DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_loves wrote:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03863-y
Problem is, Homo was in China more than 2 million years ago, so if you're claiming only the last 400k years that requires "Out of Asia."
Heretic!
Personally, not into Asia-v-Africa. I think of humans stemming from a
specific ENVIRONMENT and not a specific geographical location.
And, oh; goes without saying but Aquatic Ape explains this while
savanna nonsense can't. With Aquatic Ape, they were just eatings.
That's all. They were eating. They survived by exploiting marine
resources and in so doing they moved along the coast as resources
began to grow scarce, the weather grew hot/cold or the population
grew too large to sustain them in the one spot.
So they were just eating. Done. "Just Eating." That nets them a bounty
of protein, all the DHA their brains could ever want, travel everywhere
from Oceania to southern Africa... they were just eating.
Savanna idiocy? Well. That can't even account for the savanna!
"Well they were adapted to the trees so they ran around endurance
hunting on the savanna, and that made them evolve the ability to
endurance run... plus big brains!"
Nope.
-- --
https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/702918710262923264
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)