I don't follow all the new products for welding, but there always seems
to be something out there that surprises me.
GMAW or MIG is usually DCEP
C25 Steel / Tri-mix SS / Argon or Ar/He Aluminum --- and others.
FCAW
DCEP for dual shield
DCEN for gasless
Having my morning coffee and surfing YouTube videos this morning I ran
across a gasless flux core wire for stainless and it says to run DCEP.
Blue Demon WMS312LCF.
I use gas less flux core fairly regularly working outdoors. I do have
a DC power TIG supply that can run stick, but the little Miller/Hobart/Weldmark (has all three names on the machine) 187 MIG
machine is a lot handier to drag outside. For steel I run DCEN with
FCAW wire. I was surprised by the DCEP call out on the 312LCF. I
haven't bought any, but it might be handy for quick and dirty jobs like welding up replacement BBQ grills.
Have any of you guys run stainless FCAW gasless wire? What did you
think of it?
I watched a couple videos and the welds look cleaner than most FCAW
welds, but there was a shell of slag you need to pop off with your slag hammer like burning stick. It also looked a little ropey like maybe
they were running a little cold, but I've only made a couple stainless
welds (304) in my life, and I did that with TIG.
On 3/24/2025 2:13 PM, Bob La Londe wrote:
I don't follow all the new products for welding, but there alwaysI have a couple of rolls of flux core SS , one is 309 the other is missing part of the label so I don't know but I think it too is 309 . My experience was that the bead starts out cold and tall , but get a half
seems to be something out there that surprises me.
GMAW or MIG is usually DCEP
C25 Steel / Tri-mix SS / Argon or Ar/He Aluminum --- and others.
FCAW
DCEP for dual shield
DCEN for gasless
Having my morning coffee and surfing YouTube videos this morning I ran
across a gasless flux core wire for stainless and it says to run DCEP.
Blue Demon WMS312LCF.
I use gas less flux core fairly regularly working outdoors. I do
have a DC power TIG supply that can run stick, but the little Miller/
Hobart/Weldmark (has all three names on the machine) 187 MIG machine
is a lot handier to drag outside. For steel I run DCEN with FCAW
wire. I was surprised by the DCEP call out on the 312LCF. I haven't
bought any, but it might be handy for quick and dirty jobs like
welding up replacement BBQ grills.
Have any of you guys run stainless FCAW gasless wire? What did you
think of it?
I watched a couple videos and the welds look cleaner than most FCAW
welds, but there was a shell of slag you need to pop off with your
slag hammer like burning stick. It also looked a little ropey like
maybe they were running a little cold, but I've only made a couple
stainless welds (304) in my life, and I did that with TIG.
inch down the bead and it goes too hot . I was welding exhaust pipe so
that's probably not a fair test . That was also using my old 110V MIG
machine IIRC .
I've also got some 309L/.023 solid wire but I don't have the proper shield gas for it . Neither straight CO2 nor argon worked well .
On 3/25/2025 3:01 PM, Snag wrote:
On 3/24/2025 2:13 PM, Bob La Londe wrote:...
Yeah, generally MIG stainless takes tri-mix.
...
Bob La Londe
Bob La Londe <none@none.com99> writes:
On 3/25/2025 3:01 PM, Snag wrote:
On 3/24/2025 2:13 PM, Bob La Londe wrote:...
Yeah, generally MIG stainless takes tri-mix.
...
Bob La Londe
Tri-mix - contains helium?
You seem to get / use much more He in the USA.
I once got to try a mix with He on stainless steel - rubbish welds at
their "house" conditions in "dip". But when no-one was looking I
flipped it into "spray" and the foreman returning jumped backwards and
his his jaw dropped, and recovering a bit he asked "Did you just do
that?!". To which I answered "Yes. Here's the weld you want."
For most stainless MIG here we use Ar-1%O2. Never tried it.
MIG stainless - you have to "hot-up" the arc and give fluidity. 1% O2
in Ar is the best economically achievable for MIG stainless.
MIG stainless with 100%Ar is next-to-useless - no penetration and little fluidity (I have tried putting TIG gas (100%Ar) on a MIG welder with stainless wire - that is the limit of my experience).
TIG is inherently penetrative - runs perfectly on 100%Ar, as you know.
On 27/03/2025 07:47, Richard Smith wrote:
MIG stainless - you have to "hot-up" the arc and give fluidity. 1% O2
in Ar is the best economically achievable for MIG stainless.
MIG stainless with 100%Ar is next-to-useless - no penetration and little
fluidity (I have tried putting TIG gas (100%Ar) on a MIG welder with
stainless wire - that is the limit of my experience).
TIG is inherently penetrative - runs perfectly on 100%Ar, as you know.
I did the same with steel and MIG some years back when BOC were out of Argoshield light and the guy thought it would be OK, 100% Ar not good, fortunately the local depot got the Argoshield back in stock and
swapped the bottle FOC. I use the Argoshield light on stainless from
time to time and find it fine, IIRC 93/5/2 Ar/CO2,O2.
"Richard Smith" wrote in message news:m1r02fa6ab.fsf@void.com...
By the way - never tried it but - stainless flux-cored-wire runs on any argomix - Argon with some CO2.
----------------------------
Does it run with either gas alone? I have Argon for TIG and CO2 for
autobody MIG, and free stainless flux-core that I haven't tried yet. I modified my old 75A Century machine to allow changing polarity. If I
had a good reason a neighbor might loan me his Hobart 140.
"Jim Wilkins" <muratlanne@gmail.com> writes:
"Richard Smith" wrote in message news:m1r02fa6ab.fsf@void.com...
By the way - never tried it but - stainless flux-cored-wire runs on any
argomix - Argon with some CO2.
----------------------------
Does it run with either gas alone? I have Argon for TIG and CO2 for
autobody MIG, and free stainless flux-core that I haven't tried yet. I
modified my old 75A Century machine to allow changing polarity. If I
had a good reason a neighbor might loan me his Hobart 140.
Simple answer - don't know (pure Ar or pure CO2).
Ask the Co. who makes the wire?
Look up in spec-sheets from the likes of Lincoln, Bohler, etc?
"Bob La Londe" wrote in message news:vsk0ik$2h1ms$1@dont-email.me...
On 4/2/2025 2:56 AM, Richard Smith wrote:
"Jim Wilkins" <muratlanne@gmail.com> writes:I've found many different answers, perhaps they all work. This says
"Richard Smith" wrote in message news:m1r02fa6ab.fsf@void.com...
By the way - never tried it but - stainless flux-cored-wire runs on any
argomix - Argon with some CO2.
----------------------------
Does it run with either gas alone? I have Argon for TIG and CO2 for
autobody MIG, and free stainless flux-core that I haven't tried yet. I
modified my old 75A Century machine to allow changing polarity. If I
had a good reason a neighbor might loan me his Hobart 140.
straight CO2 is OK. https://www.harrisproductsgroup.com/en/Products/hpg-na-stainless-fcaw "Economical choice, as 100% carbon dioxide can be used as the
shielding gas"
I've never tried straight CO2 but I
know a few people that have in the past and rebuilt a few cars with pub gas.
On 02/04/2025 20:14, Jim Wilkins wrote:
"Bob La Londe" wrote in message news:vsk0ik$2h1ms$1@dont-email.me...As I understand it here in the UK CO2 usage at pubs went up quite a bit
On 4/2/2025 2:56 AM, Richard Smith wrote:
"Jim Wilkins" <muratlanne@gmail.com> writes:I've found many different answers, perhaps they all work. This says
"Richard Smith" wrote in message news:m1r02fa6ab.fsf@void.com...
By the way - never tried it but - stainless flux-cored-wire runs on any >>>> argomix - Argon with some CO2.
----------------------------
Does it run with either gas alone? I have Argon for TIG and CO2 for
autobody MIG, and free stainless flux-core that I haven't tried yet. I >>>> modified my old 75A Century machine to allow changing polarity. If I
had a good reason a neighbor might loan me his Hobart 140.
straight CO2 is OK.
https://www.harrisproductsgroup.com/en/Products/hpg-na-stainless-fcaw
"Economical choice, as 100% carbon dioxide can be used as the
shielding gas"
with the introduction of cheap MIG welders as a mate down the pub could
swap a bottle on the side, apparently the brewers now track usage much
more closely to make sure it tallies with drink sales. No idea what
happens on your side of the pond. I've never tried straight CO2 but I
know a few people that have in the past and rebuilt a few cars with pub
gas.
On Wed, 2 Apr 2025 21:24:17 +0100
David Billington <djb@invalid.com> wrote:
<snip>
I've never tried straight CO2 but I
know a few people that have in the past and rebuilt a few cars with pub gas.
Interesting CO2 source😄️
I've always used 75/25 mix... Was told by weld supply and have since
read numerous times that CO2 will give better penetration but
also more splatter than 75/25🤷️
On 4/2/2025 3:24 PM, David Billington wrote:
On 02/04/2025 20:14, Jim Wilkins wrote:
"Bob La Londe" wrote in message news:vsk0ik$2h1ms$1@dont-email.me...As I understand it here in the UK CO2 usage at pubs went up quite a
On 4/2/2025 2:56 AM, Richard Smith wrote:
"Jim Wilkins" <muratlanne@gmail.com> writes:I've found many different answers, perhaps they all work. This says
"Richard Smith" wrote in message news:m1r02fa6ab.fsf@void.com...
By the way - never tried it but - stainless flux-cored-wire runs on
any
argomix - Argon with some CO2.
----------------------------
Does it run with either gas alone? I have Argon for TIG and CO2 for
autobody MIG, and free stainless flux-core that I haven't tried yet. I >>>>> modified my old 75A Century machine to allow changing polarity. If I >>>>> had a good reason a neighbor might loan me his Hobart 140.
straight CO2 is OK.
https://www.harrisproductsgroup.com/en/Products/hpg-na-stainless-fcaw
"Economical choice, as 100% carbon dioxide can be used as the
shielding gas"
bit with the introduction of cheap MIG welders as a mate down the pub
could swap a bottle on the side, apparently the brewers now track
usage much more closely to make sure it tallies with drink sales. No
idea what happens on your side of the pond. I've never tried straight
CO2 but I know a few people that have in the past and rebuilt a few
cars with pub gas.
I've been using straight CO2 on my MIG machine since I bought it .
Leaves more spatter* than C25 , but most of my projects are function
over form and looks ain't near as important as function .
*I've been told that a spray of PAM lessens the difficulty of spatter removal . Haven't tried it so ...
...
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 484 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 51:17:19 |
Calls: | 9,627 |
Files: | 13,695 |
Messages: | 6,159,506 |
Posted today: | 1 |