Australia, New Zealand, Japan.... Australia"
He referred to Kamala as "Vice President Trump".
Earlier at Nato meeting when introducing Zelensky to Podium he called
him "President Putin", although noticing his mistake a few seconds later.
TT <TT@dprk.kp> writes:
Just watched his "big boy presser", apparently aimed to diminish
doubts about his cognitive ability.
Didn't look good. Not good at all. I saw like last 20 minutes of the
presser where he answered questions from the press and I felt just
sorry for the poor chap. He really shouldn't be there, no more.
He was mumbling about lots of unrelated stuff to questions asked,
obviously having problems to focus on what he was answering, many
times stopping his monologue with "anyways" when he lost train of
thought. He told that he will indeed run for president.
"Four Asian nations: Australia, New Zealand, Japan.... Australia"
He referred to Kamala as "Vice President Trump".
Earlier at Nato meeting when introducing Zelensky to Podium he called
him "President Putin", although noticing his mistake a few seconds
later.
There's no way Democrats can put him as candidate. No way.
Why are they letting him embarrass himself like this when clearly he's
not capable any more. Sad.
I thought he was great, actually. You're picking on a few, selected stumbles, but Biden's always been a gaffe machine. Funny thing he makes fewer gaffes than Trump, you just don't hear about it because the media doesn't bother to report it. Maybe try to listen to some of his
speeches sometimes.
He went on at great length with a good command of the details to extemporaneous questioning, often for several minutes at a time. He
didn't look particularly feeble or tired for an 81-year old, and
definitely didn't sound "confused". The difference between this and the debate was night and day.
TT <TT@dprk.kp> wrote:
He referred to Kamala as "Vice President Trump".
Earlier at Nato meeting when introducing Zelensky to Podium he called
him "President Putin", although noticing his mistake a few seconds later.
According to our president Stubido, we can fully
trust in Biden's capabilities to handle his job.
What a fucking joke! Hahahahah!
br,
KK
TT <TT@dprk.kp> writes:
TT kirjoitti 12.7.2024 klo 3.46:
Australia, New Zealand, Japan.... Australia"
https://x.com/ACTBrigitte/status/1811553607092981822
Hey look, TT is promoting twitter feeds from hardcore Trump nutters as "evidence". What a surprise!
kalevi@kolttonen.fi (Kalevi Kolttonen) writes:
TT <TT@dprk.kp> wrote:
He referred to Kamala as "Vice President Trump".
Earlier at Nato meeting when introducing Zelensky to Podium he
called him "President Putin", although noticing his mistake a few
seconds later.
According to our president Stubido, we can fully
trust in Biden's capabilities to handle his job.
What a fucking joke! Hahahahah!
br,
KK
Frankly I think you guys are magnifying his foibles to confirm your preconceived notions about Biden's state. For sure he wasn't perfect,
but overall I'd say it was average to above average. He was clearly comprehending the questions and giving meaningful, contextual
responses. It was no disaster and it certainly doesn't spell the end of
his political career.
Can anyone image Tommi Tenderloins freezing up like a deer in the
headlines on the first question? I sure can.
On 12/07/2024 10:04, jdeluise wrote:
kalevi@kolttonen.fi (Kalevi Kolttonen) writes:
TT <TT@dprk.kp> wrote:
He referred to Kamala as "Vice President Trump".
Earlier at Nato meeting when introducing Zelensky to Podium he
called him "President Putin", although noticing his mistake a few
seconds later.
According to our president Stubido, we can fully
trust in Biden's capabilities to handle his job.
What a fucking joke! Hahahahah!
br,
KK
Frankly I think you guys are magnifying his foibles to confirm your
preconceived notions about Biden's state. For sure he wasn't perfect,
but overall I'd say it was average to above average. He was clearly
comprehending the questions and giving meaningful, contextual
responses. It was no disaster and it certainly doesn't spell the end
of his political career.
Can anyone image Tommi Tenderloins freezing up like a deer in the
headlines on the first question? I sure can.
you said it doesn't matter if he is mentally incompetent cos he has a
team behind him running things anyway, yes?
I think that if the debate had never happened and he had this
newsconference, no one would be talking about his relatively small
mistakes, much less pulling him off the ticket. It would have been an average, although somewhat pugnacious, public appearance.
On 7/12/24 9:21 AM, TT wrote:
Kalevi Kolttonen kirjoitti 12.7.2024 klo 9.40:
TT <TT@dprk.kp> wrote:
He referred to Kamala as "Vice President Trump".
Earlier at Nato meeting when introducing Zelensky to Podium he called >>>> him "President Putin", although noticing his mistake a few seconds
later.
According to our president Stubido, we can fully
trust in Biden's capabilities to handle his job.
What a fucking joke! Hahahahah!
br,
KK
Yes. I think he was just being polite to the host. But went a bit too
far.
What this showed that he's intermittently functional in controlled situations. We've also seen that he can be close to non-functional as
well. Is this actually good enough for a world leader is the question at hand.
TT <TT@dprk.kp> writes:
jdeluise kirjoitti 12.7.2024 klo 12.04:
kalevi@kolttonen.fi (Kalevi Kolttonen) writes:
TT <TT@dprk.kp> wrote:Frankly I think you guys are magnifying his foibles to confirm your
He referred to Kamala as "Vice President Trump".
Earlier at Nato meeting when introducing Zelensky to Podium he
called him "President Putin", although noticing his mistake a few
seconds later.
According to our president Stubido, we can fully
trust in Biden's capabilities to handle his job.
What a fucking joke! Hahahahah!
br,
KK
preconceived notions about Biden's state. For sure he wasn't
perfect, but overall I'd say it was average to above average. He
was clearly comprehending the questions and giving meaningful,
contextual responses. It was no disaster and it certainly doesn't
spell the end of his political career.
Meaningful contextual responses?
Biden was answering hardly half of the questions with relevant
replies. He was mostly doing his retirement home shtick where he goes
constantly off-topic, mumbles so that it's hard understand what he
says. I feel like he's incapable of mouthing words correctly, sort of
like a handicapped person... unless he shouts.
There was this weird shouting episode too, where he suddenly started
shouting about great America, children being shot etc. Not sure if it
was in any form related to the question asked, or his answer even.
Maybe I need to watch the entire thing and not only last 20
minutes... but what I saw looked really bad to me. He finished
multiple times his answer with "well, anyway" when he lost his train
of thought... he also did same thing in the debate and I think the
interview afterwards.
One must have truly lowered expectations if this convinced you of his
cognitive ability & ability to lead a country.
I'd go as far as to say that he is currently incapable of doing his
job and has not been leading the country for some time.
I doubt he'd pass a cognitive test with flying colours & definitely
would not get over 100 on an IQ test... probably 60-70 at the moment?
Can anyone image Tommi Tenderloins freezing up like a deer in the
headlines on the first question? I sure can.
Biden has been doing this for decades.
You sound like Pelle, and that's not a compliment.
You're one of the most dichotomous thinkers in rst, so what I'm about to
say probably won't make any sense to you. I recognize and have stated previously that Biden's presentation was not perfect, his performance
was maybe average to above average. Still, there is no way a person in
the throes of dementia could listen, comprehend and answer the way that
he did. He *did* respond with some substance, enough at least for the masses who don't have a grasp of the underlying issues. And he did
credibly try to answer the questions as stated. How often do you hear politicians simply ignore the question and answer what they *want* to answer? They VERY often do that when they either don't know, don't understand the question, or feel like they have something to hide. He didn't do that, in my opinion.
So, even though his presentation itself wasn't great, I think he at
least showed he's capable of comprehending the issues and making sound decisions and leading, at least from a foreign policy perspective. I
can't help but imagine how Trump would respond to the same set of questions... you know, the guy that admittedly only heard of NATO after
he became president.
Unless and until there is another credible candidate on the dem side
this is about Biden vs. Trump, and on the things that matter I still
think that Biden is the superior choice. His performance at least told
me he's good enough, and as I've said he has a team to fall back on...
most of what you see during the campaign today is theatrics anyway and
has no relationship to the job itself.
It's almost like a symphony musician playing an audition. They can be simply wonderful (or terrible) at playing solos in front of the judges,
it has almost no bearing on how well they will perform day-to-day in the orchestra along with other musicians playing the same sheet of music.
Yet that's how they're judged and that's how they get the job. The
audition is an illusion.
TT <TT@dprk.kp> writes:
Four more years pause!
I'm more confident that Joe will win the election now than I've been in months. It's a huge boon to him that all the experts and celebs are counting him out... best publicity he could get.
TT <TT@dprk.kp> writes:
jdeluise kirjoitti 13.7.2024 klo 20.38:
TT <TT@dprk.kp> writes:
Four more years pause!I'm more confident that Joe will win the election now than I've been
in months. It's a huge boon to him that all the experts and celebs
are counting him out... best publicity he could get.
Not sure if I follow the logic here. So celebs telling that he's a
vegetable & 72% of American people polling that he's not cognitively
up to the task is positive? 36% approval rating. 2/3 of Americans
saying he should step aside...
At least right now it's getting the attention off Trump and on Biden.
And these "expert" reports of Biden's cadaverhood are standing in sharp relief to what seems to be his typical reality; He had another
well-delivered speech at a campaign rally yesterday. I think it's
making Biden look like a fighting underdog, and that seems to be a
really important quality to have to an American audience. Trump was
getting that and some sympathy from all the legal issues and the wait
for the Supreme Court ruling. Now he's basically out of the news cycle except for fighting the perception of his obvious association with
"Project 2025".
Pretty hard to win with those numbers. Even against Trump.
As for your previous post... I wouldn't feel comfortable voting on an
obvious puppet... while not knowing who really runs the office of
presidency. Maybe it would be ok for Finnish president who has almost
zero power but US president has great power since he signs laws &
makes crucial policies on his own through executive orders.
Even if you'd argue that Biden is still making the decisions, I'd
argue that someone in his state can be easily manipulated by inner
circle. In addition, unlikely that he'd serve the full term and
nobody really likes Kamala now do they?
It's all about beating Trump, because he would be far worse than Joe in
a coma. The shit Trump wants to do with "Project 2025" is simply chilling. Look, I don't think there is enough belief that Kamala could
beat him, she's extraordinarily unpopular. Anyone else is "unvetted"
and it's simply too late to risk it.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 483 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 181:55:21 |
| Calls: | 9,599 |
| Calls today: | 5 |
| Files: | 13,679 |
| Messages: | 6,151,012 |
| Posted today: | 1 |