• Re: U.S.-citizen family 'traumatized' after ICE raided their Oklahoma h

    From bmoore@21:1/5 to waleed.khedr@gmail.com on Thu May 1 14:18:32 2025
    In article <vuvnu9$2ko5m$1@dont-email.me>,
    PeteWasLucky <waleed.khedr@gmail.com> wrote:
    -=-=-=-=-=-

    https://www.nbcnews.com/news/latino/us-citizen-family-traumatized-ice-raid-rcna203700

    It's Biden's fault.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bmoore@21:1/5 to sawfish666@gmail.com on Fri May 2 18:58:52 2025
    In article <vv08l7$33kvl$1@dont-email.me>,
    Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> wrote:
    On 5/1/25 7:18 AM, bmoore wrote:
    In article <vuvnu9$2ko5m$1@dont-email.me>,
    PeteWasLucky <waleed.khedr@gmail.com> wrote:
    -=-=-=-=-=-

    https://www.nbcnews.com/news/latino/us-citizen-family-traumatized-ice-raid-rcna203700

    It's Biden's fault.

    Looks like one Hispanic of questionable citizenship moves out and
    another moves in.

    Well, both the old tenants and the new tenants were Hispanic. No other obvious similarity that I can see..

    What are the odds?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bmoore@21:1/5 to sawfish666@gmail.com on Sat May 3 16:59:59 2025
    In article <vv39r8$1s65m$1@dont-email.me>,
    Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> wrote:
    On 5/2/25 11:58 AM, bmoore wrote:
    In article <vv08l7$33kvl$1@dont-email.me>,
    Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> wrote:
    On 5/1/25 7:18 AM, bmoore wrote:
    In article <vuvnu9$2ko5m$1@dont-email.me>,
    PeteWasLucky <waleed.khedr@gmail.com> wrote:
    -=-=-=-=-=-

    https://www.nbcnews.com/news/latino/us-citizen-family-traumatized-ice-raid-rcna203700

    It's Biden's fault.

    Looks like one Hispanic of questionable citizenship moves out and
    another moves in.

    Well, both the old tenants and the new tenants were Hispanic. No other obvious similarity that I can see..

    What are the odds?



    Well, I was being partly facetious, but...

    Apparently the former tenant(s) were suspected of being undocumented,
    and the ICE bloodhounds tracked them to this address.

    Meanwhile, the new tenants, also Hispanic, moved in. In neither instance
    do we know if the occupants were documented--sure enough, this one says
    she is, and could well be, but she'd lend credence to her claim if the
    story used her last name as well, because an independent check could
    maybe happen. Conversely, not supplying enough information for a more >thorough independent check implies that she has something to hide. Not >certain, of course, but she could have removed even that suspicion.

    But this is being treated as a sort of #metoo moment, where we just are >supposed to take the claimant's word, and leave it at that.

    The way it has gone for so long is that I take neither party's claim at
    face value. I'm left to decide for myself based on what evidence is >supplied--often very little by either party.

    My criticism is much less for the lady involved than for the way the
    story is breathlessly reported. It is as if the *intent* of the story is >innuendo, and innuendo requires incomplete information. And they sure
    gave us that.

    OK Saw, makes sense. But with no sign of the people on the warrant, the current residents should not have been treated so harshly. My criticism is for Uncle Sam's treatment.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)