• aquatic diets

    From littoral.homo@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jul 28 01:41:24 2022
    Stable isotope-based diet reconstructions of Turkana Basin hominins
    Thure E Cerling cs 2013 doi org/10.1073/pnas.1222568110

    Hominin fossil evidence in the Turkana Basin in Kenya from c 4.1 to 1.4 Ma samples 2 archaic early hominin genera, and records some of the early evolutionary history of Paranthropus & Homo.
    Stable C isotopes in fossil tooth enamel are used to estimate the fraction of diet derived from C3 or C4 resources in these hominin taxa.
    - The earliest hominin species in the Turkana Basin, Au.anamensis, derived nearly all of its diet from C3 resources.
    - By c 3.3 Ma, the later Kenyanthr.platyops had a very wide dietary range—from virtually a purely C3 resource-based diet to one dominated by C4 resources.
    - By c 2 Ma, hominins in the Turkana Basin had split into 2 distinct groups: -- spms attributable to the genus Homo provide evidence for a diet with a c 65/35 ratio of C3- to C4-based resources,
    -- Par. boisei had a higher fraction of C4-based diet (c 25/75 ratio).
    Homo sp. increased the fraction of C4-based resources in the diet through c 1.5 Ma,
    P. boisei maintained its high dependency on C4-derived resources.

    Isotopic evidence shows their diet was primarily C4 with rel.high δ13C values: “An apparent C4-based diet is one based on aquatic resources in which algae have elevated δ13C values because of bicarbonate uptake during photosynthesis; for this example,
    algae or fish then have δ13C values with an apparent C4 component.”

    IOW, only incredible imbeciles believe their ancestors ran after antelopes.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Primum Sapienti@21:1/5 to littor...@gmail.com on Thu Jul 28 21:57:54 2022
    littor...@gmail.com wrote:
    Stable isotope-based diet reconstructions of Turkana Basin hominins
    Thure E Cerling cs 2013 doi org/10.1073/pnas.1222568110

    Hominin fossil evidence in the Turkana Basin in Kenya from c 4.1 to 1.4 Ma samples 2 archaic early hominin genera, and records some of the early evolutionary history of Paranthropus & Homo.
    Stable C isotopes in fossil tooth enamel are used to estimate the fraction of diet derived from C3 or C4 resources in these hominin taxa.
    - The earliest hominin species in the Turkana Basin, Au.anamensis, derived nearly all of its diet from C3 resources.
    - By c 3.3 Ma, the later Kenyanthr.platyops had a very wide dietary range—from virtually a purely C3 resource-based diet to one dominated by C4 resources.
    - By c 2 Ma, hominins in the Turkana Basin had split into 2 distinct groups: -- spms attributable to the genus Homo provide evidence for a diet with a c 65/35 ratio of C3- to C4-based resources,
    -- Par. boisei had a higher fraction of C4-based diet (c 25/75 ratio).
    Homo sp. increased the fraction of C4-based resources in the diet through c 1.5 Ma,
    P. boisei maintained its high dependency on C4-derived resources.

    Isotopic evidence shows their diet was primarily C4 with rel.high δ13C values: “An apparent C4-based diet is one based on aquatic resources in which algae have elevated δ13C values because of bicarbonate uptake during photosynthesis; for this
    example, algae or fish then have δ13C values with an apparent C4 component.”

    IOW, only incredible imbeciles believe their ancestors ran after antelopes.


    The link

    https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1222568110
    Stable isotope-based diet reconstructions of Turkana Basin hominins
    Junbe 3, 2013


    The REAL abstract:

    Abstract
    Hominin fossil evidence in the Turkana Basin in Kenya from ca. 4.1 to 1.4 Ma samples two archaic early hominin genera and records some of the early evolutionary history of Paranthropus and Homo. Stable carbon isotopes in
    fossil tooth enamel are used to estimate the fraction of diet derived from C3 or C4 resources in these hominin taxa. The earliest hominin species in the Turkana Basin, Australopithecus anamensis, derived nearly all of its diet
    from
    C3 resources. Subsequently, by ca. 3.3 Ma, the later Kenyanthropus platyops
    had a very wide dietary range—from virtually a purely C3 resource-based diet to one dominated by C4 resources. By ca. 2 Ma, hominins in the Turkana Basin had split into two distinct groups: specimens attributable to the genus Homo provide evidence for a diet with a ca. 65/35 ratio of C3- to C4-based resources,
    whereas P. boisei had a higher fraction of C4-based diet (ca. 25/75 ratio). Homo sp. increased the fraction of C4-based resources in the diet through
    ca. 1.5 Ma, whereas P. boisei maintained its high dependency on C4-derived resources.

    "We use the terms C3- and C4-based resources throughout our discussion,
    because our isotopic method cannot distinguish between a plant-based diet, a meat-based diet, and an omnivorous diet. Thus, based on isotopes alone, we consider that the diets of the early hominins that we have investigated could be primarily herbaceous (C3 and C4 plants), or they could be a secondary C3-
    or C4-based diet, an apparent C3- or C4-based diet, or an omnivorous diet. A secondary C3- or C4-based diet could be a meat- or insect-based diet (in
    which
    the δ13C values are derived from the basal herbaceous diet of the prey). An apparent C4-based diet is one based on aquatic resources in which algae have elevated δ13C values because of bicarbonate uptake during photosynthesis
    (40);
    for this example, algae or fish then have δ13C values with an apparent C4 component (41, 42). Lastly, an omnivorous diet is a combination of the above resources: primary herbaceous diet along with secondary C3- or C4-derived components (i.e., meat or insects) or apparent components (i.e., aquatic).

    "The stable carbon isotope signature of a meat-based diet depends on the
    nature
    of the prey: small bovid herbivores less than ca. 10 kg (e.g., dik-dik and other
    neotragines) tend to be browsers and have C3-based diets (14, 32), whereas large
    herbivores can have diets that are C3-based (browsers such as most tragelephines,
    black rhinos, and giraffes), C4-based (grazers such as warthogs, zebra, alcelaphines,
    reducines, and bovines), or mixed (e.g., impala, and some gazelles). Thus,
    the size
    of prey may be important in considering possible secondary diet C3 or C4 resources.
    Other small mammals (e.g., hyrax, lagomorphs, or rodents) could have been an important dietary resource and would contribute to isotope mixing lines
    between
    C3- and C4-based end member values."


    See also

    http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2013/05/31/1222559110
    Diet of Australopithecus afarensis from the Pliocene Hadar Formation,
    Ethiopia.

    Abstract:
    The enhanced dietary flexibility of early hominins to include
    consumption of C4/crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM) foods (i.e.,
    foods derived from grasses, sedges, and succulents common in tropical
    savannas and deserts) likely represents a significant ecological and
    behavioral distinction from both extant great apes and the last common
    ancestor that we shared with great apes. Here, we use stable carbon
    isotopic data from 20 samples of Australopithecus afarensis from Hadar
    and Dikika, Ethiopia (>3.4�2.9 Ma) to show that this species consumed
    a diet with significant C4/CAM foods, differing from its putative
    ancestor Au. anamensis. Furthermore, there is no temporal trend in the
    amount of C4/CAM food consumption over the age of the samples
    analyzed, and the amount of C4/CAM food intake was highly variable,
    even within a single narrow stratigraphic interval. As such, Au.
    afarensis was a key participant in the C4/CAM dietary expansion by
    early australopiths of the middle Pliocene. The middle Pliocene
    expansion of the eastern African australopith diet to include
    savanna-based foods represents a shift to use of plant food resources
    that were already abundant in hominin environments for at least 1
    million y and sets the stage for dietary differentiation and niche specialization by subsequent hominin taxa.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From I Envy JTEM@21:1/5 to Primum Sapienti on Fri Jul 29 20:12:19 2022
    Primum Sapienti wrote:

    The REAL abstract:

    See also

    What I find most interesting here, even more so than the fact that you are posting "Cites" you don't understand, is that I argue a far more recent
    dating for the LCA than is conventionally accepted, and both your "Cites"
    fall within my range. So maybe these are on the Chimp side of the divide
    and are completely irrelevant to human evolution.

    Another thing to consider -- well, not you per se. You won't consider
    anything that doesn't come from the nice man living in your tv -- is that
    if one entertains Out of Asia or any model other than strict Out of Africa/Replacement purity... well, who cares? Seriously. Who cares? Why
    would anyone care?

    A final point of interest, one you may fling dung at but certainly will never grasp, is that nobody is saying that there was only one population in existence. Even Out of Africa purists insists that there were many, Many,
    MANY populations, "Different Species," all existing well after someone
    stood upright and ran after a water buffalo causing them to evolve the
    ability to stand upright and run after water buffalo...

    Neanderthals, at least TWO distinct populations now labelled as
    Denisovan, each as removed as much from each other as they were
    from the Neanderthals... the Red Dear People... some "Unknown
    Ancestor" in Africa, one in Eurasia.. the west African archaic that is
    clearly not modern but has since been relabelled as "Modern" to get
    rid of it...

    Oo! Mungo Man's population! The LM3 line that we know BILLIONS
    of people descend from!

    So here you are, a short bus riding, hockey helmet wearing "Paleo Anthropologist," though with slightly less of a urine stench than is
    the norm for your ilk, claiming that your very own goddamn stupid
    model has to be wrong, because there was only ever one population
    and if you think you can misread something as proving that an
    inland population never ate a clam then no population anywhere
    could have.

    Amazing. Well, no, it's par for the course. Totally expected.

    But you have yourself a great day anyway. You can still contribute
    to society, you can still make a difference, one that doesn't involve
    science, reading, thinking or interacting with others.

    Good luck with that, and God bless!



    -- --

    https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/691142199538237440

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)