https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=4ijDYETyIts
Robert F. Kennedy endorses Trump and explains why in this 2 minute rant against the Jews using dog whistle "neocons".
He says Trump is aware of the "neocons" too and understands it all.
Scall5 <nospam@home.net> writes:
On 9/14/2024 12:41 PM, *skriptis wrote:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=4ijDYETyIts
Robert F. Kennedy endorses Trump and explains why in this 2 minute
rant against the Jews using dog whistle "neocons".
He says Trump is aware of the "neocons" too and understands it all.
Didn't Trump also say he was going to release "data" regarding the JFK
assassination? But when he was president he didn't.
Trump says that he will release UFO "data" when he is president
again. Why didn't he during his first term in office?
Just wondering...
One thing you'll never see, Trump releasing the "data" on the Epstein case.
Just wondering...One thing you'll never see, Trump releasing the "data" on the Epstein case.
Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> writes:
On 9/17/24 09:25, jdeluise wrote:
*skriptis <skriptis@post.t-com.hr> writes:
jdeluise <jdeluise@gmail.com> Wrote in message:Perhaps. There is a lot of evidence they were relatively close
Just wondering...One thing you'll never see, Trump releasing the
"data" on the Epstein case.
What a dumb post.
The way you phrased it, it would suggest that he has something to
hide himself? Lol.
friends. Remember the video where he and Epstein were palling
around at a party at Mar-a-Lago?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KLcfpU2cubo
This summer he was flying around the country in Epstein's old jet
while his was being maintained, btw.
A hated, jailed man who was chummy with the sitting president and
Reality check, it's not something he can actually release.
Is he supposed to release it and cause major upheaval in society
and revolution and possibly even risk his own life even more?
So that's the reason, imagine what would have happened if everyone
knew about your ruling class.
But if you can read between the lines, the truth is already out
there in so called "fringe sites".
may have had dirt on him mysteriously dies in jail. hmm..
Look how he dithered about releasing Epstein "data" in the Fox News
interview - https://youtu.be/t8mKw85ZQuU?t=85 (linked directly to
the clip). Guess what, Fox CLIPPED that part out when they aired it
live, everything after "Yeah".
And a reminder, he didn't release all the JFK "data" either
https://apnews.com/trump-boasted-hed-open-all-jfk-files-but-now-says-he-cant-2f48d57f9ee045d98eb784d2295288ef
What happened to his "absolute right" to do anything he wants with
any documents?!
I'm acknowledging that everything you say is possible, and I'll accept
that you say that Trump did not release the Epstein "data". You then
imply that he did this because it was damaging.
OK, he did that while he was president and had more power to suppress
damaging personal info. But he's not pres now, he's in a very nasty
campaign opposed by those who *do* have power to release this
material, and yet they have not.
To me, this implies it's either non-existent, or not very damaging. Or
possibly that their own personal ethics make them keep it hidden.
But in any event, it's not being used against him at the time it would
be most useful to his opponents.
What am I missing here?
It could be that the information is so explosive it would be damaging to
both Trump *and* powerful Dems. Thus, neither side wants it released.
On 9/17/24 8:38 PM, jdeluise wrote:
Scall5 <nospam@home.net> writes:
Libertarians have long speculated that "neither side wants it released"!
Yeah, no doubt. It's not an uncommon thought. But you know, there are
a lot of different forms (and corruptions, I'd say) of libertarianism
out there. I also think "US libertarianism" is its own unique form. I
think I remember you saying you're a libertarian. What makes you say
that? That is, what set of beliefs do you hold that lead you to
identify with libertarians. This isn't a trick question, I'm genuinely
curious.
Sometime back I came to the conclusion that US libertarianism would work
just fine...in 1870 in North Dakota.
;^)
Now for a serious question...
Do you feel that Libertarianism is related in any way to political
anarchism, such as contemporary anarchism?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contemporary_anarchism
Scall, you know, or ought to know, I'm not attempting to bait you. I've >thought about the lineage of libertarianism and it seemed to me that it
may have derived from political anarchism.
To be sure, anarchism /= anarchy. Therefore, there should be no
*negative* connotation to anarchism, as there is with anarchy.
On 9/17/24 8:38 PM, jdeluise wrote:
Scall5 <nospam@home.net> writes:
Libertarians have long speculated that "neither side wants it released"!
Yeah, no doubt. It's not an uncommon thought. But you know, there
are a lot of different forms (and corruptions, I'd say) of
libertarianism out there. I also think "US libertarianism" is its own
unique form. I think I remember you saying you're a libertarian.
What makes you say that? That is, what set of beliefs do you hold
that lead you to identify with libertarians. This isn't a trick
question, I'm genuinely curious.
Sometime back I came to the conclusion that US libertarianism would work
just fine...in 1870 in North Dakota.
;^)
Now for a serious question...
Do you feel that Libertarianism is related in any way to political
anarchism, such as contemporary anarchism?
On 9/17/24 8:38 PM, jdeluise wrote:
Scall5 <nospam@home.net> writes:
Libertarians have long speculated that "neither side wants it released"!
Yeah, no doubt. It's not an uncommon thought. But you know, there
are a lot of different forms (and corruptions, I'd say) of
libertarianism out there. I also think "US libertarianism" is its own
unique form. I think I remember you saying you're a libertarian.
What makes you say that? That is, what set of beliefs do you hold
that lead you to identify with libertarians. This isn't a trick
question, I'm genuinely curious.
Sometime back I came to the conclusion that US libertarianism would work
just fine...in 1870 in North Dakota.
;^)
Now for a serious question...
Do you feel that Libertarianism is related in any way to political
anarchism, such as contemporary anarchism?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contemporary_anarchism
Scall, you know, or ought to know, I'm not attempting to bait you. I've thought about the lineage of libertarianism and it seemed to me that it
may have derived from political anarchism.
To be sure, anarchism /= anarchy. Therefore, there should be no
*negative* connotation to anarchism, as there is with anarchy.
--Sawfish
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 483 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 234:44:54 |
| Calls: | 9,612 |
| Files: | 13,686 |
| Messages: | 6,155,639 |