He isn't even making enough slam finals and reaching later rounds of slams to even register as an underachiever, lol.
It's like that joke "you're so bad that you'd finish second in every competition where they pick the worst..."
What's his problem?
He's got flawless game, huge serve, speed, reach, return and powerful groundies.
In theory he could have been even a dominant player of this era above everyone else.
Losing to someone like Fritz is inexcusable if he wants to win slams, and he lost to him both at Wim and USO this year.
We know it's all mental, but what exactly?and he returned to his family.
He hired Lendl once, which I thought was a mistake. Lendl is there to help you break the ceiling (like he did with Murray).
Is Lendl really necessary when you still haven't figured out how to reach later stages consistently? I think David Ferrer would have been a better pick at least for the first stage. And Zverev had both guys at various times. Ferrer wasn't into coaching
But with Lendl it failed after Zverev criticised him publicly "for not saying much just toying with his dog" or something like that.
So it could be that Zverev is simply very dumb?
I mean, you don't criticise Lendl in public.
Maybe he's an utter idiot and that's why he won't live up to his potential?
Is he ruined by growing up in Germany, some kind of mental schizo situation, with his family being Russian and everyone around him German and he simply isn't grounded enough?
Whatever it is, this was a very good chance for him to win a slam.
He isn't even making enough slam finals and reaching later rounds of slams to even register as an underachiever, lol.
It's like that joke "you're so bad that you'd finish second in every competition where they pick the worst..."
What's his problem?
On 4/09/2024 8:11 pm, *skriptis wrote:> He isn't even making enough slam finals and reaching later rounds of slams to even register as an underachiever, lol.> > It's like that joke "you're so bad that you'd finish second in every competition where theypick the worst..."> > > What's his problem?> > He's got flawless game, huge serve, speed, reach, return and powerful groundies.> > In theory he could have been even a dominant player of this era above everyone else.> > Losing to someone like Fritz is
*skriptis <skriptis@post.t-com.hr> Wrote in message:r> He isn't even making enough slam finals and reaching later rounds of slams to even register as an underachiever, lol.It's like that joke "you're so bad that you'd finish second in every competitionwhere they pick the worst..."What's his problem?He's got flawless game, huge serve, speed, reach, return and powerful groundies.In theory he could have been even a dominant player of this era above everyone else.Losing to someone like Fritz is
On 9/4/24 3:11 AM, *skriptis wrote:> He isn't even making enough slam finals and reaching later rounds of slams to even register as an underachiever, lol.> > It's like that joke "you're so bad that you'd finish second in every competition where theypick the worst..."> > > What's his problem?> > He's got flawless game, huge serve, speed, reach, return and powerful groundies.> > In theory he could have been even a dominant player of this era above everyone else.> > Losing to someone like Fritz is
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 483 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 169:39:08 |
Calls: | 9,595 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 13,679 |
Messages: | 6,149,871 |