#MEM as a totality / infinity conception +#TAU: #400 [#76] / #273 - SYNCRETIC PROGRESSION / 22 homologous
If a country such as BRAZIL who had a population of 72.7 million in 1960
and exponentially over 214 million by DECEMBER 2021, can't produce
something extraordinary other than the mundane, then you ought to cease copulating like frenzied animals (ie. of feigned friendships, madness or revenge) and focus upon civility producing a better class of persons
(ie. perhaps not as übermensch since that would invoke too much of his
nazi philosophical revisionism) is the contextual basis of DE
ZENGOTITA's eugenics analogy: "...that old thing about if a million
monkeys type at random on a million keyboards for infinity, one of them
will eventually write HAMLET?
At some stage in their lives--I bet everyone you know was doing
something creative and thinking about committing to it, or did commit to
it, at least for a while.
But all this creative activity--while indubitably mostly a good
thing--has to reach a certain point of mass meaningless (ie. we note
with 3 days of public mourning that the far-right and populist PRESIDENT
JAIR BOLSONARO has only until 31 DECEMBER 2022 for propagandist
opportunism); it has to, doesn't it?
FUEHRER: I WANT TO SEE MY *GOATS* {GREATEST OF ALL TIME} VERY SOON.
I WANT TO HAVE A BIT OF FUN.
I LIKE THEIR FRISKY SCENT. (ie. *FROWZY*: ill-smelling, musty; dirty and untidy; slovenly)
GRAB THE HIND LEGS, AND UP IT!!
*FAR* *RIGHTER*
FOR ME TO HAVE MY FUN WITH SOCK-PUPPETS AND *GOATS* THAN WITH REAL
HUMANS!!!
FEMALE: (CRYING)
2ND FEMALE: IT'S OKAY ANNA NO *GOATS* WERE HARMED [IN] MAKING THIS PARODY.
Even the apparently limitless flexibility that a digitally enhanced
every person enjoys (ie. Television may have been introduced into
Australia by SEPTEMBER 1956 but only THEORETICALLY just in time for the world-cup of 1958) in the creation of whatever they want--there has to
be a limit, doesn't there?" [page 263]
"INFANATI PO PERA SIONE DEMONI
SEN SORE DIVANO
SEN SOLE DIVANO
RE DIVA ENORE
DEVORA RE SENSOLIVA
DORE SORE SENSOLIVA
DIVANO DIVANO"
{@7: Sup: 4 - BARRIER: HSIEN (#287); Ego: 76 - AGGRAVATION: CHU (#364)}
<http://www.grapple369.com/?date:2022.12.31&lexicon:H5139,H7854,H3794,H3444&idea:287,364,397,470>
#287 as [#50, #7, #10, #200, #500] = nâzîyr (H5139): {UMBRA: #267 % #41
= #21} 1) *CONSECRATED* *OR* *DEVOTED* *ONE*, Nazarite; 1a) consecrated
one; 1b) devotee, Nazarite; 1c) untrimmed (vine); Nazarite; 1a)
consecrated one; 1b) devotee, Nazarite; 1c) untrimmed (vine);
#359 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 31 DECEMBER 2022 as [#300, #9, #50] / [#300, #9, #700] /
#364 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 31 DECEMBER 2022 as [#5, #300, #9, #700] = sâṭân (H7854): {UMBRA: #359 % #41 = #31} 1) *ADVERSARY*, *ONE* *WHO* *WITHSTANDS*; 1a) *ADVERSARY* (*IN* *GENERAL* - *PERSONAL* *OR* *NATIONAL*); 2) *SUPERHUMAN* *ADVERSARY*; 2a) Satan (as noun pr);
DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #470 as [#20, #400, #10, #600] = Kittîy (H3794): {UMBRA: #430 % #41 = #20} 0) Chittim or Kittim = 'bruisers'; 1) a
general term for all islanders of the Mediterranean Sea; 2) the
descendants of Javan, the son of Japheth and grandson of Noah;
"FOR THE SHIPS OF *CHITTIM*-H3794 (ie. the ROMANS) SHALL COME AGAINST
HIM: THEREFORE HE SHALL BE GRIEVED, AND RETURN, AND HAVE INDIGNATION
AGAINST THE HOLY COVENANT: SO SHALL HE DO; HE SHALL EVEN RETURN, AND
HAVE INTELLIGENCE WITH THEM THAT FORSAKE THE HOLY COVENANT." [Daniel 11:30]
ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #397 as [#6, #10, #300, #6, #70, #5] = yᵉshûwʻâh (H3444): {UMBRA: #391 % #41 = #22} 1) salvation, deliverance; 1a)
*WELFARE*, *PROSPERITY*; 1b) deliverance; 1c) salvation (by God); 1d) victory;
YOUTUBE: "INFANATI (ERA)"
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0csQN_MdlfQ>
It is too early to draw any adverse conclusions on DE ZENGOTITA's
motivations for his post-modernity summation of "CLOSURE FOR YOU" as "JEDERMENSCH (every person) EIN (a) ÜBERMENSCH (superman)" that
constructs a cloning analogy [page 261] in being a futurist forecast of procreational technology advances which as academic conduct is the
equivalent of pumping "junk into the environment" and polluting the mind
in being a strident contradiction to his earlier prohibitions: "this
genre [of passive expectation or visionary bogus] requirement is a
vestige of modernity's faith in a technological fix." [page 255]
The "premise upon which modernity's faith in the fix is based is
logically flawed: "If people cause X, people can cure X" just isn't
true. A man who jumps off a bridge can't arrest his descent midair"
[page 256]
Whether he is disingenuous in only being possessed by a fictional
disposition of careless indifference, or intentionally engaging in
calumny as a fifth columnist, recklessly hypocritical as symptomatic of
an existential crisis or just making a blasé social critique which is otherwise unimpressed with the ontological reality and simply because
one has experienced or seen it so often before. How does one compensate
for not ever having a clue about the anthropological consequences, to
name but a few, that might manifest by the emergence of SMART PHONE technologies, semantics of programming languages, document and content representation, cloud computing and 4G / 5G with 6G now in development
is then the cause for an early onset of misanthropy as its pathos.
Is it a straw man (ie. a form of argument and an informal fallacy of
having the impression of refuting an argument) to postulate: "What would FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE ([#369 - wànwù (萬物): *ALL* *LIVING* *THINGS* /
#416 - ʼâchaz (H270): *SEIZE*] 15 OCTOBER 1844 to [#449 - yâlad (H3205): *BRING* *FORTH* *OF* *CHILD* *BIRTH* *OR* *WICKED* *BEHAVIOUR* / #350 - yâsam (H3455): *SET*, *APPOINT*, *MAKE*] 25 AUGUST 1900) have to say
about cloning if he were still alive today?
IMMANUEL KANT'S (1785) METAPHYSICS OF MORALS IDEA #416: "It may be
expounded not simply as necessary to a purpose which can be presumed a
priori and with certainty as being present in *EVERYONE* because it
belongs to his *ESSENCE*. Now skill in the choice of means to one's own greatest well-being can be called prudence in the narrowest sense. And
thus the imperative that refers to the choice of means to one's own happiness, ie. the precept of prudence, still remains hypothetical; the action is commanded not absolutely but only as a means to a further
purpose.
Finally, there is one imperative which immediately commands a certain
conduct without having as its condition any other purpose to be attained
by it. This imperative is *CATEGORICAL*. It is not concerned the
*MATTER* of the action and its intended result, but rather with the FORM
OF THE ACTION and the principle from which it follows; what is
essentially GOOD in the action consists in the mental disposition, let
the consequences be what they may. This imperative may be called that
of morality.
CATEGORICAL (#YOD, #MEM, #TAU, #ALEPH) #451 - METALOGIC IMPERATIVE
CONSISTS OF 23 ELEMENTS AS SELF REFERENCING
#YOD: #10 / #418 - ménō (G3306): reference to state or condition / ONTIC #451 - MORALITY PRAXIS GROUNDING +
#MEM: #40 / #415 - méros (G3313): constituent parts of a whole / #YOD
#MEM as a totality / infinity conception +#TAU: #400 [#76] / #273 - SYNCRETIC PROGRESSION / 22 homologous
chromosomes +
#ALEPH: #1 / #264 - periágō (G4013): I turn round; περίακτος (períaktos:
"revolving, pivoting") / female (XX) and male (XY) sex chromosome
Willing according to these three kinds of principles is also clearly distinguished by dissimilarity in the necessitation of the will. To
make this dissimilarity clear I think that they are most suitably named
in their order when they are said to be either RULES OF SKILL, COUNSELS
OF PRUDENCE, or COMMANDS (LAWS) OF MORALITY. For law alone involves the concept of a necessity that is unconditioned and indeed objective and
hence universally valid, and commands are laws which must be obeyed, ie.
must be followed even in opposition to inclination.
Counsel does indeed involve necessity, but involves such necessity as is valid only under a subjectively contingent condition, viz., whether this
or that man counts this or that as belonging to his happiness. On the
other hand, the CATEGORICAL imperative is limited by no condition, and
can quite properly be called a command since it is absolutely, though practically, necessary. The first kind of imperatives might also be
called technical (BELONGING TO *ART*), the second kind pragmatic
(belonging to welfare), the third kind moral (belonging to free conduct
as such, ie. to morals)?
The question now arises: how are all of these imperatives possible?"
[pages 26, 27]
Without quantifying any substantial basis of reasonable cause, DE
ZENGOTITA speculates, "He would not allow the experts to reduce this
fabulous eventuality to mere policy [such as rule based according to
#902 - RULE OF LAW as its #410 - OBLIGATING NORM]. He would #416 -
*PLUNGE* *STRAIGHT* to the METAPHYSICAL heart of the *MATTER* [ie.
whether the essence as hypostasis is either TRIPARTITE as being a determination towards gender progression or BIPARTITE as determination
upon the autonomy of gender?], to the delicious and terrible dilemmas
the possibility of self-replication." [page 265]
Whilst the two notions that became known as ‘chromosome continuity’ and ‘chromosome individuality’ had their grounding in a series of
experiments beginning within the mid-1880, it was according to Wikipedia resources, only later that the German scientists SCHLEIDEN, VIRCHOW and BÜTSCHLI were among the first who recognized the structures now familiar
as a chromosomal theory of inheritance in 1902.
The enlightenment goal of self realisation is not then equivalent to the "enterprise of self-construction culminating in [a] literal self-(re)construction through cloning and genetic engineering." How
might NIETZSCHE's profound crisis of nihilism as absence of IMAGO DEI
(ie. humankind as the image of God) then logically have helped us to understand cloning as the #481 - *ECSTATIC* realisation of a destiny?
FOOL FOR CHRIST (ON THE PATH) @ 0730 HOURS ON 31 DECEMBER 2022: "WE WERE CREATED FOR ETERNAL LIFE BY OUR CREATOR:
"Do not let your hand be stretched out to receive and closed when it is
time to give." [Sirach 4:31]
Draw nigh unto God and He will draw nigh unto you."
DOLF @ 1215 HOURS ON 31 DECEMBER 2022: "WILL THE VATICAN SMOTHER THE
POPE EMERITUS FOR A MORE PROPITIOUS DAY OF DEATH?"
[#10, #10, #10]@{
@1: Sup: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#10); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#10),
@2: Sup: 20 - ADVANCE: CHIN (#30); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#20),
@3: Sup: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI (#60); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#30),
Male: #60; Feme: #30
} // #30
#481 = #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY + #30 - BOLD RESOLUTION (YI) as [#8,
#7, #10, #50, #6, #400] = chizzâyôwn (H2384): {UMBRA: #81 % #41 = #40}
1) vision; 1a) *VISION* (*IN* *THE* *ECSTATIC* *STATE*); 1a1) valley of vision (perhaps fig. of Jerusalem or Hinnom); 1b) vision (in the night);
1c) vision, oracle, prophecy (in divine communication);
#30 - 𝌣毅 = #481
yì: 1. resolute; 2. decisive; 3. firm; 4. persistent
WHERE #481 = #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY + #30 - BOLD RESOLUTION (YI): "HEAD: Yang ch'i just now comes into its own. Resolutely, it *DARES*
*TO* *ACT* *SO* *THAT* *THINGS* *DEVELOP* *THEIR* *GOALS*.
This tetragram is associated with *EAST*, with *WOOD*, and with spring through its assigned constellation, patron Phase, and season of the
year. The conjunction of *WOOD* / *EAST* / spring proves so compelling
that the last barriers to yang ch'i's beneficial action are removed.
Yang ch'i now flourishes, with no real impediments to its catalyzing activities. Like Tao, it operates in such a way as to allow each of the myriad things to fulfill its potential on its own distinctive #47 -
*PATTERN* (WEN).
The tetragram title, Bold Resolution, suggests gutsy courage that takes
the initiative. This is a direct contrast to the usual characterization
of Wood, which emphasizes slow growth and pliability. Why such a sudden
burst of resolution at this juncture in the spring? Perhaps the Changes supplies the answer when it argues, "A breakthrough results from steady increase." Prior to this, there has been a steady increase in the power
of yang ch'i. Finally, it is time for yang and the myriad things under
its protection to break through yin's obstacles in a display of courage. Wood, after all, is coupled with the virtue of steadfast resolution in
early Chinese tradition. Any breakthrough, however, depends upon two preconditions covered by the correspondent Hexagram 43: The first is the
need for truthful communication between superior and inferior.
The second is the obligation of the leader to "dispense emoluments to inferiors and refrain from resting [only] on his charisma." Both preconditions associate "resolution" with "filling up" [with
information, with riches]; hence, the imagery employed in some of the Appraisals below. The attempts in Tetragram 30 to redefine the notion of courage are also noteworthy. One component of the graph for the
tetragram title depicts an enraged wild boar, yet the Mystery despises
brute, physical courage uninformed by moral courage. As YANG HSIUNG's
other neoclassic, the Model Sayings, emphasizes, the courage of sages
like Mencius far surpasses that of mere men of arms.
APPRAISAL #1: Harbouring what is awesome,
Emptiness fills him nonetheless.
FATHOMING #1: An all consuming love of power
Means: The Way and its Power are lost.
The individual's preoccupation with external displays of force or
grandeur leads him to neglect the cultivation of his inner life and
virtue. Self-importance fills the mind (conventionally termed the VOID:
#13 - INCREASE (TSENG) as [#2 - FULL CIRCLE (CHOU), #5 - KEEPING SMALL (SHAO), #6 - CONTRARIETY (LI)] = bôhûw (H922): {UMBRA: #13 % #41 = #13}
1) emptiness, *VOID*, waste) with what is inherently empty. Since he
fails to develop either his innate capacity for Goodness or his concern
for the masses, he is a prime example of the wrong kind of resolution,
just like the knight errants of old.
Any *DISPARITY* *BETWEEN* *HIS* *PUBLIC* *AND* *PRIVATE* *PERSONAE* *IS*
If a country such as BRAZIL who had a population of 72.7 million in 1960
and exponentially over 214 million by DECEMBER 2021, can't produce
something extraordinary other than the mundane, then you ought to cease copulating like frenzied animals (ie. of feigned friendships, madness or revenge) and focus upon civility producing a better class of persons
(ie. perhaps not as übermensch since that would invoke too much of his
nazi philosophical revisionism) is the contextual basis of DE
ZENGOTITA's eugenics analogy: "...that old thing about if a million
monkeys type at random on a million keyboards for infinity, one of them
will eventually write HAMLET?
At some stage in their lives--I bet everyone you know was doing
something creative and thinking about committing to it, or did commit to
it, at least for a while.
But all this creative activity--while indubitably mostly a good
thing--has to reach a certain point of mass meaningless (ie. we note
with 3 days of public mourning that the far-right and populist PRESIDENT
JAIR BOLSONARO has only until 31 DECEMBER 2022 for propagandist
opportunism); it has to, doesn't it?
FUEHRER: I WANT TO SEE MY *GOATS* {GREATEST OF ALL TIME} VERY SOON.
I WANT TO HAVE A BIT OF FUN.
I LIKE THEIR FRISKY SCENT. (ie. *FROWZY*: ill-smelling, musty; dirty and untidy; slovenly)
GRAB THE HIND LEGS, AND UP IT!!
*FAR* *RIGHTER*
FOR ME TO HAVE MY FUN WITH SOCK-PUPPETS AND *GOATS* THAN WITH REAL
HUMANS!!!
FEMALE: (CRYING)
2ND FEMALE: IT'S OKAY ANNA NO *GOATS* WERE HARMED [IN] MAKING THIS PARODY.
Even the apparently limitless flexibility that a digitally enhanced
every person enjoys (ie. Television may have been introduced into
Australia by SEPTEMBER 1956 but only THEORETICALLY just in time for the world-cup of 1958) in the creation of whatever they want--there has to
be a limit, doesn't there?" [page 263]
"INFANATI PO PERA SIONE DEMONI
SEN SORE DIVANO
SEN SOLE DIVANO
RE DIVA ENORE
DEVORA RE SENSOLIVA
DORE SORE SENSOLIVA
DIVANO DIVANO"
{@7: Sup: 4 - BARRIER: HSIEN (#287); Ego: 76 - AGGRAVATION: CHU (#364)}
<http://www.grapple369.com/?date:2022.12.31&lexicon:H5139,H7854,H3794,H3444&idea:287,364,397,470>
#287 as [#50, #7, #10, #200, #500] = nâzîyr (H5139): {UMBRA: #267 % #41
= #21} 1) *CONSECRATED* *OR* *DEVOTED* *ONE*, Nazarite; 1a) consecrated
one; 1b) devotee, Nazarite; 1c) untrimmed (vine); Nazarite; 1a)
consecrated one; 1b) devotee, Nazarite; 1c) untrimmed (vine);
#359 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 31 DECEMBER 2022 as [#300, #9, #50] / [#300, #9, #700] /
#364 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 31 DECEMBER 2022 as [#5, #300, #9, #700] = sâṭân (H7854): {UMBRA: #359 % #41 = #31} 1) *ADVERSARY*, *ONE* *WHO* *WITHSTANDS*; 1a) *ADVERSARY* (*IN* *GENERAL* - *PERSONAL* *OR* *NATIONAL*); 2) *SUPERHUMAN* *ADVERSARY*; 2a) Satan (as noun pr);
DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #470 as [#20, #400, #10, #600] = Kittîy (H3794): {UMBRA: #430 % #41 = #20} 0) Chittim or Kittim = 'bruisers'; 1) a
general term for all islanders of the Mediterranean Sea; 2) the
descendants of Javan, the son of Japheth and grandson of Noah;
"FOR THE SHIPS OF *CHITTIM*-H3794 (ie. the ROMANS) SHALL COME AGAINST
HIM: THEREFORE HE SHALL BE GRIEVED, AND RETURN, AND HAVE INDIGNATION
AGAINST THE HOLY COVENANT: SO SHALL HE DO; HE SHALL EVEN RETURN, AND
HAVE INTELLIGENCE WITH THEM THAT FORSAKE THE HOLY COVENANT." [Daniel 11:30]
ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #397 as [#6, #10, #300, #6, #70, #5] = yᵉshûwʻâh (H3444): {UMBRA: #391 % #41 = #22} 1) salvation, deliverance; 1a)
*WELFARE*, *PROSPERITY*; 1b) deliverance; 1c) salvation (by God); 1d) victory;
YOUTUBE: "INFANATI (ERA)"
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0csQN_MdlfQ>
It is too early to draw any adverse conclusions on DE ZENGOTITA's
motivations for his post-modernity summation of "CLOSURE FOR YOU" as "JEDERMENSCH (every person) EIN (a) ÜBERMENSCH (superman)" that
constructs a cloning analogy [page 261] in being a futurist forecast of procreational technology advances which as academic conduct is the
equivalent of pumping "junk into the environment" and polluting the mind
in being a strident contradiction to his earlier prohibitions: "this
genre [of passive expectation or visionary bogus] requirement is a
vestige of modernity's faith in a technological fix." [page 255]
The "premise upon which modernity's faith in the fix is based is
logically flawed: "If people cause X, people can cure X" just isn't
true. A man who jumps off a bridge can't arrest his descent midair"
[page 256]
Whether he is disingenuous in only being possessed by a fictional
disposition of careless indifference, or intentionally engaging in
calumny as a fifth columnist, recklessly hypocritical as symptomatic of
an existential crisis or just making a blasé social critique which is otherwise unimpressed with the ontological reality and simply because
one has experienced or seen it so often before. How does one compensate
for not ever having a clue about the anthropological consequences, to
name but a few, that might manifest by the emergence of SMART PHONE technologies, semantics of programming languages, document and content representation, cloud computing and 4G / 5G with 6G now in development
is then the cause for an early onset of misanthropy as its pathos.
Is it a straw man (ie. a form of argument and an informal fallacy of
having the impression of refuting an argument) to postulate: "What would FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE ([#369 - wànwù (萬物): *ALL* *LIVING* *THINGS* /
#416 - ʼâchaz (H270): *SEIZE*] 15 OCTOBER 1844 to [#449 - yâlad (H3205): *BRING* *FORTH* *OF* *CHILD* *BIRTH* *OR* *WICKED* *BEHAVIOUR* / #350 - yâsam (H3455): *SET*, *APPOINT*, *MAKE*] 25 AUGUST 1900) have to say
about cloning if he were still alive today?
IMMANUEL KANT'S (1785) METAPHYSICS OF MORALS IDEA #416: "It may be
expounded not simply as necessary to a purpose which can be presumed a
priori and with certainty as being present in *EVERYONE* because it
belongs to his *ESSENCE*. Now skill in the choice of means to one's own greatest well-being can be called prudence in the narrowest sense. And
thus the imperative that refers to the choice of means to one's own happiness, ie. the precept of prudence, still remains hypothetical; the action is commanded not absolutely but only as a means to a further
purpose.
Finally, there is one imperative which immediately commands a certain
conduct without having as its condition any other purpose to be attained
by it. This imperative is *CATEGORICAL*. It is not concerned the
*MATTER* of the action and its intended result, but rather with the FORM
OF THE ACTION and the principle from which it follows; what is
essentially GOOD in the action consists in the mental disposition, let
the consequences be what they may. This imperative may be called that
of morality.
CATEGORICAL (#YOD, #MEM, #TAU, #ALEPH) #451 - METALOGIC IMPERATIVE
CONSISTS OF 23 ELEMENTS AS SELF REFERENCING
#YOD: #10 / #418 - ménō (G3306): reference to state or condition / ONTIC #451 - MORALITY PRAXIS GROUNDING +
#MEM: #40 / #415 - méros (G3313): constituent parts of a whole / #YOD
#MEM as a totality / infinity conception +#TAU: #400 [#76] / #273 - SYNCRETIC PROGRESSION / 22 homologous
chromosomes +
#ALEPH: #1 / #264 - periágō (G4013): I turn round; περίακτος (períaktos:
"revolving, pivoting") / female (XX) and male (XY) sex chromosome
Willing according to these three kinds of principles is also clearly distinguished by dissimilarity in the necessitation of the will. To
make this dissimilarity clear I think that they are most suitably named
in their order when they are said to be either RULES OF SKILL, COUNSELS
OF PRUDENCE, or COMMANDS (LAWS) OF MORALITY. For law alone involves the concept of a necessity that is unconditioned and indeed objective and
hence universally valid, and commands are laws which must be obeyed, ie.
must be followed even in opposition to inclination.
Counsel does indeed involve necessity, but involves such necessity as is valid only under a subjectively contingent condition, viz., whether this
or that man counts this or that as belonging to his happiness. On the
other hand, the CATEGORICAL imperative is limited by no condition, and
can quite properly be called a command since it is absolutely, though practically, necessary. The first kind of imperatives might also be
called technical (BELONGING TO *ART*), the second kind pragmatic
(belonging to welfare), the third kind moral (belonging to free conduct
as such, ie. to morals)?
The question now arises: how are all of these imperatives possible?"
[pages 26, 27]
Without quantifying any substantial basis of reasonable cause, DE
ZENGOTITA speculates, "He would not allow the experts to reduce this
fabulous eventuality to mere policy [such as rule based according to
#902 - RULE OF LAW as its #410 - OBLIGATING NORM]. He would #416 -
*PLUNGE* *STRAIGHT* to the METAPHYSICAL heart of the *MATTER* [ie.
whether the essence as hypostasis is either TRIPARTITE as being a determination towards gender progression or BIPARTITE as determination
upon the autonomy of gender?], to the delicious and terrible dilemmas
the possibility of self-replication." [page 265]
Whilst the two notions that became known as ‘chromosome continuity’ and ‘chromosome individuality’ had their grounding in a series of
experiments beginning within the mid-1880, it was according to Wikipedia resources, only later that the German scientists SCHLEIDEN, VIRCHOW and BÜTSCHLI were among the first who recognized the structures now familiar
as a chromosomal theory of inheritance in 1902.
The enlightenment goal of self realisation is not then equivalent to the "enterprise of self-construction culminating in [a] literal self-(re)construction through cloning and genetic engineering." How
might NIETZSCHE's profound crisis of nihilism as absence of IMAGO DEI
(ie. humankind as the image of God) then logically have helped us to understand cloning as the #481 - *ECSTATIC* realisation of a destiny?
FOOL FOR CHRIST (ON THE PATH) @ 0730 HOURS ON 31 DECEMBER 2022: "WE WERE CREATED FOR ETERNAL LIFE BY OUR CREATOR:
"Do not let your hand be stretched out to receive and closed when it is
time to give." [Sirach 4:31]
Draw nigh unto God and He will draw nigh unto you."
DOLF @ 1215 HOURS ON 31 DECEMBER 2022: "WILL THE VATICAN SMOTHER THE
POPE EMERITUS FOR A MORE PROPITIOUS DAY OF DEATH?"
[#10, #10, #10]@{
@1: Sup: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#10); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#10),
@2: Sup: 20 - ADVANCE: CHIN (#30); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#20),
@3: Sup: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI (#60); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#30),
Male: #60; Feme: #30
} // #30
#481 = #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY + #30 - BOLD RESOLUTION (YI) as [#8,
#7, #10, #50, #6, #400] = chizzâyôwn (H2384): {UMBRA: #81 % #41 = #40}
1) vision; 1a) *VISION* (*IN* *THE* *ECSTATIC* *STATE*); 1a1) valley of vision (perhaps fig. of Jerusalem or Hinnom); 1b) vision (in the night);
1c) vision, oracle, prophecy (in divine communication);
#30 - 𝌣毅 = #481
yì: 1. resolute; 2. decisive; 3. firm; 4. persistent
WHERE #481 = #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY + #30 - BOLD RESOLUTION (YI): "HEAD: Yang ch'i just now comes into its own. Resolutely, it *DARES*
*TO* *ACT* *SO* *THAT* *THINGS* *DEVELOP* *THEIR* *GOALS*.
This tetragram is associated with *EAST*, with *WOOD*, and with spring through its assigned constellation, patron Phase, and season of the
year. The conjunction of *WOOD* / *EAST* / spring proves so compelling
that the last barriers to yang ch'i's beneficial action are removed.
Yang ch'i now flourishes, with no real impediments to its catalyzing activities. Like Tao, it operates in such a way as to allow each of the myriad things to fulfill its potential on its own distinctive #47 -
*PATTERN* (WEN).
The tetragram title, Bold Resolution, suggests gutsy courage that takes
the initiative. This is a direct contrast to the usual characterization
of Wood, which emphasizes slow growth and pliability. Why such a sudden
burst of resolution at this juncture in the spring? Perhaps the Changes supplies the answer when it argues, "A breakthrough results from steady increase." Prior to this, there has been a steady increase in the power
of yang ch'i. Finally, it is time for yang and the myriad things under
its protection to break through yin's obstacles in a display of courage. Wood, after all, is coupled with the virtue of steadfast resolution in
early Chinese tradition. Any breakthrough, however, depends upon two preconditions covered by the correspondent Hexagram 43: The first is the
need for truthful communication between superior and inferior.
The second is the obligation of the leader to "dispense emoluments to inferiors and refrain from resting [only] on his charisma." Both preconditions associate "resolution" with "filling up" [with
information, with riches]; hence, the imagery employed in some of the Appraisals below. The attempts in Tetragram 30 to redefine the notion of courage are also noteworthy. One component of the graph for the
tetragram title depicts an enraged wild boar, yet the Mystery despises
brute, physical courage uninformed by moral courage. As YANG HSIUNG's
other neoclassic, the Model Sayings, emphasizes, the courage of sages
like Mencius far surpasses that of mere men of arms.
APPRAISAL #1: Harbouring what is awesome,
Emptiness fills him nonetheless.
FATHOMING #1: An all consuming love of power
Means: The Way and its Power are lost.
The individual's preoccupation with external displays of force or
grandeur leads him to neglect the cultivation of his inner life and
virtue. Self-importance fills the mind (conventionally termed the VOID:
#13 - INCREASE (TSENG) as [#2 - FULL CIRCLE (CHOU), #5 - KEEPING SMALL (SHAO), #6 - CONTRARIETY (LI)] = bôhûw (H922): {UMBRA: #13 % #41 = #13}
1) emptiness, *VOID*, waste) with what is inherently empty. Since he
fails to develop either his innate capacity for Goodness or his concern
for the masses, he is a prime example of the wrong kind of resolution,
For instance today 2 JANUARY 2023 we have a noumenon resonance instance
of idea #338 which is also our ONTIC / DEME aggregation to phántasma (G5326): phantasmagorical neural linguistic concern (ie. the mechanics
rather than specific content) and its capacity by being subject to
thought vMEMEs throughout the day / year which then prime our instance receptiveness and hyper awareness to that CATEGORY OF UNDERSTANDING and accumulative objects of experience:
#338 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 2 JANUARY 2023 as [#30, #2, #6, #300] / [#30, #2, #300, #6] /
#346 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 2 JANUARY 2023 as [#2, #30, #2, #6, #300, #6] /
#408 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 2 JANUARY 2023 as [#30, #2, #6, #300, #20, #700] = lᵉbûwsh (H3830): {UMBRA: #338 % #41 = #10} 1) *CLOTHING*, *GARMENT*, *APPAREL*, *RAIMENT*;
<http://www.grapple369.com/?date:2023.1.2&lexicon:H3830&idea:338>
My existential concern with PREMEDIATED (ADVOCATED) MEDIA is that this process ought to be optimal for life vitality, as that which is not
adverse or detrimental. In this respect, SPAM can be considered as
entirely problematic when it assails a person's life vitality and its exercise of an unencumbered will. So what then do we make of a society
such as Brazil were the daily average of television viewing has
degenerated from 65% in 1982–1991 to 42% in 2008?
YOUTUBE: "COCK-A-DOODLE-DOO (OMER ADAM & EDEN BEN ZAKEN)"
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d60H5D9GefE>
As you may deduce, my socially reclusive and contemplating life has a particular as distinct requirement for inductive television viewing as
being predominately news media oriented which grants me an opportunity
for observation of the human condition experience within the
world--there is no doubt that others have viewed the same DEUTSCHE WELLE
NEWS program and noted the possibility of consciousness congruity
between mind and machine (eg: GNOSIS EX MACHINA) without providing any rationale for such. In my informal view (ie. my semantics ought to
clearly convey that I don't consist within the faculty of academia), inductive reasoning which is a bottom-up approach could be thought of as
a process which is directed towards the hypostatic metaphysical realm, whereas deductive reasoning is top-down which then manifests some
rationale as conjectural proposition.
@150 = #150 as [#80, #30, #10, #30] = pâlîyl (H6414): {UMBRA: #150 % #41
= #27} 1) judge, *ASSESSMENT*, estimate;
@104 = #254 as [#1, #3, #1, #9, #70, #80, #70, #10, #9, #1] =
agathopoiḯa (G16): {UMBRA: #255 % #41 = #9} 1) a *COURSE* *OF* *RIGHT* *ACTION*, well doing, virtue;
@175 = #429 as [#1, #3, #1, #3, #70, #50, #300, #1] /
#223 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 3 JANUARY 2023 as [#1, #3, #5, #200, #9, #5] = ágō (G71): {UMBRA: #804 % #41 = #25} 1) to lead, take with
one; 1a) to lead by laying hold of, and this way to bring to the point
of destination: of an animal; 1b) to lead by accompanying to (into) a
place; 1c) to lead with one's self, attach to one's self as an
attendant; 1d) to conduct, bring; 1e) to lead away, to a court of
justice, magistrate, etc.; 2) to lead,; 2a) to lead, guide, direct; 2b)
to lead through, conduct to: to something; 2c) *TO* *MOVE*, *IMPEL*:
*OF* *FORCES* *AND* *INFLUENCES* *ON* *THE* *MIND*; 3) to pass a day,
keep or celebrate a feast, etc.; 4) to go, depart;
@181 = #610 as [#5, #200, #400, #5] = hârâh (H2029): {UMBRA: #210 % #41
= #5} 1) to conceive, become pregnant, bear, be with child, be
conceived, progenitor; 1a) (Qal) to conceive, become pregnant; 1b)
(Pual) to be conceived; 1c) (Poel) *TO* *CONCEIVE*, *CONTRIVE*, *DEVISE*;
"NOW WILL I RISE, SAITH THE LORD; NOW WILL I BE EXALTED; NOW WILL I LIFT
UP MYSELF. YE SHALL *CONCEIVE*-H2029 CHAFF, YE SHALL BRING FORTH
STUBBLE: YOUR BREATH, AS FIRE, SHALL DEVOUR YOU." [Isaiah 33:10-11]
@228 = #838 as [#4, #10, #1, #30, #70, #3, #10, #200, #40, #70, #400] = dialogismós (G1261): {UMBRA: #638 % #41 = #23} 1) *THE* *THINKING* *OF*
*A* *MAN* *DELIBERATING* *WITH* *HIMSELF*; 1a) a thought, inward
reasoning; 1b) purpose, design; 2) a deliberating, questioning about
what is true; 2a) hesitation, doubting; 2b) disputing, arguing;
#360 - páthos (G3806): *FEELING* *WHICH* *THE* *MIND* *SUFFERS* as [#4,
#10, #1, #30, #70, #3, #10, #7, #5, #200, #9, #1, #10] = dialogízomai (G1260): {UMBRA: #256 % #41 = #10} 1) to bring together different
reasons, to reckon up the reasons, to reason, revolve in one's mind, deliberate;
<http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:150,254,429,610,838>
After some further meditational thought (#838 - dialogismós (G1261): DELIBERATING WITHIN AUTOS AND QUESTIONING ABOUT WHAT IS TRUE) upon the metaphysical / metempiricial (ie. outside, before or along side time) consequence of such a propensity for a BIPARTITE hypostasis subversion:
@4: Sup: 41 - RESPONSE: YING (#135 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%19}); Ego:
57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU (#122) as DEME substitution (ie. TRIPARTITE hypostasis)
As a transition from reality into a non-reality which is then #190 - CONSEQUENTIAL (CAUSE AND EFFECT: #838 [#122 / #190] - kâthab (H3789):
PAPAL / RITUAL CONDUCT IS ENTIRELY WRITTEN AND NEVER SPONTANEOUS) to our observation of an ONTIC / DEME aggregation occasioning an instance of
idea #338 and any noumenon resonance.
The additional neural linguistic concern is that the ONTIC / DEME
aggregation within our meta-descriptive phántasma (G5326):
phantasmagorical notion as human state of irrationality, actually
consists of a double pairing occasioning an exacerbated instance of idea
#676 which then exceeds the both boundary to the #451 - PRAXIS OF
RATIONALITY SPECTRUM (#452 ... #532) and apart from grammatical
declension such as #424 - ANZAC DAY (25 APRIL) purveys a lack of any substantive as resolute capability for noumenon resonance.
#676 as [#5, #50, #50, #1, #300, #70, #200] = énnatos (G1766): {UMBRA:
#676 % #41 = #20} 1) ninth; 1a) the ninth hour corresponds to our 3
o'clock in the afternoon for the sixth hour of the Jews coincides with
the twelfth of the day as divided by our method, and the first hour of
the day is 6 A.M. to us;
Rather the consideration is given such a neural linguistic / temporal referencing, whether we can apply (ie. daylight saving time excepted) a litmus test by dynamically assaying the TEMPORAL HEURISTIC @ 1500 HOURS
each day to observe any correspondence to the consciousness markers as
then indicators for any propensity of a departure from reality (ie. we
are only stating a hypothetical proposition for further informal
research opportunity without any medical or psychological qualification):
THEORETICAL TEMPORAL HEURISTIC @ 1500 HOURS ON 3 JANUARY 2023 GRAPPLE:
[#74, #14, #78, #27, #57, #37, #67, #68, #71] PROTOTYPE (not subject to
peer review)
<http://www.grapple369.com/?grapple:74,14,78,27,57,37,67,68,71&date:2023.1.3&time:15.00>
{@1: Sup: 74 - CLOSURE: CHIH (#74); Ego: 74 - CLOSURE: CHIH (#74)}
|
|
|
{@8: Sup: 17 - HOLDING BACK: JUAN (#214); Ego: 68 - DIMMING: MENG (#422
- SEE KANT'S METAPHYSICS OF MORALS IDEA)}
#175 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 3 JANUARY 2023 as [#10, #70, #9, #80, #6] / [#10, #70, #9, #6, #800] / #214 as [#5, #70, #9, #80, #10, #600]
= ʻâṭaph (H5848): {UMBRA: #159 % #41 = #36} 1) *TO**TURN* *ASIDE*; 1a) (Qal) to turn aside, turn (in order to cover); 2) to envelop oneself;
2a) (Qal) to envelop oneself, cover; 3) *TO* *BE* *FEEBLE*, *BE*
*FAINT*, *GROW* *WEAK*; 3a) (Qal) to be feeble, be faint; 3b) (Niphal)
to faint; 3c) (Hiphil) to show feebleness; 3d) (Hithpael) to faint,
faint away;
IMMANUEL KANT'S (1785) METAPHYSICS OF MORALS IDEA #422: "Act as if the
maxim of your action were to become through your will a universal law of nature. We shall now enumerate some duties, following the usual
division of them into duties to ourselves and to others and into perfect
and imperfect duties:
1) A man reduced to despair by a series of misfortunes feels sick of life but is still so far in possession of his reason that he can ask
himself whether taking his own life would not be contrary to his duty to himself. Now he asks whether the maxim of his action could become a
universal law of nature. But his maxim is this: from self-love I make as
my principle to shorten my life when its continued duration threatens
more evil than it promises satisfaction. There only remains the question
as to whether this principle of self-love can become a universal law of nature. One sees at once a contradiction in a system of nature whose law would destroy life by means of the very same feeling that acts so as to stimulate the furtherance of life, and hence there could be no existence
as a system of nature. Therefore, such a maxim cannot possibly hold as a universal law of nature and is, consequently, wholly opposed to the
supreme principle of all duty.
2) Another man in need finds himself forced to borrow money. He knows well that he won’t be able to repay it, but he sees also that he will
not get any loan unless he firmly promises to repay it within a fixed
time. He wants to make such a promise, but he still has conscience
enough to ask himself whether it is not permissible and is contrary to
duty to get out of difficulty in this way. Suppose, however, that he
decides to do so. The maxim of his action would then be expressed as
follows: when I believe myself to be in need of money, I will borrow
money and promise to pay it back, although I know that I can never do
so. Now this principle of self-love or personal advantage may perhaps be quite compatible with one’s
entire future welfare, but the question is now whether it is right. I
then transform the requirement of self-love into a universal law and put
the question thus: how would things stand if my maxim were to become a universal law?
He then sees at once that such a maxim could never hold as a universal
law of nature and be consistent with itself, but must necessarily be self-contradictory. For the universality of a law which says that anyone believing himself to be in difficulty could promise whatever he pleases
with the intention of not keeping it would make promising itself and the
end to be attained thereby quite impossible, inasmuch as no one would
believe what was promised him but would merely laugh at all such
utterances as being vain pretences.
3) A third finds in himself a talent whose cultivation could make
him a man useful in many respects. But he finds himself in comfortable circumstances [IDEA @423] and prefers to indulge in pleasure rather than
to bother himself about broadening and improving his fortunate natural aptitudes. But he asks himself further whether his maxim of neglecting
his natural gifts, besides agreeing of itself with his propensity to indulgence, might agree also with what is called duty. He then sees that
a system of nature could indeed always subsist according to such a
universal law, even though every man (like South Sea Islanders) should
let his talents rust and resolve to devote his life entirely to
idleness, indulgence, propagation and, in a word, to enjoyment. But he
cannot possibly will that this should become a universal law of nature
or be implanted in us as such a law by a natural instinct. For as a
rational being he necessarily wills that all his faculties should be developed, inasmuch as they are given him for all sorts of possible
purposes.
4) A fourth man finds things going well for himself but sees others (whom he could help) struggling with great hardships; and he thinks:
what does it matter to me? Let everybody be as happy as *HEAVEN* *WILLS*
*OR* *AS* *HE* *CAN* *MAKE* *HIMSELF*; I shall take nothing from him nor
even envy him; but I have no desire to contribute anything to his
well-being or to his assistance when in need.
"AND WHEN THE SIXTH HOUR WAS COME, THERE WAS DARKNESS OVER THE WHOLE
LAND UNTIL THE *NINTH*-G1766 HOUR. AND AT THE *NINTH*-G1766 HOUR JESUS
CRIED WITH A LOUD VOICE, SAYING, *ELOI*, *ELOI*, *LAMA* *SABACHTHANI*?
WHICH IS, BEING INTERPRETED, MY GOD, MY GOD, WHY HAST THOU FORSAKEN ME?" [Mark 15:33-34]
— ELI ELI LAMA SABACHTHANI? —
[Written 24 June 2018]
“HEIL THE DWARFISH JEW {#INRI}.
WITH CAMEO PART TO PLAY.
AS SOMEWHAT PIOUS HEW.
BUT WILL IT SAVE THE DAY?
CROWNING GLORY DECEIVE.
THORNY PLANS OF KETHER.
HABIT ROUGE GAUCHE EVE.
FLAGRANT ENVY OF VETIVER.
SUCH COSMETICUS ALL SEE.
BY BEETLEJUICE OF DUNG.
WHITEWASHED SEPULCHRE BE.
WAITING FOR HELL HAMSTRUNG.”
{@13: Sup: 73 - ALREADY FORDING, COMPLETION: CH'ENG (#422 - SEE KANT'S METAPHYSICS OF MORALS IDEA); Ego: 19 - FOLLOWING: TS'UNG (#486 - pétra (G4073): *A* *ROCK* *OR* *LARGE* *STONE*)}
ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #540 as [#20, #70, #400, #40, #10] = koûmi
(G2891): {UMBRA: #540 % #41 = #7} 1) *ARISE*;
#540 as [#80, #100, #1, #3, #40, #1, #300, #5, #9, #1] = pragmateía
(G4230): {UMBRA: #541 % #41 = #8} 1) *PROSECUTION* *OF* *ANY* *AFFAIR*;
1a) business, occupation;
DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #276 as [#10, #5, #6, #5, #90, #4, #100, #50, #6] = Yᵉhôvâh tsidqênûw (H3072): {UMBRA: #276 % #41 = #30} 0) *JEHOVAH* *IS* *OUR* *RIGHTEOUSNESS*; 1) a sacred name symbolically applied to
Jerusalem and the Messiah;
#276 as [#3, #50, #8, #200, #10, #5] = gnḗsios (G1103): {UMBRA: #541 %
#41 = #8} 1) *LEGITIMATELY* *BORN*, not spurious; 2) true, genuine,
sincere;
#276 as [#80, #70, #10, #40, #1, #10, #50, #5, #10] = poimaínō (G4165): {UMBRA: #1061 % #41 = #36} 1) to feed, to tend a flock, keep sheep; 1a)
*TO* *RULE*, *GOVERN*; 1a1) of rulers; 1a2) to furnish pasture for food;
1a3) to nourish; 1a4) to cherish one's body, to serve the body; 1a5) to supply the requisites for the soul's need;
YOUTUBE: "MESSIAH - FOR UNTO US A CHILD IS BORN (HANDEL'S MESSIAH)"
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TN5BaOGTmGs>
If such a way of thinking were to become a universal law of nature, the
human race admittedly could very well subsist and doubtless could
subsist even better than when everyone prates about sympathy and
benevolence and even on occasion exerts himself to practice them but, on
the other hand, also cheats when he can, betrays the rights of man, or otherwise violates them. But even though it is possible that a universal
law of nature could subsist in accordance with that maxim, still it is impossible to will that such a principle should hold everywhere as a law
of nature.
For a will which resolved in this way would contradict itself, inasmuch
as cases might often arise in which one would have need of the love and sympathy of others and in which he would deprive himself, by such a law
of nature springing from his own will, of all hope of the aid he wants
for himself." [pages 30 to 32]
|
{@9: Sup: 7 - ASCENT: SHANG (#221); Ego: 71 - STOPPAGE: CHIH (#493)}
<http://www.grapple369.com/?date:2023.1.3&lexicon:H4899,G2356,H584,H1478,H6330,G4088,H1442,G2631&idea:81,221,363,493>
ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #363 as [#5, #40, #300, #10, #8] = mâshîyach
(H4899): {UMBRA: #358 % #41 = #30} 1) *ANOINTED*, *ANOINTED* *ONE*; 1a)
of the Messiah, Messianic prince; 1b) of the king of Israel; 1c) of the
high priest of Israel; 1d) of Cyrus; 1e) of the patriarchs as anointed
kings;
#363 as [#9, #100, #8, #200, #20, #5, #10, #1, #10] = thrēskeía (G2356): {UMBRA: #353 % #41 = #25} 1) religious worship; 1a) *ESPECIALLY*
*EXTERNAL*, *THAT* *WHICH* *CONSISTS* *OF* *CEREMONIES*; 1a1) religious discipline, religion;
DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #81 - CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY (T'AI HSÜAN CHING) / #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY SPECTRUM (#452 ... #532) AS COURSE-trochos
OF NATURE-genesis [James 3:6]
#81 as [#6, #10, #1, #50, #8, #6] = ʼânach (H584): {UMBRA: #59 % #41 =
#18} 1) (Niphal) sigh, *GROAN* (*IN* *PAIN* *OR* *GRIEF*), *GASP*; 1a)
moan (of cattle);
#80 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 3 JANUARY 2023 as [#1, #3, #6, #70] /
#95 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 3 JANUARY 2023 as [#6, #10, #3, #6, #70] / [#10, #3, #6, #70, #6] /
#81 as [#2, #3, #6, #70] = gâvaʻ (H1478): {UMBRA: #79 % #41 = #38} 1)
*TO* *EXPIRE*, *DIE*, *PERISH*, *GIVE* *UP* *THE* *GHOST*, *YIELD* *UP*
*THE* *GHOST*, *BE* *DEAD*, *BE* *READY* *TO* *DIE*; 1a) (Qal) to
expire, die, be about to die;
#164 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 3 JANUARY 2023 as [#5, #50, #1, #50, #8, #10, #600] /
#221 as [#30, #80, #6, #100, #5] = pûwqâh (H6330): {UMBRA: #191 % #41 = #27} 1) tottering, staggering, stumbling; 1a) *OF* *QUALM* *OF*
*CONSCIENCE* (fig.);
#221 as [#80, #10, #20, #100, #10, #1] = pikría (G4088): {UMBRA: #221 %
#41 = #16} 1) *BITTER* *GALL*; 1a) *EXTREME* *WICKEDNESS*; 1b) a bitter
root, and so producing a bitter fruit; 1c) metaphor: bitterness, bitter hatred;
"LOOKING DILIGENTLY LEST ANY MAN FAIL OF THE GRACE OF GOD; LEST ANY ROOT
OF *BITTERNESS*-G4088 SPRINGING UP TROUBLE YOU, AND THEREBY MANY BE
DEFILED;" [Hebrews 12:15]
#493 as [#6, #3, #4, #80, #400] = gâdaph (H1442): {UMBRA: #87 % #41 =
#5} 1) *TO* *REVILE* *MEN*, *BLASPHEME* *GOD*; 1a) (Piel); 1a1) to
revile (between men); 1a2) to blaspheme (God);
#493 as [#20, #1, #300, #1, #20, #100, #10, #40, #1] = katákrima
(G2631): {UMBRA: #493 % #41 = #1} 1) *DAMNATORY* *SENTENCE*,
*CONDEMNATION*;
TO BE CONTINUED ...
A revision of this document may be obtained from the following URL:
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Determined%20Consciousness.pdf>
On 2/1/2023 16:38, dolf wrote:
If a country such as BRAZIL who had a population of 72.7 million in
1960 and exponentially over 214 million by DECEMBER 2021, can't
produce something extraordinary other than the mundane, then you ought
to cease copulating like frenzied animals (ie. of feigned friendships,
madness or revenge) and focus upon civility producing a better class
of persons (ie. perhaps not as übermensch since that would invoke too
much of his nazi philosophical revisionism) is the contextual basis of
DE ZENGOTITA's eugenics analogy: "...that old thing about if a million
monkeys type at random on a million keyboards for infinity, one of
them will eventually write HAMLET?
At some stage in their lives--I bet everyone you know was doing
something creative and thinking about committing to it, or did commit
to it, at least for a while.
But all this creative activity--while indubitably mostly a good
thing--has to reach a certain point of mass meaningless (ie. we note
with 3 days of public mourning that the far-right and populist
PRESIDENT JAIR BOLSONARO has only until 31 DECEMBER 2022 for
propagandist opportunism); it has to, doesn't it?
FUEHRER: I WANT TO SEE MY *GOATS* {GREATEST OF ALL TIME} VERY SOON.
I WANT TO HAVE A BIT OF FUN.
I LIKE THEIR FRISKY SCENT. (ie. *FROWZY*: ill-smelling, musty; dirty
and untidy; slovenly)
GRAB THE HIND LEGS, AND UP IT!!
*FAR* *RIGHTER*
FOR ME TO HAVE MY FUN WITH SOCK-PUPPETS AND *GOATS* THAN WITH REAL
HUMANS!!!
FEMALE: (CRYING)
2ND FEMALE: IT'S OKAY ANNA NO *GOATS* WERE HARMED [IN] MAKING THIS
PARODY.
Even the apparently limitless flexibility that a digitally enhanced
every person enjoys (ie. Television may have been introduced into
Australia by SEPTEMBER 1956 but only THEORETICALLY just in time for
the world-cup of 1958) in the creation of whatever they want--there
has to be a limit, doesn't there?" [page 263]
"INFANATI PO PERA SIONE DEMONI
SEN SORE DIVANO
SEN SOLE DIVANO
RE DIVA ENORE
DEVORA RE SENSOLIVA
DORE SORE SENSOLIVA
DIVANO DIVANO"
{@7: Sup: 4 - BARRIER: HSIEN (#287); Ego: 76 - AGGRAVATION: CHU (#364)}
<http://www.grapple369.com/?date:2022.12.31&lexicon:H5139,H7854,H3794,H3444&idea:287,364,397,470>
#287 as [#50, #7, #10, #200, #500] = nâzîyr (H5139): {UMBRA: #267 %
#41 = #21} 1) *CONSECRATED* *OR* *DEVOTED* *ONE*, Nazarite; 1a)
consecrated one; 1b) devotee, Nazarite; 1c) untrimmed (vine);
Nazarite; 1a) consecrated one; 1b) devotee, Nazarite; 1c) untrimmed
(vine);
#359 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 31 DECEMBER 2022 as [#300, #9, #50] >> / [#300, #9, #700] /
#364 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 31 DECEMBER 2022 as [#5, #300, #9, >> #700] = sâṭân (H7854): {UMBRA: #359 % #41 = #31} 1) *ADVERSARY*, *ONE* >> *WHO* *WITHSTANDS*; 1a) *ADVERSARY* (*IN* *GENERAL* - *PERSONAL* *OR*
*NATIONAL*); 2) *SUPERHUMAN* *ADVERSARY*; 2a) Satan (as noun pr);
DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #470 as [#20, #400, #10, #600] = Kittîy (H3794):
{UMBRA: #430 % #41 = #20} 0) Chittim or Kittim = 'bruisers'; 1) a
general term for all islanders of the Mediterranean Sea; 2) the
descendants of Javan, the son of Japheth and grandson of Noah;
"FOR THE SHIPS OF *CHITTIM*-H3794 (ie. the ROMANS) SHALL COME AGAINST
HIM: THEREFORE HE SHALL BE GRIEVED, AND RETURN, AND HAVE INDIGNATION
AGAINST THE HOLY COVENANT: SO SHALL HE DO; HE SHALL EVEN RETURN, AND
HAVE INTELLIGENCE WITH THEM THAT FORSAKE THE HOLY COVENANT." [Daniel
11:30]
ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #397 as [#6, #10, #300, #6, #70, #5] = yᵉshûwʻâh >> (H3444): {UMBRA: #391 % #41 = #22} 1) salvation, deliverance; 1a)
*WELFARE*, *PROSPERITY*; 1b) deliverance; 1c) salvation (by God); 1d)
victory;
YOUTUBE: "INFANATI (ERA)"
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0csQN_MdlfQ>
It is too early to draw any adverse conclusions on DE ZENGOTITA's
motivations for his post-modernity summation of "CLOSURE FOR YOU" as
"JEDERMENSCH (every person) EIN (a) ÜBERMENSCH (superman)" that
constructs a cloning analogy [page 261] in being a futurist forecast
of procreational technology advances which as academic conduct is the
equivalent of pumping "junk into the environment" and polluting the
mind in being a strident contradiction to his earlier prohibitions:
"this genre [of passive expectation or visionary bogus] requirement is
a vestige of modernity's faith in a technological fix." [page 255]
The "premise upon which modernity's faith in the fix is based is
logically flawed: "If people cause X, people can cure X" just isn't
true. A man who jumps off a bridge can't arrest his descent midair"
[page 256]
Whether he is disingenuous in only being possessed by a fictional
disposition of careless indifference, or intentionally engaging in
calumny as a fifth columnist, recklessly hypocritical as symptomatic
of an existential crisis or just making a blasé social critique which
is otherwise unimpressed with the ontological reality and simply
because one has experienced or seen it so often before. How does one
compensate for not ever having a clue about the anthropological
consequences, to name but a few, that might manifest by the emergence
of SMART PHONE technologies, semantics of programming languages,
document and content representation, cloud computing and 4G / 5G with
6G now in development is then the cause for an early onset of
misanthropy as its pathos.
Is it a straw man (ie. a form of argument and an informal fallacy of
having the impression of refuting an argument) to postulate: "What
would FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE ([#369 - wànwù (萬物): *ALL* *LIVING*
*THINGS* / #416 - ʼâchaz (H270): *SEIZE*] 15 OCTOBER 1844 to [#449 -
yâlad (H3205): *BRING* *FORTH* *OF* *CHILD* *BIRTH* *OR* *WICKED*
*BEHAVIOUR* / #350 - yâsam (H3455): *SET*, *APPOINT*, *MAKE*] 25
AUGUST 1900) have to say about cloning if he were still alive today?
IMMANUEL KANT'S (1785) METAPHYSICS OF MORALS IDEA #416: "It may be
expounded not simply as necessary to a purpose which can be presumed a
priori and with certainty as being present in *EVERYONE* because it
belongs to his *ESSENCE*. Now skill in the choice of means to one's
own greatest well-being can be called prudence in the narrowest
sense. And thus the imperative that refers to the choice of means to
one's own happiness, ie. the precept of prudence, still remains
hypothetical; the action is commanded not absolutely but only as a
means to a further purpose.
Finally, there is one imperative which immediately commands a certain
conduct without having as its condition any other purpose to be
attained by it. This imperative is *CATEGORICAL*. It is not concerned
the *MATTER* of the action and its intended result, but rather with
the FORM OF THE ACTION and the principle from which it follows; what
is essentially GOOD in the action consists in the mental disposition,
let the consequences be what they may. This imperative may be called
that of morality.
CATEGORICAL (#YOD, #MEM, #TAU, #ALEPH) #451 - METALOGIC IMPERATIVE
CONSISTS OF 23 ELEMENTS AS SELF REFERENCING
#YOD: #10 / #418 - ménō (G3306): reference to state or condition /
ONTIC #451 - MORALITY PRAXIS GROUNDING +
#MEM: #40 / #415 - méros (G3313): constituent parts of a whole / #YOD
#MEM as a totality / infinity conception +#TAU: #400 [#76] / #273 - SYNCRETIC PROGRESSION / 22 homologous
chromosomes +
#ALEPH: #1 / #264 - periágō (G4013): I turn round; περίακτος
(períaktos: "revolving, pivoting") / female (XX) and male (XY) sex
chromosome
Willing according to these three kinds of principles is also clearly
distinguished by dissimilarity in the necessitation of the will. To
make this dissimilarity clear I think that they are most suitably
named in their order when they are said to be either RULES OF SKILL,
COUNSELS OF PRUDENCE, or COMMANDS (LAWS) OF MORALITY. For law alone
involves the concept of a necessity that is unconditioned and indeed
objective and hence universally valid, and commands are laws which
must be obeyed, ie. must be followed even in opposition to inclination.
Counsel does indeed involve necessity, but involves such necessity as
is valid only under a subjectively contingent condition, viz., whether
this or that man counts this or that as belonging to his happiness.
On the other hand, the CATEGORICAL imperative is limited by no
condition, and can quite properly be called a command since it is
absolutely, though practically, necessary. The first kind of
imperatives might also be called technical (BELONGING TO *ART*), the
second kind pragmatic (belonging to welfare), the third kind moral
(belonging to free conduct as such, ie. to morals)?
The question now arises: how are all of these imperatives possible?"
[pages 26, 27]
Without quantifying any substantial basis of reasonable cause, DE
ZENGOTITA speculates, "He would not allow the experts to reduce this
fabulous eventuality to mere policy [such as rule based according to
#902 - RULE OF LAW as its #410 - OBLIGATING NORM]. He would #416 -
*PLUNGE* *STRAIGHT* to the METAPHYSICAL heart of the *MATTER* [ie.
whether the essence as hypostasis is either TRIPARTITE as being a
determination towards gender progression or BIPARTITE as determination
upon the autonomy of gender?], to the delicious and terrible dilemmas
the possibility of self-replication." [page 265]
Whilst the two notions that became known as ‘chromosome continuity’
and ‘chromosome individuality’ had their grounding in a series of
experiments beginning within the mid-1880, it was according to
Wikipedia resources, only later that the German scientists SCHLEIDEN,
VIRCHOW and BÜTSCHLI were among the first who recognized the
structures now familiar as a chromosomal theory of inheritance in 1902.
The enlightenment goal of self realisation is not then equivalent to
the "enterprise of self-construction culminating in [a] literal
self-(re)construction through cloning and genetic engineering." How
For instance today 2 JANUARY 2023 we have a noumenon resonance instance
of idea #338 which is also our ONTIC / DEME aggregation to phántasma (G5326): phantasmagorical neural linguistic concern (ie. the mechanics
rather than specific content) and its capacity by being subject to
thought vMEMEs throughout the day / year which then prime our instance receptiveness and hyper awareness to that CATEGORY OF UNDERSTANDING and accumulative objects of experience:
#338 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 2 JANUARY 2023 as [#30, #2, #6, #300] / [#30, #2, #300, #6] /
#346 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 2 JANUARY 2023 as [#2, #30, #2, #6, #300, #6] /
#408 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 2 JANUARY 2023 as [#30, #2, #6, #300, #20, #700] = lᵉbûwsh (H3830): {UMBRA: #338 % #41 = #10} 1) *CLOTHING*, *GARMENT*, *APPAREL*, *RAIMENT*;
<http://www.grapple369.com/?date:2023.1.2&lexicon:H3830&idea:338>
My existential concern with PREMEDIATED (ADVOCATED) MEDIA is that this process ought to be optimal for life vitality, as that which is not
adverse or detrimental. In this respect, SPAM can be considered as
entirely problematic when it assails a person's life vitality and its exercise of an unencumbered will. So what then do we make of a society
such as Brazil were the daily average of television viewing has
degenerated from 65% in 1982–1991 to 42% in 2008?
YOUTUBE: "COCK-A-DOODLE-DOO (OMER ADAM & EDEN BEN ZAKEN)"
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d60H5D9GefE>
As you may deduce, my socially reclusive and contemplating life has a particular as distinct requirement for inductive television viewing as
being predominately news media oriented which grants me an opportunity
for observation of the human condition experience within the
world--there is no doubt that others have viewed the same DEUTSCHE WELLE
NEWS program and noted the possibility of consciousness congruity
between mind and machine (eg: GNOSIS EX MACHINA) without providing any rationale for such. In my informal view (ie. my semantics ought to
clearly convey that I don't consist within the faculty of academia), inductive reasoning which is a bottom-up approach could be thought of as
a process which is directed towards the hypostatic metaphysical realm, whereas deductive reasoning is top-down which then manifests some
rationale as conjectural proposition.
@150 = #150 as [#80, #30, #10, #30] = pâlîyl (H6414): {UMBRA: #150 % #41
= #27} 1) judge, *ASSESSMENT*, estimate;
@104 = #254 as [#1, #3, #1, #9, #70, #80, #70, #10, #9, #1] =
agathopoiḯa (G16): {UMBRA: #255 % #41 = #9} 1) a *COURSE* *OF* *RIGHT* *ACTION*, well doing, virtue;
@175 = #429 as [#1, #3, #1, #3, #70, #50, #300, #1] /
#223 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 3 JANUARY 2023 as [#1, #3, #5, #200, #9, #5] = ágō (G71): {UMBRA: #804 % #41 = #25} 1) to lead, take with
one; 1a) to lead by laying hold of, and this way to bring to the point
of destination: of an animal; 1b) to lead by accompanying to (into) a
place; 1c) to lead with one's self, attach to one's self as an
attendant; 1d) to conduct, bring; 1e) to lead away, to a court of
justice, magistrate, etc.; 2) to lead,; 2a) to lead, guide, direct; 2b)
to lead through, conduct to: to something; 2c) *TO* *MOVE*, *IMPEL*:
*OF* *FORCES* *AND* *INFLUENCES* *ON* *THE* *MIND*; 3) to pass a day,
keep or celebrate a feast, etc.; 4) to go, depart;
@181 = #610 as [#5, #200, #400, #5] = hârâh (H2029): {UMBRA: #210 % #41
= #5} 1) to conceive, become pregnant, bear, be with child, be
conceived, progenitor; 1a) (Qal) to conceive, become pregnant; 1b)
(Pual) to be conceived; 1c) (Poel) *TO* *CONCEIVE*, *CONTRIVE*, *DEVISE*;
"NOW WILL I RISE, SAITH THE LORD; NOW WILL I BE EXALTED; NOW WILL I LIFT
UP MYSELF. YE SHALL *CONCEIVE*-H2029 CHAFF, YE SHALL BRING FORTH
STUBBLE: YOUR BREATH, AS FIRE, SHALL DEVOUR YOU." [Isaiah 33:10-11]
@228 = #838 as [#4, #10, #1, #30, #70, #3, #10, #200, #40, #70, #400] = dialogismós (G1261): {UMBRA: #638 % #41 = #23} 1) *THE* *THINKING* *OF*
*A* *MAN* *DELIBERATING* *WITH* *HIMSELF*; 1a) a thought, inward
reasoning; 1b) purpose, design; 2) a deliberating, questioning about
what is true; 2a) hesitation, doubting; 2b) disputing, arguing;
#360 - páthos (G3806): *FEELING* *WHICH* *THE* *MIND* *SUFFERS* as [#4,
#10, #1, #30, #70, #3, #10, #7, #5, #200, #9, #1, #10] = dialogízomai (G1260): {UMBRA: #256 % #41 = #10} 1) to bring together different
reasons, to reckon up the reasons, to reason, revolve in one's mind, deliberate;
<http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:150,254,429,610,838>
After some further meditational thought (#838 - dialogismós (G1261): DELIBERATING WITHIN AUTOS AND QUESTIONING ABOUT WHAT IS TRUE) upon the metaphysical / metempiricial (ie. outside, before or along side time) consequence of such a propensity for a BIPARTITE hypostasis subversion:
@4: Sup: 41 - RESPONSE: YING (#135 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%19}); Ego:
57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU (#122) as DEME substitution (ie. TRIPARTITE hypostasis)
As a transition from reality into a non-reality which is then #190 - CONSEQUENTIAL (CAUSE AND EFFECT: #838 [#122 / #190] - kâthab (H3789):
PAPAL / RITUAL CONDUCT IS ENTIRELY WRITTEN AND NEVER SPONTANEOUS) to our observation of an ONTIC / DEME aggregation occasioning an instance of
idea #338 and any noumenon resonance.
The additional neural linguistic concern is that the ONTIC / DEME
aggregation within our meta-descriptive phántasma (G5326):
phantasmagorical notion as human state of irrationality, actually
consists of a double pairing occasioning an exacerbated instance of idea
#676 which then exceeds the both boundary to the #451 - PRAXIS OF
RATIONALITY SPECTRUM (#452 ... #532) and apart from grammatical
declension such as #424 - ANZAC DAY (25 APRIL) purveys a lack of any substantive as resolute capability for noumenon resonance.
#676 as [#5, #50, #50, #1, #300, #70, #200] = énnatos (G1766): {UMBRA:
#676 % #41 = #20} 1) ninth; 1a) the ninth hour corresponds to our 3
o'clock in the afternoon for the sixth hour of the Jews coincides with
the twelfth of the day as divided by our method, and the first hour of
the day is 6 A.M. to us;
Rather the consideration is given such a neural linguistic / temporal referencing, whether we can apply (ie. daylight saving time excepted) a litmus test by dynamically assaying the TEMPORAL HEURISTIC @ 1500 HOURS
each day to observe any correspondence to the consciousness markers as
then indicators for any propensity of a departure from reality (ie. we
are only stating a hypothetical proposition for further informal
research opportunity without any medical or psychological qualification):
THEORETICAL TEMPORAL HEURISTIC @ 1500 HOURS ON 3 JANUARY 2023 GRAPPLE:
[#74, #14, #78, #27, #57, #37, #67, #68, #71] PROTOTYPE (not subject to
peer review)
<http://www.grapple369.com/?grapple:74,14,78,27,57,37,67,68,71&date:2023.1.3&time:15.00>
{@1: Sup: 74 - CLOSURE: CHIH (#74); Ego: 74 - CLOSURE: CHIH (#74)}
|
|
|
{@8: Sup: 17 - HOLDING BACK: JUAN (#214); Ego: 68 - DIMMING: MENG (#422
- SEE KANT'S METAPHYSICS OF MORALS IDEA)}
#175 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 3 JANUARY 2023 as [#10, #70, #9, #80, #6] / [#10, #70, #9, #6, #800] / #214 as [#5, #70, #9, #80, #10, #600]
= ʻâṭaph (H5848): {UMBRA: #159 % #41 = #36} 1) *TO**TURN* *ASIDE*; 1a) (Qal) to turn aside, turn (in order to cover); 2) to envelop oneself;
2a) (Qal) to envelop oneself, cover; 3) *TO* *BE* *FEEBLE*, *BE*
*FAINT*, *GROW* *WEAK*; 3a) (Qal) to be feeble, be faint; 3b) (Niphal)
to faint; 3c) (Hiphil) to show feebleness; 3d) (Hithpael) to faint,
faint away;
IMMANUEL KANT'S (1785) METAPHYSICS OF MORALS IDEA #422: "Act as if the
maxim of your action were to become through your will a universal law of nature. We shall now enumerate some duties, following the usual
division of them into duties to ourselves and to others and into perfect
and imperfect duties:
1) A man reduced to despair by a series of misfortunes feels sick of life but is still so far in possession of his reason that he can ask
himself whether taking his own life would not be contrary to his duty to himself. Now he asks whether the maxim of his action could become a
universal law of nature. But his maxim is this: from self-love I make as
my principle to shorten my life when its continued duration threatens
more evil than it promises satisfaction. There only remains the question
as to whether this principle of self-love can become a universal law of nature. One sees at once a contradiction in a system of nature whose law would destroy life by means of the very same feeling that acts so as to stimulate the furtherance of life, and hence there could be no existence
as a system of nature. Therefore, such a maxim cannot possibly hold as a universal law of nature and is, consequently, wholly opposed to the
supreme principle of all duty.
2) Another man in need finds himself forced to borrow money. He knows well that he won’t be able to repay it, but he sees also that he will
not get any loan unless he firmly promises to repay it within a fixed
time. He wants to make such a promise, but he still has conscience
enough to ask himself whether it is not permissible and is contrary to
duty to get out of difficulty in this way. Suppose, however, that he
decides to do so. The maxim of his action would then be expressed as
follows: when I believe myself to be in need of money, I will borrow
money and promise to pay it back, although I know that I can never do
so. Now this principle of self-love or personal advantage may perhaps be quite compatible with one’s
entire future welfare, but the question is now whether it is right. I
then transform the requirement of self-love into a universal law and put
the question thus: how would things stand if my maxim were to become a universal law?
He then sees at once that such a maxim could never hold as a universal
law of nature and be consistent with itself, but must necessarily be self-contradictory. For the universality of a law which says that anyone believing himself to be in difficulty could promise whatever he pleases
with the intention of not keeping it would make promising itself and the
end to be attained thereby quite impossible, inasmuch as no one would
believe what was promised him but would merely laugh at all such
utterances as being vain pretences.
3) A third finds in himself a talent whose cultivation could make
him a man useful in many respects. But he finds himself in comfortable circumstances [IDEA @423] and prefers to indulge in pleasure rather than
to bother himself about broadening and improving his fortunate natural aptitudes. But he asks himself further whether his maxim of neglecting
his natural gifts, besides agreeing of itself with his propensity to indulgence, might agree also with what is called duty. He then sees that
a system of nature could indeed always subsist according to such a
universal law, even though every man (like South Sea Islanders) should
let his talents rust and resolve to devote his life entirely to
idleness, indulgence, propagation and, in a word, to enjoyment. But he
cannot possibly will that this should become a universal law of nature
or be implanted in us as such a law by a natural instinct. For as a
rational being he necessarily wills that all his faculties should be developed, inasmuch as they are given him for all sorts of possible
purposes.
4) A fourth man finds things going well for himself but sees others (whom he could help) struggling with great hardships; and he thinks:
what does it matter to me? Let everybody be as happy as *HEAVEN* *WILLS*
*OR* *AS* *HE* *CAN* *MAKE* *HIMSELF*; I shall take nothing from him nor
even envy him; but I have no desire to contribute anything to his
well-being or to his assistance when in need.
"AND WHEN THE SIXTH HOUR WAS COME, THERE WAS DARKNESS OVER THE WHOLE
LAND UNTIL THE *NINTH*-G1766 HOUR. AND AT THE *NINTH*-G1766 HOUR JESUS
CRIED WITH A LOUD VOICE, SAYING, *ELOI*, *ELOI*, *LAMA* *SABACHTHANI*?
WHICH IS, BEING INTERPRETED, MY GOD, MY GOD, WHY HAST THOU FORSAKEN ME?" [Mark 15:33-34]
— ELI ELI LAMA SABACHTHANI? —
[Written 24 June 2018]
“HEIL THE DWARFISH JEW {#INRI}.
WITH CAMEO PART TO PLAY.
AS SOMEWHAT PIOUS HEW.
BUT WILL IT SAVE THE DAY?
CROWNING GLORY DECEIVE.
THORNY PLANS OF KETHER.
HABIT ROUGE GAUCHE EVE.
FLAGRANT ENVY OF VETIVER.
SUCH COSMETICUS ALL SEE.
BY BEETLEJUICE OF DUNG.
WHITEWASHED SEPULCHRE BE.
WAITING FOR HELL HAMSTRUNG.”
{@13: Sup: 73 - ALREADY FORDING, COMPLETION: CH'ENG (#422 - SEE KANT'S METAPHYSICS OF MORALS IDEA); Ego: 19 - FOLLOWING: TS'UNG (#486 - pétra (G4073): *A* *ROCK* *OR* *LARGE* *STONE*)}
ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #540 as [#20, #70, #400, #40, #10] = koûmi
(G2891): {UMBRA: #540 % #41 = #7} 1) *ARISE*;
#540 as [#80, #100, #1, #3, #40, #1, #300, #5, #9, #1] = pragmateía
(G4230): {UMBRA: #541 % #41 = #8} 1) *PROSECUTION* *OF* *ANY* *AFFAIR*;
1a) business, occupation;
DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #276 as [#10, #5, #6, #5, #90, #4, #100, #50, #6] = Yᵉhôvâh tsidqênûw (H3072): {UMBRA: #276 % #41 = #30} 0) *JEHOVAH* *IS* *OUR* *RIGHTEOUSNESS*; 1) a sacred name symbolically applied to
Jerusalem and the Messiah;
#276 as [#3, #50, #8, #200, #10, #5] = gnḗsios (G1103): {UMBRA: #541 %
#41 = #8} 1) *LEGITIMATELY* *BORN*, not spurious; 2) true, genuine,
sincere;
#276 as [#80, #70, #10, #40, #1, #10, #50, #5, #10] = poimaínō (G4165): {UMBRA: #1061 % #41 = #36} 1) to feed, to tend a flock, keep sheep; 1a)
*TO* *RULE*, *GOVERN*; 1a1) of rulers; 1a2) to furnish pasture for food;
1a3) to nourish; 1a4) to cherish one's body, to serve the body; 1a5) to supply the requisites for the soul's need;
YOUTUBE: "MESSIAH - FOR UNTO US A CHILD IS BORN (HANDEL'S MESSIAH)"
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TN5BaOGTmGs>
If such a way of thinking were to become a universal law of nature, the
human race admittedly could very well subsist and doubtless could
subsist even better than when everyone prates about sympathy and
benevolence and even on occasion exerts himself to practice them but, on
the other hand, also cheats when he can, betrays the rights of man, or otherwise violates them. But even though it is possible that a universal
law of nature could subsist in accordance with that maxim, still it is impossible to will that such a principle should hold everywhere as a law
of nature.
For a will which resolved in this way would contradict itself, inasmuch
as cases might often arise in which one would have need of the love and sympathy of others and in which he would deprive himself, by such a law
of nature springing from his own will, of all hope of the aid he wants
for himself." [pages 30 to 32]
|
{@9: Sup: 7 - ASCENT: SHANG (#221); Ego: 71 - STOPPAGE: CHIH (#493)}
<http://www.grapple369.com/?date:2023.1.3&lexicon:H4899,G2356,H584,H1478,H6330,G4088,H1442,G2631&idea:81,221,363,493>
ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #363 as [#5, #40, #300, #10, #8] = mâshîyach
(H4899): {UMBRA: #358 % #41 = #30} 1) *ANOINTED*, *ANOINTED* *ONE*; 1a)
of the Messiah, Messianic prince; 1b) of the king of Israel; 1c) of the
high priest of Israel; 1d) of Cyrus; 1e) of the patriarchs as anointed
kings;
#363 as [#9, #100, #8, #200, #20, #5, #10, #1, #10] = thrēskeía (G2356): {UMBRA: #353 % #41 = #25} 1) religious worship; 1a) *ESPECIALLY*
*EXTERNAL*, *THAT* *WHICH* *CONSISTS* *OF* *CEREMONIES*; 1a1) religious discipline, religion;
DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #81 - CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY (T'AI HSÜAN CHING) / #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY SPECTRUM (#452 ... #532) AS COURSE-trochos
OF NATURE-genesis [James 3:6]
#81 as [#6, #10, #1, #50, #8, #6] = ʼânach (H584): {UMBRA: #59 % #41 =
#18} 1) (Niphal) sigh, *GROAN* (*IN* *PAIN* *OR* *GRIEF*), *GASP*; 1a)
moan (of cattle);
#80 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 3 JANUARY 2023 as [#1, #3, #6, #70] /
#95 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 3 JANUARY 2023 as [#6, #10, #3, #6, #70] / [#10, #3, #6, #70, #6] /
#81 as [#2, #3, #6, #70] = gâvaʻ (H1478): {UMBRA: #79 % #41 = #38} 1)
*TO* *EXPIRE*, *DIE*, *PERISH*, *GIVE* *UP* *THE* *GHOST*, *YIELD* *UP*
*THE* *GHOST*, *BE* *DEAD*, *BE* *READY* *TO* *DIE*; 1a) (Qal) to
expire, die, be about to die;
#164 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 3 JANUARY 2023 as [#5, #50, #1, #50, #8, #10, #600] /
#221 as [#30, #80, #6, #100, #5] = pûwqâh (H6330): {UMBRA: #191 % #41 = #27} 1) tottering, staggering, stumbling; 1a) *OF* *QUALM* *OF*
*CONSCIENCE* (fig.);
#221 as [#80, #10, #20, #100, #10, #1] = pikría (G4088): {UMBRA: #221 %
#41 = #16} 1) *BITTER* *GALL*; 1a) *EXTREME* *WICKEDNESS*; 1b) a bitter
root, and so producing a bitter fruit; 1c) metaphor: bitterness, bitter hatred;
"LOOKING DILIGENTLY LEST ANY MAN FAIL OF THE GRACE OF GOD; LEST ANY ROOT
OF *BITTERNESS*-G4088 SPRINGING UP TROUBLE YOU, AND THEREBY MANY BE
DEFILED;" [Hebrews 12:15]
#493 as [#6, #3, #4, #80, #400] = gâdaph (H1442): {UMBRA: #87 % #41 =
#5} 1) *TO* *REVILE* *MEN*, *BLASPHEME* *GOD*; 1a) (Piel); 1a1) to
revile (between men); 1a2) to blaspheme (God);
#493 as [#20, #1, #300, #1, #20, #100, #10, #40, #1] = katákrima
(G2631): {UMBRA: #493 % #41 = #1} 1) *DAMNATORY* *SENTENCE*,
*CONDEMNATION*;
TO BE CONTINUED ...
A revision of this document may be obtained from the following URL:
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Determined%20Consciousness.pdf>
On 2/1/2023 16:38, dolf wrote:
If a country such as BRAZIL who had a population of 72.7 million in
1960 and exponentially over 214 million by DECEMBER 2021, can't
produce something extraordinary other than the mundane, then you ought
to cease copulating like frenzied animals (ie. of feigned friendships,
madness or revenge) and focus upon civility producing a better class
of persons (ie. perhaps not as übermensch since that would invoke too
much of his nazi philosophical revisionism) is the contextual basis of
DE ZENGOTITA's eugenics analogy: "...that old thing about if a million
monkeys type at random on a million keyboards for infinity, one of
them will eventually write HAMLET?
At some stage in their lives--I bet everyone you know was doing
something creative and thinking about committing to it, or did commit
to it, at least for a while.
But all this creative activity--while indubitably mostly a good
thing--has to reach a certain point of mass meaningless (ie. we note
with 3 days of public mourning that the far-right and populist
PRESIDENT JAIR BOLSONARO has only until 31 DECEMBER 2022 for
propagandist opportunism); it has to, doesn't it?
FUEHRER: I WANT TO SEE MY *GOATS* {GREATEST OF ALL TIME} VERY SOON.
I WANT TO HAVE A BIT OF FUN.
I LIKE THEIR FRISKY SCENT. (ie. *FROWZY*: ill-smelling, musty; dirty
and untidy; slovenly)
GRAB THE HIND LEGS, AND UP IT!!
*FAR* *RIGHTER*
FOR ME TO HAVE MY FUN WITH SOCK-PUPPETS AND *GOATS* THAN WITH REAL
HUMANS!!!
FEMALE: (CRYING)
2ND FEMALE: IT'S OKAY ANNA NO *GOATS* WERE HARMED [IN] MAKING THIS
PARODY.
Even the apparently limitless flexibility that a digitally enhanced
every person enjoys (ie. Television may have been introduced into
Australia by SEPTEMBER 1956 but only THEORETICALLY just in time for
the world-cup of 1958) in the creation of whatever they want--there
has to be a limit, doesn't there?" [page 263]
"INFANATI PO PERA SIONE DEMONI
SEN SORE DIVANO
SEN SOLE DIVANO
RE DIVA ENORE
DEVORA RE SENSOLIVA
DORE SORE SENSOLIVA
DIVANO DIVANO"
{@7: Sup: 4 - BARRIER: HSIEN (#287); Ego: 76 - AGGRAVATION: CHU (#364)}
<http://www.grapple369.com/?date:2022.12.31&lexicon:H5139,H7854,H3794,H3444&idea:287,364,397,470>
#287 as [#50, #7, #10, #200, #500] = nâzîyr (H5139): {UMBRA: #267 %
#41 = #21} 1) *CONSECRATED* *OR* *DEVOTED* *ONE*, Nazarite; 1a)
consecrated one; 1b) devotee, Nazarite; 1c) untrimmed (vine);
Nazarite; 1a) consecrated one; 1b) devotee, Nazarite; 1c) untrimmed
(vine);
#359 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 31 DECEMBER 2022 as [#300, #9, #50] >> / [#300, #9, #700] /
#364 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 31 DECEMBER 2022 as [#5, #300, #9, >> #700] = sâṭân (H7854): {UMBRA: #359 % #41 = #31} 1) *ADVERSARY*, *ONE* >> *WHO* *WITHSTANDS*; 1a) *ADVERSARY* (*IN* *GENERAL* - *PERSONAL* *OR*
*NATIONAL*); 2) *SUPERHUMAN* *ADVERSARY*; 2a) Satan (as noun pr);
DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #470 as [#20, #400, #10, #600] = Kittîy (H3794):
{UMBRA: #430 % #41 = #20} 0) Chittim or Kittim = 'bruisers'; 1) a
general term for all islanders of the Mediterranean Sea; 2) the
descendants of Javan, the son of Japheth and grandson of Noah;
"FOR THE SHIPS OF *CHITTIM*-H3794 (ie. the ROMANS) SHALL COME AGAINST
HIM: THEREFORE HE SHALL BE GRIEVED, AND RETURN, AND HAVE INDIGNATION
AGAINST THE HOLY COVENANT: SO SHALL HE DO; HE SHALL EVEN RETURN, AND
HAVE INTELLIGENCE WITH THEM THAT FORSAKE THE HOLY COVENANT." [Daniel
11:30]
ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #397 as [#6, #10, #300, #6, #70, #5] = yᵉshûwʻâh >> (H3444): {UMBRA: #391 % #41 = #22} 1) salvation, deliverance; 1a)
*WELFARE*, *PROSPERITY*; 1b) deliverance; 1c) salvation (by God); 1d)
victory;
YOUTUBE: "INFANATI (ERA)"
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0csQN_MdlfQ>
It is too early to draw any adverse conclusions on DE ZENGOTITA's
motivations for his post-modernity summation of "CLOSURE FOR YOU" as
"JEDERMENSCH (every person) EIN (a) ÜBERMENSCH (superman)" that
constructs a cloning analogy [page 261] in being a futurist forecast
of procreational technology advances which as academic conduct is the
equivalent of pumping "junk into the environment" and polluting the
mind in being a strident contradiction to his earlier prohibitions:
"this genre [of passive expectation or visionary bogus] requirement is
a vestige of modernity's faith in a technological fix." [page 255]
The "premise upon which modernity's faith in the fix is based is
logically flawed: "If people cause X, people can cure X" just isn't
true. A man who jumps off a bridge can't arrest his descent midair"
[page 256]
Whether he is disingenuous in only being possessed by a fictional
disposition of careless indifference, or intentionally engaging in
calumny as a fifth columnist, recklessly hypocritical as symptomatic
of an existential crisis or just making a blasé social critique which
is otherwise unimpressed with the ontological reality and simply
because one has experienced or seen it so often before. How does one
compensate for not ever having a clue about the anthropological
consequences, to name but a few, that might manifest by the emergence
of SMART PHONE technologies, semantics of programming languages,
document and content representation, cloud computing and 4G / 5G with
6G now in development is then the cause for an early onset of
misanthropy as its pathos.
Is it a straw man (ie. a form of argument and an informal fallacy of
having the impression of refuting an argument) to postulate: "What
would FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE ([#369 - wànwù (萬物): *ALL* *LIVING*
*THINGS* / #416 - ʼâchaz (H270): *SEIZE*] 15 OCTOBER 1844 to [#449 -
yâlad (H3205): *BRING* *FORTH* *OF* *CHILD* *BIRTH* *OR* *WICKED*
*BEHAVIOUR* / #350 - yâsam (H3455): *SET*, *APPOINT*, *MAKE*] 25
AUGUST 1900) have to say about cloning if he were still alive today?
IMMANUEL KANT'S (1785) METAPHYSICS OF MORALS IDEA #416: "It may be
expounded not simply as necessary to a purpose which can be presumed a
priori and with certainty as being present in *EVERYONE* because it
belongs to his *ESSENCE*. Now skill in the choice of means to one's
own greatest well-being can be called prudence in the narrowest
sense. And thus the imperative that refers to the choice of means to
one's own happiness, ie. the precept of prudence, still remains
hypothetical; the action is commanded not absolutely but only as a
means to a further purpose.
Finally, there is one imperative which immediately commands a certain
conduct without having as its condition any other purpose to be
attained by it. This imperative is *CATEGORICAL*. It is not concerned
the *MATTER* of the action and its intended result, but rather with
the FORM OF THE ACTION and the principle from which it follows; what
is essentially GOOD in the action consists in the mental disposition,
let the consequences be what they may. This imperative may be called
that of morality.
CATEGORICAL (#YOD, #MEM, #TAU, #ALEPH) #451 - METALOGIC IMPERATIVE
CONSISTS OF 23 ELEMENTS AS SELF REFERENCING
#YOD: #10 / #418 - ménō (G3306): reference to state or condition /
ONTIC #451 - MORALITY PRAXIS GROUNDING +
#MEM: #40 / #415 - méros (G3313): constituent parts of a whole / #YOD
#MEM as a totality / infinity conception +#TAU: #400 [#76] / #273 - SYNCRETIC PROGRESSION / 22 homologous
chromosomes +
#ALEPH: #1 / #264 - periágō (G4013): I turn round; περίακτος
(períaktos: "revolving, pivoting") / female (XX) and male (XY) sex
chromosome
Willing according to these three kinds of principles is also clearly
distinguished by dissimilarity in the necessitation of the will. To
make this dissimilarity clear I think that they are most suitably
named in their order when they are said to be either RULES OF SKILL,
COUNSELS OF PRUDENCE, or COMMANDS (LAWS) OF MORALITY. For law alone
involves the concept of a necessity that is unconditioned and indeed
objective and hence universally valid, and commands are laws which
must be obeyed, ie. must be followed even in opposition to inclination.
Counsel does indeed involve necessity, but involves such necessity as
is valid only under a subjectively contingent condition, viz., whether
this or that man counts this or that as belonging to his happiness.
On the other hand, the CATEGORICAL imperative is limited by no
condition, and can quite properly be called a command since it is
absolutely, though practically, necessary. The first kind of
imperatives might also be called technical (BELONGING TO *ART*), the
second kind pragmatic (belonging to welfare), the third kind moral
(belonging to free conduct as such, ie. to morals)?
The question now arises: how are all of these imperatives possible?"
[pages 26, 27]
Without quantifying any substantial basis of reasonable cause, DE
ZENGOTITA speculates, "He would not allow the experts to reduce this
fabulous eventuality to mere policy [such as rule based according to
For instance today 2 JANUARY 2023 we have a noumenon resonance instance
of idea #338 which is also our ONTIC / DEME aggregation to phántasma (G5326): phantasmagorical neural linguistic concern (ie. the mechanics
rather than specific content) and its capacity by being subject to
thought vMEMEs throughout the day / year which then prime our instance receptiveness and hyper awareness to that CATEGORY OF UNDERSTANDING and accumulative objects of experience:
#338 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 2 JANUARY 2023 as [#30, #2, #6, #300] / [#30, #2, #300, #6] /
#346 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 2 JANUARY 2023 as [#2, #30, #2, #6, #300, #6] /
#408 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 2 JANUARY 2023 as [#30, #2, #6, #300, #20, #700] = lᵉbûwsh (H3830): {UMBRA: #338 % #41 = #10} 1) *CLOTHING*, *GARMENT*, *APPAREL*, *RAIMENT*;
<http://www.grapple369.com/?date:2023.1.2&lexicon:H3830&idea:338>
My existential concern with PREMEDIATED (ADVOCATED) MEDIA is that this process ought to be optimal for life vitality, as that which is not
adverse or detrimental. In this respect, SPAM can be considered as
entirely problematic when it assails a person's life vitality and its exercise of an unencumbered will. So what then do we make of a society
such as Brazil were the daily average of television viewing has
degenerated from 65% in 1982–1991 to 42% in 2008?
YOUTUBE: "COCK-A-DOODLE-DOO (OMER ADAM & EDEN BEN ZAKEN)"
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d60H5D9GefE>
As you may deduce, my socially reclusive and contemplating life has a particular as distinct requirement for inductive television viewing as
being predominately news media oriented which grants me an opportunity
for observation of the human condition experience within the
world--there is no doubt that others have viewed the same DEUTSCHE WELLE
NEWS program and noted the possibility of consciousness congruity
between mind and machine (eg: GNOSIS EX MACHINA) without providing any rationale for such. In my informal view (ie. my semantics ought to
clearly convey that I don't consist within the faculty of academia), inductive reasoning which is a bottom-up approach could be thought of as
a process which is directed towards the hypostatic metaphysical realm, whereas deductive reasoning is top-down which then manifests some
rationale as conjectural proposition.
@150 = #150 as [#80, #30, #10, #30] = pâlîyl (H6414): {UMBRA: #150 % #41
= #27} 1) judge, *ASSESSMENT*, estimate;
@104 = #254 as [#1, #3, #1, #9, #70, #80, #70, #10, #9, #1] =
agathopoiḯa (G16): {UMBRA: #255 % #41 = #9} 1) a *COURSE* *OF* *RIGHT* *ACTION*, well doing, virtue;
@175 = #429 as [#1, #3, #1, #3, #70, #50, #300, #1] /
#223 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 3 JANUARY 2023 as [#1, #3, #5, #200, #9, #5] = ágō (G71): {UMBRA: #804 % #41 = #25} 1) to lead, take with
one; 1a) to lead by laying hold of, and this way to bring to the point
of destination: of an animal; 1b) to lead by accompanying to (into) a
place; 1c) to lead with one's self, attach to one's self as an
attendant; 1d) to conduct, bring; 1e) to lead away, to a court of
justice, magistrate, etc.; 2) to lead,; 2a) to lead, guide, direct; 2b)
to lead through, conduct to: to something; 2c) *TO* *MOVE*, *IMPEL*:
*OF* *FORCES* *AND* *INFLUENCES* *ON* *THE* *MIND*; 3) to pass a day,
keep or celebrate a feast, etc.; 4) to go, depart;
@181 = #610 as [#5, #200, #400, #5] = hârâh (H2029): {UMBRA: #210 % #41
= #5} 1) to conceive, become pregnant, bear, be with child, be
conceived, progenitor; 1a) (Qal) to conceive, become pregnant; 1b)
(Pual) to be conceived; 1c) (Poel) *TO* *CONCEIVE*, *CONTRIVE*, *DEVISE*;
"NOW WILL I RISE, SAITH THE LORD; NOW WILL I BE EXALTED; NOW WILL I LIFT
UP MYSELF. YE SHALL *CONCEIVE*-H2029 CHAFF, YE SHALL BRING FORTH
STUBBLE: YOUR BREATH, AS FIRE, SHALL DEVOUR YOU." [Isaiah 33:10-11]
@228 = #838 as [#4, #10, #1, #30, #70, #3, #10, #200, #40, #70, #400] = dialogismós (G1261): {UMBRA: #638 % #41 = #23} 1) *THE* *THINKING* *OF*
*A* *MAN* *DELIBERATING* *WITH* *HIMSELF*; 1a) a thought, inward
reasoning; 1b) purpose, design; 2) a deliberating, questioning about
what is true; 2a) hesitation, doubting; 2b) disputing, arguing;
#360 - páthos (G3806): *FEELING* *WHICH* *THE* *MIND* *SUFFERS* as [#4,
#10, #1, #30, #70, #3, #10, #7, #5, #200, #9, #1, #10] = dialogízomai (G1260): {UMBRA: #256 % #41 = #10} 1) to bring together different
reasons, to reckon up the reasons, to reason, revolve in one's mind, deliberate;
<http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:150,254,429,610,838>
After some further meditational thought (#838 - dialogismós (G1261): DELIBERATING WITHIN AUTOS AND QUESTIONING ABOUT WHAT IS TRUE) upon the metaphysical / metempiricial (ie. outside, before or along side time) consequence of such a propensity for a BIPARTITE hypostasis subversion:
@4: Sup: 41 - RESPONSE: YING (#135 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%19}); Ego:
57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU (#122) as DEME substitution (ie. TRIPARTITE hypostasis)
As a transition from reality into a non-reality which is then #190 - CONSEQUENTIAL (CAUSE AND EFFECT: #838 [#122 / #190] - kâthab (H3789):
PAPAL / RITUAL CONDUCT IS ENTIRELY WRITTEN AND NEVER SPONTANEOUS) to our observation of an ONTIC / DEME aggregation occasioning an instance of
idea #338 and any noumenon resonance.
The additional neural linguistic concern is that the ONTIC / DEME
aggregation within our meta-descriptive phántasma (G5326):
phantasmagorical notion as human state of irrationality, actually
consists of a double pairing occasioning an exacerbated instance of idea
#676 which then exceeds the both boundary to the #451 - PRAXIS OF
RATIONALITY SPECTRUM (#452 ... #532) and apart from grammatical
declension such as #424 - ANZAC DAY (25 APRIL) purveys a lack of any substantive as resolute capability for noumenon resonance.
#676 as [#5, #50, #50, #1, #300, #70, #200] = énnatos (G1766): {UMBRA:
#676 % #41 = #20} 1) ninth; 1a) the ninth hour corresponds to our 3
o'clock in the afternoon for the sixth hour of the Jews coincides with
the twelfth of the day as divided by our method, and the first hour of
the day is 6 A.M. to us;
Rather the consideration is given such a neural linguistic / temporal referencing, whether we can apply (ie. daylight saving time excepted) a litmus test by dynamically assaying the TEMPORAL HEURISTIC @ 1500 HOURS
each day to observe any correspondence to the consciousness markers as
then indicators for any propensity of a departure from reality (ie. we
are only stating a hypothetical proposition for further informal
research opportunity without any medical or psychological qualification):
THEORETICAL TEMPORAL HEURISTIC @ 1500 HOURS ON 3 JANUARY 2023 GRAPPLE:
[#74, #14, #78, #27, #57, #37, #67, #68, #71] PROTOTYPE (not subject to
peer review)
<http://www.grapple369.com/?grapple:74,14,78,27,57,37,67,68,71&date:2023.1.3&time:15.00>
{@1: Sup: 74 - CLOSURE: CHIH (#74); Ego: 74 - CLOSURE: CHIH (#74)}
|
|
|
{@8: Sup: 17 - HOLDING BACK: JUAN (#214); Ego: 68 - DIMMING: MENG (#422
- SEE KANT'S METAPHYSICS OF MORALS IDEA)}
#175 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 3 JANUARY 2023 as [#10, #70, #9, #80, #6] / [#10, #70, #9, #6, #800] / #214 as [#5, #70, #9, #80, #10, #600]
= ʻâṭaph (H5848): {UMBRA: #159 % #41 = #36} 1) *TO**TURN* *ASIDE*; 1a) (Qal) to turn aside, turn (in order to cover); 2) to envelop oneself;
2a) (Qal) to envelop oneself, cover; 3) *TO* *BE* *FEEBLE*, *BE*
*FAINT*, *GROW* *WEAK*; 3a) (Qal) to be feeble, be faint; 3b) (Niphal)
to faint; 3c) (Hiphil) to show feebleness; 3d) (Hithpael) to faint,
faint away;
IMMANUEL KANT'S (1785) METAPHYSICS OF MORALS IDEA #422: "Act as if the
maxim of your action were to become through your will a universal law of nature. We shall now enumerate some duties, following the usual
division of them into duties to ourselves and to others and into perfect
and imperfect duties:
1) A man reduced to despair by a series of misfortunes feels sick of life but is still so far in possession of his reason that he can ask
himself whether taking his own life would not be contrary to his duty to himself. Now he asks whether the maxim of his action could become a
universal law of nature. But his maxim is this: from self-love I make as
my principle to shorten my life when its continued duration threatens
more evil than it promises satisfaction. There only remains the question
as to whether this principle of self-love can become a universal law of nature. One sees at once a contradiction in a system of nature whose law would destroy life by means of the very same feeling that acts so as to stimulate the furtherance of life, and hence there could be no existence
as a system of nature. Therefore, such a maxim cannot possibly hold as a universal law of nature and is, consequently, wholly opposed to the
supreme principle of all duty.
2) Another man in need finds himself forced to borrow money. He knows well that he won’t be able to repay it, but he sees also that he will
not get any loan unless he firmly promises to repay it within a fixed
time. He wants to make such a promise, but he still has conscience
enough to ask himself whether it is not permissible and is contrary to
duty to get out of difficulty in this way. Suppose, however, that he
decides to do so. The maxim of his action would then be expressed as
follows: when I believe myself to be in need of money, I will borrow
money and promise to pay it back, although I know that I can never do
so. Now this principle of self-love or personal advantage may perhaps be quite compatible with one’s
entire future welfare, but the question is now whether it is right. I
then transform the requirement of self-love into a universal law and put
the question thus: how would things stand if my maxim were to become a universal law?
He then sees at once that such a maxim could never hold as a universal
law of nature and be consistent with itself, but must necessarily be self-contradictory. For the universality of a law which says that anyone believing himself to be in difficulty could promise whatever he pleases
with the intention of not keeping it would make promising itself and the
end to be attained thereby quite impossible, inasmuch as no one would
believe what was promised him but would merely laugh at all such
utterances as being vain pretences.
3) A third finds in himself a talent whose cultivation could make
him a man useful in many respects. But he finds himself in comfortable circumstances [IDEA @423] and prefers to indulge in pleasure rather than
to bother himself about broadening and improving his fortunate natural aptitudes. But he asks himself further whether his maxim of neglecting
his natural gifts, besides agreeing of itself with his propensity to indulgence, might agree also with what is called duty. He then sees that
a system of nature could indeed always subsist according to such a
universal law, even though every man (like South Sea Islanders) should
let his talents rust and resolve to devote his life entirely to
idleness, indulgence, propagation and, in a word, to enjoyment. But he
cannot possibly will that this should become a universal law of nature
or be implanted in us as such a law by a natural instinct. For as a
rational being he necessarily wills that all his faculties should be developed, inasmuch as they are given him for all sorts of possible
purposes.
4) A fourth man finds things going well for himself but sees others (whom he could help) struggling with great hardships; and he thinks:
what does it matter to me? Let everybody be as happy as *HEAVEN* *WILLS*
*OR* *AS* *HE* *CAN* *MAKE* *HIMSELF*; I shall take nothing from him nor
even envy him; but I have no desire to contribute anything to his
well-being or to his assistance when in need.
"AND WHEN THE SIXTH HOUR WAS COME, THERE WAS DARKNESS OVER THE WHOLE
LAND UNTIL THE *NINTH*-G1766 HOUR. AND AT THE *NINTH*-G1766 HOUR JESUS
CRIED WITH A LOUD VOICE, SAYING, *ELOI*, *ELOI*, *LAMA* *SABACHTHANI*?
WHICH IS, BEING INTERPRETED, MY GOD, MY GOD, WHY HAST THOU FORSAKEN ME?" [Mark 15:33-34]
— ELI ELI LAMA SABACHTHANI? —
[Written 24 June 2018]
“HEIL THE DWARFISH JEW {#INRI}.
WITH CAMEO PART TO PLAY.
AS SOMEWHAT PIOUS HEW.
BUT WILL IT SAVE THE DAY?
CROWNING GLORY DECEIVE.
THORNY PLANS OF KETHER.
HABIT ROUGE GAUCHE EVE.
FLAGRANT ENVY OF VETIVER.
SUCH COSMETICUS ALL SEE.
BY BEETLEJUICE OF DUNG.
WHITEWASHED SEPULCHRE BE.
WAITING FOR HELL HAMSTRUNG.”
{@13: Sup: 73 - ALREADY FORDING, COMPLETION: CH'ENG (#422 - SEE KANT'S METAPHYSICS OF MORALS IDEA); Ego: 19 - FOLLOWING: TS'UNG (#486 - pétra (G4073): *A* *ROCK* *OR* *LARGE* *STONE*)}
ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #540 as [#20, #70, #400, #40, #10] = koûmi
(G2891): {UMBRA: #540 % #41 = #7} 1) *ARISE*;
#540 as [#80, #100, #1, #3, #40, #1, #300, #5, #9, #1] = pragmateía
(G4230): {UMBRA: #541 % #41 = #8} 1) *PROSECUTION* *OF* *ANY* *AFFAIR*;
1a) business, occupation;
DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #276 as [#10, #5, #6, #5, #90, #4, #100, #50, #6] = Yᵉhôvâh tsidqênûw (H3072): {UMBRA: #276 % #41 = #30} 0) *JEHOVAH* *IS* *OUR* *RIGHTEOUSNESS*; 1) a sacred name symbolically applied to
Jerusalem and the Messiah;
#276 as [#3, #50, #8, #200, #10, #5] = gnḗsios (G1103): {UMBRA: #541 %
#41 = #8} 1) *LEGITIMATELY* *BORN*, not spurious; 2) true, genuine,
sincere;
#276 as [#80, #70, #10, #40, #1, #10, #50, #5, #10] = poimaínō (G4165): {UMBRA: #1061 % #41 = #36} 1) to feed, to tend a flock, keep sheep; 1a)
*TO* *RULE*, *GOVERN*; 1a1) of rulers; 1a2) to furnish pasture for food;
1a3) to nourish; 1a4) to cherish one's body, to serve the body; 1a5) to supply the requisites for the soul's need;
YOUTUBE: "MESSIAH - FOR UNTO US A CHILD IS BORN (HANDEL'S MESSIAH)"
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TN5BaOGTmGs>
If such a way of thinking were to become a universal law of nature, the
human race admittedly could very well subsist and doubtless could
subsist even better than when everyone prates about sympathy and
benevolence and even on occasion exerts himself to practice them but, on
the other hand, also cheats when he can, betrays the rights of man, or otherwise violates them. But even though it is possible that a universal
law of nature could subsist in accordance with that maxim, still it is impossible to will that such a principle should hold everywhere as a law
of nature.
For a will which resolved in this way would contradict itself, inasmuch
as cases might often arise in which one would have need of the love and sympathy of others and in which he would deprive himself, by such a law
of nature springing from his own will, of all hope of the aid he wants
for himself." [pages 30 to 32]
|
{@9: Sup: 7 - ASCENT: SHANG (#221); Ego: 71 - STOPPAGE: CHIH (#493)}
<http://www.grapple369.com/?date:2023.1.3&lexicon:H4899,G2356,H584,H1478,H6330,G4088,H1442,G2631&idea:81,221,363,493>
ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #363 as [#5, #40, #300, #10, #8] = mâshîyach
(H4899): {UMBRA: #358 % #41 = #30} 1) *ANOINTED*, *ANOINTED* *ONE*; 1a)
of the Messiah, Messianic prince; 1b) of the king of Israel; 1c) of the
high priest of Israel; 1d) of Cyrus; 1e) of the patriarchs as anointed
kings;
#363 as [#9, #100, #8, #200, #20, #5, #10, #1, #10] = thrēskeía (G2356): {UMBRA: #353 % #41 = #25} 1) religious worship; 1a) *ESPECIALLY*
*EXTERNAL*, *THAT* *WHICH* *CONSISTS* *OF* *CEREMONIES*; 1a1) religious discipline, religion;
DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #81 - CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY (T'AI HSÜAN CHING) / #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY SPECTRUM (#452 ... #532) AS COURSE-trochos
OF NATURE-genesis [James 3:6]
#81 as [#6, #10, #1, #50, #8, #6] = ʼânach (H584): {UMBRA: #59 % #41 =
#18} 1) (Niphal) sigh, *GROAN* (*IN* *PAIN* *OR* *GRIEF*), *GASP*; 1a)
moan (of cattle);
#80 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 3 JANUARY 2023 as [#1, #3, #6, #70] /
#95 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 3 JANUARY 2023 as [#6, #10, #3, #6, #70] / [#10, #3, #6, #70, #6] /
#81 as [#2, #3, #6, #70] = gâvaʻ (H1478): {UMBRA: #79 % #41 = #38} 1)
*TO* *EXPIRE*, *DIE*, *PERISH*, *GIVE* *UP* *THE* *GHOST*, *YIELD* *UP*
*THE* *GHOST*, *BE* *DEAD*, *BE* *READY* *TO* *DIE*; 1a) (Qal) to
expire, die, be about to die;
#164 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 3 JANUARY 2023 as [#5, #50, #1, #50, #8, #10, #600] /
#221 as [#30, #80, #6, #100, #5] = pûwqâh (H6330): {UMBRA: #191 % #41 = #27} 1) tottering, staggering, stumbling; 1a) *OF* *QUALM* *OF*
*CONSCIENCE* (fig.);
#221 as [#80, #10, #20, #100, #10, #1] = pikría (G4088): {UMBRA: #221 %
#41 = #16} 1) *BITTER* *GALL*; 1a) *EXTREME* *WICKEDNESS*; 1b) a bitter
root, and so producing a bitter fruit; 1c) metaphor: bitterness, bitter hatred;
"LOOKING DILIGENTLY LEST ANY MAN FAIL OF THE GRACE OF GOD; LEST ANY ROOT
OF *BITTERNESS*-G4088 SPRINGING UP TROUBLE YOU, AND THEREBY MANY BE
DEFILED;" [Hebrews 12:15]
#493 as [#6, #3, #4, #80, #400] = gâdaph (H1442): {UMBRA: #87 % #41 =
#5} 1) *TO* *REVILE* *MEN*, *BLASPHEME* *GOD*; 1a) (Piel); 1a1) to
revile (between men); 1a2) to blaspheme (God);
#493 as [#20, #1, #300, #1, #20, #100, #10, #40, #1] = katákrima
(G2631): {UMBRA: #493 % #41 = #1} 1) *DAMNATORY* *SENTENCE*,
*CONDEMNATION*;
TO BE CONTINUED ...
A revision of this document may be obtained from the following URL:
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Determined%20Consciousness.pdf>
On 2/1/2023 16:38, dolf wrote:
If a country such as BRAZIL who had a population of 72.7 million in
1960 and exponentially over 214 million by DECEMBER 2021, can't
produce something extraordinary other than the mundane, then you ought
to cease copulating like frenzied animals (ie. of feigned friendships,
madness or revenge) and focus upon civility producing a better class
of persons (ie. perhaps not as übermensch since that would invoke too
much of his nazi philosophical revisionism) is the contextual basis of
DE ZENGOTITA's eugenics analogy: "...that old thing about if a million
monkeys type at random on a million keyboards for infinity, one of
them will eventually write HAMLET?
At some stage in their lives--I bet everyone you know was doing
something creative and thinking about committing to it, or did commit
to it, at least for a while.
But all this creative activity--while indubitably mostly a good
thing--has to reach a certain point of mass meaningless (ie. we note
with 3 days of public mourning that the far-right and populist
PRESIDENT JAIR BOLSONARO has only until 31 DECEMBER 2022 for
propagandist opportunism); it has to, doesn't it?
FUEHRER: I WANT TO SEE MY *GOATS* {GREATEST OF ALL TIME} VERY SOON.
I WANT TO HAVE A BIT OF FUN.
I LIKE THEIR FRISKY SCENT. (ie. *FROWZY*: ill-smelling, musty; dirty
and untidy; slovenly)
GRAB THE HIND LEGS, AND UP IT!!
*FAR* *RIGHTER*
FOR ME TO HAVE MY FUN WITH SOCK-PUPPETS AND *GOATS* THAN WITH REAL
HUMANS!!!
FEMALE: (CRYING)
2ND FEMALE: IT'S OKAY ANNA NO *GOATS* WERE HARMED [IN] MAKING THIS
PARODY.
Even the apparently limitless flexibility that a digitally enhanced
every person enjoys (ie. Television may have been introduced into
Australia by SEPTEMBER 1956 but only THEORETICALLY just in time for
the world-cup of 1958) in the creation of whatever they want--there
For instance today 2 JANUARY 2023 we have a noumenon resonance instance
of idea #338 which is also our ONTIC / DEME aggregation to phántasma (G5326): phantasmagorical neural linguistic concern (ie. the mechanics
rather than specific content) and its capacity by being subject to
thought vMEMEs throughout the day / year which then prime our instance receptiveness and hyper awareness to that CATEGORY OF UNDERSTANDING and accumulative objects of experience:
#338 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 2 JANUARY 2023 as [#30, #2, #6, #300] / [#30, #2, #300, #6] /
#346 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 2 JANUARY 2023 as [#2, #30, #2, #6, #300, #6] /
#408 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 2 JANUARY 2023 as [#30, #2, #6, #300, #20, #700] = lᵉbûwsh (H3830): {UMBRA: #338 % #41 = #10} 1) *CLOTHING*, *GARMENT*, *APPAREL*, *RAIMENT*;
<http://www.grapple369.com/?date:2023.1.2&lexicon:H3830&idea:338>
My existential concern with PREMEDIATED (ADVOCATED) MEDIA is that this process ought to be optimal for life vitality, as that which is not
adverse or detrimental. In this respect, SPAM can be considered as
entirely problematic when it assails a person's life vitality and its exercise of an unencumbered will. So what then do we make of a society
such as Brazil were the daily average of television viewing has
degenerated from 65% in 1982–1991 to 42% in 2008?
YOUTUBE: "COCK-A-DOODLE-DOO (OMER ADAM & EDEN BEN ZAKEN)"
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d60H5D9GefE>
As you may deduce, my socially reclusive and contemplating life has a particular as distinct requirement for inductive television viewing as
being predominately news media oriented which grants me an opportunity
for observation of the human condition experience within the
world--there is no doubt that others have viewed the same DEUTSCHE WELLE
NEWS program and noted the possibility of consciousness congruity
between mind and machine (eg: GNOSIS EX MACHINA) without providing any rationale for such. In my informal view (ie. my semantics ought to
clearly convey that I don't consist within the faculty of academia), inductive reasoning which is a bottom-up approach could be thought of as
a process which is directed towards the hypostatic metaphysical realm, whereas deductive reasoning is top-down which then manifests some
rationale as conjectural proposition.
@150 = #150 as [#80, #30, #10, #30] = pâlîyl (H6414): {UMBRA: #150 % #41
= #27} 1) judge, *ASSESSMENT*, estimate;
@104 = #254 as [#1, #3, #1, #9, #70, #80, #70, #10, #9, #1] =
agathopoiḯa (G16): {UMBRA: #255 % #41 = #9} 1) a *COURSE* *OF* *RIGHT* *ACTION*, well doing, virtue;
@175 = #429 as [#1, #3, #1, #3, #70, #50, #300, #1] /
#223 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 3 JANUARY 2023 as [#1, #3, #5, #200, #9, #5] = ágō (G71): {UMBRA: #804 % #41 = #25} 1) to lead, take with
one; 1a) to lead by laying hold of, and this way to bring to the point
of destination: of an animal; 1b) to lead by accompanying to (into) a
place; 1c) to lead with one's self, attach to one's self as an
attendant; 1d) to conduct, bring; 1e) to lead away, to a court of
justice, magistrate, etc.; 2) to lead,; 2a) to lead, guide, direct; 2b)
to lead through, conduct to: to something; 2c) *TO* *MOVE*, *IMPEL*:
*OF* *FORCES* *AND* *INFLUENCES* *ON* *THE* *MIND*; 3) to pass a day,
keep or celebrate a feast, etc.; 4) to go, depart;
@181 = #610 as [#5, #200, #400, #5] = hârâh (H2029): {UMBRA: #210 % #41
= #5} 1) to conceive, become pregnant, bear, be with child, be
conceived, progenitor; 1a) (Qal) to conceive, become pregnant; 1b)
(Pual) to be conceived; 1c) (Poel) *TO* *CONCEIVE*, *CONTRIVE*, *DEVISE*;
"NOW WILL I RISE, SAITH THE LORD; NOW WILL I BE EXALTED; NOW WILL I LIFT
UP MYSELF. YE SHALL *CONCEIVE*-H2029 CHAFF, YE SHALL BRING FORTH
STUBBLE: YOUR BREATH, AS FIRE, SHALL DEVOUR YOU." [Isaiah 33:10-11]
@228 = #838 as [#4, #10, #1, #30, #70, #3, #10, #200, #40, #70, #400] = dialogismós (G1261): {UMBRA: #638 % #41 = #23} 1) *THE* *THINKING* *OF*
*A* *MAN* *DELIBERATING* *WITH* *HIMSELF*; 1a) a thought, inward
reasoning; 1b) purpose, design; 2) a deliberating, questioning about
what is true; 2a) hesitation, doubting; 2b) disputing, arguing;
#360 - páthos (G3806): *FEELING* *WHICH* *THE* *MIND* *SUFFERS* as [#4,
#10, #1, #30, #70, #3, #10, #7, #5, #200, #9, #1, #10] = dialogízomai (G1260): {UMBRA: #256 % #41 = #10} 1) to bring together different
reasons, to reckon up the reasons, to reason, revolve in one's mind, deliberate;
<http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:150,254,429,610,838>
After some further meditational thought (#838 - dialogismós (G1261): DELIBERATING WITHIN AUTOS AND QUESTIONING ABOUT WHAT IS TRUE) upon the metaphysical / metempiricial (ie. outside, before or along side time) consequence of such a propensity for a BIPARTITE hypostasis subversion:
@4: Sup: 41 - RESPONSE: YING (#135 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%19}); Ego:
57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU (#122) as DEME substitution (ie. TRIPARTITE hypostasis)
As a transition from reality into a non-reality which is then #190 - CONSEQUENTIAL (CAUSE AND EFFECT: #838 [#122 / #190] - kâthab (H3789):
PAPAL / RITUAL CONDUCT IS ENTIRELY WRITTEN AND NEVER SPONTANEOUS) to our observation of an ONTIC / DEME aggregation occasioning an instance of
idea #338 and any noumenon resonance.
The additional neural linguistic concern is that the ONTIC / DEME
aggregation within our meta-descriptive phántasma (G5326):
phantasmagorical notion as human state of irrationality, actually
consists of a double pairing occasioning an exacerbated instance of idea
#676 which then exceeds the both boundary to the #451 - PRAXIS OF
RATIONALITY SPECTRUM (#452 ... #532) and apart from grammatical
declension such as #424 - ANZAC DAY (25 APRIL) purveys a lack of any substantive as resolute capability for noumenon resonance.
#676 as [#5, #50, #50, #1, #300, #70, #200] = énnatos (G1766): {UMBRA:
#676 % #41 = #20} 1) ninth; 1a) the ninth hour corresponds to our 3
o'clock in the afternoon for the sixth hour of the Jews coincides with
the twelfth of the day as divided by our method, and the first hour of
the day is 6 A.M. to us;
Rather the consideration is given such a neural linguistic / temporal referencing, whether we can apply (ie. daylight saving time excepted) a litmus test by dynamically assaying the TEMPORAL HEURISTIC @ 1500 HOURS
each day to observe any correspondence to the consciousness markers as
then indicators for any propensity of a departure from reality (ie. we
are only stating a hypothetical proposition for further informal
research opportunity without any medical or psychological qualification):
THEORETICAL TEMPORAL HEURISTIC @ 1500 HOURS ON 3 JANUARY 2023 GRAPPLE:
[#74, #14, #78, #27, #57, #37, #67, #68, #71] PROTOTYPE (not subject to
peer review)
<http://www.grapple369.com/?grapple:74,14,78,27,57,37,67,68,71&date:2023.1.3&time:15.00>
{@1: Sup: 74 - CLOSURE: CHIH (#74); Ego: 74 - CLOSURE: CHIH (#74)}
|
|
|
{@8: Sup: 17 - HOLDING BACK: JUAN (#214); Ego: 68 - DIMMING: MENG (#422
- SEE KANT'S METAPHYSICS OF MORALS IDEA)}
#175 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 3 JANUARY 2023 as [#10, #70, #9, #80, #6] / [#10, #70, #9, #6, #800] / #214 as [#5, #70, #9, #80, #10, #600]
= ʻâṭaph (H5848): {UMBRA: #159 % #41 = #36} 1) *TO**TURN* *ASIDE*; 1a) (Qal) to turn aside, turn (in order to cover); 2) to envelop oneself;
2a) (Qal) to envelop oneself, cover; 3) *TO* *BE* *FEEBLE*, *BE*
*FAINT*, *GROW* *WEAK*; 3a) (Qal) to be feeble, be faint; 3b) (Niphal)
to faint; 3c) (Hiphil) to show feebleness; 3d) (Hithpael) to faint,
faint away;
IMMANUEL KANT'S (1785) METAPHYSICS OF MORALS IDEA #422: "Act as if the
maxim of your action were to become through your will a universal law of nature. We shall now enumerate some duties, following the usual
division of them into duties to ourselves and to others and into perfect
and imperfect duties:
1) A man reduced to despair by a series of misfortunes feels sick of life but is still so far in possession of his reason that he can ask
himself whether taking his own life would not be contrary to his duty to himself. Now he asks whether the maxim of his action could become a
universal law of nature. But his maxim is this: from self-love I make as
my principle to shorten my life when its continued duration threatens
more evil than it promises satisfaction. There only remains the question
as to whether this principle of self-love can become a universal law of nature. One sees at once a contradiction in a system of nature whose law would destroy life by means of the very same feeling that acts so as to stimulate the furtherance of life, and hence there could be no existence
as a system of nature. Therefore, such a maxim cannot possibly hold as a universal law of nature and is, consequently, wholly opposed to the
supreme principle of all duty.
2) Another man in need finds himself forced to borrow money. He knows well that he won’t be able to repay it, but he sees also that he will
not get any loan unless he firmly promises to repay it within a fixed
time. He wants to make such a promise, but he still has conscience
enough to ask himself whether it is not permissible and is contrary to
duty to get out of difficulty in this way. Suppose, however, that he
decides to do so. The maxim of his action would then be expressed as
follows: when I believe myself to be in need of money, I will borrow
money and promise to pay it back, although I know that I can never do
so. Now this principle of self-love or personal advantage may perhaps be quite compatible with one’s
entire future welfare, but the question is now whether it is right. I
then transform the requirement of self-love into a universal law and put
the question thus: how would things stand if my maxim were to become a universal law?
He then sees at once that such a maxim could never hold as a universal
law of nature and be consistent with itself, but must necessarily be self-contradictory. For the universality of a law which says that anyone believing himself to be in difficulty could promise whatever he pleases
with the intention of not keeping it would make promising itself and the
end to be attained thereby quite impossible, inasmuch as no one would
believe what was promised him but would merely laugh at all such
utterances as being vain pretences.
3) A third finds in himself a talent whose cultivation could make
him a man useful in many respects. But he finds himself in comfortable circumstances [IDEA @423] and prefers to indulge in pleasure rather than
to bother himself about broadening and improving his fortunate natural aptitudes. But he asks himself further whether his maxim of neglecting
his natural gifts, besides agreeing of itself with his propensity to indulgence, might agree also with what is called duty. He then sees that
a system of nature could indeed always subsist according to such a
universal law, even though every man (like South Sea Islanders) should
let his talents rust and resolve to devote his life entirely to
idleness, indulgence, propagation and, in a word, to enjoyment. But he
cannot possibly will that this should become a universal law of nature
or be implanted in us as such a law by a natural instinct. For as a
rational being he necessarily wills that all his faculties should be developed, inasmuch as they are given him for all sorts of possible
purposes.
4) A fourth man finds things going well for himself but sees others (whom he could help) struggling with great hardships; and he thinks:
what does it matter to me? Let everybody be as happy as *HEAVEN* *WILLS*
*OR* *AS* *HE* *CAN* *MAKE* *HIMSELF*; I shall take nothing from him nor
even envy him; but I have no desire to contribute anything to his
well-being or to his assistance when in need.
"AND WHEN THE SIXTH HOUR WAS COME, THERE WAS DARKNESS OVER THE WHOLE
LAND UNTIL THE *NINTH*-G1766 HOUR. AND AT THE *NINTH*-G1766 HOUR JESUS
CRIED WITH A LOUD VOICE, SAYING, *ELOI*, *ELOI*, *LAMA* *SABACHTHANI*?
WHICH IS, BEING INTERPRETED, MY GOD, MY GOD, WHY HAST THOU FORSAKEN ME?" [Mark 15:33-34]
— ELI ELI LAMA SABACHTHANI? —
[Written 24 June 2018]
“HEIL THE DWARFISH JEW {#INRI}.
WITH CAMEO PART TO PLAY.
AS SOMEWHAT PIOUS HEW.
BUT WILL IT SAVE THE DAY?
CROWNING GLORY DECEIVE.
THORNY PLANS OF KETHER.
HABIT ROUGE GAUCHE EVE.
FLAGRANT ENVY OF VETIVER.
SUCH COSMETICUS ALL SEE.
BY BEETLEJUICE OF DUNG.
WHITEWASHED SEPULCHRE BE.
WAITING FOR HELL HAMSTRUNG.”
{@13: Sup: 73 - ALREADY FORDING, COMPLETION: CH'ENG (#422 - SEE KANT'S METAPHYSICS OF MORALS IDEA); Ego: 19 - FOLLOWING: TS'UNG (#486 - pétra (G4073): *A* *ROCK* *OR* *LARGE* *STONE*)}
ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #540 as [#20, #70, #400, #40, #10] = koûmi
(G2891): {UMBRA: #540 % #41 = #7} 1) *ARISE*;
#540 as [#80, #100, #1, #3, #40, #1, #300, #5, #9, #1] = pragmateía
(G4230): {UMBRA: #541 % #41 = #8} 1) *PROSECUTION* *OF* *ANY* *AFFAIR*;
1a) business, occupation;
DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #276 as [#10, #5, #6, #5, #90, #4, #100, #50, #6] = Yᵉhôvâh tsidqênûw (H3072): {UMBRA: #276 % #41 = #30} 0) *JEHOVAH* *IS* *OUR* *RIGHTEOUSNESS*; 1) a sacred name symbolically applied to
Jerusalem and the Messiah;
#276 as [#3, #50, #8, #200, #10, #5] = gnḗsios (G1103): {UMBRA: #541 %
#41 = #8} 1) *LEGITIMATELY* *BORN*, not spurious; 2) true, genuine,
sincere;
#276 as [#80, #70, #10, #40, #1, #10, #50, #5, #10] = poimaínō (G4165): {UMBRA: #1061 % #41 = #36} 1) to feed, to tend a flock, keep sheep; 1a)
*TO* *RULE*, *GOVERN*; 1a1) of rulers; 1a2) to furnish pasture for food;
1a3) to nourish; 1a4) to cherish one's body, to serve the body; 1a5) to supply the requisites for the soul's need;
YOUTUBE: "MESSIAH - FOR UNTO US A CHILD IS BORN (HANDEL'S MESSIAH)"
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TN5BaOGTmGs>
If such a way of thinking were to become a universal law of nature, the
human race admittedly could very well subsist and doubtless could
subsist even better than when everyone prates about sympathy and
benevolence and even on occasion exerts himself to practice them but, on
the other hand, also cheats when he can, betrays the rights of man, or otherwise violates them. But even though it is possible that a universal
law of nature could subsist in accordance with that maxim, still it is impossible to will that such a principle should hold everywhere as a law
of nature.
For a will which resolved in this way would contradict itself, inasmuch
as cases might often arise in which one would have need of the love and sympathy of others and in which he would deprive himself, by such a law
of nature springing from his own will, of all hope of the aid he wants
for himself." [pages 30 to 32]
|
{@9: Sup: 7 - ASCENT: SHANG (#221); Ego: 71 - STOPPAGE: CHIH (#493)}
<http://www.grapple369.com/?date:2023.1.3&lexicon:H4899,G2356,H584,H1478,H6330,G4088,H1442,G2631&idea:81,221,363,493>
ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #363 as [#5, #40, #300, #10, #8] = mâshîyach
(H4899): {UMBRA: #358 % #41 = #30} 1) *ANOINTED*, *ANOINTED* *ONE*; 1a)
of the Messiah, Messianic prince; 1b) of the king of Israel; 1c) of the
high priest of Israel; 1d) of Cyrus; 1e) of the patriarchs as anointed
kings;
#363 as [#9, #100, #8, #200, #20, #5, #10, #1, #10] = thrēskeía (G2356): {UMBRA: #353 % #41 = #25} 1) religious worship; 1a) *ESPECIALLY*
*EXTERNAL*, *THAT* *WHICH* *CONSISTS* *OF* *CEREMONIES*; 1a1) religious discipline, religion;
DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #81 - CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY (T'AI HSÜAN CHING) / #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY SPECTRUM (#452 ... #532) AS COURSE-trochos
OF NATURE-genesis [James 3:6]
#81 as [#6, #10, #1, #50, #8, #6] = ʼânach (H584): {UMBRA: #59 % #41 =
#18} 1) (Niphal) sigh, *GROAN* (*IN* *PAIN* *OR* *GRIEF*), *GASP*; 1a)
moan (of cattle);
#80 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 3 JANUARY 2023 as [#1, #3, #6, #70] /
#95 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 3 JANUARY 2023 as [#6, #10, #3, #6, #70] / [#10, #3, #6, #70, #6] /
#81 as [#2, #3, #6, #70] = gâvaʻ (H1478): {UMBRA: #79 % #41 = #38} 1)
*TO* *EXPIRE*, *DIE*, *PERISH*, *GIVE* *UP* *THE* *GHOST*, *YIELD* *UP*
*THE* *GHOST*, *BE* *DEAD*, *BE* *READY* *TO* *DIE*; 1a) (Qal) to
expire, die, be about to die;
#164 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 3 JANUARY 2023 as [#5, #50, #1, #50, #8, #10, #600] /
#221 as [#30, #80, #6, #100, #5] = pûwqâh (H6330): {UMBRA: #191 % #41 = #27} 1) tottering, staggering, stumbling; 1a) *OF* *QUALM* *OF*
*CONSCIENCE* (fig.);
#221 as [#80, #10, #20, #100, #10, #1] = pikría (G4088): {UMBRA: #221 %
#41 = #16} 1) *BITTER* *GALL*; 1a) *EXTREME* *WICKEDNESS*; 1b) a bitter
root, and so producing a bitter fruit; 1c) metaphor: bitterness, bitter hatred;
"LOOKING DILIGENTLY LEST ANY MAN FAIL OF THE GRACE OF GOD; LEST ANY ROOT
OF *BITTERNESS*-G4088 SPRINGING UP TROUBLE YOU, AND THEREBY MANY BE
DEFILED;" [Hebrews 12:15]
For instance today 2 JANUARY 2023 we have a noumenon resonance instance
of idea #338 which is also our ONTIC / DEME aggregation to phántasma (G5326): phantasmagorical neural linguistic concern (ie. the mechanics
rather than specific content) and its capacity by being subject to
thought vMEMEs throughout the day / year which then prime our instance receptiveness and hyper awareness to that CATEGORY OF UNDERSTANDING and accumulative objects of experience:
#338 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 2 JANUARY 2023 as [#30, #2, #6, #300] / [#30, #2, #300, #6] /
#346 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 2 JANUARY 2023 as [#2, #30, #2, #6, #300, #6] /
#408 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 2 JANUARY 2023 as [#30, #2, #6, #300, #20, #700] = lᵉbûwsh (H3830): {UMBRA: #338 % #41 = #10} 1) *CLOTHING*, *GARMENT*, *APPAREL*, *RAIMENT*;
<http://www.grapple369.com/?date:2023.1.2&lexicon:H3830&idea:338>
My existential concern with PREMEDIATED (ADVOCATED) MEDIA is that this process ought to be optimal for life vitality, as that which is not
adverse or detrimental. In this respect, SPAM can be considered as
entirely problematic when it assails a person's life vitality and its exercise of an unencumbered will. So what then do we make of a society
such as Brazil were the daily average of television viewing has
degenerated from 65% in 1982–1991 to 42% in 2008?
YOUTUBE: "COCK-A-DOODLE-DOO (OMER ADAM & EDEN BEN ZAKEN)"
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d60H5D9GefE>
As you may deduce, my socially reclusive and contemplating life has a particular as distinct requirement for inductive television viewing as
being predominately news media oriented which grants me an opportunity
for observation of the human condition experience within the
world--there is no doubt that others have viewed the same DEUTSCHE WELLE
NEWS program and noted the possibility of consciousness congruity
between mind and machine (eg: GNOSIS EX MACHINA) without providing any rationale for such. In my informal view (ie. my semantics ought to
clearly convey that I don't consist within the faculty of academia), inductive reasoning which is a bottom-up approach could be thought of as
a process which is directed towards the hypostatic metaphysical realm, whereas deductive reasoning is top-down which then manifests some
rationale as conjectural proposition.
@150 = #150 as [#80, #30, #10, #30] = pâlîyl (H6414): {UMBRA: #150 % #41
= #27} 1) judge, *ASSESSMENT*, estimate;
@104 = #254 as [#1, #3, #1, #9, #70, #80, #70, #10, #9, #1] =
agathopoiḯa (G16): {UMBRA: #255 % #41 = #9} 1) a *COURSE* *OF* *RIGHT* *ACTION*, well doing, virtue;
@175 = #429 as [#1, #3, #1, #3, #70, #50, #300, #1] /
#223 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 3 JANUARY 2023 as [#1, #3, #5, #200, #9, #5] = ágō (G71): {UMBRA: #804 % #41 = #25} 1) to lead, take with
one; 1a) to lead by laying hold of, and this way to bring to the point
of destination: of an animal; 1b) to lead by accompanying to (into) a
place; 1c) to lead with one's self, attach to one's self as an
attendant; 1d) to conduct, bring; 1e) to lead away, to a court of
justice, magistrate, etc.; 2) to lead,; 2a) to lead, guide, direct; 2b)
to lead through, conduct to: to something; 2c) *TO* *MOVE*, *IMPEL*:
*OF* *FORCES* *AND* *INFLUENCES* *ON* *THE* *MIND*; 3) to pass a day,
keep or celebrate a feast, etc.; 4) to go, depart;
@181 = #610 as [#5, #200, #400, #5] = hârâh (H2029): {UMBRA: #210 % #41
= #5} 1) to conceive, become pregnant, bear, be with child, be
conceived, progenitor; 1a) (Qal) to conceive, become pregnant; 1b)
(Pual) to be conceived; 1c) (Poel) *TO* *CONCEIVE*, *CONTRIVE*, *DEVISE*;
"NOW WILL I RISE, SAITH THE LORD; NOW WILL I BE EXALTED; NOW WILL I LIFT
UP MYSELF. YE SHALL *CONCEIVE*-H2029 CHAFF, YE SHALL BRING FORTH
STUBBLE: YOUR BREATH, AS FIRE, SHALL DEVOUR YOU." [Isaiah 33:10-11]
@228 = #838 as [#4, #10, #1, #30, #70, #3, #10, #200, #40, #70, #400] = dialogismós (G1261): {UMBRA: #638 % #41 = #23} 1) *THE* *THINKING* *OF*
*A* *MAN* *DELIBERATING* *WITH* *HIMSELF*; 1a) a thought, inward
reasoning; 1b) purpose, design; 2) a deliberating, questioning about
what is true; 2a) hesitation, doubting; 2b) disputing, arguing;
#360 - páthos (G3806): *FEELING* *WHICH* *THE* *MIND* *SUFFERS* as [#4,
#10, #1, #30, #70, #3, #10, #7, #5, #200, #9, #1, #10] = dialogízomai (G1260): {UMBRA: #256 % #41 = #10} 1) to bring together different
reasons, to reckon up the reasons, to reason, revolve in one's mind, deliberate;
<http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:150,254,429,610,838>
After some further meditational thought (#838 - dialogismós (G1261): DELIBERATING WITHIN AUTOS AND QUESTIONING ABOUT WHAT IS TRUE) upon the metaphysical / metempiricial (ie. outside, before or along side time) consequence of such a propensity for a BIPARTITE hypostasis subversion:
@4: Sup: 41 - RESPONSE: YING (#135 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%19}); Ego:
57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU (#122) as DEME substitution (ie. TRIPARTITE hypostasis)
As a transition from reality into a non-reality which is then #190 - CONSEQUENTIAL (CAUSE AND EFFECT: #838 [#122 / #190] - kâthab (H3789):
PAPAL / RITUAL CONDUCT IS ENTIRELY WRITTEN AND NEVER SPONTANEOUS) to our observation of an ONTIC / DEME aggregation occasioning an instance of
idea #338 and any noumenon resonance.
The additional neural linguistic concern is that the ONTIC / DEME
aggregation within our meta-descriptive phántasma (G5326):
phantasmagorical notion as human state of irrationality, actually
consists of a double pairing occasioning an exacerbated instance of idea
#676 which then exceeds the both boundary to the #451 - PRAXIS OF
RATIONALITY SPECTRUM (#452 ... #532) and apart from grammatical
declension such as #424 - ANZAC DAY (25 APRIL) purveys a lack of any substantive as resolute capability for noumenon resonance.
#676 as [#5, #50, #50, #1, #300, #70, #200] = énnatos (G1766): {UMBRA:
#676 % #41 = #20} 1) ninth; 1a) the ninth hour corresponds to our 3
o'clock in the afternoon for the sixth hour of the Jews coincides with
the twelfth of the day as divided by our method, and the first hour of
the day is 6 A.M. to us;
Rather the consideration is given such a neural linguistic / temporal referencing, whether we can apply (ie. daylight saving time excepted) a litmus test by dynamically assaying the TEMPORAL HEURISTIC @ 1500 HOURS
each day to observe any correspondence to the consciousness markers as
then indicators for any propensity of a departure from reality (ie. we
are only stating a hypothetical proposition for further informal
research opportunity without any medical or psychological qualification):
THEORETICAL TEMPORAL HEURISTIC @ 1500 HOURS ON 3 JANUARY 2023 GRAPPLE:
[#74, #14, #78, #27, #57, #37, #67, #68, #71] PROTOTYPE (not subject to
peer review)
<http://www.grapple369.com/?grapple:74,14,78,27,57,37,67,68,71&date:2023.1.3&time:15.00>
{@1: Sup: 74 - CLOSURE: CHIH (#74); Ego: 74 - CLOSURE: CHIH (#74)}
|
|
|
{@8: Sup: 17 - HOLDING BACK: JUAN (#214); Ego: 68 - DIMMING: MENG (#422
- SEE KANT'S METAPHYSICS OF MORALS IDEA)}
#175 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 3 JANUARY 2023 as [#10, #70, #9, #80, #6] / [#10, #70, #9, #6, #800] / #214 as [#5, #70, #9, #80, #10, #600]
= ʻâṭaph (H5848): {UMBRA: #159 % #41 = #36} 1) *TO**TURN* *ASIDE*; 1a) (Qal) to turn aside, turn (in order to cover); 2) to envelop oneself;
2a) (Qal) to envelop oneself, cover; 3) *TO* *BE* *FEEBLE*, *BE*
*FAINT*, *GROW* *WEAK*; 3a) (Qal) to be feeble, be faint; 3b) (Niphal)
to faint; 3c) (Hiphil) to show feebleness; 3d) (Hithpael) to faint,
faint away;
IMMANUEL KANT'S (1785) METAPHYSICS OF MORALS IDEA #422: "Act as if the
maxim of your action were to become through your will a universal law of nature. We shall now enumerate some duties, following the usual
division of them into duties to ourselves and to others and into perfect
and imperfect duties:
1) A man reduced to despair by a series of misfortunes feels sick of life but is still so far in possession of his reason that he can ask
himself whether taking his own life would not be contrary to his duty to himself. Now he asks whether the maxim of his action could become a
universal law of nature. But his maxim is this: from self-love I make as
my principle to shorten my life when its continued duration threatens
more evil than it promises satisfaction. There only remains the question
as to whether this principle of self-love can become a universal law of nature. One sees at once a contradiction in a system of nature whose law would destroy life by means of the very same feeling that acts so as to stimulate the furtherance of life, and hence there could be no existence
as a system of nature. Therefore, such a maxim cannot possibly hold as a universal law of nature and is, consequently, wholly opposed to the
supreme principle of all duty.
2) Another man in need finds himself forced to borrow money. He knows well that he won’t be able to repay it, but he sees also that he will
not get any loan unless he firmly promises to repay it within a fixed
time. He wants to make such a promise, but he still has conscience
enough to ask himself whether it is not permissible and is contrary to
duty to get out of difficulty in this way. Suppose, however, that he
decides to do so. The maxim of his action would then be expressed as
follows: when I believe myself to be in need of money, I will borrow
money and promise to pay it back, although I know that I can never do
so. Now this principle of self-love or personal advantage may perhaps be quite compatible with one’s
entire future welfare, but the question is now whether it is right. I
then transform the requirement of self-love into a universal law and put
the question thus: how would things stand if my maxim were to become a universal law?
He then sees at once that such a maxim could never hold as a universal
law of nature and be consistent with itself, but must necessarily be self-contradictory. For the universality of a law which says that anyone believing himself to be in difficulty could promise whatever he pleases
with the intention of not keeping it would make promising itself and the
end to be attained thereby quite impossible, inasmuch as no one would
believe what was promised him but would merely laugh at all such
utterances as being vain pretences.
3) A third finds in himself a talent whose cultivation could make
him a man useful in many respects. But he finds himself in comfortable circumstances [IDEA @423] and prefers to indulge in pleasure rather than
to bother himself about broadening and improving his fortunate natural aptitudes. But he asks himself further whether his maxim of neglecting
his natural gifts, besides agreeing of itself with his propensity to indulgence, might agree also with what is called duty. He then sees that
a system of nature could indeed always subsist according to such a
universal law, even though every man (like South Sea Islanders) should
let his talents rust and resolve to devote his life entirely to
idleness, indulgence, propagation and, in a word, to enjoyment. But he
cannot possibly will that this should become a universal law of nature
or be implanted in us as such a law by a natural instinct. For as a
rational being he necessarily wills that all his faculties should be developed, inasmuch as they are given him for all sorts of possible
purposes.
4) A fourth man finds things going well for himself but sees others (whom he could help) struggling with great hardships; and he thinks:
what does it matter to me? Let everybody be as happy as *HEAVEN* *WILLS*
*OR* *AS* *HE* *CAN* *MAKE* *HIMSELF*; I shall take nothing from him nor
even envy him; but I have no desire to contribute anything to his
well-being or to his assistance when in need.
"AND WHEN THE SIXTH HOUR WAS COME, THERE WAS DARKNESS OVER THE WHOLE
LAND UNTIL THE *NINTH*-G1766 HOUR. AND AT THE *NINTH*-G1766 HOUR JESUS
CRIED WITH A LOUD VOICE, SAYING, *ELOI*, *ELOI*, *LAMA* *SABACHTHANI*?
WHICH IS, BEING INTERPRETED, MY GOD, MY GOD, WHY HAST THOU FORSAKEN ME?" [Mark 15:33-34]
— ELI ELI LAMA SABACHTHANI? —
[Written 24 June 2018]
“HEIL THE DWARFISH JEW {#INRI}.
WITH CAMEO PART TO PLAY.
AS SOMEWHAT PIOUS HEW.
BUT WILL IT SAVE THE DAY?
CROWNING GLORY DECEIVE.
THORNY PLANS OF KETHER.
HABIT ROUGE GAUCHE EVE.
FLAGRANT ENVY OF VETIVER.
SUCH COSMETICUS ALL SEE.
BY BEETLEJUICE OF DUNG.
WHITEWASHED SEPULCHRE BE.
WAITING FOR HELL HAMSTRUNG.”
{@13: Sup: 73 - ALREADY FORDING, COMPLETION: CH'ENG (#422 - SEE KANT'S METAPHYSICS OF MORALS IDEA); Ego: 19 - FOLLOWING: TS'UNG (#486 - pétra (G4073): *A* *ROCK* *OR* *LARGE* *STONE*)}
ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #540 as [#20, #70, #400, #40, #10] = koûmi
(G2891): {UMBRA: #540 % #41 = #7} 1) *ARISE*;
#540 as [#80, #100, #1, #3, #40, #1, #300, #5, #9, #1] = pragmateía
(G4230): {UMBRA: #541 % #41 = #8} 1) *PROSECUTION* *OF* *ANY* *AFFAIR*;
1a) business, occupation;
DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #276 as [#10, #5, #6, #5, #90, #4, #100, #50, #6] = Yᵉhôvâh tsidqênûw (H3072): {UMBRA: #276 % #41 = #30} 0) *JEHOVAH* *IS* *OUR* *RIGHTEOUSNESS*; 1) a sacred name symbolically applied to
Jerusalem and the Messiah;
#276 as [#3, #50, #8, #200, #10, #5] = gnḗsios (G1103): {UMBRA: #541 %
#41 = #8} 1) *LEGITIMATELY* *BORN*, not spurious; 2) true, genuine,
sincere;
#276 as [#80, #70, #10, #40, #1, #10, #50, #5, #10] = poimaínō (G4165): {UMBRA: #1061 % #41 = #36} 1) to feed, to tend a flock, keep sheep; 1a)
*TO* *RULE*, *GOVERN*; 1a1) of rulers; 1a2) to furnish pasture for food;
1a3) to nourish; 1a4) to cherish one's body, to serve the body; 1a5) to supply the requisites for the soul's need;
YOUTUBE: "MESSIAH - FOR UNTO US A CHILD IS BORN (HANDEL'S MESSIAH)"
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TN5BaOGTmGs>
If such a way of thinking were to become a universal law of nature, the
human race admittedly could very well subsist and doubtless could
subsist even better than when everyone prates about sympathy and
benevolence and even on occasion exerts himself to practice them but, on
the other hand, also cheats when he can, betrays the rights of man, or otherwise violates them. But even though it is possible that a universal
law of nature could subsist in accordance with that maxim, still it is impossible to will that such a principle should hold everywhere as a law
of nature.
For a will which resolved in this way would contradict itself, inasmuch
as cases might often arise in which one would have need of the love and sympathy of others and in which he would deprive himself, by such a law
of nature springing from his own will, of all hope of the aid he wants
for himself." [pages 30 to 32]
|
{@9: Sup: 7 - ASCENT: SHANG (#221); Ego: 71 - STOPPAGE: CHIH (#493)}
<http://www.grapple369.com/?date:2023.1.3&lexicon:H4899,G2356,H584,H1478,H6330,G4088,H1442,G2631&idea:81,221,363,493>
ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #363 as [#5, #40, #300, #10, #8] = mâshîyach
(H4899): {UMBRA: #358 % #41 = #30} 1) *ANOINTED*, *ANOINTED* *ONE*; 1a)
of the Messiah, Messianic prince; 1b) of the king of Israel; 1c) of the
We've just expanded the REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM to represent a dual idea
banding for each of the MAGIC SQUARE prototypes (I consider the
probability for such occurrence is very remote)
#681 as [#70, #400, #200, #10, #1] = ousía (G3776): {UMBRA: #681 % #41 = #25} 1) what one has, i.e. property, possessions, estate;
(THEOLOGY): The essential nature or 'substance' of God, often as
contrasted to the 'energies' (external actions and influences) through
which he is manifest.
(PHILOSOPHY): Essence, being; true nature of that which is a member of a kind; (in the concrete) the primary real, the substratum underlying all change and process in nature,
(IN MAGIC): A material thing by which a connection is established
between the person to be acted upon and the supernatural agent.
(THEURGY): Describes the practice of rituals, sometimes seen as magical
in nature, performed with the intention of invoking the action or
evoking the presence of one or more deities, especially with the goal of achieving henosis and perfecting oneself]
Doubtlessly such an #1512 - apokálypsis (G602): *MANIFESTATION* *AS* *APPEARANCE* would immediately invoke a disconcertion of ÜBERMENSCH (ie.
#2235 = #345 - tágma (G5001): *ARRANGEMENT* / *ORDER* +
#1890 - ánthrōpos (G444): *HUMAN* *BEING*
) and dogmatic concerns of #2235 - metousiosis manipulation:
[μ, {@1: Sup: 40 - LAW/MODEL: FA (#40); Ego: 40 - LAW/MODEL: FA (#40)}
ε, {@2: Sup: 45 - GREATNESS: TA (#85); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#45
- I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG {%1})}
τ, {@3: Sup: 21 - RELEASE: SHIH (#106 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%29});
Ego: 57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4})}
ο, {@4: Sup: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#116); Ego: 70 - SEVERANCE: KE (#172)}
υ, {@5: Sup: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#121); Ego: 76 - AGGRAVATION: CHU (#248)}
σ, {@6: Sup: 43 - ENCOUNTERS: YU (#164 ***); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#286)}
ι, {@7: Sup: 53 - ETERNITY: YUNG (#217); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#296 ***)}
ω, {@8: Sup: 43 - ENCOUNTERS: YU (#260); Ego: 71 - STOPPAGE: CHIH (#367)} σ, {@9: Sup: 81 - FOSTERING: YANG (#341); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG
(#405 ***)}
ι, {@10: Sup: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#351 ***); Ego: 10
- DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#415 ***)}
σ] {@11: Sup: 48 - RITUAL: LI (#399); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#453)}
Greek: μετουσίωσις as ONTIC: @147 - qûwm (H6965): *TO* *ESTABLISH* /
DEME: @106 - dâbaq (H1692): *BE* *JOINED* *TOGETHER*; lûwaʻ (H3886): *SWALLOW* *DOWN* {@11: Sup: 48 - RITUAL: LI (#399 - klēronomía (G2817): *INHERITANCE* *IN* *ETERNAL* *BLESSEDNESS* --> #449); Ego: 38 -
FULLNESS: SHENG (#453 = #2 - FULL CIRCLE (CHOU) --> #1 - CENTER (CHUNG))}
"FOR WHEN THE GENTILES, WHICH HAVE NOT THE LAW, DO BY *NATURE*-G5449 THE THINGS CONTAINED IN THE LAW, THESE, HAVING NOT THE LAW, ARE A LAW UNTO THEMSELVES:" [Romans 2:14]
The *COURSE*-trochos OF *NATURE*-genesis [James 3:6] as the TAO or DAO
is the natural order of the universe, whose character one's intuition
must discern to realize the potential for individual wisdom, as
conceived in the context of East Asian philosophy, East Asian religions,
or any other philosophy or religion that aligns to this principle.
This intuitive knowing of life is considered as that which cannot be
grasped as a concept.
Rather, it is known through actual living experience of one's everyday
being. Its name, TAO or DAO (Chinese: 道), came from China, where it signifies the way, path, route, road, or sometimes more loosely
doctrine, principle, or holistic belief. [Wikipedia: Tao]
"FOR THIS CAUSE GOD GAVE THEM UP UNTO VILE AFFECTIONS: FOR EVEN THEIR
WOMEN DID CHANGE THE NATURAL USE INTO THAT WHICH IS AGAINST
*NATURE*-G5449:" [Romans 1:26]
And whether it more properly constitutes a #1093 - phántasma (G5326): *APPEARANCE*, *APPARITION* AS *SPECTRE* in alarmingly representing a deviation from the #1310 - phýsis (G5449): *ORDER* *OF* *NATURE*
pervading Catholic and Orthodox Christian righteous values (ie. given
either TRANS-SUBSTANTIVITY: existence precedes essence;
CO-SUBSTANTIVITY: essence precedes existence; or TRANS-ELEMENTATION: as mythos confabulation by metastoicheiosis (μεταστοιχείωσις)) towards an
otherworldly manifestation which then grounds it's human ideal.
#174 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 4 JANUARY 2023 as [#6, #2, #100, #6, #40, #500] /
#212 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 4 JANUARY 2023 as [#10, #100, #6,
#40, #6, #700] /
#147 as [#6, #1, #100, #600] / [#1, #100, #6, #600] = qûwm (H6965):
{UMBRA: #146 % #41 = #23} 1) to rise, arise, stand, rise up, stand up;
1a) (Qal); 1a1) to arise; 1a2) to arise (hostile sense); 1a3) to arise, become powerful; 1a4) *TO* *ARISE*, *COME* *ON* *THE* *SCENE*; 1a5) to
stand; i) to maintain oneself; ii) *TO* *BE* *ESTABLISHED*, *BE*
*CONFIRMED*; iii) to stand, endure; iv) to be fixed; v) to be valid; vi)
to be proven; vii) to be fulfilled; viii) to persist; ix) to be set, be fixed; 1a6) (Piel); i) to fulfil; ii) to confirm, ratify, establish,
impose; 1a7) (Polel) to raise up; 1a8) (Hithpael) to raise oneself, rise
up; 1a9) (Hiphil); i) to cause to arise, raise; ii) to raise, set up,
erect, build; iii) to raise up, bring on the scene; iv) to raise up,
rouse, stir up, investigate; v) to raise up, constitute; vi) to cause to stand, set, station, establish; vii) to make binding; viii) to carry
out, give effect to; 1a10) (Hophal) to be raised up;
#126 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 4 JANUARY 2023 as [#20, #70, #6, #30] / #106 as [#70, #6, #30] = ʻavvâl (H5767): {UMBRA: #106 % #41 = #24} 1) unjust one, perverse one, *UNRIGHTEOUS* *ONE*;
Which is true and which is fraudulent?
REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM [33] -> #80 - LABOURING (CH'IN): 12 - 16 DECEMBER
AS IDEA #75 - 13 DECEMBER 1941: "The war will be over one day. I shall
then consider that my life's final task [qín (勤): *DILIGENTLY*; *INDUSTRIOUSLY*, *DUTY*; *WORK*] will be to *SOLVE* *THE* *RELIGIOUS* *PROBLEM*. Only then will the life of the German native be guaranteed
once and for all.
I don't interfere in matters of belief. Therefore I can't allow
churchmen to interfere with temporal affairs. The organised lie must be smashed. The State must remain the absolute master...
LUOSHU ORDER #369 MATRIX REFERENCE OBJECT
That if Pythagoras was indebted to the Barbarians [Romans 1:14]
therefore Islamic foundations to sectarian belief is compromised.
Where the TRIPARTITE idea #34 - 𝌧親 = #485 relates to a BIPARTITE notion of MARRIAGE then its BIFURCATION as #17 being a religionist's claim to
piety conform to the premise of COLONIALISM by #71 - DOMINION (ODD: #11
+ #17 + #65 + #71 = #164, EVEN: #68 + #44 + #38 + #14 = #164, CENTRE:
#41) action against nature (#205 / #164) and prerogative of STATE.
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/fascist.gif>
#540 as [#6, #2, #70, #2, #4, #400, #50, #6] = ʻabdûwth (H5659): {UMBRA: #482 % #41 = #31} 1) servitude, *BONDAGE*;
#492 as [#80, #1, #300, #100, #10, #1] = patriá (G3965): {UMBRA: #492 %
#41 = #41} 1) *LINEAGE* *RUNNING* *BACK* *TO* *SOME* *PROGENITOR*, *ANCESTRY*; 2) a nation or tribe; 2a) a group of families, all those who
in a given people lay claim to a common origin; 2b) the Israelites which distributed into twelve tribes, descended from the twelve sons of Jacob, these were divided into families which were divided into houses; 3)
*FAMILY*, *IN* *A* *WIDER* *SENSE*, *NATION*, *PEOPLE*;
But, even so, it's impossible eternally to hold humanity in bondage with lies. After all, it was only between the sixth and eighth centuries that Christianity was imposed on our peoples by princes who had an alliance
of interests with the shavelings. Our peoples had previously succeeded
in living all right without this religion. I have six divisions of SS composed of men absolutely indifferent in matters of religion. It
doesn't prevent them from going to their deaths with serenity in their
souls.
#777 as [#1, #80, #5, #20, #300, #5, #10, #50, #1, #300, #5] = apokteínō (G615): {UMBRA: #1336 % #41 = #24} 1) to kill in any way whatever; 1a)
to destroy, to allow to perish; 2) metaphor: to extinguish, abolish; 2a)
*TO* *INFLICT* *MORTAL* *DEATH*; 2b) to deprive of spiritual life and
procure eternal misery in hell;
Christ was an Aryan, and St. Paul used his doctrine to mobilise the
criminal underworld and thus organise a proto-Bolshevism. This intrusion
upon the world marks the end of a long reign, that of the clear
Graeco-Latin genius.
#666 as [#90, #70, #100, #400, #6] / [#6, #90, #70, #100, #400] =
tsaʻăqâh (H6818): {UMBRA: #265 % #41 = #19} 1) cry, outcry; 1a) outcry (against); 1b) *CRY* *OF* *DISTRESS* (*ESPECIALLY* *AS* *HEARD* *BY*
*GOD*);
What is this God who takes pleasure only in seeing men grovel before
Him? Try to picture to yourselves the meaning of the following, quite
simple story. God creates the conditions for sin. Later on He succeeds,
with the help of the Devil, in causing man to sin. Then He employs a
virgin to bring into the world a son who, by His death, will redeem
humanity!
"AND, BEHOLD, THOU SHALT *CONCEIVE*-G4815 IN THY WOMB, AND BRING FORTH A
SON, AND SHALT CALL HIS NAME JESUS." [Luke 1:31]
USURPER: #1 - CENTRE (CHUNG: #452 - bayith (H1004): SHELTER OR ABODE OF ANIMALS / kâthab (H3789): TO REGISTER, ENROL, RECORD; TO DECREE / yâshaʻ (H3467): YESHUA as JESUS' Hebrew name is derived from this root meaning:
TO SAVE, DELIVER)
GUIDE: #36 - STRENGTH (CH'IANG: #487 - Nazarēnós (G3479) RESIDENT OF NAZARETH / patḗr (G3962): JUPITER / PRIEST)
MYSTERY: #37 - PURITY (TS'UI: #488 - bᵉthûwlîym (H1331): VIRGINITY / kritḗs (G2923): ARROGATES TO HIMSELF / JUDGE)
ADJUSTER: #111
LEADER: #666
REGULATOR: #777
GENERAL GOVERNOR: #1554
#13 #22 #18 #27 #11 #20
#31 #4 #36 #9 #29 #2
#12 #21 #14 #23 #16 #25
#30 #3 #5 #32 #34 #7
#17 #26 #10 #19 #15 #24
#8 #35 #28 #1 #6 #33 = (#111 / #666) LUOSHU ORDER REFERENCE OBJECT
#396 as [#5, #10, #300, #6, #70, #5] = yᵉshûwʻâh (H3444): {UMBRA: #391 % #41 = #22} 1) *SALVATION*, *DELIVERANCE*; 1a) welfare, prosperity; 1b) deliverance; 1c) salvation (by God); 1d) victory;
I can imagine people being enthusiastic about the paradise of Mahomet,
but as for the insipid paradise of the Christians! In your lifetime, you
used to hear the music of Richard Wagner. After your death, it will be nothing but hallelujahs, the waving of palms, children of an age for the feeding-bottle, and hoary old men. The man of the isles pays homage to
the forces of nature.
#325 as [#40, #200, #80, #5] = marpêʼ (H4832): {UMBRA: #321 % #41 = #34}
1) health, healing, cure; 1a) healing, cure; 1b) health, profit, *SOUND* (*OF* *MIND*); 1c) healing; 1c1) incurable (with negative);
But Christianity is an invention of sick brains: one could imagine
nothing more senseless, nor any more indecent way of turning the idea of
the *GODHEAD* into a mockery. A negro with his tabus is crushingly
superior to the human being who seriously believes in *TRANSUBSTANTIATION*.
#369 as [#200, #1, #100, #20, #10, #20, #8, #10] = sarkikós (G4559):
{UMBRA: #621 % #41 = #6} 1) fleshly, carnal; 1a) having the nature of
flesh, i.e. under the control of the animal appetites; 1a1) *GOVERNED*
*BY* *MERE* *HUMAN* *NATURE* *NOT* *BY* *THE* *SPIRIT* *OF* *GOD*; 1a2) having its seat in the animal nature or aroused by the animal nature;
1a3) human: with the included idea of depravity; 1b) pertaining to the
flesh; 1b1) to the body: related to birth, linage, etc;
#297 as [#7, #200, #70, #500] / [#20, #7, #200, #70] = zeraʻ (H2233): {UMBRA: #277 % #41 = #31} 1) seed, sowing, offspring; 1a) a sowing; 1b)
seed; 1c) semen virile; 1d) offspring, descendants, posterity,
*CHILDREN*; 1e) *OF* *MORAL* *QUALITY*; 1e1) a practitioner of
righteousness (fig.); 1f) sowing time (by meton);
I begin to lose all respect for humanity when I think that some people
on our side, Ministers or generals, are capable of believing that we
cannot triumph without the blessing of the Church. Such a notion is
excusable in little children who have learnt nothing else.
LUOSHU ORDER #369 MATRIX REFERENCE OBJECT
31 76 13 36 81 18 29 74 11 22 40 58 27 45 63 20 38 56 67 4 49 72 9 54 65 2 47 30 75 12 32 77 14 34 79 16 21 39 57 23 41 59 25 43 61 66 3 48 68 5 50 70 7 52 35 80 17 28 73 10 33 78 15 26 44 62 19 37 55 24 42 60 71 8 53 64 1 46 69 6 51
[LEGEND: 3x3 WITH #45 - CENTRE (#135 / #404) STOICHEION OF THE KOSMOS /
#231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROLLER
CYAN NUMBERS: CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY / REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM TABLE TALK (1941-1944) IDEA ANCHORS:
[33] -> #80 - LABOURING (CH'IN): 12 - 16 DECEMBER AS IDEA #75 - 13
DECEMBER 1941
[26] -> #12 - YOUTHFULNESS (T'UNG): 9 - 13 FEBRUARY AS IDEA #147 - 10 FEBRUARY 1942
[34] -> #53 - ETERNITY (YUNG): 13 - 17 AUGUST AS IDEA #290 / #291 - 16
AUGUST 1942
[30] -> #57 - GUARDEDNESS (SHO): 31 AUGUST - 4 SEPTEMBER AS IDEA #306 -
31 AUGUST 1942
RED NUMBERS: 卐 as #65 - GAUGES CONTROLLER: c2
BLUE NUMBERS: #34 - JUPITER (#135 / #540) PRINCIPLE: b2
PURPLE NUMBERS: #15 - DOMINION ACTION (#264, #273, #308, #415, #449 [#44
/ #57]): a2]
MARS 5x5 INTELLIGENCE (#65 - ADJUSTER: ROW / #325 - LEADER: SUM / #390 - REGULATOR: ROW + SUM) SQUARE
[1] 23 [16] [4] [21]
[15] 14 [7] 18 11
[24] [17] [13] [9] [2]
20 8 [19] 12 [6]
[5] [3] [10] 22 [25]
JUPITER 4x4 (PAPAL) INTELLIGENCE (#135 - ADJUSTER: ROW / #540 - LEADER:
SUM / #675 - REGULATOR: ROW + SUM) SQUARE
26 37 31 41
40 32 34 29
36 27 42 30
33 39 28 35
SATURN 3x3 INTELLIGENCE (#123 - ADJUSTER: ROW / #369 - LEADER: SUM /
#492 - REGULATOR: ROW + SUM) SQUARE
#68 #11 #44
#17 #41 #65
#38 #71 #14
= #123 / #369 {DOMINION SCHEMA}
3x3 INTELLIGENCE (#99 - ADJUSTER: ROW / #297 - LEADER: SUM / #396 - REGULATOR: ROW + SUM) SQUARE
#41 #1 #57
#49 #33 #17
#9 #65 #25
= #99 / #297 {#ONE / #1 - IMMATERIAL BIPARTITE ELEMENT OF USURPING #9 - AUTONOMY WITHIN THE PYTHAGOREAN #1080 - HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER SCHEMA
AS TECHNOLOGY OF THE DAY}
#675 as [#1, #200, #80, #70, #50, #4, #70, #200] = áspondos (G786):
{UMBRA: #675 % #41 = #19} 1) without a treaty or covenant; 1a) *OF*
*THINGS* *NOT* *MUTUALLY* *AGREED* *UPON* e.g. abstinences from
hostilities; 2) that cannot be persuaded to enter into a covenant, implacable;
For thirty years the Germans tore each other to pieces simply in order
to know whether or not they should take *COMMUNION* (ie. associated to
the crucifixion of 3 APRIL 33 AD which is #CENTRE premise to the
PYTHAGOREAN #1 - IMMATERIAL BIPARTITE ELEMENT AS TABLE TALK IDEA @1 FOR FASCISM) in both kinds. There's nothing lower than religious notions
like that. From that point of view, one can envy the Japanese. They have
a religion which is very simple and brings them into contact with
nature. They've succeeded even in taking Christianity and turning it
into a religion that's less shocking to the intellect.
By what would you have me replace the Christians' picture of the Beyond?
What comes naturally to mankind is the sense of eternity and that sense
is at the bottom of every man. The soul and the mind migrate, just as
the body returns to nature. Thus life is eternally reborn from life. As
for the "why?" of all that, I feel no need to rack my brains on the
subject. The soul is unplumbable.
#390 as [#50, #70, #70, #200] = noûs (G3563): {UMBRA: #720 % #41 = #23}
1) the mind, comprising alike the faculties of perceiving and
understanding and those of feeling, judging, determining; 1a) *THE* *INTELLECTUAL* FACULTY*, *THE* *UNDERSTANDING*; 1b) reason in the
narrower sense, as the capacity for spiritual truth, the *HIGHER*
*POWERS* *OF* *THE* *SOUL*, the faculty of perceiving divine things, of recognising goodness and of hating evil; 1c) the power of considering
and judging soberly, calmly and impartially; 2) a particular mode of
thinking and judging, i.e thoughts, feelings, purposes, desires;
If there is a God, at the same time as He gives man life He gives him intelligence. By regulating my life according to the understanding that
is granted me, I may be mistaken, but I act in good faith. The concrete
image of the Beyond that religion forces on me does not stand up to examination. " [pages 143, 144]
TO BE CONTINUED ...
A revision of this document may be obtained from the following URL:
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Determined%20Consciousness.pdf>
On 3/1/2023 13:02, dolf wrote:
For instance today 2 JANUARY 2023 we have a noumenon resonance
instance of idea #338 which is also our ONTIC / DEME aggregation to
phántasma (G5326): phantasmagorical neural linguistic concern (ie. the
mechanics rather than specific content) and its capacity by being
subject to thought vMEMEs throughout the day / year which then prime
our instance receptiveness and hyper awareness to that CATEGORY OF
UNDERSTANDING and accumulative objects of experience:
#338 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 2 JANUARY 2023 as [#30, #2, #6,
#300] / [#30, #2, #300, #6] /
#346 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 2 JANUARY 2023 as [#2, #30, #2, #6, >> #300, #6] /
#408 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 2 JANUARY 2023 as [#30, #2, #6,
#300, #20, #700] = lᵉbûwsh (H3830): {UMBRA: #338 % #41 = #10} 1)
*CLOTHING*, *GARMENT*, *APPAREL*, *RAIMENT*;
<http://www.grapple369.com/?date:2023.1.2&lexicon:H3830&idea:338>
My existential concern with PREMEDIATED (ADVOCATED) MEDIA is that this
process ought to be optimal for life vitality, as that which is not
adverse or detrimental. In this respect, SPAM can be considered as
entirely problematic when it assails a person's life vitality and its
exercise of an unencumbered will. So what then do we make of a society
such as Brazil were the daily average of television viewing has
degenerated from 65% in 1982–1991 to 42% in 2008?
YOUTUBE: "COCK-A-DOODLE-DOO (OMER ADAM & EDEN BEN ZAKEN)"
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d60H5D9GefE>
As you may deduce, my socially reclusive and contemplating life has a
particular as distinct requirement for inductive television viewing as
being predominately news media oriented which grants me an opportunity
for observation of the human condition experience within the
world--there is no doubt that others have viewed the same DEUTSCHE
WELLE NEWS program and noted the possibility of consciousness
congruity between mind and machine (eg: GNOSIS EX MACHINA) without
providing any rationale for such. In my informal view (ie. my
semantics ought to clearly convey that I don't consist within the
faculty of academia), inductive reasoning which is a bottom-up
approach could be thought of as a process which is directed towards
the hypostatic metaphysical realm, whereas deductive reasoning is
top-down which then manifests some rationale as conjectural proposition.
@150 = #150 as [#80, #30, #10, #30] = pâlîyl (H6414): {UMBRA: #150 %
#41 = #27} 1) judge, *ASSESSMENT*, estimate;
@104 = #254 as [#1, #3, #1, #9, #70, #80, #70, #10, #9, #1] =
agathopoiḯa (G16): {UMBRA: #255 % #41 = #9} 1) a *COURSE* *OF* *RIGHT*
*ACTION*, well doing, virtue;
@175 = #429 as [#1, #3, #1, #3, #70, #50, #300, #1] /
#223 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 3 JANUARY 2023 as [#1, #3, #5,
#200, #9, #5] = ágō (G71): {UMBRA: #804 % #41 = #25} 1) to lead, take
with one; 1a) to lead by laying hold of, and this way to bring to the
point of destination: of an animal; 1b) to lead by accompanying to
(into) a place; 1c) to lead with one's self, attach to one's self as
an attendant; 1d) to conduct, bring; 1e) to lead away, to a court of
justice, magistrate, etc.; 2) to lead,; 2a) to lead, guide, direct;
2b) to lead through, conduct to: to something; 2c) *TO* *MOVE*,
*IMPEL*: *OF* *FORCES* *AND* *INFLUENCES* *ON* *THE* *MIND*; 3) to
pass a day, keep or celebrate a feast, etc.; 4) to go, depart;
@181 = #610 as [#5, #200, #400, #5] = hârâh (H2029): {UMBRA: #210 %
#41 = #5} 1) to conceive, become pregnant, bear, be with child, be
conceived, progenitor; 1a) (Qal) to conceive, become pregnant; 1b)
(Pual) to be conceived; 1c) (Poel) *TO* *CONCEIVE*, *CONTRIVE*, *DEVISE*;
"NOW WILL I RISE, SAITH THE LORD; NOW WILL I BE EXALTED; NOW WILL I
LIFT UP MYSELF. YE SHALL *CONCEIVE*-H2029 CHAFF, YE SHALL BRING FORTH
STUBBLE: YOUR BREATH, AS FIRE, SHALL DEVOUR YOU." [Isaiah 33:10-11]
@228 = #838 as [#4, #10, #1, #30, #70, #3, #10, #200, #40, #70, #400]
= dialogismós (G1261): {UMBRA: #638 % #41 = #23} 1) *THE* *THINKING*
*OF* *A* *MAN* *DELIBERATING* *WITH* *HIMSELF*; 1a) a thought, inward
reasoning; 1b) purpose, design; 2) a deliberating, questioning about
what is true; 2a) hesitation, doubting; 2b) disputing, arguing;
#360 - páthos (G3806): *FEELING* *WHICH* *THE* *MIND* *SUFFERS* as
[#4, #10, #1, #30, #70, #3, #10, #7, #5, #200, #9, #1, #10] =
dialogízomai (G1260): {UMBRA: #256 % #41 = #10} 1) to bring together
different reasons, to reckon up the reasons, to reason, revolve in
one's mind, deliberate;
<http://www.grapple369.com/?idea:150,254,429,610,838>
After some further meditational thought (#838 - dialogismós (G1261):
DELIBERATING WITHIN AUTOS AND QUESTIONING ABOUT WHAT IS TRUE) upon the
metaphysical / metempiricial (ie. outside, before or along side time)
consequence of such a propensity for a BIPARTITE hypostasis subversion:
@4: Sup: 41 - RESPONSE: YING (#135 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%19}); Ego:
57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU (#122) as DEME substitution (ie. TRIPARTITE
hypostasis)
As a transition from reality into a non-reality which is then #190 -
CONSEQUENTIAL (CAUSE AND EFFECT: #838 [#122 / #190] - kâthab (H3789):
PAPAL / RITUAL CONDUCT IS ENTIRELY WRITTEN AND NEVER SPONTANEOUS) to
our observation of an ONTIC / DEME aggregation occasioning an instance
of idea #338 and any noumenon resonance.
The additional neural linguistic concern is that the ONTIC / DEME
aggregation within our meta-descriptive phántasma (G5326):
phantasmagorical notion as human state of irrationality, actually
consists of a double pairing occasioning an exacerbated instance of
idea #676 which then exceeds the both boundary to the #451 - PRAXIS OF
RATIONALITY SPECTRUM (#452 ... #532) and apart from grammatical
declension such as #424 - ANZAC DAY (25 APRIL) purveys a lack of any
substantive as resolute capability for noumenon resonance.
#676 as [#5, #50, #50, #1, #300, #70, #200] = énnatos (G1766): {UMBRA:
#676 % #41 = #20} 1) ninth; 1a) the ninth hour corresponds to our 3
o'clock in the afternoon for the sixth hour of the Jews coincides with
the twelfth of the day as divided by our method, and the first hour of
the day is 6 A.M. to us;
Rather the consideration is given such a neural linguistic / temporal
referencing, whether we can apply (ie. daylight saving time excepted)
a litmus test by dynamically assaying the TEMPORAL HEURISTIC @ 1500
HOURS each day to observe any correspondence to the consciousness
markers as then indicators for any propensity of a departure from
reality (ie. we are only stating a hypothetical proposition for
further informal research opportunity without any medical or
psychological qualification):
THEORETICAL TEMPORAL HEURISTIC @ 1500 HOURS ON 3 JANUARY 2023 GRAPPLE:
[#74, #14, #78, #27, #57, #37, #67, #68, #71] PROTOTYPE (not subject
to peer review)
<http://www.grapple369.com/?grapple:74,14,78,27,57,37,67,68,71&date:2023.1.3&time:15.00>
{@1: Sup: 74 - CLOSURE: CHIH (#74); Ego: 74 - CLOSURE: CHIH (#74)}
|
|
|
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 481 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 16:23:21 |
| Calls: | 9,540 |
| Files: | 13,653 |
| Messages: | 6,139,777 |
