https://torontosun.com/news/local-news/warmington-trans-teacher-lemieux-returning-to-classroom-this-time-in-hamilton#:~:text=The%20principal%20highlighted%20to%20parents,special%20entry%20and%20exit%20plans.
On 8/28/23 8:37 AM, bmoore wrote:
https://torontosun.com/news/local-news/warmington-trans-teacher-lemieux-returning-to-classroom-this-time-in-hamilton#:~:text=The%20principal%20highlighted%20to%20parents,special%20entry%20and%20exit%20plans.
The ultimate result of the "I'm OK; you're OK" philosophy.
bmoore kirjoitti 28.8.2023 klo 18.55:
On Monday, August 28, 2023 at 8:43:47 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:
On 8/28/23 8:37 AM, bmoore wrote:
https://torontosun.com/news/local-news/warmington-trans-teacher-lemieux-returning-to-classroom-this-time-in-hamilton#:~:text=The%20principal%20highlighted%20to%20parents,special%20entry%20and%20exit%20plans.
The ultimate result of the "I'm OK; you're OK" philosophy.
People who need breast implants are obviously not OK with themselves.
Why, what's wrong with her breasts?
This is what happens when we treat mental health problems with surgeries.
TT kirjoitti 28.8.2023 klo 19.01:
bmoore kirjoitti 28.8.2023 klo 18.55:
On Monday, August 28, 2023 at 8:43:47 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:
On 8/28/23 8:37 AM, bmoore wrote:
https://torontosun.com/news/local-news/warmington-trans-teacher-lemieux-returning-to-classroom-this-time-in-hamilton#:~:text=The%20principal%20highlighted%20to%20parents,special%20entry%20and%20exit%20plans.
The ultimate result of the "I'm OK; you're OK" philosophy.
People who need breast implants are obviously not OK with themselves.
Why, what's wrong with her breasts?
This is what happens when we treat mental health problems with surgeries.
There's a poll on the page...
Do you think trans teacher Kayla Lemieux should be returning to a high
school classroom in Hamilton?
Yes
4.29% (344 votes)
No
95.71% (7,673 votes)
On Monday, August 28, 2023 at 8:43:47 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:
On 8/28/23 8:37 AM, bmoore wrote:
https://torontosun.com/news/local-news/warmington-trans-teacher-lemieux-returning-to-classroom-this-time-in-hamilton#:~:text=The%20principal%20highlighted%20to%20parents,special%20entry%20and%20exit%20plans.
The ultimate result of the "I'm OK; you're OK" philosophy.
People who need breast implants are obviously not OK with themselves.
TT kirjoitti 28.8.2023 klo 19.04:
TT kirjoitti 28.8.2023 klo 19.01:
bmoore kirjoitti 28.8.2023 klo 18.55:
On Monday, August 28, 2023 at 8:43:47 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:
On 8/28/23 8:37 AM, bmoore wrote:
https://torontosun.com/news/local-news/warmington-trans-teacher-lemieux-returning-to-classroom-this-time-in-hamilton#:~:text=The%20principal%20highlighted%20to%20parents,special%20entry%20and%20exit%20plans.
The ultimate result of the "I'm OK; you're OK" philosophy.
People who need breast implants are obviously not OK with themselves.
Why, what's wrong with her breasts?
This is what happens when we treat mental health problems with
surgeries.
There's a poll on the page...
Do you think trans teacher Kayla Lemieux should be returning to a
high school classroom in Hamilton?
Yes
4.29% (344 votes)
No
95.71% (7,673 votes)
...So why is extreme 4% running the society these days?
On 8/28/23 9:05 AM, TT wrote:
TT kirjoitti 28.8.2023 klo 19.04:
TT kirjoitti 28.8.2023 klo 19.01:
bmoore kirjoitti 28.8.2023 klo 18.55:
On Monday, August 28, 2023 at 8:43:47 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:Why, what's wrong with her breasts?
On 8/28/23 8:37 AM, bmoore wrote:
https://torontosun.com/news/local-news/warmington-trans-teacher-lemieux-returning-to-classroom-this-time-in-hamilton#:~:text=The%20principal%20highlighted%20to%20parents,special%20entry%20and%20exit%20plans.
The ultimate result of the "I'm OK; you're OK" philosophy.
People who need breast implants are obviously not OK with themselves. >>>
This is what happens when we treat mental health problems with
surgeries.
There's a poll on the page...
Do you think trans teacher Kayla Lemieux should be returning to a
high school classroom in Hamilton?
Yes
4.29% (344 votes)
No
95.71% (7,673 votes)
...So why is extreme 4% running the society these days?Because we're deplorables and don't know what we're doing.
On Monday, 28 August 2023 at 17:59:35 UTC+1, Sawfish wrote:domestic terrorists" is exactly what the Marxists ordered.
On 8/28/23 9:05 AM, TT wrote:well yes it's cos you voted for Biden and/or didn't vote for Trump, skrip and I did tell you repeatedly what would happen. Voting for Biden and supporting him is 100% wanting more and more of this, calling regular parents who disagree with this "
TT kirjoitti 28.8.2023 klo 19.04:Because we're deplorables and don't know what we're doing.
TT kirjoitti 28.8.2023 klo 19.01:...So why is extreme 4% running the society these days?
bmoore kirjoitti 28.8.2023 klo 18.55:There's a poll on the page...
On Monday, August 28, 2023 at 8:43:47 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:
On 8/28/23 8:37 AM, bmoore wrote:People who need breast implants are obviously not OK with themselves. >>>>> Why, what's wrong with her breasts?
https://torontosun.com/news/local-news/warmington-trans-teacher-lemieux-returning-to-classroom-this-time-in-hamilton#:~:text=The%20principal%20highlighted%20to%20parents,special%20entry%20and%20exit%20plans.The ultimate result of the "I'm OK; you're OK" philosophy.
This is what happens when we treat mental health problems with
surgeries.
Do you think trans teacher Kayla Lemieux should be returning to a
high school classroom in Hamilton?
Yes
4.29% (344 votes)
No
95.71% (7,673 votes)
On 8/29/23 5:15 AM, The Iceberg wrote:domestic terrorists" is exactly what the Marxists ordered.
On Monday, 28 August 2023 at 17:59:35 UTC+1, Sawfish wrote:
On 8/28/23 9:05 AM, TT wrote:well yes it's cos you voted for Biden and/or didn't vote for Trump, skrip and I did tell you repeatedly what would happen. Voting for Biden and supporting him is 100% wanting more and more of this, calling regular parents who disagree with this "
TT kirjoitti 28.8.2023 klo 19.04:Because we're deplorables and don't know what we're doing.
TT kirjoitti 28.8.2023 klo 19.01:...So why is extreme 4% running the society these days?
bmoore kirjoitti 28.8.2023 klo 18.55:There's a poll on the page...
On Monday, August 28, 2023 at 8:43:47 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote: >>>>>>> On 8/28/23 8:37 AM, bmoore wrote:
People who need breast implants are obviously not OK with themselves. >>>>> Why, what's wrong with her breasts?https://torontosun.com/news/local-news/warmington-trans-teacher-lemieux-returning-to-classroom-this-time-in-hamilton#:~:text=The%20principal%20highlighted%20to%20parents,special%20entry%20and%20exit%20plans.The ultimate result of the "I'm OK; you're OK" philosophy.
This is what happens when we treat mental health problems with
surgeries.
Do you think trans teacher Kayla Lemieux should be returning to a
high school classroom in Hamilton?
Yes
4.29% (344 votes)
No
95.71% (7,673 votes)
Please don't confuse me with those folks, Ice. You should know better by now.
Mainly, I can only address statements that relate to me directly. I can
try to set the record straight on that, at least. Interlocutors' choice
of descriptive terms seems OK, but factual stuff that relates to *me* I
would like it to be at least substantially accurate.
On Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 7:46:57 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:domestic terrorists" is exactly what the Marxists ordered.
On 8/29/23 5:15 AM, The Iceberg wrote:
On Monday, 28 August 2023 at 17:59:35 UTC+1, Sawfish wrote:
On 8/28/23 9:05 AM, TT wrote:well yes it's cos you voted for Biden and/or didn't vote for Trump, skrip and I did tell you repeatedly what would happen. Voting for Biden and supporting him is 100% wanting more and more of this, calling regular parents who disagree with this "
TT kirjoitti 28.8.2023 klo 19.04:Because we're deplorables and don't know what we're doing.
TT kirjoitti 28.8.2023 klo 19.01:...So why is extreme 4% running the society these days?
bmoore kirjoitti 28.8.2023 klo 18.55:There's a poll on the page...
On Monday, August 28, 2023 at 8:43:47 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 8/28/23 8:37 AM, bmoore wrote:
People who need breast implants are obviously not OK with themselves. >>>>>>> Why, what's wrong with her breasts?https://torontosun.com/news/local-news/warmington-trans-teacher-lemieux-returning-to-classroom-this-time-in-hamilton#:~:text=The%20principal%20highlighted%20to%20parents,special%20entry%20and%20exit%20plans.The ultimate result of the "I'm OK; you're OK" philosophy.
This is what happens when we treat mental health problems with
surgeries.
Do you think trans teacher Kayla Lemieux should be returning to a
high school classroom in Hamilton?
Yes
4.29% (344 votes)
No
95.71% (7,673 votes)
Please don't confuse me with those folks, Ice. You should know better byAgreed, Sawfish. But to be clear, NO ONE on rst has ever called regular parents "domestic terrorists". That's just Iceberg's mouth on overdrive.
now.
When it's so dishonest, some might call that trolling.
Mainly, I can only address statements that relate to me directly. I canSure, and Ice's statement was not. Do you think he's misrepresenting you? You have never said anything like what he accused you of.
try to set the record straight on that, at least. Interlocutors' choice
of descriptive terms seems OK, but factual stuff that relates to *me* I
would like it to be at least substantially accurate.
On Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 7:46:57 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:domestic terrorists" is exactly what the Marxists ordered.
On 8/29/23 5:15 AM, The Iceberg wrote:
On Monday, 28 August 2023 at 17:59:35 UTC+1, Sawfish wrote:
On 8/28/23 9:05 AM, TT wrote:well yes it's cos you voted for Biden and/or didn't vote for Trump, skrip and I did tell you repeatedly what would happen. Voting for Biden and supporting him is 100% wanting more and more of this, calling regular parents who disagree with this "
TT kirjoitti 28.8.2023 klo 19.04:Because we're deplorables and don't know what we're doing.
TT kirjoitti 28.8.2023 klo 19.01:...So why is extreme 4% running the society these days?
bmoore kirjoitti 28.8.2023 klo 18.55:There's a poll on the page...
On Monday, August 28, 2023 at 8:43:47 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote: >>>>>>> On 8/28/23 8:37 AM, bmoore wrote:Why, what's wrong with her breasts?
People who need breast implants are obviously not OK with themselves.https://torontosun.com/news/local-news/warmington-trans-teacher-lemieux-returning-to-classroom-this-time-in-hamilton#:~:text=The%20principal%20highlighted%20to%20parents,special%20entry%20and%20exit%20plans.The ultimate result of the "I'm OK; you're OK" philosophy.
This is what happens when we treat mental health problems with
surgeries.
Do you think trans teacher Kayla Lemieux should be returning to a >>>> high school classroom in Hamilton?
Yes
4.29% (344 votes)
No
95.71% (7,673 votes)
Please don't confuse me with those folks, Ice. You should know better by now.Agreed, Sawfish. But to be clear, NO ONE on rst has ever called regular parents "domestic terrorists". That's just Iceberg's mouth on overdrive.
When it's so dishonest, some might call that trolling.
Mainly, I can only address statements that relate to me directly. I canSure, and Ice's statement was not. Do you think he's misrepresenting you? You have never said anything like what he accused you of.
try to set the record straight on that, at least. Interlocutors' choice
of descriptive terms seems OK, but factual stuff that relates to *me* I would like it to be at least substantially accurate.
On 8/29/23 9:27 AM, bmoore wrote:
When it's so dishonest, some might call that trolling.
Thanks for the offer, b, but I do my own PR.Mainly, I can only address statements that relate to me directly. I can >> try to set the record straight on that, at least. Interlocutors' choice >> of descriptive terms seems OK, but factual stuff that relates to *me* I >> would like it to be at least substantially accurate.Sure, and Ice's statement was not. Do you think he's misrepresenting you? You have never said anything like what he accused you of.
;^)
On 8/29/23 5:15 AM, The Iceberg wrote:domestic terrorists" is exactly what the Marxists ordered.
On Monday, 28 August 2023 at 17:59:35 UTC+1, Sawfish wrote:
On 8/28/23 9:05 AM, TT wrote:well yes it's cos you voted for Biden and/or didn't vote for Trump, skrip and I did tell you repeatedly what would happen. Voting for Biden and supporting him is 100% wanting more and more of this, calling regular parents who disagree with this "
TT kirjoitti 28.8.2023 klo 19.04:Because we're deplorables and don't know what we're doing.
TT kirjoitti 28.8.2023 klo 19.01:...So why is extreme 4% running the society these days?
bmoore kirjoitti 28.8.2023 klo 18.55:There's a poll on the page...
On Monday, August 28, 2023 at 8:43:47 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote: >>>>>>> On 8/28/23 8:37 AM, bmoore wrote:
People who need breast implants are obviously not OK with themselves. >>>>> Why, what's wrong with her breasts?https://torontosun.com/news/local-news/warmington-trans-teacher-lemieux-returning-to-classroom-this-time-in-hamilton#:~:text=The%20principal%20highlighted%20to%20parents,special%20entry%20and%20exit%20plans.The ultimate result of the "I'm OK; you're OK" philosophy.
This is what happens when we treat mental health problems with
surgeries.
Do you think trans teacher Kayla Lemieux should be returning to a
high school classroom in Hamilton?
Yes
4.29% (344 votes)
No
95.71% (7,673 votes)
Please don't confuse me with those folks, Ice. You should know better by now.
I mean, to make a rhetorical point, maybe...but to my mind both guys you mentioned are pussies, the difference being one touts it and the other denies it.
Both fuckin' pussies.
On Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 10:19:55 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:
On 8/29/23 9:27 AM, bmoore wrote:
When it's so dishonest, some might call that trolling.
Thanks for the offer, b, but I do my own PR.Mainly, I can only address statements that relate to me directly. I can >> try to set the record straight on that, at least. Interlocutors' choice >> of descriptive terms seems OK, but factual stuff that relates to *me* I >> would like it to be at least substantially accurate.Sure, and Ice's statement was not. Do you think he's misrepresenting you? You have never said anything like what he accused you of.
;^)Ok, but you also let some pretty serious lies about other people slide. How do you decide what slides and what doesn't?
Sawfish <sawfi...@gmail.com> writes:
It's a rhetorical stance to provoke further engagement--for better or worse.He never moves beyond this "rhetorical stance" though. It's just the
same recycled content year after year after year. But hey, if that's
your thing more power to you!
On Tuesday, 29 August 2023 at 18:05:59 UTC+1, jdeluise wrote:
Sawfish <sawfi...@gmail.com> writes:
what you mean? what should do beyond having stance? even when demanded we pick side over that illegal US-provoked Ukraine war last year, what else?It's a rhetorical stance to provoke further engagement--for better or worse.He never moves beyond this "rhetorical stance" though. It's just the
same recycled content year after year after year. But hey, if that's
your thing more power to you!
On Tuesday, 29 August 2023 at 15:46:57 UTC+1, Sawfish wrote:domestic terrorists" is exactly what the Marxists ordered.
On 8/29/23 5:15 AM, The Iceberg wrote:
On Monday, 28 August 2023 at 17:59:35 UTC+1, Sawfish wrote:
On 8/28/23 9:05 AM, TT wrote:well yes it's cos you voted for Biden and/or didn't vote for Trump, skrip and I did tell you repeatedly what would happen. Voting for Biden and supporting him is 100% wanting more and more of this, calling regular parents who disagree with this "
TT kirjoitti 28.8.2023 klo 19.04:Because we're deplorables and don't know what we're doing.
TT kirjoitti 28.8.2023 klo 19.01:...So why is extreme 4% running the society these days?
bmoore kirjoitti 28.8.2023 klo 18.55:There's a poll on the page...
On Monday, August 28, 2023 at 8:43:47 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 8/28/23 8:37 AM, bmoore wrote:
People who need breast implants are obviously not OK with themselves. >>>>>>> Why, what's wrong with her breasts?https://torontosun.com/news/local-news/warmington-trans-teacher-lemieux-returning-to-classroom-this-time-in-hamilton#:~:text=The%20principal%20highlighted%20to%20parents,special%20entry%20and%20exit%20plans.The ultimate result of the "I'm OK; you're OK" philosophy.
This is what happens when we treat mental health problems with
surgeries.
Do you think trans teacher Kayla Lemieux should be returning to a
high school classroom in Hamilton?
Yes
4.29% (344 votes)
No
95.71% (7,673 votes)
Please don't confuse me with those folks, Ice. You should know better byno wasn't confusing you with those guys, was counting you with them cos you often said you'd voted for Trump in 2016(which was the right thing to do), but couldn't be bothered in 2020.
now.
I mean, to make a rhetorical point, maybe...but to my mind both guys you
mentioned are pussies, the difference being one touts it and the other
denies it.
Both fuckin' pussies.
Far as know that's what you did, yes you are in no way as bad as anyone who voted Biden(like bmoore, Raja etc) and you were clearly tricked, but you were part of non-Trump crowd and all because he upset a few leftist lifelong-Democrat-votingjournalists. skrip and I told you there'd be a war and there would be more and more and more of this trans/gender dumbness. Just being fair here about what happened,
cos will say Gracchus has a good excuse cos he a life-long Dem voter who didn't vote for Hillary in 2016.
On Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 10:19:55 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:
On 8/29/23 9:27 AM, bmoore wrote:Ok, but you also let some pretty serious lies about other people slide. How do you decide what slides and what doesn't?
When it's so dishonest, some might call that trolling.Thanks for the offer, b, but I do my own PR.
Mainly, I can only address statements that relate to me directly. I can >>>> try to set the record straight on that, at least. Interlocutors' choice >>>> of descriptive terms seems OK, but factual stuff that relates to *me* I >>>> would like it to be at least substantially accurate.Sure, and Ice's statement was not. Do you think he's misrepresenting you? You have never said anything like what he accused you of.
;^)
On Tuesday, 29 August 2023 at 17:27:57 UTC+1, bmoore wrote:
When it's so dishonest, some might call that trolling.he didn't vote for Trump after we told him what would happen, he has no excuses, so no misrepresentation.
Mainly, I can only address statements that relate to me directly. I canSure, and Ice's statement was not. Do you think he's misrepresenting you? You have never said anything like what he accused you of.
try to set the record straight on that, at least. Interlocutors' choice
of descriptive terms seems OK, but factual stuff that relates to *me* I
would like it to be at least substantially accurate.
On Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 11:16:15 AM UTC-7, The Iceberg wrote:
On Tuesday, 29 August 2023 at 18:05:59 UTC+1, jdeluise wrote:Everyone on this NG knows you are dishonest. No one will be disputing that.
Sawfish <sawfi...@gmail.com> writes:what you mean? what should do beyond having stance? even when demanded we pick side over that illegal US-provoked Ukraine war last year, what else?
It's a rhetorical stance to provoke further engagement--for better orHe never moves beyond this "rhetorical stance" though. It's just the
worse.
same recycled content year after year after year. But hey, if that's
your thing more power to you!
Anyone? If there is no response, I am right. Twistis doesn't count.
On 8/29/23 10:38 AM, bmoore wrote:
On Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 10:19:55 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:"... about other people..."
On 8/29/23 9:27 AM, bmoore wrote:Ok, but you also let some pretty serious lies about other people
When it's so dishonest, some might call that trolling.Thanks for the offer, b, but I do my own PR.
Mainly, I can only address statements that relate to me directly. ISure, and Ice's statement was not. Do you think he's misrepresenting
can
try to set the record straight on that, at least. Interlocutors'
choice
of descriptive terms seems OK, but factual stuff that relates to
*me* I
would like it to be at least substantially accurate.
you? You have never said anything like what he accused you of.
;^)
slide. How do you decide what slides and what doesn't?
That's the key. I could even like/agree with them, but for the most part
they need to handle it themselves.
On 29.8.2023 21.53, Sawfish wrote:
On 8/29/23 10:38 AM, bmoore wrote:
On Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 10:19:55 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:"... about other people..."
On 8/29/23 9:27 AM, bmoore wrote:Ok, but you also let some pretty serious lies about other people
When it's so dishonest, some might call that trolling.Thanks for the offer, b, but I do my own PR.
Mainly, I can only address statements that relate to me directly.Sure, and Ice's statement was not. Do you think he's
I can
try to set the record straight on that, at least. Interlocutors'
choice
of descriptive terms seems OK, but factual stuff that relates to
*me* I
would like it to be at least substantially accurate.
misrepresenting you? You have never said anything like what he
accused you of.
;^)
slide. How do you decide what slides and what doesn't?
That's the key. I could even like/agree with them, but for the most
part they need to handle it themselves.
But if it's about matters of Trump, race, Kulturkampf, etc, you clearly
pick and choose according to what side people are on. Our Tiny of
Finland is a beautiful example.
During the Trumpian schism, you were out to drive poor Tiny out of RST. Wasn't pretty. Then Tiny moved from Mommy's basement to the projects,
adopted white supremacist lingo, and voila! You two became the best of
pals.
That's how you decide what to let slide.
On 8/29/23 11:30 AM, bmoore wrote:
On Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 11:16:15 AM UTC-7, The Iceberg wrote:
On Tuesday, 29 August 2023 at 18:05:59 UTC+1, jdeluise wrote:Everyone on this NG knows you are dishonest. No one will be disputing that.
Sawfish <sawfi...@gmail.com> writes:what you mean? what should do beyond having stance? even when demanded we pick side over that illegal US-provoked Ukraine war last year, what else?
It's a rhetorical stance to provoke further engagement--for better or >>>> worse.He never moves beyond this "rhetorical stance" though. It's just the
same recycled content year after year after year. But hey, if that's
your thing more power to you!
Anyone? If there is no response, I am right. Twistis doesn't count.They provoke, and then fight, using support if they have it.
They like fightin'.
It's better than being a pussy.
On Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 11:57:26 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:
On 8/29/23 11:30 AM, bmoore wrote:Honesty is the best policy. Fighting dirty is being a pussy.
On Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 11:16:15 AM UTC-7, The Iceberg wrote:They provoke, and then fight, using support if they have it.
On Tuesday, 29 August 2023 at 18:05:59 UTC+1, jdeluise wrote:Everyone on this NG knows you are dishonest. No one will be disputing that. >>>
Sawfish <sawfi...@gmail.com> writes:what you mean? what should do beyond having stance? even when demanded we pick side over that illegal US-provoked Ukraine war last year, what else?
It's a rhetorical stance to provoke further engagement--for better or >>>>>> worse.He never moves beyond this "rhetorical stance" though. It's just the >>>>> same recycled content year after year after year. But hey, if that's >>>>> your thing more power to you!
Anyone? If there is no response, I am right. Twistis doesn't count.
They like fightin'.
It's better than being a pussy.
On 8/30/23 6:44 AM, bmoore wrote:
On Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 11:57:26 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:
On 8/29/23 11:30 AM, bmoore wrote:Honesty is the best policy. Fighting dirty is being a pussy.
On Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 11:16:15 AM UTC-7, The Iceberg wrote: >>>> On Tuesday, 29 August 2023 at 18:05:59 UTC+1, jdeluise wrote:They provoke, and then fight, using support if they have it.
Everyone on this NG knows you are dishonest. No one will be disputing that.Sawfish <sawfi...@gmail.com> writes:what you mean? what should do beyond having stance? even when demanded we pick side over that illegal US-provoked Ukraine war last year, what else?
It's a rhetorical stance to provoke further engagement--for better or >>>>>> worse.He never moves beyond this "rhetorical stance" though. It's just the >>>>> same recycled content year after year after year. But hey, if that's >>>>> your thing more power to you!
Anyone? If there is no response, I am right. Twistis doesn't count.
They like fightin'.
It's better than being a pussy.
"Rules in a knife fight?"...
;^)
From the outside it looks to me like you, skript, and Ice are in nude, greased, in a pitch black closet, with knives.
There seems to be a sort of conceptual line in RST exchanges where it crosses from intense debate/discussion to a figurative knife fight.
I don't enjoy knife fighting, and if RST is not for enjoyment, what else could it possibly be for?
On Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 11:57:26 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:
On 8/29/23 11:30 AM, bmoore wrote:
On Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 11:16:15 AM UTC-7, The Iceberg wrote:
On Tuesday, 29 August 2023 at 18:05:59 UTC+1, jdeluise wrote:Everyone on this NG knows you are dishonest. No one will be disputing that.
Sawfish <sawfi...@gmail.com> writes:what you mean? what should do beyond having stance? even when demanded we pick side over that illegal US-provoked Ukraine war last year, what else?
It's a rhetorical stance to provoke further engagement--for better or >>>> worse.He never moves beyond this "rhetorical stance" though. It's just the >>> same recycled content year after year after year. But hey, if that's >>> your thing more power to you!
Anyone? If there is no response, I am right. Twistis doesn't count.They provoke, and then fight, using support if they have it.
They like fightin'.
It's better than being a pussy.Honesty is the best policy. Fighting dirty is being a pussy.
On Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 11:16:15 AM UTC-7, The Iceberg wrote:
On Tuesday, 29 August 2023 at 18:05:59 UTC+1, jdeluise wrote:
Sawfish <sawfi...@gmail.com> writes:
Everyone on this NG knows you are dishonest. No one will be disputing that. Anyone? If there is no response, I am right. Twistis doesn't count.what you mean? what should do beyond having stance? even when demanded we pick side over that illegal US-provoked Ukraine war last year, what else?It's a rhetorical stance to provoke further engagement--for better or worse.He never moves beyond this "rhetorical stance" though. It's just the same recycled content year after year after year. But hey, if that's your thing more power to you!
On 29.8.2023 21.53, Sawfish wrote:
On 8/29/23 10:38 AM, bmoore wrote:
On Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 10:19:55 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:"... about other people..."
On 8/29/23 9:27 AM, bmoore wrote:Ok, but you also let some pretty serious lies about other people
When it's so dishonest, some might call that trolling.Thanks for the offer, b, but I do my own PR.
Mainly, I can only address statements that relate to me directly. I >>>>> canSure, and Ice's statement was not. Do you think he's misrepresenting >>>> you? You have never said anything like what he accused you of.
try to set the record straight on that, at least. Interlocutors'
choice
of descriptive terms seems OK, but factual stuff that relates to
*me* I
would like it to be at least substantially accurate.
;^)
slide. How do you decide what slides and what doesn't?
That's the key. I could even like/agree with them, but for the most part they need to handle it themselves.But if it's about matters of Trump, race, Kulturkampf, etc, you clearly
pick and choose according to what side people are on. Our Tiny of
Finland is a beautiful example.
During the Trumpian schism, you were out to drive poor Tiny out of RST. Wasn't pretty. Then Tiny moved from Mommy's basement to the projects, adopted white supremacist lingo, and voila! You two became the best of pals. That's how you decide what to let slide.
On Wednesday, August 30, 2023 at 8:34:02 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:
On 8/30/23 6:44 AM, bmoore wrote:
On Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 11:57:26 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:
On 8/29/23 11:30 AM, bmoore wrote:Honesty is the best policy. Fighting dirty is being a pussy.
On Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 11:16:15 AM UTC-7, The Iceberg wrote: >>>> On Tuesday, 29 August 2023 at 18:05:59 UTC+1, jdeluise wrote:They provoke, and then fight, using support if they have it.
Everyone on this NG knows you are dishonest. No one will be disputing that.Sawfish <sawfi...@gmail.com> writes:what you mean? what should do beyond having stance? even when demanded we pick side over that illegal US-provoked Ukraine war last year, what else?
It's a rhetorical stance to provoke further engagement--for better orHe never moves beyond this "rhetorical stance" though. It's just the >>>>> same recycled content year after year after year. But hey, if that's >>>>> your thing more power to you!
worse.
Anyone? If there is no response, I am right. Twistis doesn't count.
They like fightin'.
It's better than being a pussy.
"Rules in a knife fight?"...
;^)
From the outside it looks to me like you, skript, and Ice are in nude, greased, in a pitch black closet, with knives.I can see, but their broken clocks still find the occasional acorn :-)
There seems to be a sort of conceptual line in RST exchanges where it crosses from intense debate/discussion to a figurative knife fight.
I don't enjoy knife fighting, and if RST is not for enjoyment, what else could it possibly be for?Maybe it's a microcosm of the stilted debate that's happening in the world at large. Slow train comin'.
On Tuesday, 29 August 2023 at 20:22:47 UTC+1, Pelle Svanslös wrote:
On 29.8.2023 21.53, Sawfish wrote:
On 8/29/23 10:38 AM, bmoore wrote:But if it's about matters of Trump, race, Kulturkampf, etc, you clearly
On Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 10:19:55 AM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:"... about other people..."
On 8/29/23 9:27 AM, bmoore wrote:Ok, but you also let some pretty serious lies about other people
When it's so dishonest, some might call that trolling.Thanks for the offer, b, but I do my own PR.
Mainly, I can only address statements that relate to me directly. I >>>>>>> canSure, and Ice's statement was not. Do you think he's misrepresenting >>>>>> you? You have never said anything like what he accused you of.
try to set the record straight on that, at least. Interlocutors' >>>>>>> choice
of descriptive terms seems OK, but factual stuff that relates to >>>>>>> *me* I
would like it to be at least substantially accurate.
;^)
slide. How do you decide what slides and what doesn't?
That's the key. I could even like/agree with them, but for the most part >>> they need to handle it themselves.
pick and choose according to what side people are on. Our Tiny of
Finland is a beautiful example.
why won't you tell us where you're actually originally from cos then we could cater to that?
During the Trumpian schism, you were out to drive poor Tiny out of RST.
Wasn't pretty. Then Tiny moved from Mommy's basement to the projects,
adopted white supremacist lingo, and voila! You two became the best of pals. >> That's how you decide what to let slide.
no, you're just confusing your leftist buzzword "white supremacist" with someone who is just plain honest about your leftist disaster causing mass unchecked WEF
globalist voting-grabbing immigration policies.
Perhaps like where Biden has opened the Texas border gates to try to swamp Texas with illegals which he'll give citizenship so they can vote Demmie, yes? what could > possibly be wrong with that!
TT <T...@dprk.kp> writes:
Speaking of which, watched couple days ago Biden's speech on US health care pricing ("inflation reduction act")... He's really starting to
show his age more and more. Democrats are crazy if they elect him to
run again, I'm somewhat doubtful whether he can serve the whole term.
Who do you suggest? "Hurricane" Hillary Clinton?
TT <TT@dprk.kp> writes:
Speaking of which, watched couple days ago Biden's speech on US health
care pricing ("inflation reduction act")... He's really starting to
show his age more and more. Democrats are crazy if they elect him to
run again, I'm somewhat doubtful whether he can serve the whole term.
Who do you suggest? "Hurricane" Hillary Clinton?
jdeluise kirjoitti 31.8.2023 klo 16.54:
TT <T...@dprk.kp> writes:
Speaking of which, watched couple days ago Biden's speech on US health
care pricing ("inflation reduction act")... He's really starting to
show his age more and more. Democrats are crazy if they elect him to
run again, I'm somewhat doubtful whether he can serve the whole term.
Who do you suggest? "Hurricane" Hillary Clinton?Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
On Thursday, August 31, 2023 at 12:22:17 PM UTC-7, TT wrote:
jdeluise kirjoitti 31.8.2023 klo 16.54:
TT <T...@dprk.kp> writes:Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Speaking of which, watched couple days ago Biden's speech on US health >>>> care pricing ("inflation reduction act")... He's really starting to
show his age more and more. Democrats are crazy if they elect him to
run again, I'm somewhat doubtful whether he can serve the whole term.
Who do you suggest? "Hurricane" Hillary Clinton?
No, he's a nut. As usual, it's the lesser of two evils. Trump is obviously the greater evil. So who among the Republicans and Democrats would be good?
bmoore kirjoitti 31.8.2023 klo 22.42:
On Thursday, August 31, 2023 at 12:22:17 PM UTC-7, TT wrote:
jdeluise kirjoitti 31.8.2023 klo 16.54:
TT <T...@dprk.kp> writes:
Speaking of which, watched couple days ago Biden's speech on US health >>>> care pricing ("inflation reduction act")... He's really starting to >>>> show his age more and more. Democrats are crazy if they elect him to >>>> run again, I'm somewhat doubtful whether he can serve the whole term. >>>>
Who do you suggest? "Hurricane" Hillary Clinton?
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
No, he's a nut. As usual, it's the lesser of two evils. Trump is obviously the greater evil. So who among the Republicans and Democrats would be good?
How is he a nut?
I hear he was antivax, but anything else?
On 8/31/23 1:23 PM, Gracchus wrote:
On Thursday, August 31, 2023 at 1:05:03 PM UTC-7, TT wrote:
bmoore kirjoitti 31.8.2023 klo 22.42:Here's what he has going for him: his name. And even that carries far less cachet than it did a generation ago.
On Thursday, August 31, 2023 at 12:22:17 PM UTC-7, TT wrote:How is he a nut?
jdeluise kirjoitti 31.8.2023 klo 16.54:No, he's a nut. As usual, it's the lesser of two evils. Trump is obviously the greater evil. So who among the Republicans and Democrats would be good?
TT <T...@dprk.kp> writes:Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Speaking of which, watched couple days ago Biden's speech on US healthWho do you suggest? "Hurricane" Hillary Clinton?
care pricing ("inflation reduction act")... He's really starting to >>>>>> show his age more and more. Democrats are crazy if they elect him to >>>>>> run again, I'm somewhat doubtful whether he can serve the whole term. >>>>>>
I hear he was antivax, but anything else?
Gracchus you are old enough to understand when I say that in MANY ways
JFK was a scary mofo. The jury was out (and still is) on RFK. I was
going to vote for him, but...
Teddy was simply our version of Prince Andrew.
John Jr. was a handsome halfwit.
Certainly no consistency in the Kennedy brandname, is there?
On Thursday, August 31, 2023 at 1:05:03 PM UTC-7, TT wrote:
bmoore kirjoitti 31.8.2023 klo 22.42:Here's what he has going for him: his name. And even that carries far less cachet than it did a generation ago.
On Thursday, August 31, 2023 at 12:22:17 PM UTC-7, TT wrote:How is he a nut?
jdeluise kirjoitti 31.8.2023 klo 16.54:No, he's a nut. As usual, it's the lesser of two evils. Trump is obviously the greater evil. So who among the Republicans and Democrats would be good?
TT <T...@dprk.kp> writes:Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Speaking of which, watched couple days ago Biden's speech on US health >>>>>> care pricing ("inflation reduction act")... He's really starting to >>>>>> show his age more and more. Democrats are crazy if they elect him to >>>>>> run again, I'm somewhat doubtful whether he can serve the whole term. >>>>>>Who do you suggest? "Hurricane" Hillary Clinton?
I hear he was antivax, but anything else?
On Thursday, August 31, 2023 at 2:18:28 PM UTC-7, Sawfish wrote:up those truths and publish them, thus violating the sanctity of the Kennedy legend. It was like "Mommy Dearest" on a much grander scale.
On 8/31/23 1:23 PM, Gracchus wrote:
On Thursday, August 31, 2023 at 1:05:03 PM UTC-7, TT wrote:
bmoore kirjoitti 31.8.2023 klo 22.42:Here's what he has going for him: his name. And even that carries far less cachet than it did a generation ago.
On Thursday, August 31, 2023 at 12:22:17 PM UTC-7, TT wrote:How is he a nut?
jdeluise kirjoitti 31.8.2023 klo 16.54:No, he's a nut. As usual, it's the lesser of two evils. Trump is obviously the greater evil. So who among the Republicans and Democrats would be good?
TT <T...@dprk.kp> writes:Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Speaking of which, watched couple days ago Biden's speech on US healthWho do you suggest? "Hurricane" Hillary Clinton?
care pricing ("inflation reduction act")... He's really starting to >>>>>> show his age more and more. Democrats are crazy if they elect him to
run again, I'm somewhat doubtful whether he can serve the whole term.
I hear he was antivax, but anything else?
Gracchus you are old enough to understand when I say that in MANY ways
JFK was a scary mofo. The jury was out (and still is) on RFK. I was
going to vote for him, but...
Teddy was simply our version of Prince Andrew.
John Jr. was a handsome halfwit.
Certainly no consistency in the Kennedy brandname, is there?Nope. The "Kennedy mystique," "Camelot," etc, was always a carefully-constructed illusion many people wanted badly to protect for some reason. And some still do.
I remember a talk show in the '80s or '90s where one guest had written an expose on the Kennedys, and the other guests were all piling on him. The startling thing was, nobody disputed the book's veracity. Their problem was that the author dared to dig
bmoore kirjoitti 31.8.2023 klo 22.42:
On Thursday, August 31, 2023 at 12:22:17 PM UTC-7, TT wrote:
jdeluise kirjoitti 31.8.2023 klo 16.54:
TT <T...@dprk.kp> writes:Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Speaking of which, watched couple days ago Biden's speech on US health >>>> care pricing ("inflation reduction act")... He's really starting to >>>> show his age more and more. Democrats are crazy if they elect him to >>>> run again, I'm somewhat doubtful whether he can serve the whole term. >>>>
Who do you suggest? "Hurricane" Hillary Clinton?
No, he's a nut. As usual, it's the lesser of two evils. Trump is obviously the greater evil. So who among the Republicans and Democrats would be good?
How is he a nut?
I hear he was antivax, but anything else?
TT <T...@dprk.kp> Wrote in message:
How is he a nut? I hear he was antivax, but anything else?You must understand by now that for Jew worshipers such as him, anyone not approved by the Jews is a "nut", "nazi", "fascist", "racists" etc.
He listens to Jews, and Jews have told him tvag RFK Jr. Is no good.
On Thursday, August 31, 2023 at 1:05:03 PM UTC-7, TT wrote:
bmoore kirjoitti 31.8.2023 klo 22.42:
On Thursday, August 31, 2023 at 12:22:17 PM UTC-7, TT wrote:
jdeluise kirjoitti 31.8.2023 klo 16.54:
TT <T...@dprk.kp> writes:Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Speaking of which, watched couple days ago Biden's speech on US health
care pricing ("inflation reduction act")... He's really starting to >>>> show his age more and more. Democrats are crazy if they elect him to >>>> run again, I'm somewhat doubtful whether he can serve the whole term. >>>>
Who do you suggest? "Hurricane" Hillary Clinton?
No, he's a nut. As usual, it's the lesser of two evils. Trump is obviously the greater evil. So who among the Republicans and Democrats would be good?
How is he a nut?He's a bit out there.
I hear he was antivax, but anything else?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_F._Kennedy_Jr.>
I think he's crazy, but ymmv.
On Thursday, August 31, 2023 at 2:49:36 PM UTC-7, *skriptis wrote:
TT <T...@dprk.kp> Wrote in message:
How is he a nut? I hear he was antivax, but anything else?You must understand by now that for Jew worshipers such as him, anyone not approved by the Jews is a "nut", "nazi", "fascist", "racists" etc.
He listens to Jews, and Jews have told him tvag RFK Jr. Is no good.You are a full on kook.
bmoore <bmo...@nyx.net> Wrote in message:rsomewhat doubtful whether he can serve the whole term. > >>>> > >>> > >>> Who do you suggest? "Hurricane" Hillary Clinton? > >> Robert F. Kennedy Jr. > > > > No, he's a nut. As usual, it's the lesser of two evils. Trump is obviously the greater evil. So
On Thursday, August 31, 2023 at 1:05:03 PM UTC-7, TT wrote:> bmoore kirjoitti 31.8.2023 klo 22.42: > > On Thursday, August 31, 2023 at 12:22:17 PM UTC-7, TT wrote: > >> jdeluise kirjoitti 31.8.2023 klo 16.54: > >>> TT <T...@dprk.kp> writes: > >>>
Speaking of which, watched couple days ago Biden's speech on US health > >>>> care pricing ("inflation reduction act")... He's really starting to > >>>> show his age more and more. Democrats are crazy if they elect him to > >>>> run again, I'm
Yes, crazy because he opposes Jews and wants world peace and clean environment?
"Kennedy is a son of U.S. attorney general and senator Robert F. Kennedy and nephew of U.S. president John F. Kennedy. After growing up in the Washington, D.C. area and Massachusetts, he graduated from Harvard University and obtained his Juris Doctordegree from the University of Virginia School of Law. Kennedy began his career as an assistant district attorney in New York City. In 1984, he joined Riverkeeper and the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) in 1986, two non-profits focused on
So far so good.
"An outspoken opponent of the military industry and foreign intervention, Kennedy was highly critical of the Iraq War as well as the American involvement in the Russian invasion of Ukraine, calling the latter "a US war against Russia" and claiming thatthe goal of the war was to "sacrifice the flower of Ukrainian youth in an abattoir of death and destruction for the geopolitical ambition of the neocons"."
Wow, he's normal?
No wonder Jewish agents portray him as crazy.
"Kennedy also expressed his support for forbidding Ukraine from joining NATO, and announced that as president he would consider admitting Russia to NATO and de-escalating tensions with the People's Republic of China."
Oh I see, another peace candidate, so it's not just Trump.
So not everyone in America is evil and seduced by Jews?
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 483 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 169:36:07 |
| Calls: | 9,595 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 13,679 |
| Messages: | 6,149,871 |