2.
Good morning
My attempt to discuss the quality of meteorological models in a
German speaking newsgroup de.sci.geo >1 has not been successful.
I began this morning to document what I call a total failure
2.
When you do office work, you are probably not aware of the trouble
that wrong forecasts can create. What I wish is something halfway
reliable as regards rain and wind. I do not care much for the amount
of rain, but I do a lot for the wind-speeds.
All models that I have access to, are failing. I am obliged to
prepare for just any situation when I go to work outside and
oftentimes must organise the day differently. Imagine that you move
a working platform at 6km/h maximal speed when an unexpected CB
chases you. I do not like that.
The models that I know for now are GFS, WRF, AROME, IconD2, IconEu,
ARPEGE.
----------------
1) <news:AABnLGFp6HkAABeG.A3.flnews@ferrat.uplawski.eu> 2)<https://www.uplawski.eu/meteo/forecast_quality.html>
The models that I know for now are GFS, WRF, AROME, IconD2, IconEu,
ARPEGE.
----------------
2) <https://www.uplawski.eu/meteo/forecast_quality.html>
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 497 |
Nodes: | 16 (3 / 13) |
Uptime: | 01:41:13 |
Calls: | 9,767 |
Calls today: | 8 |
Files: | 13,748 |
Messages: | 6,186,431 |