REVIEW-Dave Bartholomew-“Little Girl Sing Ding-A-Ling”:IMPERIAL 5210;NOVEMBER 1952
https://www.spontaneouslunacy.net/dave-bartholomew-little-girl-sing-ding-a-ling-imperial-5210/#more-96961
YOUTUBE - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=996on--853o
SPONTANEOUS LUNACY VERDICT - 3/10
Retro Guy wrote:
Retro Guy wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 08:34:10 -0500, RWC wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 04:41:22 -0700, Retro Guy <retroguy@novabbs.org>
wrote:
Your subject truncated where it did because it tries to truncate at the end
of a word, and the next part is '-A-Ling:IMPERIAL' which looks like a word
because there are no spaces.
You are not giving enough detailed logic here, Retro Guy,
enough to be of practical help in constructing subjects/titles.
this was not truncated:
If you read the article you posted (click on it, or read it with a >>>>>newsreader), you will see the subject line remains intact.
REVIEW-The Five Hollywood Blue Jays:"So Worried"-RIH 185;NOVEMBER 1952 >>>>
this was truncated:
REVIEW-Dave Bartholomew-Little Girl Sing Ding-A-Ling:IMPERIAL<space> >>>> 5210;NOVEMBER 52
I see a bug!
I'll work on this today and reply back when I get somewhere.
I do have a doctor appt in a couple of hours, so there will be a bit of a >>> delay.
I found the problem. It's due to the subject being encoded on posting, and being multi-line. The second line was being discarded. It now displays (on a test site) as:
REVIEW-Dave Bartholomew-“Little Girl Sing Ding-A-Ling”:IMPERIAL 5210;N >> so it is being truncated at the pre-defined 69 characters.
I have it working properly now on a test site, but need to do some testing to make sure it doesn't break anything else. I'll keep at it for a bit.
THank you for your efforts in solving this. It is much appreciated
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 485 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 125:15:22 |
Calls: | 9,653 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 13,704 |
Messages: | 6,166,085 |