Samp finally sent in his Hall of Fame analysis to Lew, it went up on May 1.
https://digitaldreamdoor.com/pages/best_hall-of-fame-2024.html
On Mon, 6 May 2024 14:00:48 +0000, savoybg@aol.com (Bruce) wrote:
Samp finally sent in his Hall of Fame analysis to Lew, it went up on May 1. >>
https://digitaldreamdoor.com/pages/best_hall-of-fame-2024.html
Who else on planet Earth has Sampson's seemingly unbiased extensive
knowledge of popular music spanning six or more decades (1940s
onwards).
RWC wrote:
On Mon, 6 May 2024 14:00:48 +0000, savoybg@aol.com (Bruce) wrote:
Samp finally sent in his Hall of Fame analysis to Lew, it went up on May 1. >>>
https://digitaldreamdoor.com/pages/best_hall-of-fame-2024.html
Who else on planet Earth has Sampson's seemingly unbiased extensive
knowledge of popular music spanning six or more decades (1940s
onwards).
You should give him a call and feed his ego. Mention my name, but only after you've gotten the conversation going for awhile or he may hang up on you like he did with me this morning.
Bruce wrote:
RWC wrote:
On Mon, 6 May 2024 14:00:48 +0000, savoybg@aol.com (Bruce) wrote:
Samp finally sent in his Hall of Fame analysis to Lew, it went up on May 1. >>>>
https://digitaldreamdoor.com/pages/best_hall-of-fame-2024.html
Who else on planet Earth has Sampson's seemingly unbiased extensive
knowledge of popular music spanning six or more decades (1940s
onwards).
You should give him a call and feed his ego. Mention my name, but only after you've gotten the conversation going for awhile or he may hang up on you like he did with me this morning.
So you really talked to him?
Did he tell you what the problem was? Has he been ill?
Does he intend to carry on the Lunacy project?
Who else on planet Earth has Sampson's seemingly unbiased extensive knowledge of popular music spanning six or more decades (1940s----------
onwards).
Bruce wrote:
hung up after I said "Are you taking a break from the reviews?" "When you gonna start up again."He has not responded to me since he started this project. Not sure what he's mad about, but when I spoke to him he claimed he had never heard of me and hung up. On the second call he did not even say anything. He
Maybe he doesn't like having a stalker. Leave the man alone, for Christ's sake!
On 5/6/2024 11:19 AM, RWC wrote:
Who else on planet Earth has Sampson's seemingly unbiased extensive knowledge of popular music spanning six or more decades (1940s----------
onwards).
Seemingly unbiased? Only to you. To me, he's very biased, as evidenced
by his refusal to include country boogie/Western swing records that are
(to me) clear precursors of R&R. He also claims he will not include
blues records, but then he does--*some* blues records, presumably the
ones he likes.
As for his annual HOF commentaries, they're very slanted towards his
personal tastes. Do you disagree?
On 5/6/2024 11:19 AM, RWC wrote:
Who else on planet Earth has Sampson's seemingly unbiased extensive knowledge of popular music spanning six or more decades (1940s----------
onwards).
Seemingly unbiased? Only to you. To me, he's very biased, as evidenced
by his refusal to include country boogie/Western swing records that are
(to me) clear precursors of R&R.
As for his annual HOF commentaries, they're very slanted towards his
personal tastes. Do you disagree?
DianeE wrote:-----------
On 5/6/2024 11:19 AM, RWC wrote:
;----------
Who else on planet Earth has Sampson's seemingly unbiased extensive
knowledge of popular music spanning six or more decades (1940s
onwards).
Seemingly unbiased? Only to you. To me, he's very biased, as
evidenced by his refusal to include country boogie/Western swing
records that are (to me) clear precursors of R&R. He also claims he
will not include blues records, but then he does--*some* blues
records, presumably the ones he likes.
As for his annual HOF commentaries, they're very slanted towards his
personal tastes. Do you disagree?
How would you know what his personal tastes are?
I don't see them as slanted at all, and I don't know what his personal
tastes are. The only thing he's slanted against are cult acts who never really accomplished much in the way of widespread popularity. I'm with
him on that. Kool and the Gang and Chicago should have gone in long
before shit like the Stooges.
On 5/8/2024 11:49 PM, Bruce wrote:
DianeE wrote:-----------
On 5/6/2024 11:19 AM, RWC wrote:
;----------
Who else on planet Earth has Sampson's seemingly unbiased extensive
knowledge of popular music spanning six or more decades (1940s
onwards).
Seemingly unbiased? Only to you. To me, he's very biased, as
evidenced by his refusal to include country boogie/Western swing
records that are (to me) clear precursors of R&R. He also claims he
will not include blues records, but then he does--*some* blues
records, presumably the ones he likes.
As for his annual HOF commentaries, they're very slanted towards his
personal tastes. Do you disagree?
How would you know what his personal tastes are?
I don't see them as slanted at all, and I don't know what his personal
tastes are. The only thing he's slanted against are cult acts who never
really accomplished much in the way of widespread popularity. I'm with
him on that. Kool and the Gang and Chicago should have gone in long
before shit like the Stooges.
The fact that you agree with him does not translate into "he's unbiased."
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 483 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 10:50:32 |
Calls: | 9,616 |
Calls today: | 2 |
Files: | 13,692 |
Messages: | 6,155,943 |