PeteWasLucky <
waleed.khedr@gmail.com> Wrote in message:
Again the same story, Federer will continue to play well in his eighties
Talking about extremes, sounds familiar?
but he won't be able to rally five shots with a player ranked 1000.You don't understand what it takes to physically compete with younger athletes and the impact of aging on our abilities even if you are the most gifted in your genes and take care of
yourself physically and every aspect of your life.
I said all 3, not just Federer.
To an extent, Djokovic is already a proof for my point he outlasted those other two by a thin margin, nobody knows why, but we assume it's with even better regimen, elasticity, taking care of his body by drinking hot water etc which gave him an extra
year or two in comparison?
The advanced medicine of future will give all players couple of more years as well, allowing the top guys to play at the top level into their 40s.
They will never be 80, but 42, 41 why no?
That's cca extra 5 years.
Think of it.
We just got the oldest number 1 in tennis ever in a era with the oldest US president ever.
No, you won't see presidents being 110 years old, but healthy people will be sharp into their 80s why not so some of them might run, why would Biden or Trump be the last ones, I reckon they're the first of many.
World is too serious business to be left to young ones.
--
----Android NewsGroup Reader----
https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)