On Thu, 1 Oct 2020 12:21:33 -0300, "Amateur Photographer" <
amateur.photographer@altbbs.alt119.net> wrote:
Shooting JPEGs can save you time, space, and even make you a better photographer. Angela Nicholson explains
https://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/latest/photo-news/why-bother-shooting-raw-141250
But best still to have RAW saved to a second card just in case eh?
"Your guide: Eric Brushett
A few years ago I started experimenting with shooting weddings in
JPEG. I deliver JPEGs to my clients anyway, so why not? I shoot a mix
of Fujifilm and Sony equipment, but my process is the same for both. I
record raw files to slot 1, and JPEGs to slot 2. I edit off the JPEGs,
but keep the raw files in case I need to push an image further than
the JPEGs will allow. "
So you've had time to get the right WB, the optimum exposure settings
and the best JPG settings to save.
Why not just shoot RAW in the first place? I can automatically
process the files using in-camera settings as default and then only
need to worry about the handful that need special attention. And if
my WB is wrong I can "select all" and reset. And I don't need to SD
card slots and two sets of images to manage.
--
AnthonyL
Why ever wait to finish a job before starting the next?
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)