On Monday, June 30, 2008 at 8:58:19 PM UTC-4, Jay R. Yablon wrote:
"FrediFizzx" <fredifizzx@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:6csk1lF3i22a3U1@mid.individual.net...
. . .
Is there a reason why a velocity measurement would need to be so
precise as to cause infinite energy to be required? IMHO, this is not
a good reason to reject a velocity operator. Is there perhaps a
different reason? What am I missing here?
In the Standard Model, elementary fermions are massless without an interaction with the Higgs field.
Best,
Fred Diether
Fred,
I did a calculation of what happens to the mass matrix during the transformation from the Dirac-Pauli representation to the Newton-Wigner representation via Foldy-Wouthuysen. This is shown in:
http://jayryablon.wordpress.com/files/2008/06/foldy-wouthuysen.pdf
Not sure where to go from there, but I'll be away the rest of the week
on vacation, so I'll take another look when I return.
Best,
Jay.
Hi Jay
From :
https://jayryablon.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/foldy-wouthuysen.pdf
You said:
In the third line we 1 2 b = , and also b@ = -@b which flips the sign in the b term. In the final
line, we use 1 2 @ = and p p = ( + + ) + + = p 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 / / x y
This did not copy and paste properly so I will translate
we use a^2=1 and p^2/p = (px^2 + py^2 + pz^2)/(px^2 + py^2 + pz^2)^.5 = p
Allow me to sprinkle a little Koide magic on this.
(px + py + pz )/( px^2 + py^2 + pz^2 )^.5 = p
We know ahead of time if p = 2/3 then x y z will render the lepton line.
Is there a way to hammer a round peg into a square hole to use the Koide magic?
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)