents or pulls air. The people I
    am dealing with are often not technical experts, but sometimes they are
    or are becoming practical experts.

    Think of heat as having volume. The more volume there is, and the less transmission media there is the longer its going to take to drain the
    heat away.

    Yes I know that's wrong, and if anybody will feel better about
    themselves by telling me I am wrong have at it.

    --------------------

    I see your point, electricity is often introduced to beginners as behaving
    like water as long as you don't try to stretch the analogy very far, for instance electricity within conductors has no weight. If your study will go further you have to forget the water analogy and learn the mathematical
    models so you can make things that work, if not it's useful to fit new ideas into a familiar framework.

    We dove straight into specific heat, thermal mass and conductivity and the atom-level basis for them, but Phlogiston looked good enough to be the generally agreed on nature of heat until the late 1700's when experiments proved otherwise. So did Earth, Air, Fire and Water despite the excessively convoluted arguments dreamed up to defend that relic of Aristotle. The understanding of chemistry developed slowly and much later than that of
    physics which Newton codified. Among other hindrances to progress the
    natural mixtures of isotopes of different weights confused researchers who tried to accurately measure the expected small integer weight ratios of elements in simple compounds. The reason, the neutron, wasn't discovered
    until 1932.

    https://www.encyclopedia.com/people/science-and-technology/physics-biographies/count-benjamin-thompson-rumford
    His demonstration was that the few tiny chips the dull bar left in the bore couldn't possibly have contained enough heat fluid to account for the temperature rise of the barrel.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Wilkins@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jul 6 14:02:33 2023
    "Bob La Londe" wrote in message news:u86ojc$vrtr$1@dont-email.me...

    People sometimes struggle with heat management in injection molding
    because they can't understand why their skinny rubber worm comes out
    fine, but their thick heavy swimbait dents or pulls air. The people I
    am dealing with are often not technical experts, but sometimes they are
    or are becoming practical experts.

    -----------------------

    I've known about copes and drags and core prints and riddles and sprues and runners and vents and shrinkage voids since I was 5, watching the foundry workers sand-cast aluminum and describe the process to me. When I was apprenticing as a machinery designer I looked at casting design again and noticed that the descriptions assumed no scientific education, which I had plenty of by then. They gave rules of thumb about max and min web thickness
    and where to feed to keep potential voids supplied until they solidify,
    things a draftsman who may have been a failed artist needed to know.

    Circuit board layout and routing was similar. It was a bonus to the company that I knew how the circuit worked, but that wasn't essential to become a successful PC board designer. They just had to learn and follow the rules.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Richard Smith@21:1/5 to Jim Wilkins on Fri Jul 7 00:27:53 2023
    "Jim Wilkins" <muratlanne@gmail.com> writes:

    "Bob La Londe" wrote in message news:u86ojc$vrtr$1@dont-email.me...

    On 7/5/2023 8:14 PM, Jim Wilkins wrote:

    Thermodynamics can be hard to understand. 200 years ago the best
    minds believed that heat was an invisible fluid

    And while its totally wrong its still a good analogy for getting the
    point across. Its not just angry punk rockers in a mosh pit. Its a
    volume of angry punk rockers in a mosh pit. Not to technical people who
    will stop listening and start trashing you to show how smart/educated
    they are the instant you use an analogy so they can tell you how wrong
    you are. Its good for practical people who need a feel of how the a
    large volume of a substance at a particular temperature has more heat to manage than a small volume of that substance at the exact same
    temperature. Its not just angry punkers or the level of their anger.
    Its about a whole bunch of angry punkers.

    People sometimes struggle with heat management in injection molding
    because they can't understand why their skinny rubber worm comes out
    fine, but their thick heavy swimbait dents or pulls air. The people I
    am dealing with are often not technical experts, but sometimes they are
    or are becoming practical experts.

    Think of heat as having volume. The more volume there is, and the less transmission media there is the longer its going to take to drain the
    heat away.

    Yes I know that's wrong, and if anybody will feel better about
    themselves by telling me I am wrong have at it.

    ----------------------------
    Not wrong, actually pretty close to reality. Heat capacity is usually specified by mass, the easily determined weight of material, but in
    fact it's nearly constant per atom so lighter elements have higher
    specific heats. All metals would have about the same heat capacity per
    volume if their atoms were the same size, but they do vary
    somewhat. Their heat capacity runs around 2 to 3.5 Joules per cubic centimeter to change the temperature by one Celsius (Kelvin, K)
    degree. A Joule is 1 Watt for 1 Second.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Table_of_specific_heat_capacities
    "Generally, the most notable constant parameter is the volumetric heat capacity (at least for solids) which is around the value of 3
    megajoule per cubic meter per kelvin:"
    Or 3 Joules per cubic centimeter.
    The molar heat capacity is for equal numbers (6.02E23) of atoms of
    metal or individual molecules of chemicals, for compounds it's larger
    because they have more atoms per molecule.

    Measuring in cubic centimeters is a historical practice, they are
    equal to milliliters.

    Yes, the "Molar Heat Capacity"; the heat capacity for a certain
    reference number of atoms. Is almost identical across metals.
    I've seen that at least approximately across a few common metals.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Wilkins@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jul 6 19:45:46 2023
    "Richard Smith" wrote in message news:lysfa08vt2.fsf@void.com...

    "Jim Wilkins" <muratlanne@gmail.com> writes:
    ...

    Yes, the "Molar Heat Capacity"; the heat capacity for a certain
    reference number of atoms. Is almost identical across metals.
    I've seen that at least approximately across a few common metals.

    --------------------------
    Which tends to support the belief that heat is a separate undetectable fluid that infiltrates the volume of the metal. They weren't too far off since conduction band electrons do just that.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Wilkins@21:1/5 to Jim Wilkins on Thu Jul 6 19:21:23 2023
    "Bob La Londe" wrote in message news:u86ojc$vrtr$1@dont-email.me...

    On 7/5/2023 8:14 PM, Jim Wilkins wrote:

    Thermodynamics can be hard to understand. 200 years ago the best minds believed that heat was an invisible fluid

    And while its totally wrong its still a good analogy for getting the
    point across. Its not just angry punk rockers in a mosh pit. Its a
    volume of angry punk rockers in a mosh pit. Not to technical people who
    will stop listening and start trashing you to show how smart/educated
    they are the instant you use an analogy so they can tell you how wrong
    you are. Its good for practical people who need a feel of how the a
    large volume of a substance at a particular temperature has more heat to
    manage than a small volume of that substance at the exact same
    temperature. Its not just angry punkers or the level of their anger.
    Its about a whole bunch of angry punkers.

    People sometimes struggle with heat management in injection molding
    because they can't understand why their skinny rubber worm comes out
    fine, but their thick heavy swimbait dents or pulls air. The people I
    am dealing with are often not technical experts, but sometimes they are
    or are becoming practical experts.

    Think of heat as having volume. The more volume there is, and the less transmission media there is the longer its going to take to drain the
    heat away.

    Yes I know that's wrong, and if anybody will feel better about
    themselves by telling me I am wrong have at it.

    ----------------------------
    Not wrong, actually pretty close to reality. Heat capacity is usually
    specified by mass, the easily determined weight of material, but in fact
    it's nearly constant per atom so lighter elements have higher specific
    heats. All metals would have about the same heat capacity per volume if
    their atoms were the same size, but they do vary somewhat. Their heat
    capacity runs around 2 to 3.5 Joules per cubic centimeter to change the temperature by one Celsius (Kelvin, K) degree. A Joule is 1 Watt for 1
    Second.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Table_of_specific_heat_capacities
    "Generally, the most notable constant parameter is the volumetric heat
    capacity (at least for solids) which is around the value of 3 megajoule per cubic meter per kelvin:"
    Or 3 Joules per cubic centimeter.
    The molar heat capacity is for equal numbers (6.02E23) of atoms of metal or individual molecules of chemicals, for compounds it's larger because they
    have more atoms per molecule.

    Measuring in cubic centimeters is a historical practice, they are equal to milliliters.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Richard Smith@21:1/5 to Jim Wilkins on Fri Jul 7 09:05:37 2023
    "Jim Wilkins" <muratlanne@gmail.com> writes:

    "Richard Smith" wrote in message news:lysfa08vt2.fsf@void.com...

    "Jim Wilkins" <muratlanne@gmail.com> writes:
    ...

    Yes, the "Molar Heat Capacity"; the heat capacity for a certain
    reference number of atoms. Is almost identical across metals.
    I've seen that at least approximately across a few common metals.

    --------------------------
    Which tends to support the belief that heat is a separate undetectable
    fluid that infiltrates the volume of the metal. They weren't too far
    off since conduction band electrons do just that.

    I was left wondering whether the conduction-band electrons of a metal
    are responsible for the surreal rapid diffusion of hydrogen (element
    number one - it's a proton with an electron circulating around it)

    During my Doctoral study years on hydrogen in steels - where I was
    looking at weld hydrogen initially in the weld zone and what becomes
    of it - but found apparently also uncovered why modern low-carbon TMCP (Thermo-Mechanically Controlled-Processed) microalloyed steels are
    highly resistant to "sour" crude oils.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Wilkins@21:1/5 to Jim Wilkins on Fri Jul 7 09:44:14 2023
    "Richard Smith" wrote in message news:lyzg48xi26.fsf@void.com...

    "Jim Wilkins" <muratlanne@gmail.com> writes:

    Which tends to support the belief that heat is a separate undetectable
    fluid that infiltrates the volume of the metal. They weren't too far
    off since conduction band electrons do just that.

    I was left wondering whether the conduction-band electrons of a metal
    are responsible for the surreal rapid diffusion of hydrogen (element
    number one - it's a proton with an electron circulating around it)

    During my Doctoral study years on hydrogen in steels - where I was
    looking at weld hydrogen initially in the weld zone and what becomes
    of it - but found apparently also uncovered why modern low-carbon TMCP (Thermo-Mechanically Controlled-Processed) microalloyed steels are
    highly resistant to "sour" crude oils.

    --------------------------

    I'm not sure hydrogen's interactions with metals were that well understood
    when I learned it. What I took away was that under the certain conditions hydrogen may shift from a diatomic gas to metallic or nearly so and can
    share loose electrons like a metal or double bonded carbon, and its naked protons could move around similarly to but slower than electrons, like positively charged holes in a semiconductor. That's only my partly educated guess, or SWAG. I don't have the theoretical background in quantum mechanics (or interest) to pursue it.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metallic_hydrogen
    "The quest to see metallic hydrogen in laboratory at low temperature and
    static compression continues."

    https://www.fuelcellstore.com/chemistry-metal-hydrides-fuel-cells
    "*Note: It is not exactly correct to say "hydrogen atoms migrate". A
    hydrogen atom consists of a proton and an electron. As metals bind hydrogen metallically, protons move among the metal atoms through a "sea of
    electrons" that include electrons from the metal and from hydrogen. If the proton is not closely associated with any particular electron it is not, strictly speaking, a "hydrogen atom". Anyway, you get the idea."

    Catalytic action with hydrogen in general was very difficult to analyze with the available instruments of the 1960's. Even the molecular clumping of
    water near the freezing point was uncertain, which was the basis of Kurt Vonnegut's Ice 9 in "Cat's Cradle".

    Cold fusion research of Pons & Fleishman and Rossi's E-Cat were tentatively accepted, subject to verification, because some properties of hydrogen dissolved in or adsorbed on metals are still debated despite over 100 years
    of hydrogenation experience, e.g high test gasoline, NiMH batteries.

    What tipped me that Rossi's results might be a scam or experimental error
    was the naturally occurring isotopic distribution of the resulting copper, instead of being one pure isotope. When I found that his reactor was brazed copper tubing without internal cleaning or plating I realized that the hot hydrogen was reducing the copper oxide to atomically fine copper mist and blowing it into the nickel, and revealed that to one of his supporters who
    had asked me to build the apparatus for him.

    My personal research experience with hydrogen was limited to substituting deuterium for it so the organic molecule in question could be tracked in the body with MRI to find where it was metabolized. After graduation in 69 I was sucked into the military and given a year of condensed electronics
    education, which I found I liked better than Chemistry and had much better
    job prospects. My degree wasn't a complete waste, the only students who
    passed that demanding course already had technical degrees, and the broad knowledge of matter and energy it gave me has been useful in R&D to
    complement the deep but narrow education of Ph.Ds.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bob La Londe@21:1/5 to Jim Wilkins on Fri Jul 7 08:43:18 2023
    On 7/6/2023 11:02 AM, Jim Wilkins wrote:
    "Bob La Londe"  wrote in message news:u86ojc$vrtr$1@dont-email.me...

    People sometimes struggle with heat management in injection molding
    because they can't understand why their skinny rubber worm comes out
    fine, but their thick heavy swimbait dents or pulls air.  The people I
    am dealing with are often not technical experts, but sometimes they are
    or are becoming practical experts.

    -----------------------

    I've known about copes and drags and core prints and riddles and sprues
    and runners and vents and shrinkage voids since I was 5, watching the
    foundry workers sand-cast aluminum and describe the process to me. When
    I was apprenticing as a machinery designer I looked at casting design
    again and noticed that the descriptions assumed no scientific education, which I had plenty of by then. They gave rules of thumb...

    Rules of thumb often work very well. In fact sometimes its very
    difficult to get somebody to get past a rule of thumb. Not that there
    aren't a few cases were a rule of thumb nearly always apply. Just that
    some people will trust the rule of thumb better if they have some form
    of understanding they can grasp. Even if its only a general analogy
    they can put in the back of their mind to make them feel there is some
    sense to it.

    X: Just do this!

    Y: Why?

    X: Because I said so!

    Y: Silence.

    Well, that works, but it can also lead to catastrophic runaway situations.

    X: Just do this!

    Y: Why?

    X: Well, I'm not sure 100%, but this is the way I think it works.

    Y: Oh, so if we did it at one thousand times that scale we'd melt a
    hole in the crust of the planet?

    X: I hadn't thought of that. Yeah maybe. Within the scope of what we
    do in this shop just do this, but if you want to go bigger, smaller,
    faster, or slower perhaps consult somebody more educated than myself.




    --
    Bob La Londe
    Proffessional Hack, Hobbyist, Wannabe, Shade Tree, Button Pushing, Not a
    real machinist


    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Wilkins@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jul 7 14:46:48 2023
    "Bob La Londe" wrote in message news:u89bqp$1c887$1@dont-email.me...

    On 7/6/2023 11:02 AM, Jim Wilkins wrote:
    ...

    Rules of thumb often work very well. In fact sometimes its very
    difficult to get somebody to get past a rule of thumb. Not that there
    aren't a few cases were a rule of thumb nearly always apply. Just that
    some people will trust the rule of thumb better if they have some form
    of understanding they can grasp. Even if its only a general analogy
    they can put in the back of their mind to make them feel there is some
    sense to it.

    X: Just do this!

    Y: Why?

    X: Because I said so!

    Y: Silence.

    Well, that works, but it can also lead to catastrophic runaway situations.

    X: Just do this!

    Y: Why?

    X: Well, I'm not sure 100%, but this is the way I think it works.

    Y: Oh, so if we did it at one thousand times that scale we'd melt a
    hole in the crust of the planet?

    X: I hadn't thought of that. Yeah maybe. Within the scope of what we
    do in this shop just do this, but if you want to go bigger, smaller,
    faster, or slower perhaps consult somebody more educated than myself.
    Bob La Londe
    ----------------

    I do and sometimes post both rough approximations like rules of thumb and
    exact calculations. The specific heat post was rough ballpark* estimates
    plus links to find better answers.

    The approximations were useful when someone stopped by unexpectedly to ask
    me if I could build something for them. I had to quickly estimate the
    magnitude of problems to give them a good answer, then refine it after I
    knew more. The accuracy of a solution is no better than that of the most uncertain variable.**

    For example earlier today I was talking to the owner of a self-driving
    Tesla, after watching it pull out of its parking space toward me and stop beside him. I had worked for Tesla's previous tech director and chosen a portable DC-AC inverter and jump starter to his spec for a remote
    presentation, passed through his secretary so I couldn't discuss it, which proved to be too heavy to travel with because he hadn't estimated the consequences of the power output he asked for. Embarrassing the boss is
    never good so afterwards I avoided him.

    * falling within a large space, as opposed to out of it.

    ** Russian joke. A man orders a car and is told it will be delivered in ten years. He asks if that is ten years in the morning, or afternoon. The
    salesman screams TEN YEARS, TEN YEARS, WHAT DOES IT MATTER? He replies
    "Well, the plumber is due ten years from now in the morning."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From pyotr filipivich@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jul 11 07:59:06 2023
    Bob La Londe <none@none.com99> on Wed, 5 Jul 2023 16:41:13 -0700 typed
    in rec.crafts.metalworking the following:
    On 7/5/2023 8:57 AM, Jim Wilkins wrote:
    "Bob La Londe"  wrote in message news:u83vsa$hvpc$1@dont-email.me...

    I absolutely believe what I was taught, that steel burns.
    [[[ Pinch off a bit of steel wool and light it. When forging if the
    steel is yellow hot and gets into the air stream it can burn and spark. ]]] >>
    That
    reactiveness of steel premise was originally shared with a tackle making
    group which tends to be more "craftsy" than technical.  Sometimes its
    easier to allow for some grudging disagreement than to parrot "facts."

    Of course its obvious that steel(iron alloys) becomes more reactive at
    temperatures as low as molten lead.  If for no other reason than an old
    gunsmith's trick for tempering flat springs (simple carbon spring
    steels) is to dunk them in molten lead until they change color.  That's
    more than twice the temperature than knife makers tend to temper knife
    steel, but a much faster temper.  (seconds)

    That of course leads me to wonder then why steel baking in the southern >Arizona Sun will get hot enough to harm you if you pick it up and hold
    it for very long, but just develops a light surface rust and lasts for >decades. LOL.

    Local Humidity. There's not really enough water in the air to do
    more that oxidize the top later.

    We joke about it developing its light coating of protective rust. Okay
    maybe two of us make that joke.

    And then there is the stuff which just rust "a little bit" then
    stops. Used in some decorative pieces.
    --
    pyotr filipivich
    "With Age comes Wisdom. Although far too often, Age travels alone."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bob La Londe@21:1/5 to pyotr filipivich on Tue Jul 11 09:01:32 2023
    On 7/11/2023 7:59 AM, pyotr filipivich wrote:
    Bob La Londe <none@none.com99> on Wed, 5 Jul 2023 16:41:13 -0700 typed
    in rec.crafts.metalworking the following:
    On 7/5/2023 8:57 AM, Jim Wilkins wrote:
    "Bob La Londe"  wrote in message news:u83vsa$hvpc$1@dont-email.me...

    I absolutely believe what I was taught, that steel burns.
    [[[ Pinch off a bit of steel wool and light it. When forging if the
    steel is yellow hot and gets into the air stream it can burn and spark. ]]] >>>
    That
    reactiveness of steel premise was originally shared with a tackle making >>> group which tends to be more "craftsy" than technical.  Sometimes its
    easier to allow for some grudging disagreement than to parrot "facts."

    Of course its obvious that steel(iron alloys) becomes more reactive at
    temperatures as low as molten lead.  If for no other reason than an old >>> gunsmith's trick for tempering flat springs (simple carbon spring
    steels) is to dunk them in molten lead until they change color.  That's >>> more than twice the temperature than knife makers tend to temper knife
    steel, but a much faster temper.  (seconds)

    That of course leads me to wonder then why steel baking in the southern
    Arizona Sun will get hot enough to harm you if you pick it up and hold
    it for very long, but just develops a light surface rust and lasts for
    decades. LOL.

    Local Humidity. There's not really enough water in the air to do
    more that oxidize the top later.

    We joke about it developing its light coating of protective rust. Okay
    maybe two of us make that joke.

    And then there is the stuff which just rust "a little bit" then
    stops. Used in some decorative pieces.


    That is functionally what aluminum (aluminum oxide) and stainless steel (chromium oxide) do. Form an oxide layer which prevents (reduces)
    further oxidation. Sometimes people are confused about stainless because
    there is iron present and it can develop some red iron oxides in some
    alloys.

    --
    Bob La Londe
    Proffessional Hack, Hobbyist, Wannabe, Shade Tree, Button Pushing, Not a
    real machinist


    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Wilkins@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jul 11 12:32:29 2023
    "pyotr filipivich" wrote in message news:sbrqaip6u77t4emr0i87g0sr41m0ph1vde@4ax.com...

    Local Humidity. There's not really enough water in the air to do
    more that oxidize the top later.
    ------------------
    King Tut's meteoritic iron dagger shows minimal rust after 3400 years in a
    dry climate. It's the lower one. https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/nwuKYY2zUrHxyHeG68DBjf-970-80.jpg.webp

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mike Spencer@21:1/5 to pyotr filipivich on Tue Jul 11 15:45:20 2023
    pyotr filipivich <phamp@mindspring.com> writes:

    Bob La Londe <none@none.com99> on Wed, 5 Jul 2023 16:41:13 -0700 typed
    in rec.crafts.metalworking the following:

    We joke about it developing its light coating of protective rust. Okay
    maybe two of us make that joke.

    And then there is the stuff which just rust "a little bit" then
    stops. Used in some decorative pieces.

    Yes. The welded sculpture is rusty-brown but otherwise fine decades
    later. OTOH, the stone plinth, surrounding walkways and anything open
    to run-off rain water is permanently stained a similar brown. There
    was much flap about a public sculpture at Dalhousie University in
    Halifax years ago.

    Um, well, not in the Arizona desert perhaps. Nova Scotia is very
    unline the Arizona desert.

    --
    Mike Spencer Nova Scotia, Canada

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gerry@21:1/5 to mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere on Tue Jul 11 16:18:49 2023
    On 11 Jul 2023 15:45:20 -0300, Mike Spencer
    <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> wrote:

    pyotr filipivich <phamp@mindspring.com> writes:

    Bob La Londe <none@none.com99> on Wed, 5 Jul 2023 16:41:13 -0700 typed
    in rec.crafts.metalworking the following:

    We joke about it developing its light coating of protective rust. Okay
    maybe two of us make that joke.

    And then there is the stuff which just rust "a little bit" then
    stops. Used in some decorative pieces.

    Yes. The welded sculpture is rusty-brown but otherwise fine decades
    later. OTOH, the stone plinth, surrounding walkways and anything open
    to run-off rain water is permanently stained a similar brown. There
    was much flap about a public sculpture at Dalhousie University in
    Halifax years ago.

    Um, well, not in the Arizona desert perhaps. Nova Scotia is very
    unline the Arizona desert.
    Then there is Cor-ten weathering steel used in bridge pier nosings.
    IIRC it contains some copper, among other things.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)