On Wednesday, March 17, 2021 at 11:52:06 AM UTC-4, Juan Rodriguez wrote:
On Wednesday, March 17, 2021 at 11:48:11 AM UTC-4, Juan Rodriguez wrote:
On Wednesday, March 17, 2021 at 11:37:32 AM UTC-4, Juan Rodriguez wrote:
Wolfgang Van Halen most probably doesn’t own the right to perform his father’s works in a commercial public venue without himself paying the copyright owners because celebrities tend to sell the intellectual property rights to their famous
artistic productions in exchange for an annuity to benefit their children. Is that really Eddie Van Halen’s son? Are there any other little Wolfgangs shielded from their celebrity father’s fame? What is the outcome of the Bertinelli divorce?
https://www.guitarworld.com/news/wolfgang-van-halen-reveals-he-was-asked-to-play-eruption-at-the-grammys-in-tribute-to-his-father-but-declined?fbclid=IwAR3_diGDGeuXg1JS3ErMfxDDZ5SxmMv9g3-moepDJz2wPDvdskpkcCbYHjU
Me parece que entregaron permiso en fila de Wolfgang tocar esta parte famoso del solo combinado un dedo de la mano derecho a simular arpegió de legato
https://youtu.be/cmz5hA2eNR8
Aquí voy yo con el modelo EVH Wolfgang Special desdeñada de Eddie antes que murió:
https://youtu.be/Yhcu0NsJJUU
It is likely Wolfgang Van Halen inherited an annuity for the sale of Eruption. Would he trade that annuity at its present value to acquire the copyright? Maybe for air guitar! With better piracy controls its value may be higher than its long term
annuity youtu.be/pdPM6j1Q4sg
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)