• We don't care about lyrics

    From Bruce@21:1/5 to All on Sat Apr 6 02:04:53 2024
    A guy in the Beatles group feels very similar to how I feel about lyrics.

    He posted:

    My take is music is no doubt about something ("meaning of lyrics"
    sense) to those who need it to be about something, starting with
    the composer. And that's fine. It's just that any aboutness simply
    hasn't typically added much to my joy over/with songs.


    Another example: the harmony and duration of the sustain of the
    final "yeah" in "She Loves You" reaches much more deeply into
    me than whatever the song is about, whatever it meant to others,
    to history, etc.


    Of *course* I've chanced upon all such analysis of such over the
    years, but whereas such tends toward 'tl;dr', the sound of that
    word presented by their voices at that moment in the song still
    drops my jaw involuntarily.

    I think part of what I was getting at was that I've tended to be more
    into the music than the meaning of any lyrics. But that's not to say
    I don't adore the *words* comprising the lyrics. However, for me the
    important aspects of the words are more their pronunciation, syllable
    metering, and musical notes underlying the vocalizing thereof.


    Take "Help!", for example. Fantastic lyrics. And yet none of them
    give me the kind of chills/goosebumps that the first "When" does.


    The power of that "When" for me isn't what 'when' means: it's the
    sound of the word, how it's vocally attacked, whatever musical note
    is underlying it relative to its surroundings, and that it's a single
    brief - yet sustained so exquisitely long - syllable sandwiched
    between that wonderful descending guitar thing, and my all-time
    favorite vocalist's voice entering the soundscape squarely in its
    zone that's always moved/spoken to me - that voice itself.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bbug1@21:1/5 to All on Sat Apr 6 09:53:14 2024
    Zzzzzzzz!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From DianeE@21:1/5 to Bruce on Sat Apr 6 07:53:44 2024
    On 4/5/2024 10:04 PM, Bruce wrote:
    A guy in the Beatles group feels very similar to how I feel about lyrics.
    He posted:

    My take is music is no doubt about something ("meaning of lyrics"
    sense) to those who need it to be about something, starting with
    the composer. And that's fine. It's just that any aboutness simply
    hasn't typically added much to my joy over/with songs.


    Another example: the harmony and duration of the sustain of the
    final "yeah" in "She Loves You" reaches much more deeply into
    me than whatever the song is about, whatever it meant to others,
    to history, etc.


    Of *course* I've chanced upon all such analysis of such over the
    years, but whereas such tends toward 'tl;dr', the sound of that
    word presented by their voices at that moment in the song still
    drops my jaw involuntarily.

    I think part of what I was getting at was that I've tended to be more
    into the music than the meaning of any lyrics. But that's not to say
    I don't adore the *words* comprising the lyrics. However, for me the important aspects of the words are more their pronunciation, syllable metering, and musical notes underlying the vocalizing thereof.


    Take "Help!", for example. Fantastic lyrics. And yet none of them
    give me the kind of chills/goosebumps that the first "When" does.


    The power of that "When" for me isn't what 'when' means: it's the
    sound of the word, how it's vocally attacked, whatever musical note
    is underlying it relative to its surroundings, and that it's a single
    brief - yet sustained so exquisitely long - syllable sandwiched
    between that wonderful descending guitar thing, and my all-time
    favorite vocalist's voice entering the soundscape squarely in its
    zone that's always moved/spoken to me - that voice itself.
    ----------
    'tl;dr' ????? What the hell is that?????

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bruce@21:1/5 to DianeE on Sat Apr 6 14:53:53 2024
    DianeE wrote:

    On 4/5/2024 10:04 PM, Bruce wrote:
    A guy in the Beatles group feels very similar to how I feel about lyrics.
    He posted:

    My take is music is no doubt about something ("meaning of lyrics"
    sense) to those who need it to be about something, starting with
    the composer. And that's fine. It's just that any aboutness simply
    hasn't typically added much to my joy over/with songs.


    Another example: the harmony and duration of the sustain of the
    final "yeah" in "She Loves You" reaches much more deeply into
    me than whatever the song is about, whatever it meant to others,
    to history, etc.


    Of *course* I've chanced upon all such analysis of such over the
    years, but whereas such tends toward 'tl;dr', the sound of that
    word presented by their voices at that moment in the song still
    drops my jaw involuntarily.

    I think part of what I was getting at was that I've tended to be more
    into the music than the meaning of any lyrics. But that's not to say
    I don't adore the *words* comprising the lyrics. However, for me the
    important aspects of the words are more their pronunciation, syllable
    metering, and musical notes underlying the vocalizing thereof.


    Take "Help!", for example. Fantastic lyrics. And yet none of them
    give me the kind of chills/goosebumps that the first "When" does.


    The power of that "When" for me isn't what 'when' means: it's the
    sound of the word, how it's vocally attacked, whatever musical note
    is underlying it relative to its surroundings, and that it's a single
    brief - yet sustained so exquisitely long - syllable sandwiched
    between that wonderful descending guitar thing, and my all-time
    favorite vocalist's voice entering the soundscape squarely in its
    zone that's always moved/spoken to me - that voice itself.
    ----------
    'tl;dr' ????? What the hell is that?????

    It's something YOU will appreciate.

    TL;DR is an abbreviation for "too long; didn't read." It often appears in social media posts, online articles, blog posts, text messages, emails, and comments responding to various types of content.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RWC@21:1/5 to All on Sat Apr 6 16:10:01 2024
    On Sat, 6 Apr 2024 19:52:23 +0000, mariabus@blueyonder.co.uk (Roger)
    wrote:

    What about records like "Volare" or "Sukiyaki"?

    Both were HUGE hits on both sides of the pond but how many folk on either side understood the lyrics?

    So lyrics obviously can't be THAT important---otherwise people wouldn't have purchased these things

    Thanks for supporting your pal Bruce, Roger.

    Lyrics can be important, it depends on the recording...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bbug1@21:1/5 to All on Sat Apr 6 20:02:42 2024
    I thought you knew better than that, Roger. What about all the songs that are purchased BECAUSE of the lyrics? Were you just instigating in jest?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roger@21:1/5 to All on Sat Apr 6 19:52:23 2024
    What about records like "Volare" or "Sukiyaki"?

    Both were HUGE hits on both sides of the pond but how many folk on either side understood the lyrics?

    So lyrics obviously can't be THAT important---otherwise people wouldn't have purchased these things

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From DianeE@21:1/5 to RWC on Sun Apr 7 06:39:03 2024
    On 4/6/2024 4:10 PM, RWC wrote:
    On Sat, 6 Apr 2024 19:52:23 +0000, mariabus@blueyonder.co.uk (Roger)
    wrote:

    What about records like "Volare" or "Sukiyaki"?

    Both were HUGE hits on both sides of the pond but how many folk on either side understood the lyrics?

    So lyrics obviously can't be THAT important---otherwise people wouldn't have purchased these things

    Thanks for supporting your pal Bruce, Roger.

    Lyrics can be important, it depends on the recording...
    -----------
    Well, this is as rare as a total eclipse: I agree with Geoff.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roger@21:1/5 to DianeE on Sun Apr 7 11:14:31 2024
    DianeE wrote:

    On 4/6/2024 4:10 PM, RWC wrote:
    On Sat, 6 Apr 2024 19:52:23 +0000, mariabus@blueyonder.co.uk (Roger)
    wrote:

    What about records like "Volare" or "Sukiyaki"?

    Both were HUGE hits on both sides of the pond but how many folk on either side understood the lyrics?

    So lyrics obviously can't be THAT important---otherwise people wouldn't have purchased these things

    Thanks for supporting your pal Bruce, Roger.

    Lyrics can be important, it depends on the recording...
    -----------
    Well, this is as rare as a total eclipse: I agree with Geoff.

    Wow! That damned earthquake has a lot to answer for

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Will-Dockery@21:1/5 to All on Sun Apr 21 00:41:42 2024
    Bruce wrote:
    A guy in the Beatles group feels very similar to how I feel about
    lyrics.

    He posted:

    My take is music is no doubt about something ("meaning of
    lyrics"
    sense) to those who need it to be about something, starting with
    the composer. And that's fine. It's just that any aboutness simply
    hasn't typically added much to my joy over/with songs.


    Another example: the harmony and duration of the sustain of the
    final "yeah" in "She Loves You" reaches much
    more deeply into
    me than whatever the song is about, whatever it meant to others,
    to history, etc.


    Of *course* I've chanced upon all such analysis of such over the
    years, but whereas such tends toward 'tl;dr', the sound of that
    word presented by their voices at that moment in the song still
    drops my jaw involuntarily.

    I think part of what I was getting at was that I've tended to be
    more
    into the music than the meaning of any lyrics. But that's not to
    say
    I don't adore the *words* comprising the lyrics. However, for me
    the
    important aspects of the words are more their pronunciation,
    syllable
    metering, and musical notes underlying the vocalizing thereof.


    Take "Help!", for example. Fantastic lyrics. And yet none
    of them
    give me the kind of chills/goosebumps that the first
    "When" does.


    The power of that "When" for me isn't what 'when' means:
    it's the
    sound of the word, how it's vocally attacked, whatever musical
    note
    is underlying it relative to its surroundings, and that it's a
    single
    brief - yet sustained so exquisitely long - syllable sandwiched
    between that wonderful descending guitar thing, and my all-time
    favorite vocalist's voice entering the soundscape squarely in its
    zone that's always moved/spoken to me - that voice itself.


    Interesting take, although I can't say that I really agree, Brian a a
    lyricist.

    


    This is a response to the post seen at: http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=663065034#663065034

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bruce@21:1/5 to RWC on Sun Apr 21 01:45:01 2024
    RWC wrote:

    On Sat, 6 Apr 2024 19:52:23 +0000, mariabus@blueyonder.co.uk (Roger)
    wrote:

    What about records like "Volare" or "Sukiyaki"?

    Both were HUGE hits on both sides of the pond but how many folk on either side understood the lyrics?

    So lyrics obviously can't be THAT important---otherwise people wouldn't have purchased these things

    Thanks for supporting your pal Bruce, Roger.

    Lyrics can be important, it depends on the recording...

    Give us an example of a recording where you think the lyrics are important.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bruce@21:1/5 to All on Sun Apr 21 01:44:04 2024
    bbug1 wrote:

    I thought you knew better than that, Roger. What about all the songs that are purchased BECAUSE of the lyrics?

    If "songs" are purchased "because" of lyrics, then which artist is singing doesn't matter, right?

    If you get the Crew Cuts "Earth Angel" it's just as good as the Penguins version if you are buying it "because" of the lyrics.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RWC@21:1/5 to Bruce on Sun Apr 21 12:08:25 2024
    On Sun, 21 Apr 2024 01:45:01 +0000, savoybg@aol.com (Bruce) wrote:

    RWC wrote:

    On Sat, 6 Apr 2024 19:52:23 +0000, mariabus@blueyonder.co.uk (Roger)
    wrote:

    What about records like "Volare" or "Sukiyaki"?

    Both were HUGE hits on both sides of the pond but how many folk on either side understood the lyrics?

    So lyrics obviously can't be THAT important---otherwise people wouldn't have purchased these things

    Thanks for supporting your pal Bruce, Roger.

    Lyrics can be important, it depends on the recording...

    Give us an example of a recording where you think the lyrics are important.

    Elvis - Old Shep; cornball as the lyrics might be

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RWC@21:1/5 to Bruce on Sun Apr 21 11:54:56 2024
    On Sun, 21 Apr 2024 01:44:04 +0000, savoybg@aol.com (Bruce) wrote:

    bbug1 wrote:

    I thought you knew better than that, Roger. What about all the songs that are purchased BECAUSE of the lyrics?

    If "songs" are purchased "because" of lyrics, then which artist is singing doesn't matter, right?

    If you get the Crew Cuts "Earth Angel" it's just as good as the Penguins version if you are buying it "because" of the lyrics.

    No, Bruce, it's not as simple as that.

    A song that is liked because of the lyrics also has to get a pass
    mark as regards the sound that comes out of the speaker.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bruce@21:1/5 to RWC on Sun Apr 21 16:50:45 2024
    RWC wrote:

    On Sun, 21 Apr 2024 01:44:04 +0000, savoybg@aol.com (Bruce) wrote:

    bbug1 wrote:

    I thought you knew better than that, Roger. What about all the songs that are purchased BECAUSE of the lyrics?

    If "songs" are purchased "because" of lyrics, then which artist is singing doesn't matter, right?

    If you get the Crew Cuts "Earth Angel" it's just as good as the Penguins version if you are buying it "because" of the lyrics.

    No, Bruce, it's not as simple as that.

    A song that is liked because of the lyrics also has to get a pass
    mark as regards the sound that comes out of the speaker.

    Then it's not just being bought because of the lyrics.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bruce@21:1/5 to BobRoman on Sun Apr 21 17:30:27 2024
    BobRoman wrote:

    Bruce wrote:

    If "songs" are purchased "because" of lyrics, then which artist is singing doesn't matter, right?

    The people who purchased Whitney Houston's rendition of the Star Spangled Banner probably would not have bought Roseanne Barr's.

    So then it's not just being bought because of the lyrics.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark D.@21:1/5 to All on Sun Apr 21 21:47:39 2024
    On Apr 21, 2024 at 11:50:45 AM CDT, "Bruce" <Bruce> wrote:

    RWC wrote:

    On Sun, 21 Apr 2024 01:44:04 +0000, savoybg@aol.com (Bruce) wrote:

    bbug1 wrote:

    I thought you knew better than that, Roger. What about all the songs that >>>> are purchased BECAUSE of the lyrics?

    If "songs" are purchased "because" of lyrics, then which artist is singing >>> doesn't matter, right?

    If you get the Crew Cuts "Earth Angel" it's just as good as the Penguins >>> version if you are buying it "because" of the lyrics.

    No, Bruce, it's not as simple as that.

    A song that is liked because of the lyrics also has to get a pass
    mark as regards the sound that comes out of the speaker.

    Then it's not just being bought because of the lyrics.

    Nobody here ever said that records are bought JUST because of the lyrics. All they have been saying is that the various pleasures of a record will sometimes be increased because of the lyrics.

    --md

    remove "xx" for email

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bruce@21:1/5 to Mark D. on Sun Apr 21 22:25:15 2024
    Mark D. wrote:

    On Apr 21, 2024 at 11:50:45 AM CDT, "Bruce" <Bruce> wrote:

    RWC wrote:

    On Sun, 21 Apr 2024 01:44:04 +0000, savoybg@aol.com (Bruce) wrote:

    bbug1 wrote:

    I thought you knew better than that, Roger. What about all the songs that >>>>> are purchased BECAUSE of the lyrics?

    If "songs" are purchased "because" of lyrics, then which artist is singing >>>> doesn't matter, right?

    If you get the Crew Cuts "Earth Angel" it's just as good as the Penguins >>>> version if you are buying it "because" of the lyrics.

    No, Bruce, it's not as simple as that.

    A song that is liked because of the lyrics also has to get a pass
    mark as regards the sound that comes out of the speaker.

    Then it's not just being bought because of the lyrics.

    Nobody here ever said that records are bought JUST because of the lyrics. All they have been saying is that the various pleasures of a record will sometimes
    be increased because of the lyrics.

    I guess you missed this post from Bill:

    bbug1 - Sat, 6 Apr 2024 16:02
    I thought you knew better than that, Roger. What about all the songs that are purchased BECAUSE of the lyrics?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bruce@21:1/5 to Mark D. on Mon Apr 22 02:34:51 2024
    Mark D. wrote:

    On Apr 21, 2024 at 5:25:15 PM CDT, "Bruce" <Bruce> wrote:

    <div id="editor" contenteditable="false">>>
    Then it's not just being bought because of the lyrics.

    Nobody here ever said that records are bought JUST because of the lyrics. All
    they have been saying is that the various pleasures of a record will sometimes
    be increased because of the lyrics.

    I guess you missed this post from Bill:

    bbug1 - Sat, 6 Apr 2024 16:02
    I thought you knew better than that, Roger. What about all the songs that are
    purchased BECAUSE of the lyrics?
    </div>
    <div class="footer" onclick="setCursorToBottom()"></div>

    What does Bill's opinions have to do with mine?

    You said, and I quote, "Nobody here ever said that records are bought JUST because of the lyrics."

    I just showed you that Bill has said that.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark D.@21:1/5 to All on Mon Apr 22 02:12:38 2024
    On Apr 21, 2024 at 5:25:15 PM CDT, "Bruce" <Bruce> wrote:

    <div id="editor" contenteditable="false">>>
    Then it's not just being bought because of the lyrics.

    Nobody here ever said that records are bought JUST because of the lyrics. All
    they have been saying is that the various pleasures of a record will sometimes
    be increased because of the lyrics.

    I guess you missed this post from Bill:

    bbug1 - Sat, 6 Apr 2024 16:02
    I thought you knew better than that, Roger. What about all the songs that are purchased BECAUSE of the lyrics?
    </div>
    <div class="footer" onclick="setCursorToBottom()"></div>

    What does Bill's opinions have to do with mine?

    --md

    remove "xx" for email

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bruce@21:1/5 to BobRoman on Mon Apr 22 03:04:55 2024
    BobRoman wrote:

    Bruce wrote:

    BobRoman wrote:

    Bruce wrote:

    If "songs" are purchased "because" of lyrics, then which artist is singing doesn't matter, right?

    The people who purchased Whitney Houston's rendition of the Star Spangled Banner probably would not have bought Roseanne Barr's.

    So then it's not just being bought because of the lyrics.

    Bill did not say "JUST for the lyrics."

    The just is understood with the way Bill worded it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bruce@21:1/5 to BobRoman on Mon Apr 22 05:28:30 2024
    BobRoman wrote:

    Bruce wrote:

    BobRoman wrote:


    Bill did not say "JUST for the lyrics."

    The just is understood with the way Bill worded it.

    "What about all the songs that are purchased BECAUSE of the lyrics?"

    I don't see it. If "because" was the same as "just because," Lloyd Price would have written a shorter song.

    There's a reason why Bill put BECAUSE in CAPS.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)